Emma Brennan, Maeve Nolan, Claire Keogh, Lorraine Swords, Eimear Smith
Purpose/objective: This study explores young people's unique experience of living with a parent with an acquired spinal cord injury. Despite the potential impact of acquired parental disability on children's lives, research studies on the experience are scarce.
Research method/design: Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to analyze semistructured interviews with nine adolescents and young adults (13-22 years) recruited in 2021, via the National Rehabilitation Hospital in Ireland.
Results: Four main themes were identified: 1. The event and immediate aftermath, 2. Suppressing emotions and keeping the best side out, 3. Changes and continuities in family relationships and roles, and 4. Strengthening connection through open communication. Participants described feeling frightened and alone in the immediate aftermath of parental injury and highlighted the importance of support networks. The impact on adjustment of suppressing emotions to protect parents and preserve a public persona was identified. Role changes altered family dynamics and increased household responsibilities were experienced as challenging, whereas improvements in relationships were also reported. Opportunities for open communication throughout the developmental adjustment process were identified as a key factor in maintaining psychological wellbeing after a life-changing event.
Conclusion/implications: This study provides insight into the lived experience of parental disability in a small sample of white Irish participants. Although this sample may limit its generalizability, the study offers implications for healthcare professionals and families seeking to promote resilient adjustment in young people following the intrusion of spinal cord injury into family life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
{"title":"Children and young people's experiences of having a parent with a spinal cord injury.","authors":"Emma Brennan, Maeve Nolan, Claire Keogh, Lorraine Swords, Eimear Smith","doi":"10.1037/rep0000647","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rep0000647","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>This study explores young people's unique experience of living with a parent with an acquired spinal cord injury. Despite the potential impact of acquired parental disability on children's lives, research studies on the experience are scarce.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to analyze semistructured interviews with nine adolescents and young adults (13-22 years) recruited in 2021, via the National Rehabilitation Hospital in Ireland.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main themes were identified: 1. The event and immediate aftermath, 2. Suppressing emotions and keeping the best side out, 3. Changes and continuities in family relationships and roles, and 4. Strengthening connection through open communication. Participants described feeling frightened and alone in the immediate aftermath of parental injury and highlighted the importance of support networks. The impact on adjustment of suppressing emotions to protect parents and preserve a public persona was identified. Role changes altered family dynamics and increased household responsibilities were experienced as challenging, whereas improvements in relationships were also reported. Opportunities for open communication throughout the developmental adjustment process were identified as a key factor in maintaining psychological wellbeing after a life-changing event.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications: </strong>This study provides insight into the lived experience of parental disability in a small sample of white Irish participants. Although this sample may limit its generalizability, the study offers implications for healthcare professionals and families seeking to promote resilient adjustment in young people following the intrusion of spinal cord injury into family life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146144225","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Sandy J Lwi, Jas Chok, Krista Schendel, Timothy J Herron, Brian C Curran, Juliana V Baldo
Purpose/objectives: Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) has been shown to improve mental health and well-being in people with different medical conditions. However, whether it improves outcomes in chronic stroke populations is less clear, as few studies have examined the efficacy of MBSR in this population with a randomized controlled trial and an active control condition. Our study aimed to address this gap.
Research method/design: People with a history of chronic stroke (n = 59) participated in a randomized controlled trial of MBSR. They were randomly assigned to an online MBSR intervention or an online Brain Health Education intervention. Both interventions were matched on a number of variables, including schedule, instructor, and format. Participants were assessed pre-, post-, and 6 months postintervention using online questionnaires and an online neuropsychological battery.
Results: MBSR did not lead to improved anxiety F(2, 55) = 1.13, p = .321, η² = .01) or depression F(2, 68) = 0.53, p = .588, η² = .002) symptoms over time. Exploratory outcomes of cognitive functioning, physical health, and well-being also revealed no MBSR-specific improvements over time (ps > .318).
