{"title":"Fathers’ Facial Dominance Predicts First-Born Sons in Parent Dyads","authors":"Benjamin J. Zubaly, Jaime L. Palmer-Hague","doi":"10.1007/s40750-024-00254-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The Trivers-Willard hypothesis (TWH) states that offspring sex should vary depending on parent condition, and TWH effects have been studied extensively. Findings have been equivocal, however, and recent work has challenged the TWH’s theoretical predictions. One possible reason for variation in TWH findings is that few studies have investigated effects of mate selection for condition on offspring sex. Here we tested whether more dominant parents (<i>N</i> = 104 dyads from Prolific) would be more likely to share a first-born son than a first-born daughter.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Parent couples completed a survey of family demographics and dominance measures then submitted facial photographs. Photographs were standardized and rated by undergraduates for perceived facial dominance. Facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) was also measured.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>We found that rated paternal facial dominance, but not rated maternal facial dominance or their interaction, predicted the likelihood of having a first-born son. Self-reported dominance was not a reliable predictor of offspring sex, and fWHR did not predict OSR.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These results suggest that fathers’ facial dominance might influence the likelihood of a couple producing male offspring. We propose a plausible mechanism through which maternal personality, hormones, and mate preferences influence the sex of offspring. Relationships between facial cues of dominance and offspring sex warrant further investigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7178,"journal":{"name":"Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40750-024-00254-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, BIOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The Trivers-Willard hypothesis (TWH) states that offspring sex should vary depending on parent condition, and TWH effects have been studied extensively. Findings have been equivocal, however, and recent work has challenged the TWH’s theoretical predictions. One possible reason for variation in TWH findings is that few studies have investigated effects of mate selection for condition on offspring sex. Here we tested whether more dominant parents (N = 104 dyads from Prolific) would be more likely to share a first-born son than a first-born daughter.
Methods
Parent couples completed a survey of family demographics and dominance measures then submitted facial photographs. Photographs were standardized and rated by undergraduates for perceived facial dominance. Facial width-to-height ratio (fWHR) was also measured.
Results
We found that rated paternal facial dominance, but not rated maternal facial dominance or their interaction, predicted the likelihood of having a first-born son. Self-reported dominance was not a reliable predictor of offspring sex, and fWHR did not predict OSR.
Conclusion
These results suggest that fathers’ facial dominance might influence the likelihood of a couple producing male offspring. We propose a plausible mechanism through which maternal personality, hormones, and mate preferences influence the sex of offspring. Relationships between facial cues of dominance and offspring sex warrant further investigation.
期刊介绍:
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology is an international interdisciplinary scientific journal that publishes theoretical and empirical studies of any aspects of adaptive human behavior (e.g. cooperation, affiliation, and bonding, competition and aggression, sex and relationships, parenting, decision-making), with emphasis on studies that also address the biological (e.g. neural, endocrine, immune, cardiovascular, genetic) mechanisms controlling behavior.