Ban mining, ban dining? Re(examining) the policy and practice of ‘militarised conservationism’ on ASM operations

IF 3.6 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1016/j.exis.2024.101432
George Ofosu , Daniel Siaw , David Sarpong , Stephen Danquah
{"title":"Ban mining, ban dining? Re(examining) the policy and practice of ‘militarised conservationism’ on ASM operations","authors":"George Ofosu ,&nbsp;Daniel Siaw ,&nbsp;David Sarpong ,&nbsp;Stephen Danquah","doi":"10.1016/j.exis.2024.101432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) frontier continues to advance in most mineral-endowed countries due to rising unemployment and general economic decline particularly in rural communities. The sector, however, is often viewed in a negative light because it is highly environmentally destructive. In seeking to address the environmental challenges, many governments have, on occasion, actioned military strategies aimed at presenting facets of ‘sanitisation’ to a highly informal industry that has historically been tagged as an enemy of the environment. This study examines such ‘mining vs. environment’ discourses that have resulted in military crackdowns on ASM operations in parts of sub-Saharan Africa. Overall, the findings bust the ‘myth’ of the appropriateness of military interventions regarding ASM operations. Offering insights into the livelihood dimensions of ASM operations, we submit that our understanding of mining-ban failures can be assisted by an understanding of the broader geographical, socio-economic, technological, and institutional antecedents that combine to allow illegal mining operations to proliferate.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47848,"journal":{"name":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24000303/pdfft?md5=8dfb77a9aa470f759437f94bb4061986&pid=1-s2.0-S2214790X24000303-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Extractive Industries and Society-An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214790X24000303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The artisanal and small-scale mining (ASM) frontier continues to advance in most mineral-endowed countries due to rising unemployment and general economic decline particularly in rural communities. The sector, however, is often viewed in a negative light because it is highly environmentally destructive. In seeking to address the environmental challenges, many governments have, on occasion, actioned military strategies aimed at presenting facets of ‘sanitisation’ to a highly informal industry that has historically been tagged as an enemy of the environment. This study examines such ‘mining vs. environment’ discourses that have resulted in military crackdowns on ASM operations in parts of sub-Saharan Africa. Overall, the findings bust the ‘myth’ of the appropriateness of military interventions regarding ASM operations. Offering insights into the livelihood dimensions of ASM operations, we submit that our understanding of mining-ban failures can be assisted by an understanding of the broader geographical, socio-economic, technological, and institutional antecedents that combine to allow illegal mining operations to proliferate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
禁止采矿,禁止餐饮?重新审视个体和小型金矿开采活动中的 "军事化保护主义 "政策和做法
在大多数矿产资源丰富的国家,由于失业率上升和经济普遍衰退,特别是在农村社区,手工和小规模采矿(ASM)的前沿继续向前推进。然而,人们往往对该行业持负面看法,因为它对环境造成了严重破坏。为了应对环境挑战,许多国家的政府有时会采取军事战略,目的是对这个在历史上一直被视为环境公敌的高度非正规行业进行 "净化"。本研究探讨了在撒哈拉以南非洲部分地区导致对个体和小型金矿开采活动进行军事打击的 "采矿与环境 "论调。总体而言,研究结果打破了军事干预个体和小型金矿开采活动的 "神话"。我们对个体和小型金矿开采活动的生计层面提出了自己的见解,我们认为,我们对采矿禁令失败的理解可以通过对更广泛的地理、社会经济、技术和制度先决条件的理解来帮助,这些先决条件共同促成了非法采矿活动的扩散。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
19.40%
发文量
135
期刊最新文献
Gendered informal gold trading in Indonesia: Case studies from Central Kalimantan Will the EU have enough minerals to drive their electric dreams by 2030? Examining community desire to change for adaptive transition in post-mining ecological sustainability Participation of mining communities in the provision of public goods and services: Evidence from the Basket Fund project in Eastern DRC Mining struggles in north-central Mexico: Between mining tradition, poverty, and environmentalism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1