Techniques to identify microtremor wave contributions and impact to seismic site characterization

IF 1.6 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Journal of Seismology Pub Date : 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1007/s10950-024-10189-5
Hema Sharma, Sheri Molnar, Aamna Sirohey
{"title":"Techniques to identify microtremor wave contributions and impact to seismic site characterization","authors":"Hema Sharma,&nbsp;Sheri Molnar,&nbsp;Aamna Sirohey","doi":"10.1007/s10950-024-10189-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We investigate whether varying wavefield contributions are the likely cause to variation in microtremor horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (<i>MHVSR</i>) amplification shape between six sites in the relatively homogeneous geologic setting of Windsor, Ontario. We quantify the <i>MHVSR</i> shape in terms of peak broadness and its fitness using mathematical functions to identify potential wave type contributions. We develop a technique that uses particle motion plots of cross-correlated microtremor recordings to establish the dominant wave types contributing to the microtremor wavefield within three important frequency bandwidths (below, spanning, and above the fundamental peak frequency). We investigate the variability in the inverted shear-wave velocity (<i>V</i><sub>S</sub>) depth profile by performing 21 <i>MHVSR</i> inversions with varying Rayleigh, Love, and body wave contributions. The impact to seismic site characterization is that the depth and <i>V</i><sub>S</sub> of the resonator (half-space) layer are overestimated consistently by an average of 28% compared to the often-default-assumed Rayleigh ellipticity forward amplification model. Our study demonstrates the importance of correctly identifying wave type contributions of the microtremor wavefield for the proper estimation of <i>V</i><sub>S</sub> depth profiles, especially to obtain correct thickness of the sediment layer and resonator <i>V</i><sub>S</sub> and thereby the average <i>V</i><sub>S</sub> of the upper 30 m (<i>V</i><sub>S30</sub>).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Seismology","volume":"28 2","pages":"345 - 372"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Seismology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10950-024-10189-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate whether varying wavefield contributions are the likely cause to variation in microtremor horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio (MHVSR) amplification shape between six sites in the relatively homogeneous geologic setting of Windsor, Ontario. We quantify the MHVSR shape in terms of peak broadness and its fitness using mathematical functions to identify potential wave type contributions. We develop a technique that uses particle motion plots of cross-correlated microtremor recordings to establish the dominant wave types contributing to the microtremor wavefield within three important frequency bandwidths (below, spanning, and above the fundamental peak frequency). We investigate the variability in the inverted shear-wave velocity (VS) depth profile by performing 21 MHVSR inversions with varying Rayleigh, Love, and body wave contributions. The impact to seismic site characterization is that the depth and VS of the resonator (half-space) layer are overestimated consistently by an average of 28% compared to the often-default-assumed Rayleigh ellipticity forward amplification model. Our study demonstrates the importance of correctly identifying wave type contributions of the microtremor wavefield for the proper estimation of VS depth profiles, especially to obtain correct thickness of the sediment layer and resonator VS and thereby the average VS of the upper 30 m (VS30).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定微震波贡献及其对地震遗址特征描述影响的技术
我们研究了在安大略省温莎相对均匀的地质环境中,不同波场贡献是否是导致六个站点之间微震波水平垂直谱比(MHVSR)放大形状变化的可能原因。我们从峰值宽度的角度量化了 MHVSR 的形状,并使用数学函数确定潜在的波型贡献。我们开发了一种技术,利用交叉相关微震颤记录的质点运动图来确定在三个重要频率带宽(低于、跨越和高于基峰值频率)内对微震颤波场有贡献的主要波型。我们通过对不同的瑞利波、洛夫波和体波贡献进行 21 次 MHVSR 反演,研究了反演剪切波速度(VS)深度剖面的变化。与通常默认的瑞利椭圆度正向放大模型相比,共振层(半空间)的深度和剪切波速度(VS)被平均高估了 28%,这对地震现场特征描述产生了影响。我们的研究表明,要正确估算 VS 深度剖面,尤其是要获得沉积层和共振 VS 的正确厚度,进而获得上层 30 米的平均 VS(VS30),就必须正确识别微震波场的波型贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Seismology
Journal of Seismology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Seismology is an international journal specialising in all observational and theoretical aspects related to earthquake occurrence. Research topics may cover: seismotectonics, seismicity, historical seismicity, seismic source physics, strong ground motion studies, seismic hazard or risk, engineering seismology, physics of fault systems, triggered and induced seismicity, mining seismology, volcano seismology, earthquake prediction, structural investigations ranging from local to regional and global studies with a particular focus on passive experiments.
期刊最新文献
Source parameters of the May 28, 2016, Mihoub earthquake (Mw 5.4, Algeria) deduced from Bayesian modelling of Sentinel-1 SAR data Fault imaging using earthquake sequences: a revised seismotectonic model for the Albstadt Shear Zone, Southwest Germany A logic-tree based probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the central ionian islands of cephalonia and ithaca (Western Greece) Developing machine learning-based ground motion models to predict peak ground velocity in Turkiye Fault structures of the Haichenghe fault zone in Liaoning, China from high-precision location based on dense array observation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1