首页 > 最新文献

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques最新文献

英文 中文
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy In Situs Inversus Totalis (SIT): A Case Series - Modified French Technique Provides Optimum Outcomes. 腹腔镜胆囊反全位切除术(SIT):一个病例系列-改良的法国技术提供最佳结果。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-15 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001433
Kalpesh Jani, Anushri Parikh, Madhavan Iyengar, Monil N Shah

Background: Situs inversus totalis (SIT) is a rare congenital condition characterized by the mirror-image reversal of thoracic and abdominal organs. Its incidence is between 0.04% and 0.30%. Patients with SIT presenting with cholelithiasis pose diagnostic and technical challenges, particularly during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), due to reversed anatomic landmarks and difficulties in orientation.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 12 patients with SIT who underwent LC between September 2006 and April 2023 at our tertiary center. Preoperative evaluation included hematology, liver function tests, ultrasonography, cardiac, and pulmonary assessments. Surgeries were performed under general anesthesia using a modified French technique in mirror-image configuration. A harmonic scalpel (ultracision) was used for dissection in all cases.

Results: Out of 5375 LCs performed during the study period, 12 were in patients with SIT (prevalence: 0.22%). All procedures were completed laparoscopically without conversion. One case required port site modification for optimal clip application. Two patients underwent gallbladder decompression, and one developed postoperative ileus, which resolved conservatively. No intraoperative complications, bile duct injuries, or mortalities were observed.

Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in SIT patients is safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons. Modifications in surgical technique and port placement are essential to accommodate the reversed anatomy. Preoperative planning and intraoperative vigilance are key to minimizing complications and achieving outcomes comparable to anatomically normal patients.

背景:完全性倒位(SIT)是一种罕见的先天性疾病,其特征是胸部和腹部器官的镜像反转。发病率在0.04% ~ 0.30%之间。以胆石症为表现的SIT患者在诊断和技术上面临挑战,特别是在腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)中,由于解剖标志逆转和定位困难。方法:我们对2006年9月至2023年4月在我们三级中心接受LC治疗的12例SIT患者进行了回顾性分析。术前评估包括血液学、肝功能检查、超声检查、心脏和肺部评估。手术在全身麻醉下进行,采用改良的法式镜像配置技术。所有病例均采用超声刀进行解剖。结果:在研究期间进行的5375例LCs中,12例为SIT患者(患病率:0.22%)。所有手术均在腹腔镜下完成,无转换。一个案例需要端口位置修改,以获得最佳夹应用。2例患者行胆囊减压术,1例术后肠梗阻,经保守治疗后痊愈。无术中并发症、胆管损伤或死亡。结论:由经验丰富的外科医生进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术是安全可行的。修改手术技术和端口放置是必要的,以适应反向解剖。术前计划和术中警惕是减少并发症和达到与解剖正常患者相当的结果的关键。
{"title":"Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy In Situs Inversus Totalis (SIT): A Case Series - Modified French Technique Provides Optimum Outcomes.","authors":"Kalpesh Jani, Anushri Parikh, Madhavan Iyengar, Monil N Shah","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001433","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001433","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Situs inversus totalis (SIT) is a rare congenital condition characterized by the mirror-image reversal of thoracic and abdominal organs. Its incidence is between 0.04% and 0.30%. Patients with SIT presenting with cholelithiasis pose diagnostic and technical challenges, particularly during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), due to reversed anatomic landmarks and difficulties in orientation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of 12 patients with SIT who underwent LC between September 2006 and April 2023 at our tertiary center. Preoperative evaluation included hematology, liver function tests, ultrasonography, cardiac, and pulmonary assessments. Surgeries were performed under general anesthesia using a modified French technique in mirror-image configuration. A harmonic scalpel (ultracision) was used for dissection in all cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 5375 LCs performed during the study period, 12 were in patients with SIT (prevalence: 0.22%). All procedures were completed laparoscopically without conversion. One case required port site modification for optimal clip application. Two patients underwent gallbladder decompression, and one developed postoperative ileus, which resolved conservatively. No intraoperative complications, bile duct injuries, or mortalities were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in SIT patients is safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons. Modifications in surgical technique and port placement are essential to accommodate the reversed anatomy. Preoperative planning and intraoperative vigilance are key to minimizing complications and achieving outcomes comparable to anatomically normal patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145985754","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Gender-specific Differences in Preoperative Characteristics and Perioperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Robotic Resection Rectopexy With NOSE for Obstructive Defecation Syndrome. 梗阻性排便综合征患者行鼻机器人直肠切除术的术前特征和围手术期结局的性别差异。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-13 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001439
Jamal Driouch, Shazadi Sajid, Omar Thaher

Purpose: Obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) significantly impairs bowel function and often requires surgical intervention. This study evaluated sex-specific differences in outcomes after robotic-assisted resection rectopexy with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE).

Methods: A prospective cohort of 57 patients (46 females, 11 males) undergoing robotic NOSE rectopexy for ODS was analyzed. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Wexner Constipation Score (WCS), Incontinence Score (WIS), and Altomare OD Score at baseline, 1, 3, and 12 months. To account for unequal group sizes, entropy balancing was applied and weighted analyses were performed.

Results: Descriptive data indicated that rectocele was more frequent in females (73.9% vs. 27.3%), and male patients had slightly longer hospital stays (6.0 vs. 4.6 d). Constipation, ODS, and incontinence scores improved markedly in both sexes (eg, WCS at 12 mo: 2.0 in males vs. 4.8 in females). While raw values suggested somewhat faster improvement in males, weighted analyses confirmed that no significant sex effects remained. No conversions or anastomotic leaks occurred, and overall patient satisfaction was high (96.5%).

Conclusion: Robotic NOSE rectopexy provides safe and effective treatment for ODS in both sexes. Descriptive analyses suggested a trend toward faster recovery in male patients, but after adjustment with entropy balancing no significant sex effects were found. Both sexes experienced marked functional improvement and high satisfaction, supporting robotic NOSE rectopexy as a valuable treatment option.

