Prescribing patterns of antimicrobials according to the WHO AWaRe classification at a tertiary referral hospital in the southern highlands of Tanzania

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infection Prevention in Practice Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100347
Anthony Nsojo , Lutengano George , Davance Mwasomola , Joseph Tawete , Christopher H. Mbotwa , Clement N. Mweya , Issakwisa Mwakyula
{"title":"Prescribing patterns of antimicrobials according to the WHO AWaRe classification at a tertiary referral hospital in the southern highlands of Tanzania","authors":"Anthony Nsojo ,&nbsp;Lutengano George ,&nbsp;Davance Mwasomola ,&nbsp;Joseph Tawete ,&nbsp;Christopher H. Mbotwa ,&nbsp;Clement N. Mweya ,&nbsp;Issakwisa Mwakyula","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2024.100347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Antimicrobial consumption continues to rise globally and contributes to the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to evaluate antimicrobial prescribing patterns in a selected tertiary hospital in Tanzania.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional study was conducted for one year (September 2021–September 2022) at Mbeya Zonal Referral Hospital, a public hospital in the southern highlands zone of Tanzania. Data on clinical diagnosis, laboratory tests, prescribed antimicrobials, and prescribers' designations were collected through a custom eMedical system, aligning antimicrobials with the WHO's 2021 AWaRe classification. Descriptive analysis was performed to assess the pattern of antimicrobial prescriptions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 2,293 antimicrobial prescriptions, 62.41% were ACCESS, 37.42% were WATCH, and 0.17% fell in the RESERVE categories. Metronidazole, accounting for 23.8%, was the most commonly prescribed antimicrobial. More than 50% of the ACCESS and WATCH prescriptions were justified by laboratory diagnosis and were predominantly prescribed by clinicians. A very small proportion of prescriptions (&lt;1%) were informed by culture and sensitivity (C/S) testing. The Paediatric department had the majority of WATCH prescriptions (72.2%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The prescribing patterns at the study hospital generally align with WHO AWaRe guidelines, potentially mitigating antimicrobial resistance. Nevertheless, the scarcity of culture and sensitivity testing is a concern that warrants targeted improvement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"6 2","pages":"Article 100347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000118/pdfft?md5=338d9270a948324c5a41ac067967b050&pid=1-s2.0-S2590088924000118-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088924000118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Antimicrobial consumption continues to rise globally and contributes to the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to evaluate antimicrobial prescribing patterns in a selected tertiary hospital in Tanzania.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted for one year (September 2021–September 2022) at Mbeya Zonal Referral Hospital, a public hospital in the southern highlands zone of Tanzania. Data on clinical diagnosis, laboratory tests, prescribed antimicrobials, and prescribers' designations were collected through a custom eMedical system, aligning antimicrobials with the WHO's 2021 AWaRe classification. Descriptive analysis was performed to assess the pattern of antimicrobial prescriptions.

Results

Of 2,293 antimicrobial prescriptions, 62.41% were ACCESS, 37.42% were WATCH, and 0.17% fell in the RESERVE categories. Metronidazole, accounting for 23.8%, was the most commonly prescribed antimicrobial. More than 50% of the ACCESS and WATCH prescriptions were justified by laboratory diagnosis and were predominantly prescribed by clinicians. A very small proportion of prescriptions (<1%) were informed by culture and sensitivity (C/S) testing. The Paediatric department had the majority of WATCH prescriptions (72.2%).

Conclusion

The prescribing patterns at the study hospital generally align with WHO AWaRe guidelines, potentially mitigating antimicrobial resistance. Nevertheless, the scarcity of culture and sensitivity testing is a concern that warrants targeted improvement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
坦桑尼亚南部高地一家三级转诊医院根据世卫组织 AWaRe 分类开具抗菌药处方的模式
背景在全球范围内,抗菌药物的消耗量持续上升,导致了抗菌药物耐药性的出现和蔓延。这项研究旨在评估坦桑尼亚一家选定的三级医院的抗菌药物处方模式。方法这项横断面研究在坦桑尼亚南部高原地区的一家公立医院姆贝亚分区转诊医院进行,为期一年(2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 9 月)。通过定制的电子医疗系统收集了临床诊断、实验室检测、处方抗菌药物和处方者指定的数据,并将抗菌药物与世界卫生组织 2021 年的 AWaRe 分类相一致。结果 在 2,293 个抗菌药物处方中,62.41% 属于 ACCESS,37.42% 属于 WATCH,0.17% 属于 RESERVE。甲硝唑是最常用的抗菌药物,占 23.8%。50% 以上的 ACCESS 和 WATCH 处方是根据实验室诊断开具的,并且主要由临床医生开具。只有很小一部分处方(1%)是根据培养和药敏试验(C/S)开出的。结论:研究医院的处方模式总体上符合世界卫生组织的 AWaRe 指南,有可能减轻抗菌药耐药性。然而,培养和药敏试验的缺乏是一个值得关注的问题,需要有针对性地加以改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
期刊最新文献
Effects of disposable pull-through brush types for reprocessing of flexible endoscopes in clinical environment Sodium dichloroisocyanurate: a promising candidate for the disinfection of resilient drain biofilm Clinical and economic impact of ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care units in Japan Healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and practices in preventing catheter-associated urinary tract infections: a cross-sectional study in a rehabilitation facility Surgical prophylaxis in Haydom Lutheran Hospital, Tanzania – learning from a point prevalence survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1