Child Development Card (KKA) as a discriminant tool for the growth and development of stunted and normal children in Indonesia.

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health Research Pub Date : 2024-02-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/22799036241231790
Ratna Jatnika, Hendriati Agustiani, Fitri Ariyanti Abidin, Fitriani Yustikasari Lubis, Kustimah Kustimah, Lucia Voni Febriani, Syauqiyyah Syahlaa
{"title":"Child Development Card (KKA) as a discriminant tool for the growth and development of stunted and normal children in Indonesia.","authors":"Ratna Jatnika, Hendriati Agustiani, Fitri Ariyanti Abidin, Fitriani Yustikasari Lubis, Kustimah Kustimah, Lucia Voni Febriani, Syauqiyyah Syahlaa","doi":"10.1177/22799036241231790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stunting is a significant concern in Indonesia, but its detection currently relies on anthropometric measurements, lacking the integration of comprehensive evaluations of child development. Therefore, the Child Development Card (KKA) serves as a valuable instrument employed to assess the growth and developmental aspects of children.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This research aimed to investigate the potential of KKA as a discriminative tool for distinguishing between stunted and normal children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants consisted of 159 and 88 normal and stunted children aged 13-24 and 25-60 months. The aspects of children's development examined included passive communication, social behavior, gross motor skills, active communication, fine motor skills, intelligence, and self-help skills. Discriminant analysis was conducted to identify the developmental aspects differentiating stunted children from normal children.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis using SPSS 25 showed that the discriminating aspects of children's development between stunted and normal children were gross motor skills, fine motor skills, passive communication, and intelligence. For the age group of 13-24 months, the discriminant function is represented as D = - 0.276 + 0.197 K - 0.511 GK + 0.361 KP. Meanwhile, for the age group of 25-60 months, the discriminant function is expressed as D = - 2.586 + 0.151 GK - 0.081 GH.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Stunted and normal children could be differentiated based on four key aspects of development: gross and fine motor skills, passive communication, and intelligence. These findings aid in the early detection of stunted children and emphasize the crucial role of parental stimulation across these four aspects.</p>","PeriodicalId":45958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"22799036241231790"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10865944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/22799036241231790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stunting is a significant concern in Indonesia, but its detection currently relies on anthropometric measurements, lacking the integration of comprehensive evaluations of child development. Therefore, the Child Development Card (KKA) serves as a valuable instrument employed to assess the growth and developmental aspects of children.

Aim: This research aimed to investigate the potential of KKA as a discriminative tool for distinguishing between stunted and normal children.

Methods: The participants consisted of 159 and 88 normal and stunted children aged 13-24 and 25-60 months. The aspects of children's development examined included passive communication, social behavior, gross motor skills, active communication, fine motor skills, intelligence, and self-help skills. Discriminant analysis was conducted to identify the developmental aspects differentiating stunted children from normal children.

Results: The analysis using SPSS 25 showed that the discriminating aspects of children's development between stunted and normal children were gross motor skills, fine motor skills, passive communication, and intelligence. For the age group of 13-24 months, the discriminant function is represented as D = - 0.276 + 0.197 K - 0.511 GK + 0.361 KP. Meanwhile, for the age group of 25-60 months, the discriminant function is expressed as D = - 2.586 + 0.151 GK - 0.081 GH.

Conclusion: Stunted and normal children could be differentiated based on four key aspects of development: gross and fine motor skills, passive communication, and intelligence. These findings aid in the early detection of stunted children and emphasize the crucial role of parental stimulation across these four aspects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将儿童发育卡(KKA)作为印度尼西亚发育迟缓儿童和正常儿童生长发育的判别工具。
背景:发育迟缓是印度尼西亚的一个重大问题,但目前对发育迟缓的检测主要依赖于人体测量,缺乏对儿童发育的综合评估。因此,儿童发育卡(KKA)是评估儿童生长发育情况的重要工具。目的:本研究旨在调查儿童发育卡作为区分发育迟缓儿童和正常儿童的鉴别工具的潜力:参与者包括 159 名正常儿童和 88 名发育迟缓儿童,年龄分别为 13-24 个月和 25-60 个月。考察的儿童发育方面包括被动交流、社交行为、粗大运动技能、主动交流、精细运动技能、智力和自助技能。研究人员进行了判别分析,以确定发育迟缓儿童与正常儿童在哪些发育方面存在差异:使用 SPSS 25 进行的分析表明,儿童发育迟缓与正常儿童之间的区别在于粗大运动技能、精细运动技能、被动交流和智力。对于 13-24 个月年龄组,判别函数表示为 D = - 0.276 + 0.197 K - 0.511 GK + 0.361 KP。而 25-60 个月年龄组的判别函数则表示为 D = - 2.586 + 0.151 GK - 0.081 GH:结论:发育迟缓儿童和正常儿童可根据发育的四个关键方面进行区分:粗大和精细运动技能、被动交流和智力。这些发现有助于及早发现发育迟缓的儿童,并强调了父母对这四个方面的刺激所起的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Research
Journal of Public Health Research PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Public Health Research (JPHR) is an online Open Access, peer-reviewed journal in the field of public health science. The aim of the journal is to stimulate debate and dissemination of knowledge in the public health field in order to improve efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency of public health interventions to improve health outcomes of populations. This aim can only be achieved by adopting a global and multidisciplinary approach. The Journal of Public Health Research publishes contributions from both the “traditional'' disciplines of public health, including hygiene, epidemiology, health education, environmental health, occupational health, health policy, hospital management, health economics, law and ethics as well as from the area of new health care fields including social science, communication science, eHealth and mHealth philosophy, health technology assessment, genetics research implications, population-mental health, gender and disparity issues, global and migration-related themes. In support of this approach, JPHR strongly encourages the use of real multidisciplinary approaches and analyses in the manuscripts submitted to the journal. In addition to Original research, Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, Meta-synthesis and Perspectives and Debate articles, JPHR publishes newsworthy Brief Reports, Letters and Study Protocols related to public health and public health management activities.
期刊最新文献
Factors on medical clerkship students' quality of life: A survey study. Magseed preoperative localization in non-palpable breast lesions: Our single-center Breast Unit experience. Analyzing diversity trends in dermatology: A comprehensive overview. Reproducibility and explainability in digital pathology: The need to make black-box artificial intelligence systems more transparent. Healthcare students are faced with the issue of the rights of people with disabilities and the quality of services: Are we training future healthcare workers who overemphasize technology?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1