目的:梗阻性排便综合征(ODS)严重损害肠功能,通常需要手术干预。本研究评估了机器人辅助切除直肠固定术与自然孔口标本提取(NOSE)后结果的性别差异。方法:对57例(女性46例,男性11例)接受机械鼻直肠固定术治疗ODS的患者进行前瞻性队列分析。在基线、1、3和12个月时,使用Wexner便秘评分(WCS)、失禁评分(WIS)和Altomare OD评分来评估功能结局。为了解释不相等的群体规模,应用熵平衡并进行加权分析。结果:描述性数据显示,直肠前突在女性中更为常见(73.9%对27.3%),男性患者的住院时间略长(6.0 d对4.6 d)。便秘、ODS和尿失禁评分在两性中均有显著改善(例如,12个月时WCS:男性2.0,女性4.8)。虽然原始数据表明男性的改善速度较快,但加权分析证实,没有显著的性别影响存在。无吻合口瘘发生,患者总体满意度高(96.5%)。结论:机器鼻直肠固定术是一种安全有效的治疗男性和女性ODS的方法。描述性分析显示男性患者有更快恢复的趋势,但经过熵平衡调整后,没有发现显著的性别影响。两种性别都经历了显著的功能改善和高满意度,支持机器人鼻子直肠固定术作为有价值的治疗选择。
{"title":"Gender-specific Differences in Preoperative Characteristics and Perioperative Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Robotic Resection Rectopexy With NOSE for Obstructive Defecation Syndrome.","authors":"Jamal Driouch, Shazadi Sajid, Omar Thaher","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001439","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001439","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Obstructive defecation syndrome (ODS) significantly impairs bowel function and often requires surgical intervention. This study evaluated sex-specific differences in outcomes after robotic-assisted resection rectopexy with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort of 57 patients (46 females, 11 males) undergoing robotic NOSE rectopexy for ODS was analyzed. Functional outcomes were assessed using the Wexner Constipation Score (WCS), Incontinence Score (WIS), and Altomare OD Score at baseline, 1, 3, and 12 months. To account for unequal group sizes, entropy balancing was applied and weighted analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Descriptive data indicated that rectocele was more frequent in females (73.9% vs. 27.3%), and male patients had slightly longer hospital stays (6.0 vs. 4.6 d). Constipation, ODS, and incontinence scores improved markedly in both sexes (eg, WCS at 12 mo: 2.0 in males vs. 4.8 in females). While raw values suggested somewhat faster improvement in males, weighted analyses confirmed that no significant sex effects remained. No conversions or anastomotic leaks occurred, and overall patient satisfaction was high (96.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic NOSE rectopexy provides safe and effective treatment for ODS in both sexes. Descriptive analyses suggested a trend toward faster recovery in male patients, but after adjustment with entropy balancing no significant sex effects were found. Both sexes experienced marked functional improvement and high satisfaction, supporting robotic NOSE rectopexy as a valuable treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145959357","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Clinicopathological Factors and Nomogram Development for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. 预测局部晚期直肠癌淋巴结转移的临床病理因素和Nomogram发展。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001434
Xu Sun, Rui Li, Hao Liu, Sizhe Wang, Wen Zhao, Wenxing Gao, Peng Chen, Dingchang Li, Guanglong Dong

Background: Research on lymph node metastasis (LNM) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains significantly underexplored. This study investigates the clinicopathological factors associated with LNM in LARC and develops a predictive nomogram for clinical application.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 1270 patients with LARC who underwent radical surgery between 2018 and 2023. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of LNM. A nomogram integrating these predictors was constructed and internally validated using bootstrap resampling. Subgroup analyses were carried out to compare stage N1 (n=333) and stage N2 (n=265) patients to determine the risk factors for advanced metastasis.

Results: The detection rate of LNM was 47.0% (598/1270). Independent risk factors included mucinous adenocarcinoma (OR=1.529, P=0.018), bowel obstruction (OR=1.418, P=0.014), poor tumor differentiation (OR=2.468, P<0.001), perineural invasion (OR=1.784, P=0.003), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI, OR=2.741, P<0.001). Conversely, a history of alcohol consumption (OR=0.721, P=0.016) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status (OR=0.241, P=0.005) appeared to exert protective effects. The nomogram demonstrated moderate predictive accuracy (C-index: 0.657, 95% CI: 0.627-0.686). In subgroup analyses, Ki-67 expression emerged as an additional independent risk factor for stage N2 patients (OR=1.016, P=0.040).

Conclusion: This study elucidated key risk factors for LNM in LARC patients and developed a nomogram for clinical use, offering valuable insights for the design and implementation of multidisciplinary perioperative treatment strategies.

