Georgia Dominguez, Oviya Muralidharan, Rachel Lee Him, Leila Harrison, Tyler Vaivada, Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Introduction: Neonatal respiratory conditions are leading causes of mortality and morbidity during the neonatal period. This review evaluated 11 management interventions for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), apnoea of prematurity (AOP), meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN), as well as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) as a potential complication from respiratory care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Methods: Two different methodological approaches were completed: (1) updating outdated reviews and pooling all LMIC studies and (2) re-analysis of LMIC studies from up-to-date reviews. Review updates were conducted between October 2022 and February 2023 and followed systematic methodology. A total of 50 studies were included across four review updates and seven review re-analyses.
Results: Findings indicate that bubble CPAP (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.96) and prophylactic CPAP (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.57) for RDS reduced the risk of treatment failure compared to other ventilation types or supportive care, respectively. Postnatal corticosteroids reduced BPD assessed as oxygen requirement at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.77). All other outcomes were found to be non-significant across remaining interventions.
Conclusions: Our findings indicate that prophylactic and bubble CPAP may provide some benefit by reducing treatment failure compared to other pressure sources. The safety and efficacy of other management interventions for RDS, AOP, BPD, MAS, and TTN remains uncertain given limited evaluations in LMICs. Future research should conduct adequately powered trials in underrepresented LMIC regions, investigate long-term outcomes, and evaluate cost-effectiveness.
{"title":"The Care of Preterm and Term Newborns with Respiratory Conditions: A Systematic Synthesis of Evidence from Low- and Middle-Income Countries.","authors":"Georgia Dominguez, Oviya Muralidharan, Rachel Lee Him, Leila Harrison, Tyler Vaivada, Zulfiqar A Bhutta","doi":"10.1159/000542482","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542482","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neonatal respiratory conditions are leading causes of mortality and morbidity during the neonatal period. This review evaluated 11 management interventions for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), apnoea of prematurity (AOP), meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), transient tachypnea of the newborn (TTN), as well as bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) as a potential complication from respiratory care in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two different methodological approaches were completed: (1) updating outdated reviews and pooling all LMIC studies and (2) re-analysis of LMIC studies from up-to-date reviews. Review updates were conducted between October 2022 and February 2023 and followed systematic methodology. A total of 50 studies were included across four review updates and seven review re-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings indicate that bubble CPAP (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.96) and prophylactic CPAP (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.57) for RDS reduced the risk of treatment failure compared to other ventilation types or supportive care, respectively. Postnatal corticosteroids reduced BPD assessed as oxygen requirement at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.77). All other outcomes were found to be non-significant across remaining interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicate that prophylactic and bubble CPAP may provide some benefit by reducing treatment failure compared to other pressure sources. The safety and efficacy of other management interventions for RDS, AOP, BPD, MAS, and TTN remains uncertain given limited evaluations in LMICs. Future research should conduct adequately powered trials in underrepresented LMIC regions, investigate long-term outcomes, and evaluate cost-effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142635155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Oviya Muralidharan, Sarah Rehman, Davneet Sihota, Leila Harrison, Tyler Vaivada, Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Introduction: Effective post-resuscitation care is crucial for improving outcomes in neonates post-asphyxia. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of post-asphyxial aftercare strategies and forms part of a supplement describing an extensive synthesis of effective newborn interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Methods: Evidence was generated by performing de novo reviews, updates to reviews via systematic searches, and reanalyses of studies conducted in LMICs from existing reviews.
Results: Sixty-one trials recruiting 5,046 term infants post-asphyxia were included across all intervention domains. Limited studies were available from LMICs related to fluid restriction, antiseizure medications, and early interventions to improve developmental outcomes. Our reanalysis of whole-body cooling trials in LMICs found effects on neonatal mortality and mortality or neurological disability in infancy differed significantly based on the care center and type of cooling device used. Pharmacological therapies for neuroprotection evaluated in 27 trials in middle-income countries had varied effects in neonates with encephalopathy. Majority of the trials (60%) focused on magnesium sulfate therapy and showed significant improvements in short-term mortality and morbidities.
