Unveiling urban ecological integrity: spatially explicit assessment in contrasting environments

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Urban Ecosystems Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1007/s11252-024-01517-1
Richard Lemoine-Rodríguez, Michelle García-Arroyo, Miguel A. Gómez-Martínez, Meri Back, Tonje Lindeman, Ian MacGregor-Fors
{"title":"Unveiling urban ecological integrity: spatially explicit assessment in contrasting environments","authors":"Richard Lemoine-Rodríguez, Michelle García-Arroyo, Miguel A. Gómez-Martínez, Meri Back, Tonje Lindeman, Ian MacGregor-Fors","doi":"10.1007/s11252-024-01517-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although much attention has been paid to improve the representation of the urban spatial complexity, most efforts have been limited to the inclusion of green cover data to describe the biological component of cities, leaving the measurement of crucial urban ecological properties out of the picture. To tackle this, the Urban Ecosystem Integrity Index (UEII) was recently proposed to spatially represent the interplay between the intensity of urbanization and the biological components of cities, including urban biodiversity. The UEII has shown to be effective in measuring the ecosystem integrity of a Neotropical city; however its generalized applicability remains to be tested. Thus, here we tested the suitability of the UEII when applied in a boreal city and also evaluated if it adds more valuable information than the NDVI (also contrasting it with a UEII previously published for a tropical city), which is often suggested as a proxy of urban greenness and therefore the ecology of cities. We calculated the UEII by considering land surface temperature, built-up cover, and native plants and bird species richness of the city of Lahti, Finland (Palearctic; boreal). The UEII showed to be robust, comparable, and effective in capturing the intra and inter-urban spatial heterogeneity of both cities. Moreover, although the UEII and NDVI values correlated, the variance in such correlation showed the detail that the UEII brings to the quantificaiton of the ecological integrity of the cities, representing a more integral indicator. Thus, our findings indicate that the UEII is a valuable tool to inform on areas requiring ecological enhancement, as well as identifying those that are thriving, in cities ranging from tropical and highly biodiverse to boreal and with considerable less biodiversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48869,"journal":{"name":"Urban Ecosystems","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01517-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although much attention has been paid to improve the representation of the urban spatial complexity, most efforts have been limited to the inclusion of green cover data to describe the biological component of cities, leaving the measurement of crucial urban ecological properties out of the picture. To tackle this, the Urban Ecosystem Integrity Index (UEII) was recently proposed to spatially represent the interplay between the intensity of urbanization and the biological components of cities, including urban biodiversity. The UEII has shown to be effective in measuring the ecosystem integrity of a Neotropical city; however its generalized applicability remains to be tested. Thus, here we tested the suitability of the UEII when applied in a boreal city and also evaluated if it adds more valuable information than the NDVI (also contrasting it with a UEII previously published for a tropical city), which is often suggested as a proxy of urban greenness and therefore the ecology of cities. We calculated the UEII by considering land surface temperature, built-up cover, and native plants and bird species richness of the city of Lahti, Finland (Palearctic; boreal). The UEII showed to be robust, comparable, and effective in capturing the intra and inter-urban spatial heterogeneity of both cities. Moreover, although the UEII and NDVI values correlated, the variance in such correlation showed the detail that the UEII brings to the quantificaiton of the ecological integrity of the cities, representing a more integral indicator. Thus, our findings indicate that the UEII is a valuable tool to inform on areas requiring ecological enhancement, as well as identifying those that are thriving, in cities ranging from tropical and highly biodiverse to boreal and with considerable less biodiversity.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示城市生态完整性:对比环境中的空间明确评估
尽管人们对改善城市空间复杂性的表征给予了极大关注,但大多数努力仅限于纳入绿化覆盖数据来描述城市的生物组成部分,而忽略了对关键城市生态属性的测量。为解决这一问题,最近提出了城市生态系统完整性指数(UEII),从空间上体现城市化强度与城市生物组成部分(包括城市生物多样性)之间的相互作用。UEII 在测量一个新热带城市的生态系统完整性方面已显示出其有效性,但其普遍适用性仍有待检验。因此,我们在此测试了 UEII 在北方城市的适用性,并评估了它是否比 NDVI 增加了更多有价值的信息(同时还与之前发布的热带城市 UEII 进行了对比)。我们考虑了芬兰拉赫蒂市(古北区;北方区)的地表温度、建筑覆盖率、本地植物和鸟类物种丰富度,计算出了 UEII。结果表明,UEII 在捕捉两个城市内部和城市间的空间异质性方面具有稳健性、可比性和有效性。此外,尽管 UEII 和 NDVI 值存在相关性,但这种相关性的差异表明,UEII 为城市生态完整性的量化带来了更多细节,代表了一个更完整的指标。因此,我们的研究结果表明,UEII 是一种有价值的工具,可以为需要改善生态环境的地区提供信息,同时还可以识别那些生态环境欣欣向荣的地区,这些城市既包括热带地区和生物多样性高度丰富的地区,也包括北方地区和生物多样性相当匮乏的地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Ecosystems
Urban Ecosystems BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Urban Ecosystems is an international journal devoted to scientific investigations of urban environments and the relationships between socioeconomic and ecological structures and processes in urban environments. The scope of the journal is broad, including interactions between urban ecosystems and associated suburban and rural environments. Contributions may span a range of specific subject areas as they may apply to urban environments: biodiversity, biogeochemistry, conservation biology, wildlife and fisheries management, ecosystem ecology, ecosystem services, environmental chemistry, hydrology, landscape architecture, meteorology and climate, policy, population biology, social and human ecology, soil science, and urban planning.
期刊最新文献
Evidence-base for urban green-blue infrastructure to support insect diversity. Human recreational activity does not influence open cup avian nest survival in urban green spaces. Influence of habitat structures on fish abundances and diversity: comparing mainstream and tributary communities in the urban uMsunduze Catchment, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Bee community response to multiple stressors along a tropical urban-peri urban gradient Urban scavenging: vertebrates display greater sensitivity to land-cover and garden vegetation cover than invertebrates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1