Objectives: Previous studies have identified unique challenges for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients of different genders, which impact disease management. However, the association between disease activity and healthcare-seeking behaviours in male and female RA patients remains underexplored. This study aimed to investigate this association, with a specific focus on the gender-specific effects of follow-up intervals on disease control.
Methods: A nationwide survey (July-September 2023) across 330 rheumatology centres in China included 13 278 female (83.85%) and 2,557 male RA patients (16.15%) aged ≥18 years. Standardized questionnaires captured demographic and healthcare-seeking behaviours. Disease activity was assessed using the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI).
Results: Females had younger disease onset (45.84 vs 51.03 years, p < 0.001), longer disease duration (7.51 vs 5.64 years, p < 0.001), higher low disease activity/clinical remission rates (22.61% vs 15.33%, p < 0.001), and lower glucocorticoid use (39.5% vs 47.73%, p < 0.001). Despite similar self-reported regular follow-up rates (84.73% vs 83.14%), both genders experienced suboptimal visit intervals (>3 months: 61.30% vs 62.65%, p < 0.001). Prolonged follow-up intervals were independently associated with poor disease control (CDAI > 10) in the female subgroup, with longer intervals linked to higher odds of inadequate control at 6-month (OR = 1.22, 95%CI : 1.09-1.37, p < 0.001) and 12-month intervals (OR = 1.43, 95%CI : 1.22-1.60, p < 0.001). Regular monitoring reduced high disease activity risk across genders (OR = 0.64, 95%CI : 0.56-0.74, p < 0.001). A generalized linear model showed no significant follow-up interval-gender interaction on disease activity (all p> 0.20).
Conclusion: This large-scale study reveals gender-dimorphic patterns in RA progression and healthcare engagement. Females tended to exhibit better treatment response, with a more pronounced interval-dependent disease control trend. No significant interval-gender interaction confirms this is a descriptive trend, not a validated gender-specific difference. Our findings emphasize the need for strategies accounting for such gender-dimorphic trends to optimize care continuity and improve RA management.
目的:先前的研究已经确定了不同性别的类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者的独特挑战,这影响了疾病的管理。然而,在男性和女性类风湿性关节炎患者中,疾病活动性和求医行为之间的关系仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在调查这种关联,特别关注随访间隔对疾病控制的性别特异性影响。方法:在中国330个风湿病中心进行全国性调查(2023年7月至9月),包括年龄≥18岁的13278名女性(83.85%)和2557名男性(16.15%)RA患者。标准化的调查问卷记录了人口统计和求医行为。采用临床疾病活动性指数(CDAI)评估疾病活动性。结果:女性亚组的发病年龄较年轻(45.84岁vs 51.03岁,p = 3个月;61.30% vs 62.65%, p = 10), 6个月时控制不足的几率较高(OR = 1.22, 95%CI: 1.09-1.37, p = 0.20)。结论:这项大规模研究揭示了RA进展和医疗保健参与的性别二态模式。女性倾向于表现出更好的治疗反应,具有更明显的间隔依赖疾病控制趋势。没有显著的性别间相互作用证实这是一种描述性趋势,而不是一种有效的性别差异。我们的研究结果强调需要考虑这种性别二态化趋势的策略,以优化护理连续性和改善RA管理。
{"title":"Gender-specific impact of follow-up intervals on disease control in rheumatoid arthritis: a nationwide analysis of 15,835 Chinese patients.","authors":"Haojie Xu, Liyun Zhang, Yuehong Huo, Rui Wu, Lijun Wu, Ling Lei, Linyu Geng, Chunyu Tan, Xiaomei Li, Ru Li, Yin Su","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keag079","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Previous studies have identified unique challenges for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients of different genders, which impact disease management. However, the association between disease activity and healthcare-seeking behaviours in male and female RA patients remains underexplored. This study aimed to investigate this association, with a specific focus on the gender-specific effects of follow-up intervals on disease control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide survey (July-September 2023) across 330 rheumatology centres in China included 13 278 female (83.85%) and 2,557 male RA patients (16.15%) aged ≥18 years. Standardized questionnaires captured demographic and healthcare-seeking behaviours. Disease activity was assessed using