Conclusions/implications: People with a history of chronic stroke reported improved outcomes from participating in either intervention, providing support that both online MBSR and Brain Health Education interventions are feasible and low-cost interventions for this population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
目的/目标:基于正念的减压(MBSR)已被证明可以改善患有不同疾病的人的心理健康和福祉。然而,它是否能改善慢性卒中人群的预后尚不清楚,因为很少有研究通过随机对照试验和主动对照条件来检验正念减压疗法在慢性卒中人群中的疗效。我们的研究旨在解决这一差距。研究方法/设计:有慢性中风病史的人(n = 59)参加了正念减压疗法的随机对照试验。他们被随机分配到在线正念减压干预组或在线脑健康教育干预组。两种干预措施在许多变量上都是匹配的,包括时间表、教师和形式。参与者在干预前、干预后和干预后6个月通过在线问卷和在线神经心理学测试进行评估。结果:随着时间的推移,MBSR并不能改善焦虑症状(F(2,55) = 1.13, p = .321, η²= .01)或抑郁症状(F(2,68) = 0.53, p = .588, η²= .002)。认知功能、身体健康和幸福感的探索性结果也显示,随着时间的推移,mbsr没有特异性改善(ps >.318)。结论/意义:有慢性中风史的人报告说,参与任何一种干预都改善了结果,这表明在线正念减压和脑健康教育干预对这类人群都是可行的,而且成本低。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"A randomized controlled trial of online mindfulness-based stress reduction in chronic stroke.","authors":"Sandy J Lwi, Jas Chok, Krista Schendel, Timothy J Herron, Brian C Curran, Juliana V Baldo","doi":"10.1037/rep0000651","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rep0000651","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objectives: </strong>Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) has been shown to improve mental health and well-being in people with different medical conditions. However, whether it improves outcomes in chronic stroke populations is less clear, as few studies have examined the efficacy of MBSR in this population with a randomized controlled trial and an active control condition. Our study aimed to address this gap.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>People with a history of chronic stroke (n = 59) participated in a randomized controlled trial of MBSR. They were randomly assigned to an online MBSR intervention or an online Brain Health Education intervention. Both interventions were matched on a number of variables, including schedule, instructor, and format. Participants were assessed pre-, post-, and 6 months postintervention using online questionnaires and an online neuropsychological battery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MBSR did not lead to improved anxiety <i>F</i>(2, 55) = 1.13, <i>p</i> = .321, η² = .01) or depression <i>F</i>(2, 68) = 0.53, <i>p</i> = .588, η² = .002) symptoms over time. Exploratory outcomes of cognitive functioning, physical health, and well-being also revealed no MBSR-specific improvements over time (<i>p</i>s > .318).</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>People with a history of chronic stroke reported improved outcomes from participating in either intervention, providing support that both online MBSR and Brain Health Education interventions are feasible and low-cost interventions for this population. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12778976/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145906973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose/objective: Disability is often framed as an inherently negative experience that harms the mental health and well-being of disabled individuals. This perspective, however, ignores the impact of disability discrimination. The relationship between disability discrimination and mental health has been documented in several cultural contexts, but not yet in a large-scale, nationally representative sample in the United States. Additionally, limited research has explored moderators of the relationship between disability discrimination and mental health. The purpose of the present study was to examine the association between disability discrimination and mental health outcomes, as well as the moderating role of disability permanence-a critical yet understudied component of the disability experience-in shaping this relationship.
Research method/design: The present study uses a large national sample of adults with physical disabilities in the United States (N = 5,115), drawn from the second wave of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions Wave-II.
Results: Our findings reveal that experiencing greater disability discrimination in the prior year predicts greater anxiety and depression, assessed through both symptomology and clinical diagnoses, and that this relationship is stronger for people with temporary (vs. permanent) disabilities.
Conclusion/implications: These results underscore the necessity of addressing disability discrimination in order to promote the mental health and well-being of disabled individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
目的/目标:残疾通常被定义为一种内在的消极体验,损害残疾人的心理健康和福祉。然而,这种观点忽略了残疾歧视的影响。残疾歧视与心理健康之间的关系已经在几个文化背景下被记录下来,但尚未在美国进行大规模的、具有全国代表性的样本研究。此外,有限的研究探讨了残疾歧视与心理健康之间关系的调节因素。本研究的目的是研究残疾歧视与心理健康结果之间的关系,以及残疾永久性在形成这种关系中的调节作用-残疾经历的一个关键但尚未得到充分研究的组成部分。研究方法/设计:本研究使用了美国全国范围内大量身体残疾的成年人样本(N = 5115),这些样本来自第二波全国酒精及相关疾病流行病学调查第二波。结果:我们的研究结果表明,通过症状学和临床诊断评估,在前一年经历过更大的残疾歧视预示着更大的焦虑和抑郁,并且这种关系对于暂时(与永久性)残疾的人来说更强。结论/影响:这些结果强调了解决残疾歧视问题的必要性,以促进残疾人的心理健康和福祉。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Disability discrimination, disability permanence, and mental health among U.S. adults.","authors":"Jordan Rubin-McGregor, Jeffrey M Hunger","doi":"10.1037/rep0000643","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rep0000643","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>Disability is often framed as an inherently negative experience that harms the mental health and well-being of disabled individuals. This perspective, however, ignores the impact of disability discrimination. The relationship between disability discrimination and mental health has been documented in several cultural contexts, but not yet in a large-scale, nationally representative sample in the United States. Additionally, limited research has explored moderators of the relationship between disability discrimination and mental health. The purpose of the present study was to examine the association between disability discrimination and mental health outcomes, as well as the moderating role of disability permanence-a critical yet understudied component of the disability experience-in shaping this relationship.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>The present study uses a large national sample of adults with physical disabilities in the United States (<i>N</i> = 5,115), drawn from the second wave of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions Wave-II.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings reveal that experiencing greater disability discrimination in the prior year predicts greater anxiety and depression, assessed through both symptomology and clinical diagnoses, and that this relationship is stronger for people with temporary (vs. permanent) disabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications: </strong>These results underscore the necessity of addressing disability discrimination in order to promote the mental health and well-being of disabled individuals. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776073","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Megan E Narad, Eloise E Kaizar, Nanhua Zhang, H Gerry Taylor, Keith Owen Yeates, Brad G Kurowski, Shari L Wade
Objective: Examine the moderating effect of preinjury attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and secondary ADHD on response to a family-based problem solving (FBPS) intervention following pediatric traumatic brain injury.
