Supply Chain Contracts in the Small Data Regime

Xuejun Zhao, William B. Haskell, Guodong Yu
{"title":"Supply Chain Contracts in the Small Data Regime","authors":"Xuejun Zhao, William B. Haskell, Guodong Yu","doi":"10.1287/msom.2022.0325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: We study supply chain contract design under uncertainty. In this problem, the retailer has full information about the demand distribution, whereas the supplier only has partial information drawn from historical demand realizations and contract terms. The supplier wants to optimize the contract terms, but she only has limited data on the true demand distribution. Methodology/results: We show that the classical approach for contract design is fragile in the small data regime by identifying cases where it incurs a large loss. We then show how to combine the historical demand and retailer data to improve the supplier’s contract design. On top of this, we propose a robust contract design model where the uncertainty set requires little prior knowledge from the supplier. We show how to optimize the supplier’s worst-case profit based on this uncertainty set. In the single-product case, the worst-case profit can be found with bisection search. In the multiproduct case, the worst-case profit can be found with a cutting plane algorithm. Managerial implications: Our framework demonstrates the importance of combining the demand and retailer information into the supplier’s contract design problem. We also demonstrate the advantage of our robust model by comparing it against classical data-driven approaches. This comparison sheds light on the value of information from interactions between agents in a game-theoretic setting and suggests that such information should be utilized in data-driven decision making.Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0325 .","PeriodicalId":501267,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","volume":"90 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problem definition: We study supply chain contract design under uncertainty. In this problem, the retailer has full information about the demand distribution, whereas the supplier only has partial information drawn from historical demand realizations and contract terms. The supplier wants to optimize the contract terms, but she only has limited data on the true demand distribution. Methodology/results: We show that the classical approach for contract design is fragile in the small data regime by identifying cases where it incurs a large loss. We then show how to combine the historical demand and retailer data to improve the supplier’s contract design. On top of this, we propose a robust contract design model where the uncertainty set requires little prior knowledge from the supplier. We show how to optimize the supplier’s worst-case profit based on this uncertainty set. In the single-product case, the worst-case profit can be found with bisection search. In the multiproduct case, the worst-case profit can be found with a cutting plane algorithm. Managerial implications: Our framework demonstrates the importance of combining the demand and retailer information into the supplier’s contract design problem. We also demonstrate the advantage of our robust model by comparing it against classical data-driven approaches. This comparison sheds light on the value of information from interactions between agents in a game-theoretic setting and suggests that such information should be utilized in data-driven decision making.Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0325 .
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小数据制度下的供应链合同
问题定义:我们研究的是不确定情况下的供应链合同设计。在这个问题中,零售商拥有关于需求分布的全部信息,而供应商只有从历史需求实现和合同条款中获得的部分信息。供应商希望优化合同条款,但她只有关于真实需求分布的有限数据。方法/结果:我们通过确定会造成巨大损失的情况,说明经典的合同设计方法在小数据环境下非常脆弱。然后,我们展示了如何结合历史需求和零售商数据来改进供应商的合同设计。在此基础上,我们提出了一种稳健的合同设计模型,在该模型中,不确定性集对供应商的先验知识要求不高。我们展示了如何基于该不确定性集优化供应商的最坏情况利润。在单产品情况下,最坏情况利润可以通过分段搜索找到。在多产品情况下,最坏情况利润可通过切割面算法求得。管理意义:我们的框架证明了在供应商的合同设计问题中结合需求和零售商信息的重要性。我们还通过与传统的数据驱动方法进行比较,证明了我们的稳健模型的优势。这种比较揭示了博弈论环境中代理之间互动信息的价值,并建议在数据驱动决策中利用这些信息:在线附录见 https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2022.0325 。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Competition in Optimal Stopping: Behavioral Insights Information Dependency in Mitigating Disruption Cascades Adaptive Two-Stage Stochastic Programming with an Analysis on Capacity Expansion Planning Problem Demand Equilibria in Spatial Service Systems Optimal Salesforce Compensation with General Demand and Operational Considerations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1