the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Females had younger disease onset (45.84 vs 51.03 years, p < 0.001), longer disease duration (7.51 vs 5.64 years, p < 0.001), higher low disease activity/clinical remission rates (22.61% vs 15.33%, p < 0.001), and lower glucocorticoid use (39.5% vs 47.73%, p < 0.001). Despite similar self-reported regular follow-up rates (84.73% vs 83.14%), both genders experienced suboptimal visit intervals (>3 months: 61.30% vs 62.65%, p < 0.001). Prolonged follow-up intervals were independently associated with poor disease control (CDAI > 10) in the female subgroup, with longer intervals linked to higher odds of inadequate control at 6-month (OR = 1.22, 95%CI : 1.09-1.37, p < 0.001) and 12-month intervals (OR = 1.43, 95%CI : 1.22-1.60, p < 0.001). Regular monitoring reduced high disease activity risk across genders (OR = 0.64, 95%CI : 0.56-0.74, p < 0.001). A generalized linear model showed no significant follow-up interval-gender interaction on disease activity (all p> 0.20).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This large-scale study reveals gender-dimorphic patterns in RA progression and healthcare engagement. Females tended to exhibit better treatment response, with a more pronounced interval-dependent disease control trend. No significant interval-gender interaction confirms this is a descriptive trend, not a validated gender-specific difference. Our findings emphasize the need for strategies accounting for such gender-dimorphic trends to optimize care continuity and improve RA management.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146132923","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag076
Beatriz Frade-Sosa, José A Gómez-Puerta, Irene Altabás-González, José María Pego-Reigosa, Ivette Casafont-Solé, Tarek Carlos Salman-Monte, Andrea Hernández-Martín, José Andrés Román-Ivorra, María Piqueras-García, Sandra Garrote-Corral, Eva Tomero, Elena de la Mata-Pinilla, Jaime Calvo-Alén, Julia Martínez-Barrio, Paola Vidal-Montal, Josefina Cortés-Hernández, Consuelo Ramos-Giráldez, Francisco Javier Novoa, Vicenç Torrente-Segarra, Jorge Fragio-Gil, Leyre Riancho-Zarrabeitia, Iñigo Rúa-Figueroa
Objectives: Belimumab (BEL) is an approved biologic therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that, when added to standard care, reduces disease activity, flare rates, and glucocorticoid exposure. In clinical practice, BEL is frequently combined with conventional immunosuppressants (IS), but the added benefit of concomitant IS once disease control is achieved remains uncertain. Observational data suggest that BEL monotherapy may be effective in selected patients, but comparative real-world evidence is limited. Objectives were to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of BEL as monotherapy vs in combination with IS in patients with SLE included in the BEL-Spain Registry.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of SLE patients treated with BEL with or without IS, with at least 12 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was remission according to the 2021 DORIS definition. Secondary outcomes included Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), flare rates, and glucocorticoid use. Overlap propensity score weighting was applied to adjust for confounding by indication.
Results: Among 258 patients, 177 (68.6%) received BEL with IS and 81 (31.4%) BEL monotherapy. At 12 months, DORIS remission rates were 48.1% in the IS group and 51.4% in the monotherapy group (p=NS), with comparable LLDAS and flare rates. Propensity score-adjusted analyses confirmed no significant differences in remission rates (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.37-2.14). Global treatment trajectories were stable, other than progressive glucocorticoid reduction in both groups.
Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, BEL monotherapy achieved similar outcomes to combination therapy with IS in selected SLE patients. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and define optimal treatment strategies.