Conclusion: The sample sizes of included trials were relatively small, and the certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Evidence on long-term survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes was limited. Further research on promising neuroprotective therapies and factors affecting their implementation in low-resource contexts is required. To reduce the high burden related to asphyxia in LMICs, this review underscores the need for a paradigm shift toward prevention, and strategies that emphasize improving antenatal and obstetric care.
{"title":"Post-Asphyxial Aftercare and Management of Neonates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Evidence Synthesis.","authors":"Oviya Muralidharan, Sarah Rehman, Davneet Sihota, Leila Harrison, Tyler Vaivada, Zulfiqar A Bhutta","doi":"10.1159/000541862","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541862","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Effective post-resuscitation care is crucial for improving outcomes in neonates post-asphyxia. This review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of post-asphyxial aftercare strategies and forms part of a supplement describing an extensive synthesis of effective newborn interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Evidence was generated by performing de novo reviews, updates to reviews via systematic searches, and reanalyses of studies conducted in LMICs from existing reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-one trials recruiting 5,046 term infants post-asphyxia were included across all intervention domains. Limited studies were available from LMICs related to fluid restriction, antiseizure medications, and early interventions to improve developmental outcomes. Our reanalysis of whole-body cooling trials in LMICs found effects on neonatal mortality and mortality or neurological disability in infancy differed significantly based on the care center and type of cooling device used. Pharmacological therapies for neuroprotection evaluated in 27 trials in middle-income countries had varied effects in neonates with encephalopathy. Majority of the trials (60%) focused on magnesium sulfate therapy and showed significant improvements in short-term mortality and morbidities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The sample sizes of included trials were relatively small, and the certainty of evidence ranged from very low to moderate. Evidence on long-term survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes was limited. Further research on promising neuroprotective therapies and factors affecting their implementation in low-resource contexts is required. To reduce the high burden related to asphyxia in LMICs, this review underscores the need for a paradigm shift toward prevention, and strategies that emphasize improving antenatal and obstetric care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142635121","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Lily F Roberts, Libby G Lord, Caroline A Crowther, Jane E Harding, Luling Lin
Introduction: Hypoglycaemic neonates are usually admitted to neonatal intensive care for intravenous (IV) dextrose infusion if increased feeding and dextrose gel fail to restore normoglycaemia. However, the effectiveness of this intervention is uncertain. This review aimed to assess the evidence for the risks and benefits of IV dextrose for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia.
Methods: Four databases and three clinical trial registries were searched from inception to October 5, 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised studies of interventions, cohort studies, and before and after studies were considered for inclusion without language or publication date restrictions. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool or Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Meta-analysis was planned but not carried out due to insufficient data.
Results: Across 6 studies (two RCTs and four cohort), 711 participants were included. Evidence from one cohort study suggests IV dextrose treatment may not be associated with neurodevelopmental impairment at ≥18 months of age (no effect numbers, p > 0.2; very low certainty evidence; 60 infants). Evidence from one RCT suggests IV dextrose treatment may reduce the likelihood of repeated hypoglycaemia (risk ratio [RR]: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.20, 2.18], p = 0.5; low certainty evidence; 80 infants) compared to treatment with oral sucrose bolus. However, the risk of a hyperglycaemic episode may be increased (RR: 2.33 [95% CI: 0.65, 8.39], p = 0.19; 80 infants).
Conclusion: More evidence is needed to clarify the benefits and risks of IV dextrose for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia.
