Ambulatory Robotic Colectomy: Factors Affecting and Affected by Postoperative Opioid Use.

Michael M Vu, Jace J Franko, Anna Buzadzhi, Beau Prey, Maksim Rusev, Marta Lavery, Laila Rashidi
{"title":"Ambulatory Robotic Colectomy: Factors Affecting and Affected by Postoperative Opioid Use.","authors":"Michael M Vu, Jace J Franko, Anna Buzadzhi, Beau Prey, Maksim Rusev, Marta Lavery, Laila Rashidi","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The ongoing opioid crisis demands an investigation into the factors driving postoperative opioid use. Ambulatory robotic colectomies are an emerging concept in colorectal surgery, but concerns persist surrounding adequate pain control for these patients who are discharged very early. We sought to identify key factors affecting recovery room opioid use (ROU) and additional outpatient opioid prescriptions (AOP) after ambulatory robotic colectomies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-institution retrospective review of ambulatory robotic colon resections performed between 2019 and 2022. Patients were included if they discharged on the same day (SDD) or postoperative day 1 (POD1). Outcomes of interest included ROU [measured in parenteral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs)], AOP (written between PODs 2 to 7), postoperative emergency department presentations, and readmissions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred nineteen cases were examined, 48 of which underwent SDD. The mean ROU was 29.4 MME, and 8.7% of patients required AOP. Between SDD and POD1 patients, there were no differences in postoperative emergency department presentations, readmissions, recovery opioid use, or additional outpatient opioid scripts. Older age was associated with a lower ROU (-0.54 MME for each additional year). Older age, a higher body mass index, and right-sided colectomies were also more likely to use zero ROU. Readmissions were strongly associated with lower ROU. Among SDD patients, lower ROU was also associated with higher rates of AOP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ambulatory robotic colectomies and SDD can be performed with low opioid use and readmission rates. Notably, we found an association between low ROU and more readmission, and, in some cases, higher AOP. This suggests that adequate pain control during the postoperative recovery phase is a crucial component of reducing these negative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The ongoing opioid crisis demands an investigation into the factors driving postoperative opioid use. Ambulatory robotic colectomies are an emerging concept in colorectal surgery, but concerns persist surrounding adequate pain control for these patients who are discharged very early. We sought to identify key factors affecting recovery room opioid use (ROU) and additional outpatient opioid prescriptions (AOP) after ambulatory robotic colectomies.

Methods: This was a single-institution retrospective review of ambulatory robotic colon resections performed between 2019 and 2022. Patients were included if they discharged on the same day (SDD) or postoperative day 1 (POD1). Outcomes of interest included ROU [measured in parenteral morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs)], AOP (written between PODs 2 to 7), postoperative emergency department presentations, and readmissions.

Results: Two hundred nineteen cases were examined, 48 of which underwent SDD. The mean ROU was 29.4 MME, and 8.7% of patients required AOP. Between SDD and POD1 patients, there were no differences in postoperative emergency department presentations, readmissions, recovery opioid use, or additional outpatient opioid scripts. Older age was associated with a lower ROU (-0.54 MME for each additional year). Older age, a higher body mass index, and right-sided colectomies were also more likely to use zero ROU. Readmissions were strongly associated with lower ROU. Among SDD patients, lower ROU was also associated with higher rates of AOP.

Conclusion: Ambulatory robotic colectomies and SDD can be performed with low opioid use and readmission rates. Notably, we found an association between low ROU and more readmission, and, in some cases, higher AOP. This suggests that adequate pain control during the postoperative recovery phase is a crucial component of reducing these negative outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
门诊机器人结肠切除术:影响术后阿片类药物使用的因素及受其影响的因素
背景:当前的阿片类药物危机要求对术后阿片类药物使用的驱动因素进行调查。非卧床机器人结肠切除术是结直肠手术中的一个新兴概念,但对于这些很早就出院的患者来说,充分的疼痛控制仍然令人担忧。我们试图找出影响非卧床机器人结肠切除术后恢复室阿片类药物使用(ROU)和门诊阿片类药物额外处方(AOP)的关键因素:这是对2019年至2022年期间进行的门诊机器人结肠切除术的单机构回顾性研究。当天(SDD)或术后第 1 天(POD1)出院的患者均被纳入。相关结果包括ROU[以肠外吗啡毫克当量(MMEs)计算]、AOP(写在POD2至7之间)、术后急诊就诊和再入院:共检查了 219 例患者,其中 48 例接受了 SDD。平均 ROU 为 29.4 MME,8.7% 的患者需要 AOP。SDD患者与POD1患者在术后急诊就诊、再入院、恢复期阿片类药物使用或门诊阿片类药物额外用量方面没有差异。年龄越大,ROU 越低(每多一年-0.54 MME)。年龄越大、体重指数越高、右侧结肠切除术的患者使用零 ROU 的可能性也越大。再入院与较低的 ROU 密切相关。在 SDD 患者中,较低的 ROU 也与较高的 AOP 率相关:结论:使用非卧床机器人结肠切除术和 SDD 可以降低阿片类药物的使用率和再入院率。值得注意的是,我们发现低 ROU 与更高的再入院率之间存在关联,在某些情况下还与更高的 AOP 有关。这表明,术后恢复阶段充分的疼痛控制是减少这些不良后果的关键因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of Laparoscopic Left Hemihepatectomy Combined With Choledochoscopic Lithotomy for Complex Intrahepatic Bile Duct Stones and Its Impact on Postoperative Liver Function. Surgical Options for Retained Gallstones After Cholecystectomy. Comparative Analysis of the Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Versus Open Segment 7 Hepatectomy. Minimally Invasive Pauli Parastomal Hernia Repair. Ventral Hernia Repair With a Hybrid Absorbable-permanent Preperitoneal Mesh.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1