Mentorship in rehabilitation psychology: Attitudes and perspectives.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Rehabilitation Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1037/rep0000546
Sonya Kim, Emily Dudek, Maria Kajankova, Tiffany Channing, Laura Tabio, Christina M Derbidge
{"title":"Mentorship in rehabilitation psychology: Attitudes and perspectives.","authors":"Sonya Kim, Emily Dudek, Maria Kajankova, Tiffany Channing, Laura Tabio, Christina M Derbidge","doi":"10.1037/rep0000546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize how mentorship has been perceived, received, and practiced by individuals in the field of rehabilitation psychology across the career lifespan.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Current members of the American Psychological Association Division 22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) were invited to complete an electronic survey via REDCap assessing individual experiences and perspectives on mentorship. Thematic analysis was used to identify key constructs and themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>39 participants (<i>n</i> = 25 mentors) completed the survey with valid responses. Participants spanned the career lifespan, ranging from predoctoral trainees to late-senior psychologists. Mentorship was generally perceived as helpful for both mentors and mentees. Several important qualities of mentors (e.g., availability, communication skills, self-disclosure, and emotional support) and mentees (e.g., flexibility, motivation, and openness to feedback) were identified. Among both groups, mentorship was viewed as especially beneficial for obtaining American Board of Professional Psychology (ABPP) board certification, which may reflect an aspect of mentoring unique to Division 22. Existing gaps in mentorship and key areas for improvement were also identified; access to mid- to late-career mentorship emerged as a notable gap in mentorship. Increased program structure, networking opportunities, and research mentorship were also identified as possible areas of growth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides meaningful insights into mentorship within the field of rehabilitation psychology. Our findings demonstrate the value of mentorship across the career lifespan, and the beneficial role of mentorship in obtaining ABPP board certification. In addition, we identify key areas of growth that can inform and improve mentorship within the field. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000546","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To characterize how mentorship has been perceived, received, and practiced by individuals in the field of rehabilitation psychology across the career lifespan.

Method: Current members of the American Psychological Association Division 22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) were invited to complete an electronic survey via REDCap assessing individual experiences and perspectives on mentorship. Thematic analysis was used to identify key constructs and themes.

Results: 39 participants (n = 25 mentors) completed the survey with valid responses. Participants spanned the career lifespan, ranging from predoctoral trainees to late-senior psychologists. Mentorship was generally perceived as helpful for both mentors and mentees. Several important qualities of mentors (e.g., availability, communication skills, self-disclosure, and emotional support) and mentees (e.g., flexibility, motivation, and openness to feedback) were identified. Among both groups, mentorship was viewed as especially beneficial for obtaining American Board of Professional Psychology (ABPP) board certification, which may reflect an aspect of mentoring unique to Division 22. Existing gaps in mentorship and key areas for improvement were also identified; access to mid- to late-career mentorship emerged as a notable gap in mentorship. Increased program structure, networking opportunities, and research mentorship were also identified as possible areas of growth.

Conclusions: This study provides meaningful insights into mentorship within the field of rehabilitation psychology. Our findings demonstrate the value of mentorship across the career lifespan, and the beneficial role of mentorship in obtaining ABPP board certification. In addition, we identify key areas of growth that can inform and improve mentorship within the field. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康复心理学导师制度:态度和观点。
目的描述康复心理学领域的个人在整个职业生涯中是如何看待、接受和实践导师制的:方法:邀请美国心理学会第 22 分部(康复心理学)的现任成员通过 REDCap 完成一项电子调查,评估个人经历和对导师制的看法。采用主题分析法确定关键结构和主题:39 名参与者(n = 25 名导师)完成了调查,并做出了有效回答。参与者跨越了职业生涯的各个阶段,从博士前期受训者到晚期资深心理学家不等。人们普遍认为导师制对指导者和被指导者都有帮助。导师和被指导者的一些重要品质(如可用性、沟通技巧、自我披露和情感支持)(如灵活性、积极性和对反馈的开放性)得到了确认。在这两个群体中,导师指导被认为特别有利于获得美国职业心理学委员会 (ABPP) 的委员会认证,这可能反映了导师指导在第 22 分部的独特性。指导方面的现有差距和需要改进的关键领域也得到了确认;获得职业生涯中后期的指导是指导方面的一个显著差距。增加计划结构、交流机会和研究指导也被认为是可能的发展领域:本研究为康复心理学领域的导师制提供了有意义的见解。我们的研究结果表明了导师制在整个职业生涯中的价值,以及导师制在获得 ABPP 委员会认证中的有益作用。此外,我们还发现了一些关键的发展领域,这些领域可以为该领域的导师制提供信息并加以改进。(PsycInfo 数据库记录 (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Psychology is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles in furtherance of the mission of Division 22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) of the American Psychological Association and to advance the science and practice of rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation psychologists consider the entire network of biological, psychological, social, environmental, and political factors that affect the functioning of persons with disabilities or chronic illness. Given the breadth of rehabilitation psychology, the journal"s scope is broadly defined.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the feasibility of heart rate variability biofeedback for individuals with tetraplegia: A pilot clinical trial. Ableist microaggressions and psychological distress among adults with disabilities: The role of disability visibility. Prolonged exposure for posttraumatic stress disorder following spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled trial. Psychometric network analysis in rehabilitation research: A methodological demonstration in depression symptoms of veterans and service members at 1 and 2 years after traumatic brain injury. TRACking health behavior in people with multiple sclerosis: Effects of a randomized trial on physical activity and working memory.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1