背景:局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)淋巴结转移(LNM)的研究仍显着不足。本研究探讨了LARC中与LNM相关的临床病理因素,并开发了一种用于临床应用的预测图。方法:回顾性分析2018 - 2023年间1270例接受根治性手术的LARC患者。进行单因素和多因素logistic回归分析,以确定LNM的独立预测因素。构建了一个整合这些预测因子的nomogram,并使用bootstrap重采样进行内部验证。亚组分析比较N1期(333例)和N2期(265例)患者,以确定晚期转移的危险因素。结果:LNM的检出率为47.0%(598/1270)。独立危险因素包括:粘液腺癌(OR=1.529, P=0.018)、肠梗阻(OR=1.418, P=0.014)、肿瘤分化差(OR=2.468, P)。结论:本研究阐明了LARC患者发生LNM的关键危险因素,并建立了临床应用的nomogram,为多学科围手术期治疗策略的设计和实施提供了有价值的见解。
{"title":"Clinicopathological Factors and Nomogram Development for Predicting Lymph Node Metastasis in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.","authors":"Xu Sun, Rui Li, Hao Liu, Sizhe Wang, Wen Zhao, Wenxing Gao, Peng Chen, Dingchang Li, Guanglong Dong","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001434","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001434","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on lymph node metastasis (LNM) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains significantly underexplored. This study investigates the clinicopathological factors associated with LNM in LARC and develops a predictive nomogram for clinical application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 1270 patients with LARC who underwent radical surgery between 2018 and 2023. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of LNM. A nomogram integrating these predictors was constructed and internally validated using bootstrap resampling. Subgroup analyses were carried out to compare stage N1 (n=333) and stage N2 (n=265) patients to determine the risk factors for advanced metastasis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The detection rate of LNM was 47.0% (598/1270). Independent risk factors included mucinous adenocarcinoma (OR=1.529, P=0.018), bowel obstruction (OR=1.418, P=0.014), poor tumor differentiation (OR=2.468, P<0.001), perineural invasion (OR=1.784, P=0.003), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI, OR=2.741, P<0.001). Conversely, a history of alcohol consumption (OR=0.721, P=0.016) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status (OR=0.241, P=0.005) appeared to exert protective effects. The nomogram demonstrated moderate predictive accuracy (C-index: 0.657, 95% CI: 0.627-0.686). In subgroup analyses, Ki-67 expression emerged as an additional independent risk factor for stage N2 patients (OR=1.016, P=0.040).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study elucidated key risk factors for LNM in LARC patients and developed a nomogram for clinical use, offering valuable insights for the design and implementation of multidisciplinary perioperative treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145959324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Barbed Sutures at the Hiatus: What's the Evidence? 裂口处的倒钩缝合线:证据是什么?
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2026-01-12 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001436
Benjamin Clapp, Priya Patel, Jorge Urbina

Background: Barbed sutures enable knotless, continuous cruroplasty and are increasingly used in hiatal and paraesophageal hernia repairs. Despite widespread adoption, outcome data specific to the hiatus are limited and diaphragmatic application remains off-label.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and MEDLINE (inception-August 2025) identified adult hiatal/paraesophageal hernia repairs using barbed sutures. Data on operative approach, mesh use, operative time, recurrence, and perioperative outcomes were extracted. The FDA MAUDE database (2010 to 2025) was reviewed for device-related events.

Results: Five studies (n=741) met the inclusion criteria. In laparoscopic comparisons, barbed sutures shortened per-stitch closure time compared with interrupted silk, although total closure time was not significantly different. In pooled analysis of 4 comparative studies, the weighted mean difference in operative time was +12.8 minutes (95% CI: -4.3 to 29.8; P=0.14; I²=40%). Individual series demonstrated variable findings: operative time increased with mesh reinforcement but not when mesh was avoided (P=0.45). One study reported that barbed cruroplasty with biosynthetic mesh reinforcement significantly reduced ≥1-year anatomic recurrence (24.7% vs. 44.9%; risk difference -20.3%, 95% CI: -33.7 to -7.0) and symptomatic recurrence (17.2% vs. 42.2%, P=0.003) compared with barbed suture-only repair. Postmarket surveillance analysis of the FDA MAUDE database (2010 to 2025) identified only 2 hiatal-specific adverse events associated with barbed sutures, although underreporting is likely.

Conclusions: Barbed sutures for cruroplasty appear time-efficient and may lower recurrence when combined with mesh in larger hernias. However, current evidence is sparse, heterogeneous, and based largely on retrospective series. Given the off-label nature of diaphragmatic use, prospective studies with standardized recurrence definitions are needed to clarify safety and long-term efficacy.

背景:倒钩缝线可以实现无结、连续的疝成形术,越来越多地用于食管裂孔和食管旁疝的修复。尽管被广泛采用,但针对间隙的具体结果数据有限,并且膈肌应用仍未得到认可。方法:系统检索PubMed和MEDLINE(盗- 2025年8月),确定成人食道裂孔/食道旁疝采用倒钩缝合修复。提取手术入路、补片使用、手术时间、复发和围手术期结果的数据。FDA MAUDE数据库(2010年至2025年)审查了与器械相关的事件。结果:5项研究(n=741)符合纳入标准。在腹腔镜比较中,倒钩缝合与断丝缝合相比缩短了每针缝合时间,尽管总缝合时间没有显著差异。在4项比较研究的合并分析中,加权平均手术时间差为+12.8分钟(95% CI: -4.3 ~ 29.8; P=0.14; I²=40%)。个别系列显示了不同的结果:补片加固后手术时间增加,而避免补片时没有增加(P=0.45)。一项研究报道,与仅用倒钩缝合修复相比,生物合成补片加固的倒钩肾成形术可显著降低≥1年的解剖复发率(24.7% vs. 44.9%;风险差异-20.3%,95% CI: -33.7 ~ -7.0)和症状复发(17.2% vs. 42.2%, P=0.003)。FDA MAUDE数据库的上市后监测分析(2010年至2025年)仅确定了2例与倒刺缝合线相关的局部特异性不良事件,尽管可能存在漏报的情况。结论:在大疝修补术中,与补片联合使用倒钩缝合更省时,可降低复发率。然而,目前的证据是稀疏的,异质性的,并且主要基于回顾性的系列。考虑到横膈膜手术的标签外性质,需要有标准化复发定义的前瞻性研究来阐明安全性和长期疗效。
{"title":"Barbed Sutures at the Hiatus: What's the Evidence?","authors":"Benjamin Clapp, Priya Patel, Jorge Urbina","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001436","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001436","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Barbed sutures enable knotless, continuous cruroplasty and are increasingly used in hiatal and paraesophageal hernia repairs. Despite widespread adoption, outcome data specific to the hiatus are limited and diaphragmatic application remains off-label.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed and MEDLINE (inception-August 2025) identified adult hiatal/paraesophageal hernia repairs using barbed sutures. Data on operative approach, mesh use, operative time, recurrence, and perioperative outcomes were extracted. The FDA MAUDE database (2010 to 2025) was reviewed for device-related events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies (n=741) met the inclusion criteria. In laparoscopic comparisons, barbed sutures shortened per-stitch closure time compared with interrupted silk, although total closure time was not significantly different. In pooled analysis of 4 comparative studies, the weighted mean difference in operative time was +12.8 minutes (95% CI: -4.3 to 29.8; P=0.14; I²=40%). Individual series demonstrated variable findings: operative time increased with mesh reinforcement but not when mesh was avoided (P=0.45). One study reported that barbed cruroplasty with biosynthetic mesh reinforcement significantly reduced ≥1-year anatomic recurrence (24.7% vs. 44.9%; risk difference -20.3%, 95% CI: -33.7 to -7.0) and symptomatic recurrence (17.2% vs. 42.2%, P=0.003) compared with barbed suture-only repair. Postmarket surveillance analysis of the FDA MAUDE database (2010 to 2025) identified only 2 hiatal-specific adverse events associated with barbed sutures, although underreporting is likely.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Barbed sutures for cruroplasty appear time-efficient and may lower recurrence when combined with mesh in larger hernias. However, current evidence is sparse, heterogeneous, and based largely on retrospective series. Given the off-label nature of diaphragmatic use, prospective studies with standardized recurrence definitions are needed to clarify safety and long-term efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2026-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145959331","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
EUS-TD With Multiple Plastic Stents for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A Retrospective Evaluation of Early Postsurgery Management. EUS-TD联合多个塑料支架治疗术后胰瘘:早期术后处理的回顾性评价。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-24 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001430
Koichiro Miyagawa, Shinji Oe, Yasuhisa Mori, Tsuyoshi Ueda, Nobuhiko Shinohara, Kosuke Hideshima, Yudai Koya, Yuichi Honma, Masaru Harada