目的:Belimumab (BEL)是一种被批准用于系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的生物疗法,当加入标准治疗时,可降低疾病活动性、发作率和糖皮质激素暴露。在临床实践中,BEL经常与常规免疫抑制剂(is)联合使用,但一旦达到疾病控制,合并is的额外益处仍不确定。观察性数据表明BEL单药治疗可能对特定患者有效,但比较真实世界的证据有限。目的是评估BEL作为单药治疗与联合IS治疗SLE患者的临床疗效。方法:我们对接受BEL治疗的SLE患者进行了回顾性分析,并进行了至少12个月的随访。根据2021年DORIS的定义,主要结局是缓解。次要结局包括狼疮低疾病活动状态(LLDAS)、耀斑率和糖皮质激素的使用。采用重叠倾向评分加权来调整适应症的混淆。结果:258例患者中,177例(68.6%)接受BEL联合IS治疗,81例(31.4%)接受BEL单药治疗。12个月时,IS组的DORIS缓解率为48.1%,单药组为51.4% (p=NS), LLDAS和耀斑率相当。倾向评分校正分析证实缓解率无显著差异(OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.37-2.14)。除了两组的糖皮质激素逐渐减少外,总体治疗轨迹是稳定的。结论:在这个真实世界的队列中,BEL单药治疗在选定的SLE患者中获得了与IS联合治疗相似的结果。需要前瞻性研究来证实这些发现并确定最佳治疗策略。
{"title":"Does adding concomitant immunosuppressive therapy to belimumab provide additional benefits in SLE? Results From the BEL-Spain Registry.","authors":"Beatriz Frade-Sosa, José A Gómez-Puerta, Irene Altabás-González, José María Pego-Reigosa, Ivette Casafont-Solé, Tarek Carlos Salman-Monte, Andrea Hernández-Martín, José Andrés Román-Ivorra, María Piqueras-García, Sandra Garrote-Corral, Eva Tomero, Elena de la Mata-Pinilla, Jaime Calvo-Alén, Julia Martínez-Barrio, Paola Vidal-Montal, Josefina Cortés-Hernández, Consuelo Ramos-Giráldez, Francisco Javier Novoa, Vicenç Torrente-Segarra, Jorge Fragio-Gil, Leyre Riancho-Zarrabeitia, Iñigo Rúa-Figueroa","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keag076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Belimumab (BEL) is an approved biologic therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) that, when added to standard care, reduces disease activity, flare rates, and glucocorticoid exposure. In clinical practice, BEL is frequently combined with conventional immunosuppressants (IS), but the added benefit of concomitant IS once disease control is achieved remains uncertain. Observational data suggest that BEL monotherapy may be effective in selected patients, but comparative real-world evidence is limited. Objectives were to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of BEL as monotherapy vs in combination with IS in patients with SLE included in the BEL-Spain Registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of SLE patients treated with BEL with or without IS, with at least 12 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was remission according to the 2021 DORIS definition. Secondary outcomes included Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS), flare rates, and glucocorticoid use. Overlap propensity score weighting was applied to adjust for confounding by indication.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 258 patients, 177 (68.6%) received BEL with IS and 81 (31.4%) BEL monotherapy. At 12 months, DORIS remission rates were 48.1% in the IS group and 51.4% in the monotherapy group (p=NS), with comparable LLDAS and flare rates. Propensity score-adjusted analyses confirmed no significant differences in remission rates (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.37-2.14). Global treatment trajectories were stable, other than progressive glucocorticoid reduction in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this real-world cohort, BEL monotherapy achieved similar outcomes to combination therapy with IS in selected SLE patients. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and define optimal treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146132918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag068
Dirk M Wuttge
{"title":"Comment on: Long-term effects of selexipag in SSc-associated digital ulcers: a case-control multicentre observational study.","authors":"Dirk M Wuttge","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keag068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag068","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146132876","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag072
Jose Loureiro-Amigo, Jaume Mestre-Torres, Ana Marín-Sánchez, Laura Viñas Giménez, María Teresa Sanz Martínez, Irene Agraz Pamplona, Roser Solans-Laqué
Objectives: Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) are a key biomarker for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), particularly microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). Although indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) has traditionally been the reference technique, its diagnostic value in contemporary real-world practice remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of IIF ANCA testing in routine clinical practice.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with an ANCA request at a tertiary hospital over a four-year period. All IIF-positive sera were subsequently tested for anti-PR3 and anti-MPO antibodies by chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). Clinical data, test indication and final diagnoses were retrieved from electronic medical records.