{"title":"Intravenous Dextrose for the Treatment of Neonatal Hypoglycaemia: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Lily F Roberts, Libby G Lord, Caroline A Crowther, Jane E Harding, Luling Lin","doi":"10.1159/000541471","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541471","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypoglycaemic neonates are usually admitted to neonatal intensive care for intravenous (IV) dextrose infusion if increased feeding and dextrose gel fail to restore normoglycaemia. However, the effectiveness of this intervention is uncertain. This review aimed to assess the evidence for the risks and benefits of IV dextrose for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases and three clinical trial registries were searched from inception to October 5, 2023. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomised studies of interventions, cohort studies, and before and after studies were considered for inclusion without language or publication date restrictions. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's Risk of Bias 2 tool or Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Meta-analysis was planned but not carried out due to insufficient data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 6 studies (two RCTs and four cohort), 711 participants were included. Evidence from one cohort study suggests IV dextrose treatment may not be associated with neurodevelopmental impairment at ≥18 months of age (no effect numbers, p > 0.2; very low certainty evidence; 60 infants). Evidence from one RCT suggests IV dextrose treatment may reduce the likelihood of repeated hypoglycaemia (risk ratio [RR]: 0.67 [95% CI: 0.20, 2.18], p = 0.5; low certainty evidence; 80 infants) compared to treatment with oral sucrose bolus. However, the risk of a hyperglycaemic episode may be increased (RR: 2.33 [95% CI: 0.65, 8.39], p = 0.19; 80 infants).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>More evidence is needed to clarify the benefits and risks of IV dextrose for treatment of neonatal hypoglycaemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142635118","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Li Jiang, Georgia Dominguez, Aoife Cummins, Oviya Muralidharan, Leila Harrison, Tyler Vaivada, Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Background: Several interventions provided to newborns at birth or within 24 h after birth have been proven critical in improving neonatal survival and other birth outcomes. We aimed to provide an update on the effectiveness and safety of these interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
Summary: Following a comprehensive scoping of the literature, we updated or re-analyzed the LMIC-specific evidence for included topics. Ninety-four LMIC studies were identified. Delayed cord clamping with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping resulted in a lower risk of blood transfusion in newborns <32-34 gestational weeks and a lower occurrence of anemia in term newborns but did not have significant effect on neonatal mortality or other common morbidities both in preterm and term newborns. Immediate thermal care using plastic wrap/bag led to a 38% lower risk of hypothermia and a higher axillary temperature in preterm newborns without increasing the risk of hyperthermia. Kangaroo mother care initiated immediately (iKMC) or early after birth (eKMC, within 24 h) significantly reduced neonatal mortality and the occurrence of hypothermia in preterm or low-birth-weight neonates. For delayed first bath in newborns, no pooled estimate was generated due to high heterogeneity of included studies. Trials from high-income countries demonstrated anti-D's effectiveness in lowering the incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunization in subsequent pregnancy if given within 72 h postpartum.
Key messages: We generated the most updated LMIC evidence for several immediate newborn care interventions. Despite their effectiveness and safety in improving some of the neonatal outcomes, further high-quality trials are necessary.
{"title":"Immediate Care for Common Conditions in Term and Preterm Neonates: The Evidence.","authors":"Li Jiang, Georgia Dominguez, Aoife Cummins, Oviya Muralidharan, Leila Harrison, Tyler Vaivada, Zulfiqar A Bhutta","doi":"10.1159/000541037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several interventions provided to newborns at birth or within 24 h after birth have been proven critical in improving neonatal survival and other birth outcomes. We aimed to provide an update on the effectiveness and safety of these interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Following a comprehensive scoping of the literature, we updated or re-analyzed the LMIC-specific evidence for included topics. Ninety-four LMIC studies were identified. Delayed cord clamping with immediate neonatal care after cord clamping resulted in a lower risk of blood transfusion in newborns <32-34 gestational weeks and a lower occurrence of anemia in term newborns but did not have significant effect on neonatal mortality or other common morbidities both in preterm and term newborns. Immediate thermal care using plastic wrap/bag led to a 38% lower risk of hypothermia and a higher axillary temperature in preterm newborns without increasing the risk of hyperthermia. Kangaroo mother care initiated immediately (iKMC) or early after birth (eKMC, within 24 h) significantly reduced neonatal mortality and the occurrence of hypothermia in preterm or low-birth-weight neonates. For delayed first bath in newborns, no pooled estimate was generated due to high heterogeneity of included studies. Trials from high-income countries demonstrated anti-D's effectiveness in lowering the incidence of Rhesus D alloimmunization in subsequent pregnancy if given within 72 h postpartum.</p><p><strong>Key messages: </strong>We generated the most updated LMIC evidence for several immediate newborn care interventions. Despite their effectiveness and safety in improving some of the neonatal outcomes, further high-quality trials are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142635110","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Rachel Lee Him, Sarah Rehman, Davneet Sihota, Rahima Yasin, Maha Azhar, Taleaa Masroor, Hamna Amir Naseem, Laiba Masood, Sawera Hanif, Leila Harrison, Tyler Vaivada, M Jeeva Sankar, Angela Dramowski, Susan E Coffin, Davidson H Hamer, Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Introduction: We present a robust and up-to-date synthesis of evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to prevent and treat newborn infections in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Newborn infection prevention interventions included strategies to reduce antimicrobial resistance (AMR), prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), clean birth kits (CBKs), chlorhexidine cleansing, topical emollients, and probiotic and synbiotic supplementation. Interventions to treat suspected neonatal infections included prophylactic systemic antifungal agents and community-based antibiotic delivery for possible serious bacterial infections (PSBIs).