Method: Analyses included 233 participants (114 FBPS and 119 internet resource comparison group), aged 11-18 who had been hospitalized for a moderate-severe traumatic brain injury within the previous 18 months. Parents completed measures of child functioning and their own functioning at time of enrollment, 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-ups. Linear mixed models examined the moderating effect of ADHD status on the effect of treatment over time.
Results: Main effect of ADHD status was significant for executive functioning, F(2, 429) = 55.15, p < .0001; social competence, F(2, 421) = 22.94, p < .0001; parental depression, F(2, 420) = 4.83, p = .0085; and parental distress, F(2, 413) = 6.35, p = .0019. Consistently, those with ADHD demonstrated worse outcomes than those without ADHD. ADHD status moderated the effect of FBPS on functional impairment, F(6, 430) = 5.16, p < .0001. Among those who received FBPS, those without ADHD demonstrated the expected improvement in functional outcomes over time. The secondary ADHD group had a delayed improvement in outcomes, not present until the 18-month follow-up. The preinjury attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder group showed no change in outcomes over time.
Conclusions/implications: ADHD status had a significant effect on adolescent and parent outcomes and moderated the effect of FBPS on functional outcomes. Findings highlight the importance of identifying children with preinjury ADHD as well as new onset ADHD symptoms after injury to guide intervention delivery. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:探讨损伤前注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和继发性注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)对儿童创伤性脑损伤后家庭问题解决(FBPS)干预反应的调节作用。方法:纳入233例(FBPS组114例,互联网资源对照组119例),年龄11-18岁,在18个月内因中重度颅脑损伤住院治疗。父母在入组、6个月、12个月和18个月随访时完成了儿童功能和自身功能的测量。线性混合模型检验了ADHD状态对治疗效果的调节作用。结果:ADHD状态对执行功能的主效应显著,F(2,429) = 55.15, p < 0.0001;社会能力,F(2,421) = 22.94, p < 0.0001;父母抑郁,F(2,420) = 4.83, p = 0.0085;父母焦虑,F(2,413) = 6.35, p = 0.0019。一贯地,那些患有多动症的人比那些没有多动症的人表现出更糟糕的结果。ADHD状态可调节FBPS对功能障碍的影响,F(6,430) = 5.16, p < 0.0001。在接受FBPS治疗的患者中,那些没有多动症的患者随着时间的推移表现出预期的功能改善。继发性注意力缺陷多动症组在结果上的改善是延迟的,直到18个月的随访才出现。损伤前注意缺陷多动障碍组的结果随着时间的推移没有变化。结论/意义:ADHD状态对青少年和父母结局有显著影响,并调节FBPS对功能结局的影响。研究结果强调了识别损伤前ADHD儿童以及损伤后新发ADHD症状对指导干预实施的重要性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder as a moderator of the efficacy of family-based problem solving after pediatric traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Megan E Narad, Eloise E Kaizar, Nanhua Zhang, H Gerry Taylor, Keith Owen Yeates, Brad G Kurowski, Shari L Wade","doi":"10.1037/rep0000644","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rep0000644","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine the moderating effect of preinjury attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and secondary ADHD on response to a family-based problem solving (FBPS) intervention following pediatric traumatic brain injury.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Analyses included 233 participants (114 FBPS and 119 internet resource comparison group), aged 11-18 who had been hospitalized for a moderate-severe traumatic brain injury within the previous 18 months. Parents completed measures of child functioning and their own functioning at time of enrollment, 6-, 12-, and 18-month follow-ups. Linear mixed models examined the moderating effect of ADHD status on the effect of treatment over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Main effect of ADHD status was significant for executive functioning, <i>F</i>(2, 429) = 55.15, <i>p</i> < .0001; social competence, <i>F</i>(2, 421) = 22.94, <i>p</i> < .0001; parental depression, <i>F</i>(2, 420) = 4.83, <i>p</i> = .0085; and parental distress, <i>F</i>(2, 413) = 6.35, <i>p</i> = .0019. Consistently, those with ADHD demonstrated worse outcomes than those without ADHD. ADHD status moderated the effect of FBPS on functional impairment, <i>F</i>(6, 430) = 5.16, <i>p</i> < .0001. Among those who received FBPS, those without ADHD demonstrated the expected improvement in functional outcomes over time. The secondary ADHD group had a delayed improvement in outcomes, not present until the 18-month follow-up. The preinjury attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder group showed no change in outcomes over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions/implications: </strong>ADHD status had a significant effect on adolescent and parent outcomes and moderated the effect of FBPS on functional outcomes. Findings highlight the importance of identifying children with preinjury ADHD as well as new onset ADHD symptoms after injury to guide intervention delivery. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Suzzette M Chopin, Erin E Andrews, Kristen Jackson, Serina Hoover, Kathleen Bechtold
Purpose/objective: This article reports survey results from the American Board of Rehabilitation Psychology (ABRP) on motivators and barriers to pursuing board certification and identifies ways the ABRP can reduce barriers.
Research method/design: An electronic survey was sent to Division 22 and Academy of Rehabilitation Psychology listservs. Participants (N = 113) were primarily early career (37%), not board-certified (62%), and did not identify as a member of an underrepresented group (70%). Two independent coders conducted thematic analysis of qualitative data, identifying key themes. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion; final themes were agreed upon by consensus.