Results: We included 5,157 patients and IIF was positive in 653 (12.7%): perinuclear ANCA (P-ANCA) in 17.9%, cytoplasmic ANCA (C-ANCA) in 13.3% and atypical ANCA (A-ANCA) in 68.8%. CLIA was negative in 97.3% of A-ANCA. AAV was diagnosed in 47 patients, and 42 (89.4%) had positive IIF. For GPA and MPA, IIF showed a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 88%, with a very high negative predictive value (NPV) (99.9%) but low positive predictive value (PPV) (6.1%). Specificity improved to 96.8% when restricted to typical patterns (C-ANCA or P-ANCA) and to 99.6% when combined with positive CLIA results >20 IU/ml. Almost all AAV cases were diagnosed in patients with high pre-test probability (such as renal disease, lung infiltrates, or peripheral neuropathies) and interstitial lung disease was the most frequent non-AAV diagnosis in IIF-positive patients.
Conclusions: ANCA IIF retains good diagnostic efficiency and a very high NPV for GPA and MPA, but has low PPV, particularly when tested for nonspecific symptoms.
{"title":"ANCA testing in real-world clinical practice: diagnostic performance and predictive value in a Spanish cohort.","authors":"Jose Loureiro-Amigo, Jaume Mestre-Torres, Ana Marín-Sánchez, Laura Viñas Giménez, María Teresa Sanz Martínez, Irene Agraz Pamplona, Roser Solans-Laqué","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keag072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) are a key biomarker for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), particularly microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). Although indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) has traditionally been the reference technique, its diagnostic value in contemporary real-world practice remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of IIF ANCA testing in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with an ANCA request at a tertiary hospital over a four-year period. All IIF-positive sera were subsequently tested for anti-PR3 and anti-MPO antibodies by chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA). Clinical data, test indication and final diagnoses were retrieved from electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 5,157 patients and IIF was positive in 653 (12.7%): perinuclear ANCA (P-ANCA) in 17.9%, cytoplasmic ANCA (C-ANCA) in 13.3% and atypical ANCA (A-ANCA) in 68.8%. CLIA was negative in 97.3% of A-ANCA. AAV was diagnosed in 47 patients, and 42 (89.4%) had positive IIF. For GPA and MPA, IIF showed a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 88%, with a very high negative predictive value (NPV) (99.9%) but low positive predictive value (PPV) (6.1%). Specificity improved to 96.8% when restricted to typical patterns (C-ANCA or P-ANCA) and to 99.6% when combined with positive CLIA results >20 IU/ml. Almost all AAV cases were diagnosed in patients with high pre-test probability (such as renal disease, lung infiltrates, or peripheral neuropathies) and interstitial lung disease was the most frequent non-AAV diagnosis in IIF-positive patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ANCA IIF retains good diagnostic efficiency and a very high NPV for GPA and MPA, but has low PPV, particularly when tested for nonspecific symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146132850","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of serial fetal echocardiographic surveillance, specifically atrioventricular interval (AVI) monitoring, in managing Anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La-Positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pregnancies.
Methods: SLE pregnancies with positive anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La antibodies were retrospectively included (n = 50). Pregnancies were stratified into two groups based on based on whether optimal pre-gestational conditions were met. All pregnancies underwent serial fetal echocardiography, including structural assessment and precise AVI measurement.
Results: The overall incidence of fetal cardiac conduction abnormalities was 12% (6/50). The incidence was significantly higher in the suboptimal-conditions group (group 2, 26% [5/19]) compared with the optimal-conditions group (group 1, 3% [1/31]) (p = 0.024). Through close monitoring, one fetus with persistent AVI prolongation received dexamethasone and intravenous immunoglobulin, successfully preventing progression to advanced heart block; the other five cases normalized spontaneously upon short-term follow-up, avoiding overtreatment.