Methods: A descriptive review combining different methodological approaches was conducted. To provide the most suitable recommendations for real-world implementation, our analyses considered the impact of these interventions within three distinct health settings: facility, mixed, and community.
Results: In facility settings, the strongest evidence supported the implementation of multimodal stewardship interventions for AMR reduction and device-associated infection prevention bundles for HAI prevention. Emollients in preterm newborns reduced the risk of invasive infection compared to routine skin care. Probiotics in preterm newborns reduced neonatal mortality, invasive infection, and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) risks compared to standard care or placebo. There was insufficient evidence for synbiotics and prophylactic systemic antifungals in LMICs. In mixed settings, CBKs reduced neonatal mortality risk compared to standard care. In community settings, chlorhexidine umbilical cord cleansing reduced omphalitis risk compared to dry cord care. For the treatment of PSBIs, purely domiciliary-based antibiotic delivery reduced the risk of all-cause neonatal mortality when compared to the standard hospital referral.
Conclusion: Strategies for preventing HAIs and reducing AMR in healthcare facilities should be multimodal, and strategy selection should consider the feasibility of integration within existing newborn care programs. Probiotics are effective for facility-based use in preterm newborns; however, the establishment of high-quality, cost-effective mass production of standardized formulations is needed. Chlorhexidine cord cleansing is effective in community settings to prevent omphalitis in contexts where unhygienic cord applications are prevalent. Community-based antibiotic delivery of simplified regimens for PSBIs is a safe alternative when hospital-based care in LMICs is not possible or is declined by parents. More randomized trial evidence is needed to establish the effectiveness of CBKs, emollients, synbiotics, and prophylactic systemic antifungals in LMICs.
导言:我们对中低收入国家(LMICs)预防和治疗新生儿感染干预措施的有效性进行了可靠的最新证据综述。新生儿感染预防干预措施包括减少抗菌素耐药性(AMR)的策略、预防医疗保健相关感染(HAI)、清洁分娩包(CBK)、洗必泰清洁、局部润肤以及补充益生菌和合成益生菌。治疗疑似新生儿感染的干预措施包括预防性全身抗真菌剂和针对可能的严重细菌感染(PSBIs)的社区抗生素递送:方法:结合不同的方法论进行了描述性综述。为了给现实世界的实施提供最合适的建议,我们的分析考虑了这些干预措施在设施、混合和社区三种不同卫生环境中的影响:结果:在医疗机构中,最有力的证据支持实施多模式管理干预措施以减少AMR,支持实施器械相关感染预防捆绑措施以预防HAI。与常规皮肤护理相比,早产新生儿使用润肤剂可降低侵入性感染的风险。与标准护理或安慰剂相比,早产新生儿使用益生菌可降低新生儿死亡率、侵入性感染和坏死性小肠结肠炎(NEC)的风险。在低收入和中等收入国家,合成益生菌和预防性全身抗真菌药物的证据不足。在混合环境中,与标准护理相比,CBK 可降低新生儿死亡风险。在社区环境中,与干脐带护理相比,洗必泰脐带清洁可降低脐炎风险。在治疗PSBIs方面,与标准的医院转诊相比,单纯的家庭抗生素给药降低了新生儿全因死亡的风险:结论:医疗机构预防 HAIs 和减少 AMR 的策略应该是多模式的,选择策略时应考虑与现有新生儿护理计划整合的可行性。益生菌对早产新生儿在医疗机构中的使用是有效的;但是,需要建立高质量、高成本效益的标准化制剂批量生产体系。洗必泰脐带清洁剂在社区环境中可有效预防脐带感染。在低收入和中等收入国家,如果无法提供医院护理或家长拒绝提供医院护理,那么在社区提供治疗 PSBIs 的简化抗生素治疗方案是一种安全的替代方法。需要更多的随机试验证据来确定 CBK、润肤剂、合成益生菌和预防性全身抗真菌药物在低收入和中等收入国家的有效性。
{"title":"Prevention and Treatment of Neonatal Infections in Facility and Community Settings of Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Descriptive Review.","authors":"Rachel Lee Him, Sarah Rehman, Davneet Sihota, Rahima Yasin, Maha Azhar, Taleaa Masroor, Hamna Amir Naseem, Laiba Masood, Sawera Hanif, Leila Harrison, Tyler Vaivada, M Jeeva Sankar, Angela Dramowski, Susan E Coffin, Davidson H Hamer, Zulfiqar A Bhutta","doi":"10.1159/000541871","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541871","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We present a robust and up-to-date synthesis of evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to prevent and treat newborn infections in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Newborn infection prevention interventions included strategies to reduce antimicrobial resistance (AMR), prevention of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), clean birth kits (CBKs), chlorhexidine cleansing, topical emollients, and probiotic and synbiotic supplementation. Interventions to treat suspected neonatal infections included prophylactic systemic antifungal agents and community-based antibiotic delivery for possible serious bacterial infections (PSBIs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive review combining different methodological approaches was conducted. To provide the most suitable recommendations for real-world implementation, our analyses considered the impact of these interventions within three distinct health settings: facility, mixed, and community.