Child sexual abuse, mental health, and legislation in India and Thailand: A cross-country comparison

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, LEGAL Journal of forensic and legal medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2024.102655
Chonnakarn Jatchavala , Ramdas Ransing , Nutt Sukavejworakit , Rodrigo Ramalho , Nilesh Devraj
{"title":"Child sexual abuse, mental health, and legislation in India and Thailand: A cross-country comparison","authors":"Chonnakarn Jatchavala ,&nbsp;Ramdas Ransing ,&nbsp;Nutt Sukavejworakit ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Ramalho ,&nbsp;Nilesh Devraj","doi":"10.1016/j.jflm.2024.102655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Child sexual abuse (CSA) is a serious public health issue in India and Thailand. To identify potential barriers for addressing CSA in these countries, it is necessary to explore and compare research, laws, and policies in these two countries.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>The Scopus and PubMed databases were searched for published literature on “Child Sexual Abuse” AND “India” OR “Thailand” concerning research focus, prevalence, factors, and policies or interventions on CSA. Main legislations related to CSA were compared using a predefined outline. Additionally, authors compared and analysed current legislation in relation to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Published literature (n = 64) included original articles (n = 26), reviews (n = 36), editorials or letters to the editor (n = 2). No collaboration on CSA between the two countries was found. Several differences in the main legislation (e.g., punishment, services) of India and Thailand were observed, both between countries and in relation to the UNCRC.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that CSA is mostly under-researched in both countries in terms of services, policy and legislation. There is a need for cross-country, multidisciplinary, and collaborative research on CSA in both India and Thailand.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic and legal medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1752928X24000179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Child sexual abuse (CSA) is a serious public health issue in India and Thailand. To identify potential barriers for addressing CSA in these countries, it is necessary to explore and compare research, laws, and policies in these two countries.

Material and methods

The Scopus and PubMed databases were searched for published literature on “Child Sexual Abuse” AND “India” OR “Thailand” concerning research focus, prevalence, factors, and policies or interventions on CSA. Main legislations related to CSA were compared using a predefined outline. Additionally, authors compared and analysed current legislation in relation to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).

Results

Published literature (n = 64) included original articles (n = 26), reviews (n = 36), editorials or letters to the editor (n = 2). No collaboration on CSA between the two countries was found. Several differences in the main legislation (e.g., punishment, services) of India and Thailand were observed, both between countries and in relation to the UNCRC.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that CSA is mostly under-researched in both countries in terms of services, policy and legislation. There is a need for cross-country, multidisciplinary, and collaborative research on CSA in both India and Thailand.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
印度和泰国的儿童性虐待、心理健康和立法:跨国比较
引言在印度和泰国,儿童性虐待(CSA)是一个严重的公共卫生问题。材料与方法在 Scopus 和 PubMed 数据库中搜索了有关 "儿童性虐待"、"印度 "或 "泰国 "的已发表文献,内容涉及 CSA 的研究重点、流行率、因素、政策或干预措施。使用预定义的大纲对与 "儿童性虐待 "相关的主要立法进行了比较。此外,作者还比较和分析了与联合国《儿童权利公约》(UNCRC)相关的现行立法。结果发表的文献(n = 64)包括原创文章(n = 26)、评论(n = 36)、社论或致编辑的信(n = 2)。未发现两国在 CSA 方面有任何合作。我们的研究结果表明,印度和泰国在主要立法(如惩罚、服务)方面存在一些差异,既有国家之间的差异,也有与《联合国儿童权利公约》有关的差异。印度和泰国都需要对儿童全面发展问题进行跨国、多学科的合作研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
106
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine publishes topical articles on aspects of forensic and legal medicine. Specifically the Journal supports research that explores the medical principles of care and forensic assessment of individuals, whether adult or child, in contact with the judicial system. It is a fully peer-review hybrid journal with a broad international perspective. The Journal accepts submissions of original research, review articles, and pertinent case studies, editorials, and commentaries in relevant areas of Forensic and Legal Medicine, Context of Practice, and Education and Training. The Journal adheres to strict publication ethical guidelines, and actively supports a culture of inclusive and representative publication.
期刊最新文献
Beyond the distance between juridic and scientific decision-making process: An evidence-based prediction algorithm for professional liability assessment in healthcare-associated infections Transfer and persistence of microbiota markers from the human hand to the knife: A preliminary study Analysis of non-metric dental traits for ethnicity identification in a mixed population of Uttar Pradesh An evaluation of potential challenges in forensic psychiatric assessment in Parkinson's disease Femicide in Ireland 2012–2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1