Results: Most nonboard-certified participants had considered specialty certification (93%). Of those reporting barriers (n = 64), primary barriers included work/time constraints (30%), lack of benefit (18%) and institutional support (15%), personal obstacles (14%), and financial considerations (13%). Motivational factors included professional reputation (42%), mentorship (38%), and institutional support (14%). Responses from those who identified as participants from diverse professional backgrounds emphasized the importance of mentorship, institutional and financial support, and elucidation of alternative pathways to certification.
Conclusion/implications: Despite strong interest in board certification, many individuals either do not initiate the process or begin but do not complete it. There also remains a lack of clarity regarding requirements and the process. The ABRP has implemented initiatives to address these concerns, including outlining alternative pathways, clarifying candidacy requirements, transitioning mentorship to the Academy of Rehabilitation Psychology, implementing educational outreach programs, providing individualized encouragement to candidates, increasing awareness of scholarship opportunities, and promoting nontraditional pathways to board certification. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
目的/目的:本文报告了美国康复心理学委员会(ABRP)关于追求委员会认证的动机和障碍的调查结果,并确定了ABRP可以减少障碍的方法。研究方法/设计:电子调查发送至22分部和康复心理学学会listservs。参与者(N = 113)主要是早期职业(37%),非董事会认证(62%),并且不认为自己是代表性不足的群体的成员(70%)。两名独立编码员对定性数据进行专题分析,确定关键主题。分歧通过讨论解决;最后的主题以协商一致方式商定。结果:大多数非董事会认证的参与者考虑过专业认证(93%)。在这些报告障碍(n = 64)中,主要障碍包括工作/时间限制(30%)、缺乏福利(18%)和机构支持(15%)、个人障碍(14%)和财务考虑(13%)。激励因素包括职业声誉(42%)、师徒关系(38%)和机构支持(14%)。来自不同专业背景的参与者的回应强调了指导、机构和财政支持以及说明获得认证的替代途径的重要性。结论/启示:尽管对董事会认证有强烈的兴趣,但许多人要么不开始这个过程,要么开始但没有完成它。在需求和流程方面仍然缺乏明确性。ABRP已经采取措施来解决这些问题,包括概述替代途径,澄清候选人要求,向康复心理学学院过渡指导,实施教育推广计划,为候选人提供个性化的鼓励,提高对奖学金机会的认识,并促进非传统途径获得董事会认证。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Motivators and barriers to pursuing board certification: Survey results and future directions.","authors":"Suzzette M Chopin, Erin E Andrews, Kristen Jackson, Serina Hoover, Kathleen Bechtold","doi":"10.1037/rep0000648","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rep0000648","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>This article reports survey results from the American Board of Rehabilitation Psychology (ABRP) on motivators and barriers to pursuing board certification and identifies ways the ABRP can reduce barriers.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>An electronic survey was sent to Division 22 and Academy of Rehabilitation Psychology listservs. Participants (<i>N</i> = 113) were primarily early career (37%), not board-certified (62%), and did not identify as a member of an underrepresented group (70%). Two independent coders conducted thematic analysis of qualitative data, identifying key themes. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion; final themes were agreed upon by consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most nonboard-certified participants had considered specialty certification (93%). Of those reporting barriers (<i>n</i> = 64), primary barriers included work/time constraints (30%), lack of benefit (18%) and institutional support (15%), personal obstacles (14%), and financial considerations (13%). Motivational factors included professional reputation (42%), mentorship (38%), and institutional support (14%). Responses from those who identified as participants from diverse professional backgrounds emphasized the importance of mentorship, institutional and financial support, and elucidation of alternative pathways to certification.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications: </strong>Despite strong interest in board certification, many individuals either do not initiate the process or begin but do not complete it. There also remains a lack of clarity regarding requirements and the process. The ABRP has implemented initiatives to address these concerns, including outlining alternative pathways, clarifying candidacy requirements, transitioning mentorship to the Academy of Rehabilitation Psychology, implementing educational outreach programs, providing individualized encouragement to candidates, increasing awareness of scholarship opportunities, and promoting nontraditional pathways to board certification. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145776111","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Areum Han, Jereme D Wilroy, Hon K Yuen, Jeremy Jenkins, Jessica Hawkins
Objective: This pilot study examined the effects of videoconference-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), supplemented with psychoeducation materials, compared to psychoeducation materials alone, on depressive symptoms and other mental health outcomes in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) sustained within the past 5 years.
Method: A parallel-group, two-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in the United States with 34 adults who had sustained an SCI within 5 years and reported at least mild depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] scores ≥5). Participants were randomly assigned to either the ACT group (n = 15) or the control group (n = 19). The ACT group received eight weekly 1-hr individual ACT sessions via videoconferencing, along with a 1-hr booster session. The control group received only psychoeducation materials. The primary outcome was depressive symptoms measured by the PHQ-9.
Results: From pretest to posttest, the ACT group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in PHQ-9 scores (Z = 2.1, p = .04, d = 0.75) and all other mental health outcomes compared to the control group, with medium-to-large effect sizes. These improvements were maintained at the 2-month follow-up for PHQ-9 scores (Z = 2.78, p = .005, d = 0.97) and all other measures, except cognitive fusion.