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In facility settings, the strongest evidence supported the implementation of multimodal stewardship interventions for AMR reduction and device-associated infection prevention bundles for HAI prevention. Emollients in preterm newborns reduced the risk of invasive infection compared to routine skin care. Probiotics in preterm newborns reduced neonatal mortality, invasive infection, and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) risks compared to standard care or placebo. There was insufficient evidence for synbiotics and prophylactic systemic antifungals in LMICs. In mixed settings, CBKs reduced neonatal mortality risk compared to standard care. In community settings, chlorhexidine umbilical cord cleansing reduced omphalitis risk compared to dry cord care. For the treatment of PSBIs, purely domiciliary-based antibiotic delivery reduced the risk of all-cause neonatal mortality when compared to the standard hospital referral.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Strategies for preventing HAIs and reducing AMR in healthcare facilities should be multimodal, and strategy selection should consider the feasibility of integration within existing newborn care programs. Probiotics are effective for facility-based use in preterm newborns; however, the establishment of high-quality, cost-effective mass production of standardized formulations is needed. Chlorhexidine cord cleansing is effective in community settings to prevent omphalitis in contexts where unhygienic cord applications are prevalent. Community-based antibiotic delivery of simplified regimens for PSBIs is a safe alternative when hospital-based care in LMICs is not possible or is declined by parents. More randomized trial evidence is needed to establish the effectiveness of CBKs, emollients, synbiotics, and prophylactic systemic antifungals in LMICs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142635137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Christian A Maiwald, Christian F Poets, Axel R Franz
{"title":"Response to Härtel et al. \"Less Invasive Surfactant Administration for Preterm Infants - State of the Art\".","authors":"Christian A Maiwald, Christian F Poets, Axel R Franz","doi":"10.1159/000542538","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542538","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142635141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Daniel O'Reilly, Charlotte Jones, Aisling Smith, David Mackin, Laura Mc Donald, John Quinn, Maeve O'Reilly, Aisling M Flinn, Ronan Leahy, David Williams, Jennifer Donnelly, David Corcoran
Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-Ts) targeting CD19 represent a significant advance in treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. Although a significant minority of recipients are women during their reproductive years, there is a paucity of data regarding pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women previously treated with CAR-T. This is important as maternal T cells are known to cross the placenta and into breastmilk during pregnancy and breastfeeding, respectively.
Case presentation: Here we present two successful pregnancies following CAR-T therapy where both neonates were initially breastfed. These represent the first cases of neonates born following CAR-T therapy comprehensively described in medical literature.