Conclusion: SLE pregnancies with anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La antibodies and suboptimal gestational conditions constitute a distinct high-risk subgroup. A management strategy through risk-stratified serial fetal AVI monitoring allows for precise treatment identification, significantly improving neonatal outcomes while avoiding unnecessary interventions.
{"title":"Fetal echocardiographic surveillance in anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La-Positive systemic lupus erythematosus pregnancies: risk stratification of congenital heart block.","authors":"Baoquan Chen, Xin Yang, Yixiu Zhang, Jiuliang Zhao, Xinping Tian, Yijun Song, Xining Wu, Hua Meng, Yunshu Ouyang, Ke Lv","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keag077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the clinical utility of serial fetal echocardiographic surveillance, specifically atrioventricular interval (AVI) monitoring, in managing Anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La-Positive systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SLE pregnancies with positive anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La antibodies were retrospectively included (n = 50). Pregnancies were stratified into two groups based on based on whether optimal pre-gestational conditions were met. All pregnancies underwent serial fetal echocardiography, including structural assessment and precise AVI measurement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall incidence of fetal cardiac conduction abnormalities was 12% (6/50). The incidence was significantly higher in the suboptimal-conditions group (group 2, 26% [5/19]) compared with the optimal-conditions group (group 1, 3% [1/31]) (p = 0.024). Through close monitoring, one fetus with persistent AVI prolongation received dexamethasone and intravenous immunoglobulin, successfully preventing progression to advanced heart block; the other five cases normalized spontaneously upon short-term follow-up, avoiding overtreatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SLE pregnancies with anti-SSA/Ro-SSB/La antibodies and suboptimal gestational conditions constitute a distinct high-risk subgroup. A management strategy through risk-stratified serial fetal AVI monitoring allows for precise treatment identification, significantly improving neonatal outcomes while avoiding unnecessary interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146132931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Objectives: A core set of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has not been established, and no studies have compared predictive validity of disease-specific and generic quality of life (QOL) instruments. We aimed to compare the predictive validity of the Lupus PRO and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form-12 (SF-12) for damage accrual in patients with SLE.
Methods: The Lupus PRO questionnaire contains both health-related (HR) and non-HR-QOL measures, whereas the SF-12 indices are the physical component summary (PCS), mental component summary (MCS), and role-social component summary (RCS). Damage accrual was evaluated using an increase of one unit in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI). We examined the association and predictive accuracy of the Lupus PRO and SF-12 scores at baseline for damage accrual using survival models for recurrent events.
Results: Among 1326 patients, those with a higher HR-QOL on Lupus PRO at baseline showed significantly lower damage accrual (hazard ratio: 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-0.99), whereas higher PCS and RCS of SF-12 were associated with lower damage accrual (0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98; 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.99). The Akaike Information Criterion, Bayesian Information Criterion, C-index, and area under the curve were comparable between the Lupus PRO and SF-12. Only higher PCS of the SF-12 was associated with glucocorticoid-independent SDI.
Conclusion: Predictive metrics and discriminatory performance were comparable between the Lupus PRO and SF-12. Our findings highlight both disease-specific and generic QOL measurements can be valuable options for core set outcomes.
