The Revision of First Step to Success: A Process Evaluation Study of First Step Next

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Education and Treatment of Children Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1007/s43494-024-00120-5
Edward G. Feil, Jason W. Small, Hill M. Walker, Andy J. Frey, Shantel D. Crosby, Jon Lee, John R. Seeley, Annemieke Golly, Steven R Forness
{"title":"The Revision of First Step to Success: A Process Evaluation Study of First Step Next","authors":"Edward G. Feil, Jason W. Small, Hill M. Walker, Andy J. Frey, Shantel D. Crosby, Jon Lee, John R. Seeley, Annemieke Golly, Steven R Forness","doi":"10.1007/s43494-024-00120-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The demand for preventive and easily implemented interventions to address the needs of children with significant behavioral challenges in general education settings is well-documented. First Step to Success is an evidenced-based program to address challenging behavior in preschool and elementary-school settings with a 20-year history of successful implementation (Walker et al., 1997; Walker et al., 2014b). A revision of the intervention, called First Step Next (Walker et al., 2015), was designed to (1) standardize the program components across preschool and elementary settings; (2) make the program more user friendly for implementers, including parents; and (3) increase the program’s efficacy by adding new components and updating existing ones. The current study used a mixed-method approach to compare process data collected from a previous efficacy trial of the original preschool version of First Step (Feil et al., 2014) to the revised version (First Step Next; Feil et al., 2020). Overall procedural fidelity ratings were high for both program variations. Further, alliance and satisfaction ratings, as per parent- and teacher-report, were acceptable, although there were some divergent findings between parent and teacher perspectives at the item level. This study provides support for the feasibility of successfully implementing First Step Next with young children and their families in preschool settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":51493,"journal":{"name":"Education and Treatment of Children","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Treatment of Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-024-00120-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The demand for preventive and easily implemented interventions to address the needs of children with significant behavioral challenges in general education settings is well-documented. First Step to Success is an evidenced-based program to address challenging behavior in preschool and elementary-school settings with a 20-year history of successful implementation (Walker et al., 1997; Walker et al., 2014b). A revision of the intervention, called First Step Next (Walker et al., 2015), was designed to (1) standardize the program components across preschool and elementary settings; (2) make the program more user friendly for implementers, including parents; and (3) increase the program’s efficacy by adding new components and updating existing ones. The current study used a mixed-method approach to compare process data collected from a previous efficacy trial of the original preschool version of First Step (Feil et al., 2014) to the revised version (First Step Next; Feil et al., 2020). Overall procedural fidelity ratings were high for both program variations. Further, alliance and satisfaction ratings, as per parent- and teacher-report, were acceptable, although there were some divergent findings between parent and teacher perspectives at the item level. This study provides support for the feasibility of successfully implementing First Step Next with young children and their families in preschool settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修订《迈向成功的第一步》:下一步 "的过程评估研究
在普通教育环境中,需要预防性且易于实施的干预措施来满足有严重行为挑战的儿童的需求,这一点已得到充分证明。迈向成功的第一步 "是一项以实证为基础的计划,旨在解决学龄前和小学环境中的挑战性行为,已有 20 年的成功实施历史(Walker 等人,1997 年;Walker 等人,2014 年 b)。该干预措施的修订版名为 "第一步下一步"(Walker 等人,2015 年),其目的是:(1)在学前和小学环境中实现计划内容的标准化;(2)使包括家长在内的实施者更容易使用该计划;以及(3)通过增加新内容和更新现有内容来提高计划的有效性。目前的研究采用了混合方法,将之前对原版学前 "第一步"(Feil 等人,2014 年)和修订版(First Step Next;Feil 等人,2020 年)进行的疗效试验中收集的过程数据进行比较。两个方案变体的总体程序忠实度评分都很高。此外,根据家长和教师的报告,尽管在项目层面上家长和教师的观点存在一些分歧,但联盟度和满意度都是可以接受的。本研究为在学龄前环境中成功实施幼儿及其家庭 "第一步下一步 "计划的可行性提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Education and Treatment of Children (ETC) is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning the development of services for children and youth who are at risk for or experiencing emotional or behavioral problems. A primary criterion for publication is that the material be of direct value to educators, parents, child care providers, or mental health professionals in improving the effectiveness of their services. Therefore, authors are required to compose their manuscripts in a clear, concise style that will be readily understood by the practitioners who are likely to make use of the information.
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness- and Relationship-Based Interventions: Which Break is Better for Improving Classroom Behavior? Enhancing Ci3T Professional Learning: Initial Lessons Learned from Ci3T Implementers A Systematic Review of Explicit Instruction and Frequency Building Interventions to Teach Students to Write The Daily Report Card and Check-in/Check-out: A Commentary About Two Siloed Interventions Training Behavior Analysts as Strategic Scientists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1