Conclusion: Pregnancy following CAR-T therapy does not appear to be associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Further work is required to delineate the outcomes in this population.
简介以 CD19 为靶点的嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞(CAR-T)是治疗复发/难治性 B 细胞恶性肿瘤患者的一大进步。虽然有相当一部分接受者是育龄期妇女,但有关曾接受过 CAR-T 治疗的妇女的妊娠和新生儿预后的数据却很少。这一点非常重要,因为众所周知,母体 T 细胞会在妊娠和哺乳期间分别穿过胎盘和进入母乳:在此,我们介绍了两例在接受 CAR-T 治疗后成功怀孕的病例,这两例病例的新生儿最初都是母乳喂养。这些病例是医学文献中全面描述的第一例接受 CAR-T 疗法后出生的新生儿:结论:CAR-T疗法后妊娠似乎与新生儿不良结局无关。结论:CAR-T疗法后妊娠似乎与新生儿的不良预后无关。
{"title":"Neonatal Outcomes following 2 Cases of Maternal CAR-T Therapy for High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma.","authors":"Daniel O'Reilly, Charlotte Jones, Aisling Smith, David Mackin, Laura Mc Donald, John Quinn, Maeve O'Reilly, Aisling M Flinn, Ronan Leahy, David Williams, Jennifer Donnelly, David Corcoran","doi":"10.1159/000542016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542016","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-Ts) targeting CD19 represent a significant advance in treatment for patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies. Although a significant minority of recipients are women during their reproductive years, there is a paucity of data regarding pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women previously treated with CAR-T. This is important as maternal T cells are known to cross the placenta and into breastmilk during pregnancy and breastfeeding, respectively.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>Here we present two successful pregnancies following CAR-T therapy where both neonates were initially breastfed. These represent the first cases of neonates born following CAR-T therapy comprehensively described in medical literature.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnancy following CAR-T therapy does not appear to be associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Further work is required to delineate the outcomes in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142607632","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Srirupa Hari Gopal, Robert Tillman, James D Hammond Ii, Joseph L Hagan, Sharada H Gowda, Nidhy P Varghese, Caraciolo J Fernandes
Introduction: While a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) helps offload the right ventricle in the acute congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH)-associated pulmonary hypertension, its role on long-term outcomes in CDH has not been investigated. Our objective was to examine associations of the PDA with long-term clinical outcomes in CDH.
Methods: A single-center retrospective descriptive study of 122 CDH patients dichotomized by duration with PDA, as ≤14 versus >14 postnatal days (PND) and ≤30 versus >30 PND. Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were used for analyses.
Results: In unadjusted and adjusted for CDH severity comparisons, patients with PDA >14 PND and >30 PND had a higher risk of death, longer length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and need for tracheostomy, diuretics, and PH medications at discharge.
Conclusion: A PDA beyond the newborn period is associated with adverse outcomes in infants with CDH.
{"title":"Association between Time with Open Ductus Arteriosus and Outcomes in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.","authors":"Srirupa Hari Gopal, Robert Tillman, James D Hammond Ii, Joseph L Hagan, Sharada H Gowda, Nidhy P Varghese, Caraciolo J Fernandes","doi":"10.1159/000541385","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541385","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) helps offload the right ventricle in the acute congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH)-associated pulmonary hypertension, its role on long-term outcomes in CDH has not been investigated. Our objective was to examine associations of the PDA with long-term clinical outcomes in CDH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective descriptive study of 122 CDH patients dichotomized by duration with PDA, as ≤14 versus >14 postnatal days (PND) and ≤30 versus >30 PND. Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and multiple linear and logistic regression analyses were used for analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In unadjusted and adjusted for CDH severity comparisons, patients with PDA >14 PND and >30 PND had a higher risk of death, longer length of stay, mechanical ventilation duration, and need for tracheostomy, diuretics, and PH medications at discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A PDA beyond the newborn period is associated with adverse outcomes in infants with CDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142592337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Chiara Poggi, Davide Sarcina, Francesca Miselli, Martina Ciarcià, Carlo Dani
Introduction: Neonatal sequential organ failure assessment (nSOFA) score predicts mortality in preterm newborns. The aim of the study was to assess whether nSOFA score could predict respiratory outcomes in preterm infants with late-onset sepsis (LOS).
