Evidence-base for urban green-blue infrastructure to support insect diversity.

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Urban Ecosystems Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1007/s11252-024-01649-4
Diana E Bowler, Corey T Callaghan, Jéssica F Felappi, Brittany M Mason, Robin Hutchinson, Prashant Kumar, Laurence Jones
{"title":"Evidence-base for urban green-blue infrastructure to support insect diversity.","authors":"Diana E Bowler, Corey T Callaghan, Jéssica F Felappi, Brittany M Mason, Robin Hutchinson, Prashant Kumar, Laurence Jones","doi":"10.1007/s11252-024-01649-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Green-blue urban infrastructures potentially offer win-win benefits for people and nature in urban areas. Given increasing evidence of widespread declines of insects, as well as their ecological importance, there is a need to better understand the potential role of green-blue urban infrastructure for insect conservation. In this review, we evaluated 201 studies about the ability of green-blue infrastructure to support insect diversity. Most studies were focused on the role of local and landscape-level characteristics of green-blue infrastructure. Fewer studies explicitly compared one type of infrastructure to another, and even fewer compared insect communities between green-blue infrastructure and traditional infrastructure. Overall, the body of research highlights the importance of plant diversity and reduced intensity of management (e.g., mowing) for most insect taxon groups. While local characteristics seem to be generally more important than landscape factors, insect communities within green-blue infrastructures can also depend on their connectivity and landscape context. Some infrastructure types are generally more beneficial than others; for instance, ground-level habitats tend to support more insects than green roofs. Few studies simultaneously studied synergies or trade-offs with other services provided by green-blue infrastructure, but environmental variables, such as tree cover and plant diversity, that affect insects are likely to also affect the provision of other services such as improving thermal comfort and the well-being of people. Our review offers some initial evidence for how green-blue infrastructure could be designed for multifunctionality with insects in mind.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11252-024-01649-4.</p>","PeriodicalId":48869,"journal":{"name":"Urban Ecosystems","volume":"28 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01649-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Green-blue urban infrastructures potentially offer win-win benefits for people and nature in urban areas. Given increasing evidence of widespread declines of insects, as well as their ecological importance, there is a need to better understand the potential role of green-blue urban infrastructure for insect conservation. In this review, we evaluated 201 studies about the ability of green-blue infrastructure to support insect diversity. Most studies were focused on the role of local and landscape-level characteristics of green-blue infrastructure. Fewer studies explicitly compared one type of infrastructure to another, and even fewer compared insect communities between green-blue infrastructure and traditional infrastructure. Overall, the body of research highlights the importance of plant diversity and reduced intensity of management (e.g., mowing) for most insect taxon groups. While local characteristics seem to be generally more important than landscape factors, insect communities within green-blue infrastructures can also depend on their connectivity and landscape context. Some infrastructure types are generally more beneficial than others; for instance, ground-level habitats tend to support more insects than green roofs. Few studies simultaneously studied synergies or trade-offs with other services provided by green-blue infrastructure, but environmental variables, such as tree cover and plant diversity, that affect insects are likely to also affect the provision of other services such as improving thermal comfort and the well-being of people. Our review offers some initial evidence for how green-blue infrastructure could be designed for multifunctionality with insects in mind.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11252-024-01649-4.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市绿蓝基础设施支持昆虫多样性的证据基础。
绿蓝城市基础设施可能为城市地区的人与自然带来双赢的好处。鉴于越来越多的证据表明昆虫数量普遍下降,以及它们的生态重要性,有必要更好地了解绿蓝城市基础设施对昆虫保护的潜在作用。在这篇综述中,我们评估了201项关于绿蓝基础设施支持昆虫多样性能力的研究。大多数研究都集中在绿蓝基础设施的地方和景观层面特征的作用上。很少有研究明确地将一种类型的基础设施与另一种类型的基础设施进行比较,更少的研究将绿蓝基础设施与传统基础设施之间的昆虫群落进行比较。总的来说,研究主体强调了植物多样性和减少管理强度(如割草)对大多数昆虫分类群的重要性。虽然当地特征似乎比景观因素更重要,但绿蓝基础设施内的昆虫群落也可能取决于它们的连通性和景观环境。某些基础设施类型通常比其他类型更有益;例如,与绿色屋顶相比,地面栖息地倾向于支持更多的昆虫。很少有研究同时研究绿蓝基础设施提供的其他服务的协同作用或权衡,但影响昆虫的环境变量,如树木覆盖和植物多样性,可能也会影响其他服务的提供,如改善热舒适和人们的福祉。我们的研究提供了一些初步证据,说明绿蓝基础设施如何在设计时考虑到昆虫的多功能。补充资料:在线版本提供补充资料,网址为10.1007/s11252-024-01649-4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Ecosystems
Urban Ecosystems BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
6.90%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Urban Ecosystems is an international journal devoted to scientific investigations of urban environments and the relationships between socioeconomic and ecological structures and processes in urban environments. The scope of the journal is broad, including interactions between urban ecosystems and associated suburban and rural environments. Contributions may span a range of specific subject areas as they may apply to urban environments: biodiversity, biogeochemistry, conservation biology, wildlife and fisheries management, ecosystem ecology, ecosystem services, environmental chemistry, hydrology, landscape architecture, meteorology and climate, policy, population biology, social and human ecology, soil science, and urban planning.
期刊最新文献
Evidence-base for urban green-blue infrastructure to support insect diversity. Bee community response to multiple stressors along a tropical urban-peri urban gradient Urban scavenging: vertebrates display greater sensitivity to land-cover and garden vegetation cover than invertebrates Soil unsealing in Mediterranean schoolyards: what factors drive ant communities? Wildlife resilience in an urban landscape: understanding land-use impacts in Cape Town
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1