Profiles of mathematical deficits in children with dyslexia.

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH npj Science of Learning Pub Date : 2024-02-15 DOI:10.1038/s41539-024-00217-x
B Pedemonte, C W Pereira, V Borghesani, M Ebbert, I E Allen, P Pinheiro-Chagas, J De Leon, Z Miller, B L Tee, M L Gorno-Tempini
{"title":"Profiles of mathematical deficits in children with dyslexia.","authors":"B Pedemonte, C W Pereira, V Borghesani, M Ebbert, I E Allen, P Pinheiro-Chagas, J De Leon, Z Miller, B L Tee, M L Gorno-Tempini","doi":"10.1038/s41539-024-00217-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite a high rate of concurrent mathematical difficulties among children with dyslexia, we still have limited information regarding the prevalence and severity of mathematical deficits in this population. To address this gap, we developed a comprehensive battery of cognitive tests, known as the UCSF Mathematical Cognition Battery (MCB), with the aim of identifying deficits in four distinct mathematical domains: number processing, arithmetical procedures, arithmetic facts retrieval, and geometrical abilities. The mathematical abilities of a cohort of 75 children referred to the UCSF Dyslexia Center with a diagnosis of dyslexia, along with 18 typically developing controls aged 7 to 16, were initially evaluated using a behavioral neurology approach. A team of professional clinicians classified the 75 children with dyslexia into five groups, based on parents' and teachers' reported symptoms and clinical history. These groups included children with no mathematical deficits and children with mathematical deficits in number processing, arithmetical procedures, arithmetic facts retrieval, or geometrical abilities. Subsequently, the children underwent evaluation using the MCB to determine concordance with the clinicians' impressions. Additionally, neuropsychological and cognitive standardized tests were administered. Our study reveals that within a cohort of children with dyslexia, 66% exhibit mathematical deficits, and among those with mathematical deficits, there is heterogeneity in the nature of these deficits. If these findings are confirmed in larger samples, they can potentially pave the way for new diagnostic approaches, consistent subtype classification, and, ultimately personalized interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48503,"journal":{"name":"npj Science of Learning","volume":"9 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10869821/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Science of Learning","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00217-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite a high rate of concurrent mathematical difficulties among children with dyslexia, we still have limited information regarding the prevalence and severity of mathematical deficits in this population. To address this gap, we developed a comprehensive battery of cognitive tests, known as the UCSF Mathematical Cognition Battery (MCB), with the aim of identifying deficits in four distinct mathematical domains: number processing, arithmetical procedures, arithmetic facts retrieval, and geometrical abilities. The mathematical abilities of a cohort of 75 children referred to the UCSF Dyslexia Center with a diagnosis of dyslexia, along with 18 typically developing controls aged 7 to 16, were initially evaluated using a behavioral neurology approach. A team of professional clinicians classified the 75 children with dyslexia into five groups, based on parents' and teachers' reported symptoms and clinical history. These groups included children with no mathematical deficits and children with mathematical deficits in number processing, arithmetical procedures, arithmetic facts retrieval, or geometrical abilities. Subsequently, the children underwent evaluation using the MCB to determine concordance with the clinicians' impressions. Additionally, neuropsychological and cognitive standardized tests were administered. Our study reveals that within a cohort of children with dyslexia, 66% exhibit mathematical deficits, and among those with mathematical deficits, there is heterogeneity in the nature of these deficits. If these findings are confirmed in larger samples, they can potentially pave the way for new diagnostic approaches, consistent subtype classification, and, ultimately personalized interventions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阅读障碍儿童的数学缺陷概况。
尽管阅读障碍儿童中并发数学困难的比例很高,但我们对这一人群中数学缺陷的发生率和严重程度的了解仍然有限。为了弥补这一不足,我们开发了一套全面的认知测试,即加州大学旧金山分校数学认知测试(MCB),旨在识别四个不同数学领域的缺陷:数字处理、计算程序、算术事实检索和几何能力。我们采用行为神经学方法对 75 名转诊到加州大学旧金山分校阅读障碍中心并被诊断为阅读障碍的儿童以及 18 名 7-16 岁发育正常的对照组儿童的数学能力进行了初步评估。一个由专业临床医生组成的团队根据家长和教师报告的症状和临床病史,将 75 名患有阅读障碍的儿童分为五组。这些组别包括没有数学缺陷的儿童和在数字处理、算术程序、算术事实检索或几何能力方面有数学缺陷的儿童。随后,这些儿童接受了 MCB 评估,以确定与临床医生的印象是否一致。此外,还进行了神经心理学和认知能力标准化测试。我们的研究表明,在患有阅读障碍的儿童中,有 66% 存在数学缺陷,而在存在数学缺陷的儿童中,这些缺陷的性质存在差异。如果这些发现能在更大的样本中得到证实,就有可能为新的诊断方法、一致的亚型分类以及最终的个性化干预铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Feature versus object in interpreting working memory capacity. Mathematics interest, self-efficacy, and anxiety predict STEM career choice in emerging adulthood. Enhancing mathematical learning outcomes through a low-cost single-channel BCI system. Targeted memory reactivation with sleep disruption does not weaken week-old memories. A transient memory lapse in humans 1-3 h after training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1