Conclusion: This pilot randomized controlled trial is the first to demonstrate the potential efficacy of videoconference-delivered ACT in improving mental health outcomes among individuals with SCI experiencing depressive symptoms. Larger, more diverse samples and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm and extend these findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:本初步研究考察了视频会议提供的接受和承诺治疗(ACT),辅以心理教育材料,与单独的心理教育材料相比,对过去5年内持续的脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的抑郁症状和其他心理健康结果的影响。方法:在美国进行一项平行组、两组随机对照试验,34名5年内患有脊髓损伤且报告至少有轻度抑郁症状的成年人(患者健康问卷-9 [PHQ-9]评分≥5)。参与者被随机分配到ACT组(n = 15)或对照组(n = 19)。ACT组每周通过视频会议接受8次1小时的单独ACT会议,以及1小时的强化会议。对照组只接受心理教育材料。主要终点是通过PHQ-9测量抑郁症状。结果:从测试前到测试后,与对照组相比,ACT组在PHQ-9得分(Z = 2.1, p = 0.04, d = 0.75)和所有其他心理健康结果方面表现出更大的改善,具有中等到较大的效应量。在2个月的随访中,PHQ-9评分(Z = 2.78, p = 0.005, d = 0.97)和除认知融合外的所有其他测量均保持了这些改善。结论:该试点随机对照试验首次证明了视频会议式ACT在改善有抑郁症状的脊髓损伤患者心理健康结果方面的潜在功效。需要更大、更多样化的样本和更长的随访期来证实和扩展这些发现。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Videoconference-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy for depressed individuals with spinal cord injury sustained within the past 5 years: A pilot randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Areum Han, Jereme D Wilroy, Hon K Yuen, Jeremy Jenkins, Jessica Hawkins","doi":"10.1037/rep0000642","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rep0000642","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot study examined the effects of videoconference-delivered acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), supplemented with psychoeducation materials, compared to psychoeducation materials alone, on depressive symptoms and other mental health outcomes in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) sustained within the past 5 years.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A parallel-group, two-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted in the United States with 34 adults who had sustained an SCI within 5 years and reported at least mild depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] scores ≥5). Participants were randomly assigned to either the ACT group (<i>n</i> = 15) or the control group (<i>n</i> = 19). The ACT group received eight weekly 1-hr individual ACT sessions via videoconferencing, along with a 1-hr booster session. The control group received only psychoeducation materials. The primary outcome was depressive symptoms measured by the PHQ-9.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From pretest to posttest, the ACT group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in PHQ-9 scores (<i>Z</i> = 2.1, <i>p</i> = .04, <i>d</i> = 0.75) and all other mental health outcomes compared to the control group, with medium-to-large effect sizes. These improvements were maintained at the 2-month follow-up for PHQ-9 scores (<i>Z</i> = 2.78, <i>p</i> = .005, <i>d</i> = 0.97) and all other measures, except cognitive fusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This pilot randomized controlled trial is the first to demonstrate the potential efficacy of videoconference-delivered ACT in improving mental health outcomes among individuals with SCI experiencing depressive symptoms. Larger, more diverse samples and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm and extend these findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145656010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Purpose: Prototypes are idealized examples of the "typical" member of that group. Prototypicality plays an important role not only in how people are treated and discriminated against, but also whose experiences with discrimination are seen as legitimate. When it comes to research, prototypicality can also mask the experiences of people with multiply marginalized identities. The aim of this study was to examine prototypicality related to disability-what is the gender and race of the prototypical disabled person, does this differ based on participants' own identities, and does this impact perceptions of warmth?
Research method: We conducted an online survey in April 2025 with 230 people. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and ordinal regression models.
Results: While picturing a disabled person who experienced discrimination, 59.9% of participants thought of a cisgender man, and 79.0% of participants thought of a White person. When gender and race were combined, disabled White men were prototypical 49.5% of the time, disabled White women 29.8%, disabled Black men 7.2%, disabled Black women 5.3%, and all other combinations of race and gender identities less than 2% each. There was no significant relationship between participants' own identities and prototypicality. There was a relationship between prototypicality and warmth, with disabled White women rated significantly warmer (OR [CI] = 2.18 [1.09, 4.36]).