Introduction: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a serious complication that can lead to potentially fatal outcomes; therefore, early intervention with drainage is warranted whenever clinically feasible. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage (EUS-TD) is becoming an alternative to percutaneous drainage for managing POPF. While EUS-TD is increasingly used, there is no consensus on stent type or the need for external drainage in early postoperative EUS-TD for POPF. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of EUS-TD using multiple plastic stents (PSs) without external drainage for managing POPF within postoperative day 15.

Methods: This retrospective case series included 11 patients who developed POPF and underwent EUS-TD within postoperative day 15 between January 2021 and June 2024. The primary outcome was clinical success of EUS-TD with multiple PSs without external drainage. Secondary outcomes included technical success, complications, length of hospital stay, and recurrence rate.

Results: Eleven POPF patients underwent EUS-TD. Two or more PSs were successfully placed in all cases, with clinical success achieved in 10 of 11 cases. One case required additional percutaneous drainage. A pseudoaneurysm rupture occurred in one case and was successfully managed with interventional radiology. The mean length of hospital stay was 19.1 days. No recurrences were observed during a median follow-up period of 26.0 months. Stents were removed after 6 months or later.

Conclusions: EUS-TD using multiple PSs without external drainage may be a feasible approach for managing POPF within postoperative day 15. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and optimize early postoperative management strategies for POPF.

术后胰瘘(POPF)是一种严重的并发症,可能导致潜在的致命结果;因此,只要临床可行,早期介入引流是必要的。超声内镜引导下的经壁引流(EUS-TD)正在成为治疗POPF的一种替代方法。虽然EUS-TD的使用越来越多,但对于支架类型或是否需要体外引流在术后早期EUS-TD治疗POPF方面尚无共识。本研究旨在评估EUS-TD在术后15天内使用多个塑料支架(ps)治疗POPF的可行性。方法:该回顾性病例系列包括11例发生POPF并在2021年1月至2024年6月术后第15天内接受EUS-TD的患者。主要结局是临床成功的EUS-TD合并多个PSs无外部引流。次要结局包括技术成功、并发症、住院时间和复发率。结果:11例POPF患者行EUS-TD。所有病例均成功放置两个或两个以上的ps, 11例中有10例取得临床成功。1例需要额外经皮引流。一例假性动脉瘤破裂,经介入放射治疗成功。平均住院时间为19.1天。中位随访26.0个月,无复发。6个月后取出支架。结论:EUS-TD采用多个PSs,无需外部引流,可能是治疗术后15天内POPF的可行方法。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现并优化POPF的早期术后管理策略。
{"title":"EUS-TD With Multiple Plastic Stents for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A Retrospective Evaluation of Early Postsurgery Management.","authors":"Koichiro Miyagawa, Shinji Oe, Yasuhisa Mori, Tsuyoshi Ueda, Nobuhiko Shinohara, Kosuke Hideshima, Yudai Koya, Yuichi Honma, Masaru Harada","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001430","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001430","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a serious complication that can lead to potentially fatal outcomes; therefore, early intervention with drainage is warranted whenever clinically feasible. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage (EUS-TD) is becoming an alternative to percutaneous drainage for managing POPF. While EUS-TD is increasingly used, there is no consensus on stent type or the need for external drainage in early postoperative EUS-TD for POPF. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of EUS-TD using multiple plastic stents (PSs) without external drainage for managing POPF within postoperative day 15.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case series included 11 patients who developed POPF and underwent EUS-TD within postoperative day 15 between January 2021 and June 2024. The primary outcome was clinical success of EUS-TD with multiple PSs without external drainage. Secondary outcomes included technical success, complications, length of hospital stay, and recurrence rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven POPF patients underwent EUS-TD. Two or more PSs were successfully placed in all cases, with clinical success achieved in 10 of 11 cases. One case required additional percutaneous drainage. A pseudoaneurysm rupture occurred in one case and was successfully managed with interventional radiology. The mean length of hospital stay was 19.1 days. No recurrences were observed during a median follow-up period of 26.0 months. Stents were removed after 6 months or later.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EUS-TD using multiple PSs without external drainage may be a feasible approach for managing POPF within postoperative day 15. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings and optimize early postoperative management strategies for POPF.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145820661","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Impact of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Timing on Mortality and Morbidity in High-Risk Patients With Acute Calculous Cholecystitis. 经皮胆囊造瘘时机对急性结石性胆囊炎高危患者死亡率和发病率的影响。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-23 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001431
Ali Levent Işik, Ali Bekraki

Background: The optimal timing of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) in acute cholecystitis remains unclear, despite its increasing adoption as a treatment option for elderly and critically ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of PC timing on complications, hospital stay, and mortality in high-risk patients with moderate and severe acute calculous cholecystitis.

