Longhui Zhao , Meihua Zhang , Yuanyu Qin , Tongliang Wang , Xiaofei Zhai , Jianguo Cui , Jichao Wang
{"title":"Auditory sensitivity and tympanic middle ear in a vocal and a non-vocal frog","authors":"Longhui Zhao , Meihua Zhang , Yuanyu Qin , Tongliang Wang , Xiaofei Zhai , Jianguo Cui , Jichao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2024.108970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The tympanic middle ear is important for anuran hearing on land. However, many species have partly or entirely lost their tympanic apparatus. Previous studies have compared hearing sensitivities in species that possess and lack tympanic membranes capable of sound production and acoustic communication. However, little is known about how these hearing abilities are comparable to those of mutant species. Here, we compared the eardrum and middle ear anatomies of two sympatric sibling species from a noisy stream habitat, namely the “non-vocal” Hainan torrent frog (<em>Amolops hainanensis</em>) and the “vocal” little torrent frog (<em>Amolops torrentis</em>), the latter of which is capable of acoustic communication. Our results showed that the relative (to head size) eardrum diameter of <em>A. hainanensis</em> was smaller than that of <em>A. torrentis</em>, although the absolute size was not smaller. Unlike <em>A. torrentis</em>, the tympanic membrane area of <em>A. hainanensis</em> was not clearly differentiated from the surrounding skin. The middle ear, however, was well-developed in both species. We measured the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) of <em>A. hainanensis</em> and compared the ABR thresholds and latencies to those previously obtained for <em>A. torrentis</em>. Our results suggested that these two species exhibited significant differences in hearing sensitivity. <em>A. hainanensis</em> (smaller relative eardrum, nonvocal) had higher ABR thresholds and longer initial response times than <em>A. torrentis</em> (larger relative eardrum, vocal) at lower frequencies. Neurophysiological responses from the brain were obtained for tone pips between 800 Hz and 7,000 Hz, with peak sensitivities found at 3,000 Hz (73 dB SPL) for <em>A. hainanensis</em>, and at 1,800 Hz (61 dB SPL) for <em>A. torrentis</em>. Our results suggest that the non-vocal <em>A. hainanensis</em> has lower hearing sensitivity than its vocal sister species (i.e., <em>A. torrentis</em>), which may be related to differences in tympanic or inner ear structure and morphology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"444 ","pages":"Article 108970"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595524000236","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The tympanic middle ear is important for anuran hearing on land. However, many species have partly or entirely lost their tympanic apparatus. Previous studies have compared hearing sensitivities in species that possess and lack tympanic membranes capable of sound production and acoustic communication. However, little is known about how these hearing abilities are comparable to those of mutant species. Here, we compared the eardrum and middle ear anatomies of two sympatric sibling species from a noisy stream habitat, namely the “non-vocal” Hainan torrent frog (Amolops hainanensis) and the “vocal” little torrent frog (Amolops torrentis), the latter of which is capable of acoustic communication. Our results showed that the relative (to head size) eardrum diameter of A. hainanensis was smaller than that of A. torrentis, although the absolute size was not smaller. Unlike A. torrentis, the tympanic membrane area of A. hainanensis was not clearly differentiated from the surrounding skin. The middle ear, however, was well-developed in both species. We measured the auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) of A. hainanensis and compared the ABR thresholds and latencies to those previously obtained for A. torrentis. Our results suggested that these two species exhibited significant differences in hearing sensitivity. A. hainanensis (smaller relative eardrum, nonvocal) had higher ABR thresholds and longer initial response times than A. torrentis (larger relative eardrum, vocal) at lower frequencies. Neurophysiological responses from the brain were obtained for tone pips between 800 Hz and 7,000 Hz, with peak sensitivities found at 3,000 Hz (73 dB SPL) for A. hainanensis, and at 1,800 Hz (61 dB SPL) for A. torrentis. Our results suggest that the non-vocal A. hainanensis has lower hearing sensitivity than its vocal sister species (i.e., A. torrentis), which may be related to differences in tympanic or inner ear structure and morphology.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles.
Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.