Exploring the impacts of IT service management on the business agility index: an AHP simulation-based decision-making approach

IF 2.3 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Information Systems and e-Business Management Pub Date : 2024-02-10 DOI:10.1007/s10257-024-00669-z
{"title":"Exploring the impacts of IT service management on the business agility index: an AHP simulation-based decision-making approach","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s10257-024-00669-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>Business agility has been recognized as a core competitive capability in a dynamic business environment. In this context, the organizational IT capability is a co-factor for achieving and keeping business agility. IT capability has been managed through the utilization of plan-driven IT service management (ITSM) frameworks and standards such as the ITIL v3.v2011 and the ISO/IEC 20000. These implementations have produced benefits such as better IT user satisfaction level, reduction of IT services TCO, and improved understanding and communication between IT services users and IT services staff. However, the current business environment continues highly changing with the emergence and maturation of new IT technologies and IT-based business innovation approaches. Consequently, the organizational IT capability is pushed to be also agile and keep its contribution to the business agility aim. Given the novelty of agile ITSM standards and frameworks—ITIL v4 framework, VeriSM framework, and the ISO/IEC 29110-4-3 standard—, there is a knowledge gap on what they are and how they could produce an agile organizational IT capability and contribute to the business agility aim in this modern business environment. This research, thus, compares the potential impacts on a business agility index from the main plan driven and agile ITSM frameworks and standards. For this aim, we design an Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) decision-making model using core findings from the business agility literature and the Porter’s value chain and simulate a set of scenarios. Simulation results indicated that: (1) there were differences in the contributions from the five evaluated ITSM frameworks and standards to the business agility index; and (2) the high and very high scores produced by the two agile ITSM frameworks and standards were obtained only when other relevant agility capabilities were also achieved. Hence, this research reduces the knowledge gap and provides initial theoretical findings and insights on the impacts on business agility from the main ITSM frameworks and standards considering other relevant agility capabilities. However, empirical research is encouraged to collect confirmatory evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":13660,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems and e-Business Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems and e-Business Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-024-00669-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Business agility has been recognized as a core competitive capability in a dynamic business environment. In this context, the organizational IT capability is a co-factor for achieving and keeping business agility. IT capability has been managed through the utilization of plan-driven IT service management (ITSM) frameworks and standards such as the ITIL v3.v2011 and the ISO/IEC 20000. These implementations have produced benefits such as better IT user satisfaction level, reduction of IT services TCO, and improved understanding and communication between IT services users and IT services staff. However, the current business environment continues highly changing with the emergence and maturation of new IT technologies and IT-based business innovation approaches. Consequently, the organizational IT capability is pushed to be also agile and keep its contribution to the business agility aim. Given the novelty of agile ITSM standards and frameworks—ITIL v4 framework, VeriSM framework, and the ISO/IEC 29110-4-3 standard—, there is a knowledge gap on what they are and how they could produce an agile organizational IT capability and contribute to the business agility aim in this modern business environment. This research, thus, compares the potential impacts on a business agility index from the main plan driven and agile ITSM frameworks and standards. For this aim, we design an Analytical Hierarchical Process (AHP) decision-making model using core findings from the business agility literature and the Porter’s value chain and simulate a set of scenarios. Simulation results indicated that: (1) there were differences in the contributions from the five evaluated ITSM frameworks and standards to the business agility index; and (2) the high and very high scores produced by the two agile ITSM frameworks and standards were obtained only when other relevant agility capabilities were also achieved. Hence, this research reduces the knowledge gap and provides initial theoretical findings and insights on the impacts on business agility from the main ITSM frameworks and standards considering other relevant agility capabilities. However, empirical research is encouraged to collect confirmatory evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索 IT 服务管理对业务敏捷性指数的影响:基于 AHP 模拟的决策方法