Materials and methods: Between 2020 and 2024, 124 consecutive patients who underwent PC were retrospectively reviewed. The time periods from admission to PC were measured. Patients with grade II cholecystitis who had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ≥6 and an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) score ≥3, and those with grade III cholecystitis who had a CCI score ≥4 and an ASA-PS score ≥3, were defined as high-risk patients using TG18-aligned thresholds. Among these 82 high-risk patients, the median time from admission to PC was 39 hours (range: 21 to 62 h).

Results: Early high-risk group (≤48 h; n=51) had shorter hospital stay [7 (5 to 8) vs. 13 (6 to 20) d; P<0.001], lower ≤90-day mortality rate (5.9% vs. 22.6%; P=0.037) and lower ≤365-day mortality rate (7.8% vs. 25.8%; P=0.049) as compared with delayed high-risk group (>48 h; n=31). Delayed PC (OR=4.80, P=0.004) and complications related to PC (OR=4.37, P=0.015) were independent risk factors for longer hospital stay. A higher CCI Score (≥7) (OR=13.68, P=0.047) and delayed PC (OR=8.64, P=0.04) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality.

Conclusions: While emergency cholecystectomy remains the gold standard for the treatment of acute cholecystitis, PC represents a valuable initial treatment alternative in high-risk patients when performed at an early stage. Early PC provides significant advantages, including fewer complications, shorter hospitalization, and reduced in-hospital mortality.

背景:急性胆囊炎的经皮胆囊造瘘术(PC)的最佳时机尚不清楚,尽管它越来越多地作为老年人和危重患者的治疗选择。本研究旨在评估PC时间对中重度急性结石性胆囊炎高危患者并发症、住院时间和死亡率的影响。材料和方法:在2020年至2024年期间,回顾性分析了124例连续接受PC治疗的患者。测量从入院到PC的时间。II级胆囊炎患者Charlson合并症指数(CCI)评分≥6,美国麻醉医师协会身体状况(ASA-PS)评分≥3,III级胆囊炎患者CCI评分≥4,ASA-PS评分≥3,使用tg18校正阈值定义为高危患者。在这82例高危患者中,从入院到PC的中位时间为39小时(范围:21 ~ 62小时)。结果:早期高危组(≤48 h, n=51)住院时间较短[7 (5 ~ 8)d比13 (6 ~ 20)d;P48 h;n = 31)。延迟PC (OR=4.80, P=0.004)和PC相关并发症(OR=4.37, P=0.015)是延长住院时间的独立危险因素。较高的CCI评分(≥7)(OR=13.68, P=0.047)和延迟PC (OR=8.64, P=0.04)是院内死亡的独立危险因素。结论:虽然急诊胆囊切除术仍然是治疗急性胆囊炎的金标准,但在高危患者早期进行PC是一种有价值的初始治疗选择。早期PC具有显著的优势,包括并发症少,住院时间短,住院死亡率低。
{"title":"The Impact of Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Timing on Mortality and Morbidity in High-Risk Patients With Acute Calculous Cholecystitis.","authors":"Ali Levent Işik, Ali Bekraki","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001431","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001431","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal timing of percutaneous cholecystostomy (PC) in acute cholecystitis remains unclear, despite its increasing adoption as a treatment option for elderly and critically ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of PC timing on complications, hospital stay, and mortality in high-risk patients with moderate and severe acute calculous cholecystitis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between 2020 and 2024, 124 consecutive patients who underwent PC were retrospectively reviewed. The time periods from admission to PC were measured. Patients with grade II cholecystitis who had a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score ≥6 and an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) score ≥3, and those with grade III cholecystitis who had a CCI score ≥4 and an ASA-PS score ≥3, were defined as high-risk patients using TG18-aligned thresholds. Among these 82 high-risk patients, the median time from admission to PC was 39 hours (range: 21 to 62 h).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Early high-risk group (≤48 h; n=51) had shorter hospital stay [7 (5 to 8) vs. 13 (6 to 20) d; P<0.001], lower ≤90-day mortality rate (5.9% vs. 22.6%; P=0.037) and lower ≤365-day mortality rate (7.8% vs. 25.8%; P=0.049) as compared with delayed high-risk group (>48 h; n=31). Delayed PC (OR=4.80, P=0.004) and complications related to PC (OR=4.37, P=0.015) were independent risk factors for longer hospital stay. A higher CCI Score (≥7) (OR=13.68, P=0.047) and delayed PC (OR=8.64, P=0.04) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While emergency cholecystectomy remains the gold standard for the treatment of acute cholecystitis, PC represents a valuable initial treatment alternative in high-risk patients when performed at an early stage. Early PC provides significant advantages, including fewer complications, shorter hospitalization, and reduced in-hospital mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145811461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Suggestion for an Easy Laparoscopic Technique to Avoid Difficulties in Nonmidline Ventral Hernia Repair: Transabdominal Partial Extraperitoneal (TAPE) Approach. 一种避免非中线腹疝修补困难的简单腹腔镜技术建议:经腹部部分腹膜外(磁带)入路。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-22 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001429
Huseyin Kilavuz, Murat Demir, Feyyaz Gungor, Muhammed F Arslan, Idris Kurtulus

Background: Nonmidline ventral hernias (NMVH) are encountered less frequently than midline ventral hernias. Laparoscopic NMVH repairs are considered technically more difficult than midline hernias. For this reason, various intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal approach methods have been defined in the surgery of this group of hernias. In this study, we aimed to present the clinical data and follow-up results of patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of NMVH using the transabdominal partial extraperitoneal (TAPE) technique.

Methods: In this single-center and retrospective study, demographic information, hernia characteristics, operative findings, and follow-up data of laparoscopic NMVH surgeries performed by a hernia-specific general surgery unit between January 2022 and June 2024 were scanned and analyzed.