Conclusion: Prototypicality has significant implications not only for the ways we produce and enact science but also for our attempts to reduce discrimination and combat inequity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:原型是该群体中“典型”成员的理想化例子。原型性不仅在人们如何被对待和歧视方面发挥着重要作用,而且在那些受到歧视的经历被视为合法的方面也发挥着重要作用。当涉及到研究时,原型性也可以掩盖具有多重边缘身份的人的经历。这项研究的目的是检验与残疾相关的原型性——原型残疾人的性别和种族是什么,这是否基于参与者自己的身份而有所不同,这是否影响对温暖的感知?研究方法:我们于2025年4月对230人进行了在线调查。采用描述性统计、卡方检验和有序回归模型对数据进行分析。结果:当描绘一个遭受歧视的残疾人时,59.9%的参与者想到了一个顺性别男性,79.0%的参与者想到了一个白人。当性别和种族结合在一起时,残疾白人男性占49.5%,残疾白人女性占29.8%,残疾黑人男性占7.2%,残疾黑人女性占5.3%,所有其他种族和性别身份的组合各不到2%。被试自身身份与原型性之间无显著关系。原型性与温暖之间存在关系,残疾白人女性被评为明显更温暖(OR [CI] = 2.18[1.09, 4.36])。结论:原型性不仅对我们创造和制定科学的方式有重要影响,而且对我们减少歧视和对抗不平等的尝试也有重要影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"The prototypical disabled person and its implications for discrimination research and intersectionality.","authors":"Carli Friedman","doi":"10.1037/rep0000646","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rep0000646","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prototypes are idealized examples of the \"typical\" member of that group. Prototypicality plays an important role not only in how people are treated and discriminated against, but also whose experiences with discrimination are seen as legitimate. When it comes to research, prototypicality can also mask the experiences of people with multiply marginalized identities. The aim of this study was to examine prototypicality related to disability-what is the gender and race of the prototypical disabled person, does this differ based on participants' own identities, and does this impact perceptions of warmth?</p><p><strong>Research method: </strong>We conducted an online survey in April 2025 with 230 people. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and ordinal regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While picturing a disabled person who experienced discrimination, 59.9% of participants thought of a cisgender man, and 79.0% of participants thought of a White person. When gender and race were combined, disabled White men were prototypical 49.5% of the time, disabled White women 29.8%, disabled Black men 7.2%, disabled Black women 5.3%, and all other combinations of race and gender identities less than 2% each. There was no significant relationship between participants' own identities and prototypicality. There was a relationship between prototypicality and warmth, with disabled White women rated significantly warmer (<i>OR</i> [CI] = 2.18 [1.09, 4.36]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prototypicality has significant implications not only for the ways we produce and enact science but also for our attempts to reduce discrimination and combat inequity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145656056","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Kathleen F Pagulayan, Holly K Rau, Orli M Shulein, Madeleine L Werhane, David P Sheppard, Jeanne M Hoffman, Elizabeth W Twamley, Rhonda M Williams
Purpose/objective: To describe the development of a novel rehabilitation intervention (Tools for Rehabilitation and Cognitive Care [On-TRACC]) for individuals reporting cognitive persistent postconcussive symptoms (PPCSs) after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) as a bridge to care for modifiable conditions that can impact cognition.
Research method/design: Intervention development via four methods: literature review, veteran survey, clinician survey, and a beta test with three participants/three clinicians. A total of 53 veterans with a history of mTBI and cognitive PPCSs participated in the veteran survey, while seven clinicians, including speech pathologists, psychologists, and a psychology postdoctoral fellow, completed the clinician survey. Three veterans and three clinicians participated in a beta test of the intervention to assess usability, identify any content issues, and gather specific feedback.
Results: The new intervention is a five-session, patient-centered rehabilitation program for individuals reporting persistent cognitive difficulties after mTBI. On-TRACC provides tailored psychoeducation about modifiable factors contributing to cognitive difficulties, self-management skills, and compensatory cognitive rehabilitation strategies. On-TRACC is based on personalized values and is designed to support short- and long-term management of factors contributing to current symptoms that are currently untreated or undertreated.
Conclusion/implications: Through a multistep process that incorporated stakeholder input and a review of the empirical literature, we developed an evidence-informed intervention that fills a gap in current care for cognitive PPCSs. Future studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this intervention for individuals with chronic cognitive difficulties after mTBI. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目的/目的:描述一种新型康复干预(康复和认知护理工具[On-TRACC])的发展,用于轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后报告认知持续性脑震荡后症状(PPCSs)的个体,作为对可能影响认知的可改变条件的护理的桥梁。研究方法/设计:通过文献综述、老兵调查、临床医生调查、三名参与者/三名临床医生的beta测试四种方法进行干预开发。共有53名有mTBI和认知PPCSs病史的退伍军人参与了退伍军人调查,包括语言病理学家、心理学家和心理学博士后在内的7名临床医生完成了临床医生调查。三名退伍军人和三名临床医生参与了干预的beta测试,以评估可用性,确定任何内容问题,并收集具体的反馈。结果:新的干预是一个五期,以患者为中心的康复计划,用于报告mTBI后持续认知困难的个人。On-TRACC提供量身定制的心理教育,了解导致认知困难、自我管理技能和补偿性认知康复策略的可改变因素。on - tracc基于个性化价值观,旨在支持对导致目前未治疗或治疗不足的症状的因素进行短期和长期管理。结论/启示:通过一个多步骤的过程,包括利益相关者的意见和对经验文献的回顾,我们开发了一种循证干预,填补了目前认知ppcs护理的空白。需要进一步的研究来评估这种干预对mTBI后慢性认知困难患者的疗效。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"On-tools for rehabilitation and cognitive care: Development of a brief intervention for chronic cognitive difficulties after mild traumatic brain injury.","authors":"Kathleen F Pagulayan, Holly K Rau, Orli M Shulein, Madeleine L Werhane, David P Sheppard, Jeanne M Hoffman, Elizabeth W Twamley, Rhonda M Williams","doi":"10.1037/rep0000641","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000641","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>To describe the development of a novel rehabilitation intervention (Tools for Rehabilitation and Cognitive Care [On-TRACC]) for individuals reporting cognitive persistent postconcussive symptoms (PPCSs) after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) as a bridge to care for modifiable conditions that can impact cognition.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>Intervention development via four methods: literature review, veteran survey, clinician survey, and a beta test with three participants/three clinicians. A total of 53 veterans with a history of mTBI and cognitive PPCSs participated in the veteran survey, while seven clinicians, including speech pathologists, psychologists, and a psychology postdoctoral fellow, completed the clinician survey. Three veterans and three clinicians participated in a beta test of the intervention to assess usability, identify any content issues, and gather specific feedback.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The new intervention is a five-session, patient-centered rehabilitation program for individuals reporting persistent cognitive difficulties after mTBI. On-TRACC provides tailored psychoeducation about modifiable factors contributing to cognitive difficulties, self-management skills, and compensatory cognitive rehabilitation strategies. On-TRACC is based on personalized values and is designed to support short- and long-term management of factors contributing to current symptoms that are currently untreated or undertreated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications: </strong>Through a multistep process that incorporated stakeholder input and a review of the empirical literature, we developed an evidence-informed intervention that fills a gap in current care for cognitive PPCSs. Future studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of this intervention for individuals with chronic cognitive difficulties after mTBI. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145543306","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Shaun Hancock, Jan Cameron, Tharshanah Thayabaranathan, Rene Stolwyk, Natasha A Lannin, Monique F Kilkenny, Nadine E Andrew, Ian Kneebone, Muideen Olaiya, Maree Hackett, Dominique A Cadilhac
Objective: To assess characteristics of individuals who wanted to address mental health needs during hospital admission for stroke through structured, person-centered goal setting, and to describe the types of mental health-related goals.