Methods: This retrospective, observational, single-center study enrolled infants with gestational age <32 weeks born between January 2016 and June 2023 who experienced an episode of LOS during NICU stay. The primary outcome was death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD); secondary outcomes were BPD, death or mechanical ventilation (MV) on day 5 after the onset of LOS, and MV on day 5 after the onset of LOS. The nSOFA score was assessed at the onset of LOS and after 6 ± 1, 12 ± 3, and 24 ± 3 h.
Results: Neonatal SOFA score was significantly higher in patients who developed each outcome versus those who did not at all timings. Maximal nSOFA score during the first 24 h after onset of LOS was an independent predictive factor for death or BPD (p = 0.007), BPD (p = 0.009), and death or MV on day 5 (p = 0.009), areas under the curve (AUC) were 0.740 (95% CI: 0.656-0.828), 0.700 (95% CI: 0.602-0.800), and 0.800 (95% CI: 0.710-0.889), respectively. Maximal nSOFA score also predicted moderate to severe BPD (p = 0.019) and death or moderate to severe BPD (p < 0.001). Maximal nSOFA ≥4 was associated with odds ratio (OR) of 7.37 (95% CI: 2.42-22.44) for death or BPD, 4.86 (95% CI: 1.54-15.28) for BPD, and 7.99 (95% CI: 3.47-18.36) for death or MV on day 5. AUC of the predicting model was 0.895 (95% CI: 0.801-0.928) for BPD, 0.897 (95% CI: 0.830-0.939) for death or BPD, 0.904 (95% CI: 0.851-0.956) for MV on day 5, 0.923 (95% CI: 0.892-0.973) for death or MV on day 5.
Conclusion: Maximal nSOFA score during the first 24 h after the onset of LOS predicts respiratory outcomes and allows identification of patients who may crucially benefit from lung-protective measures.
{"title":"Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Predicts Respiratory Outcomes in Preterm Newborns with Late-Onset Sepsis: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Chiara Poggi, Davide Sarcina, Francesca Miselli, Martina Ciarcià, Carlo Dani","doi":"10.1159/000539526","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539526","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neonatal sequential organ failure assessment (nSOFA) score predicts mortality in preterm newborns. The aim of the study was to assess whether nSOFA score could predict respiratory outcomes in preterm infants with late-onset sepsis (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational, single-center study enrolled infants with gestational age <32 weeks born between January 2016 and June 2023 who experienced an episode of LOS during NICU stay. The primary outcome was death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD); secondary outcomes were BPD, death or mechanical ventilation (MV) on day 5 after the onset of LOS, and MV on day 5 after the onset of LOS. The nSOFA score was assessed at the onset of LOS and after 6 ± 1, 12 ± 3, and 24 ± 3 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neonatal SOFA score was significantly higher in patients who developed each outcome versus those who did not at all timings. Maximal nSOFA score during the first 24 h after onset of LOS was an independent predictive factor for death or BPD (p = 0.007), BPD (p = 0.009), and death or MV on day 5 (p = 0.009), areas under the curve (AUC) were 0.740 (95% CI: 0.656-0.828), 0.700 (95% CI: 0.602-0.800), and 0.800 (95% CI: 0.710-0.889), respectively. Maximal nSOFA score also predicted moderate to severe BPD (p = 0.019) and death or moderate to severe BPD (p < 0.001). Maximal nSOFA ≥4 was associated with odds ratio (OR) of 7.37 (95% CI: 2.42-22.44) for death or BPD, 4.86 (95% CI: 1.54-15.28) for BPD, and 7.99 (95% CI: 3.47-18.36) for death or MV on day 5. AUC of the predicting model was 0.895 (95% CI: 0.801-0.928) for BPD, 0.897 (95% CI: 0.830-0.939) for death or BPD, 0.904 (95% CI: 0.851-0.956) for MV on day 5, 0.923 (95% CI: 0.892-0.973) for death or MV on day 5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maximal nSOFA score during the first 24 h after the onset of LOS predicts respiratory outcomes and allows identification of patients who may crucially benefit from lung-protective measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142584630","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}