Are we done with (Wordy) manifestos? Towards an introverted digital humanism

Giacomo Pezzano
{"title":"Are we done with (Wordy) manifestos? Towards an introverted digital humanism","authors":"Giacomo Pezzano","doi":"10.1016/j.jrt.2024.100078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Beginning with a reconstruction of the anthropological paradigms underlying <em>The Vienna Manifesto</em> and <em>The Onlife Manifesto</em> (§ 1.1), this paper distinguishes between two possible approaches to digital humanism: an <em>extroverted</em> one, principally engaged in finding a way to humanize digital technologies, and an <em>introverted</em> one, pointing instead attention to how digital technologies can re-humanize us, particularly our “mindframe” (§ 1.2). On this basis, I stress that if we take seriously the consequences of the “mediatic turn”, according to which human reason is finally recognized as mediatically contingent (§ 2.1), then we should accept that just as the book created the poietic context for the development of traditional humanism and its “bookish” idea of private and public reason, so too digital psycho-technologies today provide the conditions for the rise of a new humanism (§ 2.2). I then discuss the possible humanizing potential of digital simulated worlds: I compare the symbolic-reconstructive mindset to the sensorimotor mindset (§ 3.1), and I highlight their respective mediological association with the book and the video game, advocating for the peculiar thinking and reasoning affordances now offered by the new digital psycho-technologies (§ 3.2).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of responsible technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659624000040/pdfft?md5=bba4bc77d24cfec45f135507bd575f96&pid=1-s2.0-S2666659624000040-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of responsible technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659624000040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beginning with a reconstruction of the anthropological paradigms underlying The Vienna Manifesto and The Onlife Manifesto (§ 1.1), this paper distinguishes between two possible approaches to digital humanism: an extroverted one, principally engaged in finding a way to humanize digital technologies, and an introverted one, pointing instead attention to how digital technologies can re-humanize us, particularly our “mindframe” (§ 1.2). On this basis, I stress that if we take seriously the consequences of the “mediatic turn”, according to which human reason is finally recognized as mediatically contingent (§ 2.1), then we should accept that just as the book created the poietic context for the development of traditional humanism and its “bookish” idea of private and public reason, so too digital psycho-technologies today provide the conditions for the rise of a new humanism (§ 2.2). I then discuss the possible humanizing potential of digital simulated worlds: I compare the symbolic-reconstructive mindset to the sensorimotor mindset (§ 3.1), and I highlight their respective mediological association with the book and the video game, advocating for the peculiar thinking and reasoning affordances now offered by the new digital psycho-technologies (§ 3.2).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们的(文字)宣言写完了吗?走向内敛的数字人文主义
本文首先重构了《维也纳宣言》和《我们的生活宣言》所依据的人类学范式(§ 1.1),然后区分了数字人文主义的两种可能方法:一种是外向型方法,主要致力于找到使数字技术人性化的途径;另一种是内向型方法,关注数字技术如何重新使我们人性化,尤其是我们的 "思维框架"(§ 1.2)。在此基础上,我强调,如果我们认真对待 "媒介转向 "的后果,即人类理性最终被承认为媒介上的偶然性(§ 2.1),那么我们就应该承认,正如书籍为传统人文主义及其 "书本式 "的私人和公共理性思想的发展创造了诗意的背景,今天的数字心理技术也为新人文主义的兴起提供了条件(§ 2.2)。然后,我讨论了数字模拟世界可能具有的人性化潜能:我将符号--建构思维方式与感觉运动思维方式进行了比较(§ 3.1),并强调了它们各自与书籍和电子游戏之间的媒介关联,倡导新的数字心理技术现在所提供的特殊思维和推理能力(§ 3.2)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of responsible technology
Journal of responsible technology Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
168 days
期刊最新文献
Start doing the right thing: Indicators for socially responsible start-ups and investors Virtual Social Labs – Requirements and Challenges for Effective Team Collaboration A call to action: Designing a more transparent online world for children and young people Embedding responsible innovation into R&D practices: A case study of socially assistive robot development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1