Results: Data from 26 patients with NMVH who underwent laparoscopic repair using the TAPE technique were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 52.9±13.5 years. No intraoperative complications or conversion to open surgery were observed in any case. The median operative time was 100 (82.5 to 120) minutes. The median VAS score on the first postoperative day was 5 (3.75 to 6). Complications developed in 38.5% of patients during hospitalization; 26.9% were Clavien-Dindo class 1 and 11.5% were class 3a. The median hospital stay was 3 (3 to 5) days. The mean follow-up period was 17.8 (9 to 48) months, during which 2 patients (7.7%) experienced recurrence.

Conclusions: The TAPE technique is among the reliable techniques that can be applied in the laparoscopic repair of NMVH with low complication and recurrence rates.

背景:非中线腹疝(NMVH)的发生率低于中线腹疝。腹腔镜下NMVH修复被认为在技术上比中线疝更困难。因此,在这组疝气的手术中定义了各种腹膜内和腹膜外入路方法。在本研究中,我们旨在介绍采用经腹部分腹腔外(TAPE)技术行腹腔镜下NMVH修复的患者的临床资料和随访结果。方法:在这项单中心回顾性研究中,对2022年1月至2024年6月期间某疝气专科普外科单位施行的腹腔镜下NMVH手术的人口统计学信息、疝气特征、手术表现及随访资料进行扫描和分析。结果:我们分析了26例采用TAPE技术进行腹腔镜修复的NMVH患者的资料。患者平均年龄52.9±13.5岁。所有病例均无术中并发症或转开手术。中位手术时间为100(82.5 ~ 120)分钟。术后第一天VAS评分中位数为5分(3.75 ~ 6分)。38.5%的患者在住院期间出现并发症;Clavien-Dindo 1类占26.9%,3a类占11.5%。中位住院时间为3(3 ~ 5)天。平均随访时间为17.8(9 ~ 48)个月,其中2例(7.7%)复发。结论:TAPE技术是腹腔镜下修复NMVH的可靠技术之一,并发症低,复发率低。
{"title":"A Suggestion for an Easy Laparoscopic Technique to Avoid Difficulties in Nonmidline Ventral Hernia Repair: Transabdominal Partial Extraperitoneal (TAPE) Approach.","authors":"Huseyin Kilavuz, Murat Demir, Feyyaz Gungor, Muhammed F Arslan, Idris Kurtulus","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001429","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001429","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nonmidline ventral hernias (NMVH) are encountered less frequently than midline ventral hernias. Laparoscopic NMVH repairs are considered technically more difficult than midline hernias. For this reason, various intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal approach methods have been defined in the surgery of this group of hernias. In this study, we aimed to present the clinical data and follow-up results of patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of NMVH using the transabdominal partial extraperitoneal (TAPE) technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center and retrospective study, demographic information, hernia characteristics, operative findings, and follow-up data of laparoscopic NMVH surgeries performed by a hernia-specific general surgery unit between January 2022 and June 2024 were scanned and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 26 patients with NMVH who underwent laparoscopic repair using the TAPE technique were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 52.9±13.5 years. No intraoperative complications or conversion to open surgery were observed in any case. The median operative time was 100 (82.5 to 120) minutes. The median VAS score on the first postoperative day was 5 (3.75 to 6). Complications developed in 38.5% of patients during hospitalization; 26.9% were Clavien-Dindo class 1 and 11.5% were class 3a. The median hospital stay was 3 (3 to 5) days. The mean follow-up period was 17.8 (9 to 48) months, during which 2 patients (7.7%) experienced recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TAPE technique is among the reliable techniques that can be applied in the laparoscopic repair of NMVH with low complication and recurrence rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145805805","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Single-port Robotic Cholecystectomy (SPRC) Using the da Vinci Xi System With Straight Instruments: A Practical and Feasible Alternative to SP System or Single-site Platform. 单端口机器人胆囊切除术(SPRC)使用直式仪器的达芬奇Xi系统:SP系统或单站点平台的实用可行的替代方案。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-18 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001428
Yi-Jie Wang, Heng-Yu Tung, Yu-Ying Chen, Tzu-Chi Wang, Zhi-Jie Hong, Kuo-Feng Hsu

Background: Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) offers excellent cosmetic results but is technically challenging. Robotic systems can overcome these limitations, and although the da Vinci Xi is designed for multiport surgery, it can be adapted for single-port procedures. This study reports our experience performing single-port robotic cholecystectomy (SPRC) with straight instruments, emphasizing technical optimization and perioperative outcomes.

Methods: SPRC was performed using an optimized umbilical port configuration and docking technique. Surgical steps were standardized to ensure stable traction and precise dissection, with a crossover method applied in difficult cases to improve exposure (see Supplemental Videos 1, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/SLE/A507 , and 2, Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/SLE/A508 ). Eleven patients underwent SPRC, and demographic, operative, and perioperative data were analyzed.

Results: All procedures were completed without conversion to open or multiport surgery. The mean operative time was 116.7 ± 22.2 minutes, with minimal blood loss (13.8 ± 7.5 mL). No intraoperative complications or gallbladder perforations occurred, and only one patient required temporary drainage for minor oozing. Postoperative VAS scores averaged 3.1 ± 1.0 on day 0 and 1.6 ± 0.5 on day 1, with a mean hospital stay of 2.2 ± 1.1 days. No readmissions or port-site complications were observed.

Conclusions: SPRC with the da Vinci Xi system using straight instruments is feasible and safe. Optimized port placement and instrument coordination yield outcomes comparable to those reported for the SP system or single-site platform, providing an accessible alternative for centers without these platforms.

