Close Collaboration with Parents Affects the Length of Stay and Growth in Preterm Infants: A Register-Based Study in Finland.

Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1159/000535517
Ryo Itoshima, Kjell Helenius, Sari Ahlqvist-Björkroth, Tero Vahlberg, Liisa Lehtonen
{"title":"Close Collaboration with Parents Affects the Length of Stay and Growth in Preterm Infants: A Register-Based Study in Finland.","authors":"Ryo Itoshima, Kjell Helenius, Sari Ahlqvist-Björkroth, Tero Vahlberg, Liisa Lehtonen","doi":"10.1159/000535517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate how Close Collaboration with Parents (CC), a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)-wide educational model for healthcare staff to improve their family-centred care practices, affects the length of stay (LOS), growth, and later hospital visits and rehospitalizations of preterm infants.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This register-based study included all preterm infants born below 35 weeks of gestation in Finland from 2006 to 2020. Eligible infants were classified into the Full Close Collaboration (Full-CC) group (n = 2,104) if the NICUs of both the delivery and discharge hospitals had implemented the intervention; into the Partial-CC group (n = 515) if only one of the NICUs had implemented the intervention; and into the control group (n = 11,621) if neither had implemented the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adjusted LOS, the primary outcome, was 1.8 days or 6% shorter in the Full-CC group than in the control group (geometric mean ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.89-1.00). Growth was better in the Full-CC group compared to the control group: adjusted group difference 11.7 g/week (95% CI, 1.4-22.0) for weight, 1.3 mm/week (95% CI, 0.6-2.0) for length. The Full-CC group infants had lower odds of having any unscheduled outpatient visits compared to the control group (adjusted odds ratio 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98). No significant differences were found in any other comparisons.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>The unit-wide intervention improving family-centred care practices in NICUs may lead to more efficient use of hospital resources by shortening the LOS, improving growth, and decreasing hospital visits of preterm infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"351-358"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000535517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate how Close Collaboration with Parents (CC), a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)-wide educational model for healthcare staff to improve their family-centred care practices, affects the length of stay (LOS), growth, and later hospital visits and rehospitalizations of preterm infants.

Methods: This register-based study included all preterm infants born below 35 weeks of gestation in Finland from 2006 to 2020. Eligible infants were classified into the Full Close Collaboration (Full-CC) group (n = 2,104) if the NICUs of both the delivery and discharge hospitals had implemented the intervention; into the Partial-CC group (n = 515) if only one of the NICUs had implemented the intervention; and into the control group (n = 11,621) if neither had implemented the intervention.

Results: The adjusted LOS, the primary outcome, was 1.8 days or 6% shorter in the Full-CC group than in the control group (geometric mean ratio 0.94, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.89-1.00). Growth was better in the Full-CC group compared to the control group: adjusted group difference 11.7 g/week (95% CI, 1.4-22.0) for weight, 1.3 mm/week (95% CI, 0.6-2.0) for length. The Full-CC group infants had lower odds of having any unscheduled outpatient visits compared to the control group (adjusted odds ratio 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.98). No significant differences were found in any other comparisons.

Discussion/conclusion: The unit-wide intervention improving family-centred care practices in NICUs may lead to more efficient use of hospital resources by shortening the LOS, improving growth, and decreasing hospital visits of preterm infants.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与父母密切合作影响早产儿的住院时间和生长:一项基于登记的芬兰研究。
简介:这项研究旨在评估 "与父母密切协作"(CC)这一在新生儿重症监护室(NICU)范围内针对医护人员改善以家庭为中心的护理实践的教育模式如何影响早产儿的住院时间(LOS)、生长发育以及日后的医院就诊和再次住院:这项以登记为基础的研究包括 2006 年至 2020 年期间芬兰所有妊娠 35 周以下的早产儿。如果分娩医院和出院医院的新生儿重症监护室都实施了干预措施,则符合条件的婴儿被分为完全密切协作(Full-CC)组(n = 2,104);如果只有一家新生儿重症监护室实施了干预措施,则被分为部分密切协作(Partial-CC)组(n = 515);如果两家医院都没有实施干预措施,则被分为对照组(n = 11,621):调整后的住院时间(主要结果),全母乳喂养组比对照组缩短了 1.8 天或 6%(几何平均比为 0.94,95% 置信区间 [95% CI] 为 0.89-1.00)。与对照组相比,全母乳喂养组婴儿的生长情况更好:调整后的组间差异为:体重 11.7 克/周(95% CI,1.4-22.0),身长 1.3 毫米/周(95% CI,0.6-2.0)。与对照组相比,全母乳喂养组婴儿接受任何计划外门诊的几率较低(调整后的几率比 0.81;95% CI,0.67-0.98)。讨论/结论:讨论/结论:在新生儿重症监护室采取以家庭为中心的护理措施,可缩短早产儿的住院时间、改善早产儿的生长发育并减少早产儿的医院就诊次数,从而更有效地利用医院资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Care of Preterm and Term Newborns with Respiratory Conditions: A Systematic Synthesis of Evidence from Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Intravenous Dextrose for the Treatment of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: A Systematic Review. Post-Asphyxial Aftercare and Management of Neonates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Evidence Synthesis. Immediate Care for Common Conditions in Term and Preterm Neonates: The Evidence. Prevention and Treatment of Neonatal Infections in Facility and Community Settings of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Descriptive Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1