{"title":"Comparison of predictive validity of the Lupus Patient-Reported Outcome and Short-Form-12 for damage accrual in systemic lupus erythematosus.","authors":"Akira Onishi, Hideaki Tsuji, Tsuneo Sasai, Mirei Shirakashi, Ryosuke Hiwa, Shuichiro Nakabo, Shuji Akizuki, Ran Nakashima, Keisuke Nishimura, Ken-Ei Sada, Yoshia Miyawaki, Masataka Umeda, Ryusuke Yoshimi, Shigeru Ohno, Nobuyuki Yajima, Hiroshi Kajiyama, Shuzo Sato, Dai Kishida, Michio Fujiwara, Takashi Kida, Yusuke Matsuo, Ayuko Takatani, Takahisa Onishi, Tomoaki Ida, Kunihiko Umekita, Hirofumi Miyake, Hiroto Nakano, Kei Ikeda, Kunihiro Ichinose, Hajime Yoshifuji, Masao Tanaka, Akio Morinobu","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keag080","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag080","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A core set of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has not been established, and no studies have compared predictive validity of disease-specific and generic quality of life (QOL) instruments. We aimed to compare the predictive validity of the Lupus PRO and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form-12 (SF-12) for damage accrual in patients with SLE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Lupus PRO questionnaire contains both health-related (HR) and non-HR-QOL measures, whereas the SF-12 indices are the physical component summary (PCS), mental component summary (MCS), and role-social component summary (RCS). Damage accrual was evaluated using an increase of one unit in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI). We examined the association and predictive accuracy of the Lupus PRO and SF-12 scores at baseline for damage accrual using survival models for recurrent events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1326 patients, those with a higher HR-QOL on Lupus PRO at baseline showed significantly lower damage accrual (hazard ratio: 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-0.99), whereas higher PCS and RCS of SF-12 were associated with lower damage accrual (0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.98; 0.92, 95% CI: 0.86-0.99). The Akaike Information Criterion, Bayesian Information Criterion, C-index, and area under the curve were comparable between the Lupus PRO and SF-12. Only higher PCS of the SF-12 was associated with glucocorticoid-independent SDI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Predictive metrics and discriminatory performance were comparable between the Lupus PRO and SF-12. Our findings highlight both disease-specific and generic QOL measurements can be valuable options for core set outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146132964","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag070
Francisco A Felix-Tellez, Alfredo Guillen- Del-Castillo, Claudia Pedroza, Ariadna Aguilar, Claudia Barber, Carolina Malagelada, Laura Polo-Figueras, Laura Triginer, Claudia Codina-Clavaguera, Michael Hughes, Jordi Serra, Carmen Pilar Simeón-Aznar, Zsuzsanna H McMahan, Luis G Alcala-Gonzalez
Objectives: To determine the prevalence of objectively defined gastric dysmotility in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and to evaluate its associations with SSc clinical and immunological features and adverse outcomes (SSc-related death and/or lung transplantation).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. All participants underwent a standardized 4-h solid gastric emptying scintigraphy. Gastric dysmotility was defined as ≥ 20% gastric retention at 4-h. We examined associations between gastric dysmotility and demographic, clinical, and immunologic characteristics of SSc, as well as relevant clinical outcomes.
Results: Ninety-four patients were included (mean age 48 ± 12 years; 81% female). Gastric dysmotility was identified in 33 patients (35%). Patients with gastric dysmotility had a higher prevalence of interstitial lung disease (63.6%.vs.30.3%, p= 0.033) and absent esophageal contractility (75.8%.vs.45.9%, p< 0.001) compared with those without. Gastric dysmotility was less frequent in patients with anti-centromere antibodies (27.3%.vs.55.0%, p= 0.009) but more common in those with anti-U1RNP antibodies (15.6%.vs.1.7%, p= 0.011). During follow-up (mean duration 2.8 ± 1.7 years; 260 person-years), 16 patients (17.0%) experienced the composite end point of SSc-related death and/or lung transplantation. In unadjusted Cox regression, gastric dysmotility was strongly associated with adverse outcomes (HR = 6.47, 95%CI: 2.09-20.10, p= 0.001), which remained significant after adjustment for confounders (HR = 4.23, 95%CI: 1.25-14.33, p= 0.020).
Conclusions: In SSc, we have confirmed that gastric dysmotility is associated with a distinct clinical and serological phenotype and that it independently predicts serious adverse outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of objective assessment of gastric function and its potential role in risk stratification.