背景:单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)具有良好的美容效果,但在技术上具有挑战性。机器人系统可以克服这些限制,尽管达芬奇Xi是为多口手术设计的,但它也可以适用于单口手术。本研究报告了我们使用直式器械进行单孔机器人胆囊切除术(SPRC)的经验,强调了技术优化和围手术期结果。方法:采用优化的脐带端口配置和对接技术进行SPRC。标准化手术步骤以确保稳定牵引和精确解剖,在困难病例中采用交叉方法以改善暴露(见补充视频1,补充数字内容1,http://links.lww.com/SLE/A507和2,补充数字内容2,http://links.lww.com/SLE/A508)。11例患者接受了SPRC,并对人口学、手术和围手术期数据进行了分析。结果:所有手术均完成,未转开孔或多孔手术。平均手术时间116.7±22.2分钟,出血量最小(13.8±7.5 mL)。无术中并发症或胆囊穿孔发生,仅有1例患者因轻微渗液需要暂时引流。术后VAS评分0天平均3.1±1.0分,1天平均1.6±0.5分,平均住院时间2.2±1.1天。无再入院或港口并发症。结论:采用直式器械的达芬奇系统SPRC是可行且安全的。优化的端口放置和仪器协调效果可与SP系统或单站点平台相媲美,为没有这些平台的中心提供了可访问的替代方案。
{"title":"Single-port Robotic Cholecystectomy (SPRC) Using the da Vinci Xi System With Straight Instruments: A Practical and Feasible Alternative to SP System or Single-site Platform.","authors":"Yi-Jie Wang, Heng-Yu Tung, Yu-Ying Chen, Tzu-Chi Wang, Zhi-Jie Hong, Kuo-Feng Hsu","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001428","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001428","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) offers excellent cosmetic results but is technically challenging. Robotic systems can overcome these limitations, and although the da Vinci Xi is designed for multiport surgery, it can be adapted for single-port procedures. This study reports our experience performing single-port robotic cholecystectomy (SPRC) with straight instruments, emphasizing technical optimization and perioperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SPRC was performed using an optimized umbilical port configuration and docking technique. Surgical steps were standardized to ensure stable traction and precise dissection, with a crossover method applied in difficult cases to improve exposure (see Supplemental Videos 1, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/SLE/A507 , and 2, Supplemental Digital Content 2, http://links.lww.com/SLE/A508 ). Eleven patients underwent SPRC, and demographic, operative, and perioperative data were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All procedures were completed without conversion to open or multiport surgery. The mean operative time was 116.7 ± 22.2 minutes, with minimal blood loss (13.8 ± 7.5 mL). No intraoperative complications or gallbladder perforations occurred, and only one patient required temporary drainage for minor oozing. Postoperative VAS scores averaged 3.1 ± 1.0 on day 0 and 1.6 ± 0.5 on day 1, with a mean hospital stay of 2.2 ± 1.1 days. No readmissions or port-site complications were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SPRC with the da Vinci Xi system using straight instruments is feasible and safe. Optimized port placement and instrument coordination yield outcomes comparable to those reported for the SP system or single-site platform, providing an accessible alternative for centers without these platforms.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145805179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Choledochoduodenostomy At a Single Institution. 腹腔镜与开放式胆总管十二指肠切开术在同一医院的比较。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-17 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001426
Hirotaka Okamoto, Atsushi Yamamoto, Kenji Kawashima, Toshio Fukasawa

Background: Choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) has been reconsidered as an alternative to choledocholithiasis, especially in cases where endoscopic clearance is difficult. This study aimed to evaluate the use of laparoscopic CDD and compare the results with open CDD, including long-term outcomes.

Methods: The medical records of 65 patients who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery due to the difficulty of endoscopic treatment between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Laparoscopic CDD was performed in 20 cases during the latter period, from April 2016, and open CDD was performed in 45 cases during the former period, before April 2016. The laparoscopic and open CDD surgical results were compared. Data on patient demographics, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications like bile leakage, reflux cholangitis, and anastomosis stenosis were evaluated.

Results: The median operative times, blood losses, and hospital stays were 187 and 125 minutes, 32 and 95 mL, and 8 and 14 days in the laparoscopic and open CDD groups, respectively. The occurrence of minor bile leakage, reflux cholangitis, and anastomosis stenosis was 2/20 (10%) and 1/45 (2.2%), 1/20 (5%) and 2/45 (4.4%), and 2/20 (10%) and 1/45 (2.2%) in the laparoscopic and open CDD groups, respectively. A comparison between the laparoscopic and open CDD groups revealed no significant difference in reflux cholangitis or anastomosis stenosis, but the operative times and incidence of minor bile leakage were higher in the laparoscopic group, and the hospital stays and amount of blood loss were lower in the laparoscopic group.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic CDD is feasible and not inferior to open CDD. The laparoscopic approach is minimally invasive and may be particularly advantageous in some patients.