Method: Analysis of aggregated baseline data from a randomized controlled trial (Recovery-focused Community support to Avoid readmissions and improve Participation after Stroke). Trial participants were recruited from 11 Australian hospitals. Within 10 days of stroke admission, participants selected two to five recovery goals from five categories (health, mind and body, everyday activities, out-and-about, and health care). Baseline data included demographics, anxiety/depression status, health-related quality of life, unmet needs, and self-efficacy after stroke. Characteristics associated with selecting mental health-related goals were determined using multivariable logistic regressions.
Results: Among 465 participants (33% female, Mdn = 67 years), 50 (11%) selected a mental health-related goal. Content of most mental health-related goals focused on improving mental health (73%) and controlling another lifestyle factor (20%). Selection of mental health-related goals was associated with being under 65 years of age, OR = 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [1.1, 3.9]; history of mental health concerns, OR = 4.7, 95% CI = [2.5, 8.9]; elevated symptoms of depression or anxiety, OR = 6.6, 95% CI = [3.3, 13.0]; or reporting an unmet mental health need, OR = 5.5, 95% CI = [2.7, 10.9].
Conclusion: We highlight important characteristics associated with self-selecting mental health-related goals after stroke. Greater understanding of barriers for older individuals and those with elevated symptoms of depression/anxiety setting mental health-related goals is warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目的:通过结构化的、以人为中心的目标设定来评估卒中住院期间想要解决心理健康需求的个体的特征,并描述心理健康相关目标的类型。方法:分析来自一项随机对照试验的汇总基线数据(以康复为重点的社区支持以避免卒中后再入院和改善参与)。试验参与者从11家澳大利亚医院招募。在中风入院的10天内,参与者从五个类别(健康、身心、日常活动、外出活动和医疗保健)中选择两到五个恢复目标。基线数据包括人口统计、焦虑/抑郁状态、健康相关生活质量、未满足的需求和卒中后的自我效能。使用多变量逻辑回归确定与选择心理健康相关目标相关的特征。结果:在465名参与者中(33%为女性,Mdn = 67岁),50名(11%)选择了与心理健康相关的目标。大多数心理健康相关目标的内容侧重于改善心理健康(73%)和控制另一种生活方式因素(20%)。心理健康目标的选择与年龄在65岁以下相关,OR = 2.1, 95%可信区间(CI) = [1.1, 3.9];精神病史,OR = 4.7, 95% CI = [2.5, 8.9];抑郁或焦虑症状加重,or = 6.6, 95% CI = [3.3, 13.0];或报告未满足的心理健康需求,or = 5.5, 95% CI =[2.7, 10.9]。结论:我们强调了与脑卒中后自我选择心理健康目标相关的重要特征。有必要进一步了解老年人和抑郁/焦虑症状加重者设定心理健康相关目标的障碍。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Factors influencing self-selected mental health-related recovery goals poststroke: An observational study.","authors":"Shaun Hancock, Jan Cameron, Tharshanah Thayabaranathan, Rene Stolwyk, Natasha A Lannin, Monique F Kilkenny, Nadine E Andrew, Ian Kneebone, Muideen Olaiya, Maree Hackett, Dominique A Cadilhac","doi":"10.1037/rep0000638","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rep0000638","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess characteristics of individuals who wanted to address mental health needs during hospital admission for stroke through structured, person-centered goal setting, and to describe the types of mental health-related goals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Analysis of aggregated baseline data from a randomized controlled trial (Recovery-focused Community support to Avoid readmissions and improve Participation after Stroke). Trial participants were recruited from 11 Australian hospitals. Within 10 days of stroke admission, participants selected two to five recovery goals from five categories (health, mind and body, everyday activities, out-and-about, and health care). Baseline data included demographics, anxiety/depression status, health-related quality of life, unmet needs, and self-efficacy after stroke. Characteristics associated with selecting mental health-related goals were determined using multivariable logistic regressions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 465 participants (33% female, <i>Mdn</i> = 67 years), 50 (11%) selected a mental health-related goal. Content of most mental health-related goals focused on improving mental health (73%) and controlling another lifestyle factor (20%). Selection of mental health-related goals was associated with being under 65 years of age, <i>OR</i> = 2.1, 95% confidence interval (CI) = [1.1, 3.9]; history of mental health concerns, <i>OR</i> = 4.7, 95% CI = [2.5, 8.9]; elevated symptoms of depression or anxiety, <i>OR</i> = 6.6, 95% CI = [3.3, 13.0]; or reporting an unmet mental health need, OR = 5.5, 95% CI = [2.7, 10.9].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We highlight important characteristics associated with self-selecting mental health-related goals after stroke. Greater understanding of barriers for older individuals and those with elevated symptoms of depression/anxiety setting mental health-related goals is warranted. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145460327","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-02-06DOI: 10.1037/rep0000602
Susan Robinson-Whelen, Rosemary B Hughes, Diana Gonzalez, Linda Norah-Davis, Luis G Leon-Novelo, Esther Ngan, Megan L Whelen, Lisa Wenzel, Heather B Taylor
Purpose/objective: To report on a randomized controlled trial of Zest, a highly innovative psychological health promotion group intervention designed specifically for women with spinal cord injury (SCI), a population at risk for adverse psychological health.
