Estimating curvilinear time-varying treatment effects: Combining g-estimation of structural nested mean models with time-varying effect models for longitudinal causal inference.

IF 7.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychological methods Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1037/met0000637
Wen Wei Loh
{"title":"Estimating curvilinear time-varying treatment effects: Combining g-estimation of structural nested mean models with time-varying effect models for longitudinal causal inference.","authors":"Wen Wei Loh","doi":"10.1037/met0000637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Longitudinal designs can fortify causal inquiries of a focal predictor (i.e., treatment) on an outcome. But valid causal inferences are complicated by causal feedback between confounders and treatment over time. G-estimation of a structural nested mean model (SNMM) is designed to handle the complexities beset by measured time-varying or treatment-dependent confounding in longitudinal data. But valid inference requires correctly specifying the functional form of the SNMM, such as how the effects stay constant or change over time. In this article, we develop a g-estimation strategy for linear structural nested mean models whose causal parameters adopt the form of time-varying coefficient functions. These time-varying coefficient functions are smooth semiparametric functions of time that permit probing how the treatment effects may change curvilinearly. Further effect modification by time-invariant and time-varying covariates can be readily postulated in the SNMM to test fine-grained effect heterogeneity. We then describe a g-estimation strategy for estimating such an SNMM. We utilize the established time-varying effect model (TVEM) approach from the prevention and psychotherapy research literature for modeling flexible changes in covariate-outcome associations over time. Moreover, we exploit a known benefit of g-estimation over routine regression methods: its double robustness conferring protection against biases induced by certain forms of model misspecification. We encourage psychology researchers seeking correct causal conclusions from longitudinal data to use an SNMM with time-varying coefficient functions to assess curvilinear causal effects over time, and to use g-estimation with TVEM to resolve measured treatment-dependent confounding. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20782,"journal":{"name":"Psychological methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000637","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Longitudinal designs can fortify causal inquiries of a focal predictor (i.e., treatment) on an outcome. But valid causal inferences are complicated by causal feedback between confounders and treatment over time. G-estimation of a structural nested mean model (SNMM) is designed to handle the complexities beset by measured time-varying or treatment-dependent confounding in longitudinal data. But valid inference requires correctly specifying the functional form of the SNMM, such as how the effects stay constant or change over time. In this article, we develop a g-estimation strategy for linear structural nested mean models whose causal parameters adopt the form of time-varying coefficient functions. These time-varying coefficient functions are smooth semiparametric functions of time that permit probing how the treatment effects may change curvilinearly. Further effect modification by time-invariant and time-varying covariates can be readily postulated in the SNMM to test fine-grained effect heterogeneity. We then describe a g-estimation strategy for estimating such an SNMM. We utilize the established time-varying effect model (TVEM) approach from the prevention and psychotherapy research literature for modeling flexible changes in covariate-outcome associations over time. Moreover, we exploit a known benefit of g-estimation over routine regression methods: its double robustness conferring protection against biases induced by certain forms of model misspecification. We encourage psychology researchers seeking correct causal conclusions from longitudinal data to use an SNMM with time-varying coefficient functions to assess curvilinear causal effects over time, and to use g-estimation with TVEM to resolve measured treatment-dependent confounding. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
估计曲线时变治疗效果:将结构嵌套均值模型的 g-估计与时变效应模型相结合,用于纵向因果推断。
纵向设计可以加强重点预测因子(即治疗)对结果的因果关系调查。但是,随着时间的推移,混杂因素和治疗之间的因果反馈会使有效的因果推论变得复杂。结构嵌套均值模型(SNMM)的 G-estimation 设计用于处理纵向数据中测量到的时变混杂因素或依赖治疗的混杂因素所带来的复杂性。但有效的推断需要正确指定 SNMM 的函数形式,如效应如何保持不变或随时间变化。在本文中,我们为因果参数采用时变系数函数形式的线性结构嵌套均值模型开发了一种 g 估计策略。这些时变系数函数是时间的平滑半参数函数,可以探究治疗效果如何发生曲线变化。在 SNMM 中,可以很容易地假设时间不变协变量和时间变化协变量对效果的进一步修饰,以检验细粒度的效果异质性。然后,我们将介绍一种估计 SNMM 的 g 估计策略。我们利用预防和心理治疗研究文献中成熟的时变效应模型(TVEM)方法来模拟协变量-结果关联随时间的灵活变化。此外,我们还利用了 g-estimation 相对于常规回归方法的一个已知优势:其双重稳健性可防止因某些形式的模型规范错误而导致的偏差。我们鼓励从纵向数据中寻求正确因果结论的心理学研究人员使用具有时变系数函数的 SNMM 来评估随时间变化的曲线因果效应,并使用 g-estimation 和 TVEM 来解决测量到的治疗相关混杂问题。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological methods
Psychological methods PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
159
期刊介绍: Psychological Methods is devoted to the development and dissemination of methods for collecting, analyzing, understanding, and interpreting psychological data. Its purpose is the dissemination of innovations in research design, measurement, methodology, and quantitative and qualitative analysis to the psychological community; its further purpose is to promote effective communication about related substantive and methodological issues. The audience is expected to be diverse and to include those who develop new procedures, those who are responsible for undergraduate and graduate training in design, measurement, and statistics, as well as those who employ those procedures in research.
期刊最新文献
A guided tutorial on linear mixed-effects models for the analysis of accuracies and response times in experiments with fully crossed design. Bayes factors for logistic (mixed-effect) models. Better power by design: Permuted-subblock randomization boosts power in repeated-measures experiments. Building a simpler moderated nonlinear factor analysis model with Markov Chain Monte Carlo estimation. Definition and identification of causal ratio effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1