背景:胆总管十二指肠吻合术(CDD)已被重新考虑作为胆总管结石的替代方法,特别是在内镜下清除困难的情况下。本研究旨在评估腹腔镜CDD的使用,并将结果与开放式CDD进行比较,包括长期结果。方法:回顾性分析2011年至2021年65例因内镜治疗困难而行腹腔镜或开放手术患者的病历。2016年4月起,后期行腹腔镜CDD 20例;2016年4月前,前期行开放式CDD 45例。比较腹腔镜与开放式CDD手术效果。评估患者人口统计学数据、手术时间、出血量、住院时间以及胆漏、反流性胆管炎和吻合口狭窄等并发症。结果:腹腔镜组和开放CDD组的中位手术时间分别为187和125分钟,出血量和住院时间分别为32和95 mL, 8和14 d。轻度胆漏、反流性胆管炎、吻合口狭窄的发生率在腹腔镜组和开放CDD组分别为2/20(10%)和1/45(2.2%),1/20(5%)和2/45(4.4%),2/20(10%)和1/45(2.2%)。腹腔镜组与开放CDD组比较,反流性胆管炎和吻合口狭窄无显著差异,但腹腔镜组手术次数和轻微胆漏发生率较高,住院时间和出血量较低。结论:腹腔镜CDD是可行的,并不亚于开放式CDD。腹腔镜方法是微创的,对某些患者可能特别有利。
{"title":"Comparing Laparoscopic and Open Choledochoduodenostomy At a Single Institution.","authors":"Hirotaka Okamoto, Atsushi Yamamoto, Kenji Kawashima, Toshio Fukasawa","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001426","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001426","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) has been reconsidered as an alternative to choledocholithiasis, especially in cases where endoscopic clearance is difficult. This study aimed to evaluate the use of laparoscopic CDD and compare the results with open CDD, including long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of 65 patients who underwent laparoscopic or open surgery due to the difficulty of endoscopic treatment between 2011 and 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Laparoscopic CDD was performed in 20 cases during the latter period, from April 2016, and open CDD was performed in 45 cases during the former period, before April 2016. The laparoscopic and open CDD surgical results were compared. Data on patient demographics, operative time, blood loss, hospital stay, and complications like bile leakage, reflux cholangitis, and anastomosis stenosis were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median operative times, blood losses, and hospital stays were 187 and 125 minutes, 32 and 95 mL, and 8 and 14 days in the laparoscopic and open CDD groups, respectively. The occurrence of minor bile leakage, reflux cholangitis, and anastomosis stenosis was 2/20 (10%) and 1/45 (2.2%), 1/20 (5%) and 2/45 (4.4%), and 2/20 (10%) and 1/45 (2.2%) in the laparoscopic and open CDD groups, respectively. A comparison between the laparoscopic and open CDD groups revealed no significant difference in reflux cholangitis or anastomosis stenosis, but the operative times and incidence of minor bile leakage were higher in the laparoscopic group, and the hospital stays and amount of blood loss were lower in the laparoscopic group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laparoscopic CDD is feasible and not inferior to open CDD. The laparoscopic approach is minimally invasive and may be particularly advantageous in some patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145805750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antibiotics Versus Surgery for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in Adults: A Meta-analysis of Long-term Outcomes and Risk Factors for Failure. 抗生素与手术治疗成人无并发症急性阑尾炎:长期结局和失败危险因素的荟萃分析。
IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2025-12-15 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001425
Mohamed AbdAlla Salman, Ahmed Elewa, Mohamed Tourky, Mahmoud Ali, Evelyn Nkem Emechap, Amr Elserafy, Ahmed Salman

Background: Acute uncomplicated appendicitis has traditionally been managed surgically, but recent trials suggest nonoperative treatment with antibiotics may be effective in selected adults. This meta-analysis compares long-term outcomes of antibiotics versus surgery and evaluates predictors of treatment failure, including the presence of an appendicolith.

Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and clinical trial registries up to July 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antibiotics versus appendectomy in adults with imaging-confirmed uncomplicated appendicitis. The primary outcome was 1-year treatment success. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, recurrence, and subgroup analysis by appendicolith. A meta-regression explored the relationship between appendicolith prevalence and treatment failure.

Results: Seven RCTs (n=3164) were included. The 1-year treatment success rate was significantly lower in the antibiotics group (73.8%) versus surgery (98.1%) (RR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84). Complication rates were comparable (RR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.29-1.12). Patients with appendicolith had a significantly higher failure rate (up to 46%). Meta-regression confirmed a positive correlation between appendicolith prevalence and antibiotic failure.

Conclusions: Antibiotics can be effective in selected patients, but recurrence and treatment failure remain concerns, particularly in the presence of appendicolith. Appendectomy remains the definitive treatment. This meta-analysis, including the most recent trials and a novel meta-regression, provides timely insights for shared decision-making.

背景:急性无并发症阑尾炎传统上是手术治疗,但最近的试验表明,非手术治疗抗生素可能对某些成年人有效。这项荟萃分析比较了抗生素与手术的长期结果,并评估了治疗失败的预测因素,包括阑尾结石的出现。方法:系统检索截至2024年7月的MEDLINE、Embase、CENTRAL和临床试验注册。我们纳入了随机对照试验(rct),比较抗生素与阑尾切除术对成人影像学确诊的无并发症阑尾炎的疗效。主要结局是1年的治疗成功。次要结局包括并发症发生率、复发率和阑尾结石亚组分析。荟萃回归探讨阑尾炎患病率与治疗失败之间的关系。结果:纳入7项rct (n=3164)。抗生素组1年治疗成功率(73.8%)明显低于手术组(98.1%)(RR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84)。并发症发生率相当(RR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.29-1.12)。阑尾结石患者的失败率明显更高(高达46%)。meta回归证实阑尾炎患病率与抗生素失效呈正相关。结论:抗生素对选定的患者有效,但复发和治疗失败仍然值得关注,特别是存在阑尾结石的患者。阑尾切除术仍是最终的治疗方法。这项荟萃分析,包括最近的试验和一项新颖的荟萃回归,为共同决策提供了及时的见解。
{"title":"Antibiotics Versus Surgery for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in Adults: A Meta-analysis of Long-term Outcomes and Risk Factors for Failure.","authors":"Mohamed AbdAlla Salman, Ahmed Elewa, Mohamed Tourky, Mahmoud Ali, Evelyn Nkem Emechap, Amr Elserafy, Ahmed Salman","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001425","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001425","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute uncomplicated appendicitis has traditionally been managed surgically, but recent trials suggest nonoperative treatment with antibiotics may be effective in selected adults. This meta-analysis compares long-term outcomes of antibiotics versus surgery and evaluates predictors of treatment failure, including the presence of an appendicolith.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and clinical trial registries up to July 2024. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing antibiotics versus appendectomy in adults with imaging-confirmed uncomplicated appendicitis. The primary outcome was 1-year treatment success. Secondary outcomes included complication rates, recurrence, and subgroup analysis by appendicolith. A meta-regression explored the relationship between appendicolith prevalence and treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven RCTs (n=3164) were included. The 1-year treatment success rate was significantly lower in the antibiotics group (73.8%) versus surgery (98.1%) (RR 0.78, 95% CI: 0.73-0.84). Complication rates were comparable (RR 0.57, 95% CI: 0.29-1.12). Patients with appendicolith had a significantly higher failure rate (up to 46%). Meta-regression confirmed a positive correlation between appendicolith prevalence and antibiotic failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antibiotics can be effective in selected patients, but recurrence and treatment failure remain concerns, particularly in the presence of appendicolith. Appendectomy remains the definitive treatment. This meta-analysis, including the most recent trials and a novel meta-regression, provides timely insights for shared decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145763989","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1