Research method/design: A national sample of 175 women with SCI were randomized to either the Zest intervention or a control group that received intervention materials at the end of the study. The Zest group participated in a psychological health promotion intervention that met weekly for 10 weeks in the free, online, three-dimensional virtual world of Second Life. The novel use of this technology afforded delivery to participants with SCI without requiring them to leave their homes. Both groups completed online surveys at baseline, at program end, and at 6 months assessing the primary outcomes (depression, self-esteem, and life satisfaction) and the proposed mediators (self-efficacy, connectedness, and perceived stress).
Results: Zest was well received by participants. We found significant group differences supporting the efficacy of the intervention on the primary outcomes of depression, self-esteem, and life satisfaction. Analyses also supported self-efficacy and perceived stress as important mediators of the impact of the intervention on the primary outcomes.
Conclusion/implications: Zest, a group program offered on a virtual world platform, offers promise as an intervention for enhancing the psychological health of women with SCI. More attention should be devoted to the psychosocial health needs of people with SCI by developing and implementing affordable, accessible, and widely available programming. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
目的/目的:报道一项Zest的随机对照试验,Zest是一种高度创新的心理健康促进组干预,专门针对有不良心理健康风险的女性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者。研究方法/设计:175名SCI女性被随机分为Zest干预组和对照组,对照组在研究结束时接受干预材料。Zest小组参加了一项促进心理健康的干预活动,为期10周,每周在“第二人生”的免费在线三维虚拟世界中见面。这项技术的新应用为脊髓损伤患者提供了不需要离开家的接生服务。两组都在基线、项目结束时和6个月时完成了在线调查,评估了主要结果(抑郁、自尊和生活满意度)和建议的中介因素(自我效能感、连系性和感知压力)。结果:Zest得到了参与者的一致好评。我们发现显著的组间差异支持干预在抑郁、自尊和生活满意度的主要结果上的有效性。分析还支持自我效能感和感知压力是干预对主要结果影响的重要中介。结论/启示:Zest是一个在虚拟世界平台上提供的小组项目,有望作为一种干预措施来改善脊髓损伤女性的心理健康。应该通过制定和实施负担得起的、可获得的和广泛可用的规划,更多地关注脊髓损伤患者的心理社会健康需求。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
{"title":"Promoting psychological health in women with spinal cord injury: A randomized trial.","authors":"Susan Robinson-Whelen, Rosemary B Hughes, Diana Gonzalez, Linda Norah-Davis, Luis G Leon-Novelo, Esther Ngan, Megan L Whelen, Lisa Wenzel, Heather B Taylor","doi":"10.1037/rep0000602","DOIUrl":"10.1037/rep0000602","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>To report on a randomized controlled trial of Zest, a highly innovative psychological health promotion group intervention designed specifically for women with spinal cord injury (SCI), a population at risk for adverse psychological health.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>A national sample of 175 women with SCI were randomized to either the Zest intervention or a control group that received intervention materials at the end of the study. The Zest group participated in a psychological health promotion intervention that met weekly for 10 weeks in the free, online, three-dimensional virtual world of Second Life. The novel use of this technology afforded delivery to participants with SCI without requiring them to leave their homes. Both groups completed online surveys at baseline, at program end, and at 6 months assessing the primary outcomes (depression, self-esteem, and life satisfaction) and the proposed mediators (self-efficacy, connectedness, and perceived stress).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Zest was well received by participants. We found significant group differences supporting the efficacy of the intervention on the primary outcomes of depression, self-esteem, and life satisfaction. Analyses also supported self-efficacy and perceived stress as important mediators of the impact of the intervention on the primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implications: </strong>Zest, a group program offered on a virtual world platform, offers promise as an intervention for enhancing the psychological health of women with SCI. More attention should be devoted to the psychosocial health needs of people with SCI by developing and implementing affordable, accessible, and widely available programming. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"426-436"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143366562","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}