{"title":"Delayed gastric emptying identifies a high-risk clinical subgroup in patients with systemic sclerosis.","authors":"Francisco A Felix-Tellez, Alfredo Guillen- Del-Castillo, Claudia Pedroza, Ariadna Aguilar, Claudia Barber, Carolina Malagelada, Laura Polo-Figueras, Laura Triginer, Claudia Codina-Clavaguera, Michael Hughes, Jordi Serra, Carmen Pilar Simeón-Aznar, Zsuzsanna H McMahan, Luis G Alcala-Gonzalez","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keag070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the prevalence of objectively defined gastric dysmotility in systemic sclerosis (SSc) and to evaluate its associations with SSc clinical and immunological features and adverse outcomes (SSc-related death and/or lung transplantation).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study. All participants underwent a standardized 4-h solid gastric emptying scintigraphy. Gastric dysmotility was defined as ≥ 20% gastric retention at 4-h. We examined associations between gastric dysmotility and demographic, clinical, and immunologic characteristics of SSc, as well as relevant clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-four patients were included (mean age 48 ± 12 years; 81% female). Gastric dysmotility was identified in 33 patients (35%). Patients with gastric dysmotility had a higher prevalence of interstitial lung disease (63.6%.vs.30.3%, p= 0.033) and absent esophageal contractility (75.8%.vs.45.9%, p< 0.001) compared with those without. Gastric dysmotility was less frequent in patients with anti-centromere antibodies (27.3%.vs.55.0%, p= 0.009) but more common in those with anti-U1RNP antibodies (15.6%.vs.1.7%, p= 0.011). During follow-up (mean duration 2.8 ± 1.7 years; 260 person-years), 16 patients (17.0%) experienced the composite end point of SSc-related death and/or lung transplantation. In unadjusted Cox regression, gastric dysmotility was strongly associated with adverse outcomes (HR = 6.47, 95%CI: 2.09-20.10, p= 0.001), which remained significant after adjustment for confounders (HR = 4.23, 95%CI: 1.25-14.33, p= 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In SSc, we have confirmed that gastric dysmotility is associated with a distinct clinical and serological phenotype and that it independently predicts serious adverse outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of objective assessment of gastric function and its potential role in risk stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146132943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag075
Katya Meridor, Stephanie R Harrison, Richard Parker, Ramu Chimakurthi, Philip M Laws, Dennis McGonagle, Andrew Barr, Claire Y Vandevelde, Helena Marzo-Ortega, Jane E Freeston
{"title":"Comment on: FIB-4 as an effective screening tool in psoriatic arthritis patients at high-risk for liver disease: a cross-sectional study using FibroScan: Reply.","authors":"Katya Meridor, Stephanie R Harrison, Richard Parker, Ramu Chimakurthi, Philip M Laws, Dennis McGonagle, Andrew Barr, Claire Y Vandevelde, Helena Marzo-Ortega, Jane E Freeston","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keag075","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag075","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146132799","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag012
Fadi Kharouf, Qixuan Li, Laura P Whittall Garcia, Arenn Jauhal, Dafna D Gladman, Zahi Touma
{"title":"Comment on: Short and long-term outcomes of patients with pure membranous lupus nephritis compared to patients with proliferative disease: reply.","authors":"Fadi Kharouf, Qixuan Li, Laura P Whittall Garcia, Arenn Jauhal, Dafna D Gladman, Zahi Touma","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keag012","DOIUrl":"10.1093/rheumatology/keag012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145948991","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-04DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keag048
Pedro Gaspar, Ana Rita Cruz-Machado, Ana Mafalda Abrantes, Filipa Costa, Inês Parreira, Ana Rita Lopes, Ryan Costa-Silva, Ana Teodósio Chícharo, Joana Rosa Martins, João Pedro Marques, Diogo Santos, Vasco C Romão, Luis Graca, João E Fonseca
{"title":"Comment on: Loss of antiphospholipid antibody positivity decreases the risk of recurrent thrombosis in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: reply.","authors":"Pedro Gaspar, Ana Rita Cruz-Machado, Ana Mafalda Abrantes, Filipa Costa, Inês Parreira, Ana Rita Lopes, Ryan Costa-Silva, Ana Teodósio Chícharo, Joana Rosa Martins, João Pedro Marques, Diogo Santos, Vasco C Romão, Luis Graca, João E Fonseca","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keag048","DOIUrl":"10.1093/rheumatology/keag048","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":21255,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4,"publicationDate":"2026-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146041583","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}