Comparative effectiveness of tofacitinib and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real-world practice: a prospective observational study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY Rheumatology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/rheumatology/keae109
Soo-Kyung Cho, Yeo-Jin Song, Hye Won Kim, Eunwoo Nam, Ja-Young Jeon, Hyun-Jeong Yoo, Yoon-Kyoung Sung
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of tofacitinib and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in real-world practice: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Soo-Kyung Cho, Yeo-Jin Song, Hye Won Kim, Eunwoo Nam, Ja-Young Jeon, Hyun-Jeong Yoo, Yoon-Kyoung Sung","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keae109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of tofacitinib vs TNF inhibitors (TNFis) in Korean patients with RA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study used data from a single academic referral hospital's registries of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib and examined remission rates based on the DAS28-ESR after 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for achieving remission with tofacitinib compared with TNFi, adjusting for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This analysis included 665 patients (200 on tofacitinib and 455 on TNFis) who were followed up for at least 12 months. Of these, 96 patients in the tofacitinib group (48.0%) and 409 patients in the TNFi group (89.9%) were treatment-naïve to bDMARDs. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant difference in the remission rates between the two groups (18.0% vs 19.6%, P = 0.640). Multivariable analysis demonstrated comparable remission rates with tofacitinib and TNFi (OR 1.204, 95% CI 0.720-2.013). In the subpopulation naïve to Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) and bDMARDs, tofacitinib showed better remission rates than TNFis (OR 1.867, 95% CI 1.033-3.377). Tofacitinib had more adverse events but similar rates of serious adverse events to TNFis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In real-world settings, there was no significant difference in remission rates at 12 months between the tofacitinib and TNFi groups. In terms of safety, tofacitinib exhibited a higher incidence of adverse events compared with TNFis, while the occurrence of serious adverse events was comparable between the groups.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02602704.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"541-547"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae109","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of tofacitinib vs TNF inhibitors (TNFis) in Korean patients with RA.

Methods: The study used data from a single academic referral hospital's registries of biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) and tofacitinib and examined remission rates based on the DAS28-ESR after 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for achieving remission with tofacitinib compared with TNFi, adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: This analysis included 665 patients (200 on tofacitinib and 455 on TNFis) who were followed up for at least 12 months. Of these, 96 patients in the tofacitinib group (48.0%) and 409 patients in the TNFi group (89.9%) were treatment-naïve to bDMARDs. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed no significant difference in the remission rates between the two groups (18.0% vs 19.6%, P = 0.640). Multivariable analysis demonstrated comparable remission rates with tofacitinib and TNFi (OR 1.204, 95% CI 0.720-2.013). In the subpopulation naïve to Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) and bDMARDs, tofacitinib showed better remission rates than TNFis (OR 1.867, 95% CI 1.033-3.377). Tofacitinib had more adverse events but similar rates of serious adverse events to TNFis.

Conclusion: In real-world settings, there was no significant difference in remission rates at 12 months between the tofacitinib and TNFi groups. In terms of safety, tofacitinib exhibited a higher incidence of adverse events compared with TNFis, while the occurrence of serious adverse events was comparable between the groups.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02602704.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
类风湿关节炎患者服用托法替尼和肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂在实际应用中的疗效比较:一项前瞻性观察研究。
目的评估托法替尼与肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFi)对韩国类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效:该研究使用了一家学术转诊医院的生物改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARDs)和托法替尼登记数据,并根据疾病活动评分(DAS)28-红细胞沉降率(ESR)对12个月后的缓解率进行了研究。多变量逻辑回归分析用于估算托法替尼与 TNFi 相比获得缓解的几率比(OR),并对潜在的混杂因素进行了调整:该分析纳入了随访至少12个月的665名患者(200名服用托法替尼,455名服用TNFi)。其中,96名托法替尼组患者(48.0%)和409名TNFi组患者(89.9%)对bDMARDs治疗无效。意向治疗分析显示,两组患者的缓解率无显著差异(18.0% vs 19.6%,P = 0.640)。多变量分析显示,托法替尼和 TNFi 的缓解率相当(OR 1.204,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.720-2.013)。在未使用 JAKi 和 bDMARD 的亚群中,托法替尼的缓解率高于 TNFi(OR 1.867,95% CI 1.033-3.377)。托法替尼的不良事件(AEs)较多,但严重不良事件(SAEs)发生率与TNFi相似:结论:在真实世界中,托法替尼组和TNFi组在12个月的缓解率上没有显著差异。在安全性方面,托法替尼的AE发生率高于TNFi,而SAE的发生率在两组之间不相上下:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,NCT02602704。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rheumatology
Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1091
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Rheumatology strives to support research and discovery by publishing the highest quality original scientific papers with a focus on basic, clinical and translational research. The journal’s subject areas cover a wide range of paediatric and adult rheumatological conditions from an international perspective. It is an official journal of the British Society for Rheumatology, published by Oxford University Press. Rheumatology publishes original articles, reviews, editorials, guidelines, concise reports, meta-analyses, original case reports, clinical vignettes, letters and matters arising from published material. The journal takes pride in serving the global rheumatology community, with a focus on high societal impact in the form of podcasts, videos and extended social media presence, and utilizing metrics such as Altmetric. Keep up to date by following the journal on Twitter @RheumJnl.
期刊最新文献
Treatment guidelines for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in adults: a comparative review Prevalence and clinical significance of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies in interstitial lung disease: A retrospective cohort study Abatacept and the risk of malignancy: a meta-analysis across disease indications Advancing treatment for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: insights into immune modulation by JAK inhibition. Efficacy of upadacitinib in treating a paediatric case of refractory Takayasu arteritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1