摘要 业务敏捷性已被视为动态业务环境中的一种核心竞争能力。在这种情况下,组织的信息技术能力是实现和保持业务敏捷性的共同因素。信息技术能力是通过利用计划驱动的信息技术服务管理(ITSM)框架和标准(如 ITIL v3.v2011 和 ISO/IEC 20000)来管理的。这些实施带来了诸多好处,如提高 IT 用户满意度、降低 IT 服务总体拥有成本,以及增进 IT 服务用户与 IT 服务人员之间的理解和沟通。然而,随着新 IT 技术和基于 IT 的业务创新方法的出现和成熟,当前的业务环境仍在不断发生巨大变化。因此,组织的 IT 能力也被推向敏捷,并不断为业务敏捷性目标做出贡献。鉴于敏捷 ITSM 标准和框架--ITIL v4 框架、VeriSM 框架和 ISO/IEC 29110-4-3 标准--的新颖性,对于它们是什么以及它们如何在现代商业环境中产生敏捷的组织 IT 能力并促进业务敏捷性目标的实现,还存在知识空白。因此,本研究比较了主要的计划驱动型和敏捷型 ITSM 框架和标准对业务敏捷性指数的潜在影响。为此,我们利用业务敏捷性文献和波特价值链的核心研究成果,设计了一个层次分析法(AHP)决策模型,并模拟了一系列情景。模拟结果表明(1) 五种受评估的 ITSM 框架和标准对业务敏捷性指数的贡献存在差异;(2) 两种敏捷 ITSM 框架和标准只有在同时具备其他相关敏捷性能力的情况下才能获得高分和极高分。因此,本研究缩小了知识差距,并就考虑到其他相关敏捷能力的主要 ITSM 框架和标准对业务敏捷性的影响提供了初步的理论发现和见解。不过,我们鼓励开展实证研究,以收集确证证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Nowadays, in the age of information technology and the internet, the creation and maintenance of business models has to consider the latest developments in information technology to ensure competitiveness and long-term success of the enterprise. The aim of Information Systems Management (ISM) is to integrate information technology into business models and business processes to explore its potential to meet the business goals. Many international journals in the field of information systems (IS) or information management (IM) focus primarily on the quantitative analysis of information systems phenomena, especially through the use of empirical studies. However, research on qualitative analysis, development, and deployment of information systems is not covered sufficiently by the existing international IS journals. Therefore, the journal Information Systems and e-Business Management (ISeB) focuses on the core tasks of Information Systems Management, the conceptual analysis, design, and deployment of information systems, as well as on all e-business related topics. 1. Editorial objective The central aim of the journal ISeB is to publish original, well-written, self-contained contributions that elucidate novel research and innovation in information systems management and e-business which advance the field fundamentally and significantly. Published quarterly, the journal will: - Provide a vibrant forum for both academicians and industry specialists to explore the information systems and e-business management field - Bring innovative research on all aspects of information systems management from analytical, behavioral and technological perspectives - Enable rapid dissemination of latest research and innovation, supported with a double-blind peer review process. 2. Nature of topics The function of information systems management is the use of information technology (IT) to meet the information requirements of a company. Core tasks of ISM are the generation of project ideas (e.g. identification of business opportunities enabled by new information technologies), conceptual analysis, design, and integration of information systems. Submissions to ISeB should have a clear business focus and use appropriate information systems methodologies. They should either be founded on theory or should have proven their value based on prototypes and their beneficial application in the field. The general applicability of the concepts presented is strictly required. Case studies are welcome, if the insights presented allow general applicability. Moreover, empirical studies are welcome if clear research questions with relevance to the field of information systems and e-business management are given and the studies are carried out correctly. ISeB topics focus on (but are not restricted to) the following areas: - Information Modeling: The central task of information systems modeling is the conceptual specification of information systems from the business point of view. Information modeling includes the development or the application of high-level modeling techniques used for conceptual modeling, e.g. event-driven process chain (EPC) for process modeling, entity-relationship model (ERM) for data modeling, and object-oriented methods like the unified modeling language (UML). - Domain-Specific Information Systems: Different industry domains (e.g. manufacturing, retailing, or finance) are characterized by different requirements to information systems that are reflected in different IS architectures for specific domains. The development and maintenance of information systems in an industry domain can be supported by these architectures. Either the development of generalizable domain-specific architectures or the employment of such architectures in practice can be discussed. - E-Business Management (intra-organization al and inter-organizational information systems): Possible sub-topics include the development and deployment of IS for electronic commerce and supply chain management, market places, new business scenarios enabled through new technologies. Based on a business strategy, submissions have to clearly state how the strategy can be operationalized using IS. - Information Systems Development: The development and deployment of large-scale IS (e.g. enterprise resource planning software) requires the use of appropriate software engineering methodologies, procedure models, and project management. Possible research areas are the development of software engineering methodologies, procedure models, and the design of project management methods. Empirical studies on IS development may focus on the application of well-founded methods in practice. - Information Technology Management: The function of information technology management is the provision and operation of the technical infrastructure and the planning of the technical orientation of information systems in an enterprise. An important aspect is the impact of changing information systems on organizational structures and processes – and vice versa. In this context, the use of information technology to realize a business strategy efficiently can be analyzed. - Latest Information Technology Developments: Latest developments in information technology have to be evaluated to explore potentials to generate new business strategies. Current topics and trends to be evaluated for business use are e.g. business intelligence systems, agent technology, and workflow management systems. Officially cited as: Inf Syst E-Bus Manage
期刊最新文献
My way, your way, or no way? How Mobility-as-a-Service ecosystems emerge Collective attention overload in a global manufacturing company: a case study Converting free users to paying customers in freemium services: a SaaS success model Unveiling blind spots in consulting firms’ disseminating discourse on digital transformation Business process management in the age of AI – three essential drifts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1