Assessing the Roles of Symmetry, Prototypicality, and Sexual Dimorphism of face Shape in Health Perceptions

IF 1.2 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology Pub Date : 2024-02-10 DOI:10.1007/s40750-024-00233-6
Kathlyne Leger, Junzhi Dong, Lisa M. DeBruine, Benedict C. Jones, Victor K. M. Shiramizu
{"title":"Assessing the Roles of Symmetry, Prototypicality, and Sexual Dimorphism of face Shape in Health Perceptions","authors":"Kathlyne Leger,&nbsp;Junzhi Dong,&nbsp;Lisa M. DeBruine,&nbsp;Benedict C. Jones,&nbsp;Victor K. M. Shiramizu","doi":"10.1007/s40750-024-00233-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Health perceptions are thought to play an important role in human mate preferences. Although many studies have investigated potential relationships between health ratings of faces and facial symmetry, prototypicality, and sexual dimorphism, findings have been mixed across studies. Consequently, we tested for potential relationships between health ratings of faces and the symmetry, prototypicality, and sexual dimorphism of those faces’ shapes. When these three shape characteristics were considered in separate regression models, we observed significant positive relationships between health ratings and both shape symmetry and prototypicality. By contrast, health ratings and sexual dimorphism were not significantly correlated in these analyses. However, in analyses in which symmetry, prototypicality, and sexual dimorphism were entered simultaneously as predictors in a single model, prototypicality, but not symmetry, was significantly correlated with health ratings. Moreover, sexual dimorphism predicted health ratings of female, but not male, faces in these analyses. Collectively, these results suggest that the relationship between symmetry and health ratings is, at least partly, driven by the effect of prototypicality on health perceptions and highlight the importance of considering multiple aspects of face shape when investigating factors that predict perceived health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7178,"journal":{"name":"Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology","volume":"10 1","pages":"18 - 30"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40750-024-00233-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40750-024-00233-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Health perceptions are thought to play an important role in human mate preferences. Although many studies have investigated potential relationships between health ratings of faces and facial symmetry, prototypicality, and sexual dimorphism, findings have been mixed across studies. Consequently, we tested for potential relationships between health ratings of faces and the symmetry, prototypicality, and sexual dimorphism of those faces’ shapes. When these three shape characteristics were considered in separate regression models, we observed significant positive relationships between health ratings and both shape symmetry and prototypicality. By contrast, health ratings and sexual dimorphism were not significantly correlated in these analyses. However, in analyses in which symmetry, prototypicality, and sexual dimorphism were entered simultaneously as predictors in a single model, prototypicality, but not symmetry, was significantly correlated with health ratings. Moreover, sexual dimorphism predicted health ratings of female, but not male, faces in these analyses. Collectively, these results suggest that the relationship between symmetry and health ratings is, at least partly, driven by the effect of prototypicality on health perceptions and highlight the importance of considering multiple aspects of face shape when investigating factors that predict perceived health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估脸型的对称性、原型性和性别二形性在健康认知中的作用
摘要 健康感知被认为在人类的配偶偏好中起着重要作用。尽管许多研究都调查了人脸的健康评分与脸部对称性、原型性和性别二形性之间的潜在关系,但不同研究的结果却不尽相同。因此,我们测试了面孔的健康评分与这些面孔形状的对称性、原型性和性别二形性之间的潜在关系。当这三个形状特征在单独的回归模型中被考虑时,我们观察到健康评分与形状对称性和原型性之间存在显著的正相关关系。相比之下,在这些分析中,健康评分和性别二形性没有明显的相关性。然而,在同时将对称性、原型性和性别二形性作为预测因子加入单一模型的分析中,原型性(而非对称性)与健康评分呈显著相关。此外,在这些分析中,性二态能预测女性面孔的健康评分,但不能预测男性面孔的健康评分。总之,这些结果表明,对称性与健康评分之间的关系至少部分是由原型性对健康感知的影响所驱动的,并强调了在研究预测健康感知的因素时考虑脸型的多个方面的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology is an international interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes theoretical and empirical studies of any aspects of adaptive human behavior (e.g. cooperation, affiliation, and bonding, competition and aggression, sex and relationships, parenting, decision-making), with emphasis on studies that also address the biological (e.g. neural, endocrine, immune, cardiovascular, genetic) mechanisms controlling behavior.
期刊最新文献
Different Types of Social Feedback can Enhance or Reduce Performance, and Induce or Alleviate Psychosocial Stress: An Exploratory Study of the Underlying Neurophysiological Mechanisms Life History Network in a Postconflict Socioecology: The Effect of Childhood Environment Fathers’ Facial Dominance Predicts First-Born Sons in Parent Dyads Testosterone Concentrations and 2D:4D Digit Ratio in Heterosexual and Masculine and Feminine Lesbian Women Relationship Between Popularity, the Oxytocin Receptor Polymorphism Gene (OXTR rs53576), Emotional Intelligence, and Empathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1