A Systematic Review of Explicit Instruction and Frequency Building Interventions to Teach Students to Write

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Education and Treatment of Children Pub Date : 2024-08-21 DOI:10.1007/s43494-024-00125-0
Alyssa R. McElroy, Jessica E. Van Stratton, Paige Sherlund-Pelfrey
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Explicit Instruction and Frequency Building Interventions to Teach Students to Write","authors":"Alyssa R. McElroy, Jessica E. Van Stratton, Paige Sherlund-Pelfrey","doi":"10.1007/s43494-024-00125-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A primary goal of educational settings in the United States is to produce competent writers. However, most students do not receive adequate instruction and practice beyond grade three. Furthermore, only 29% of high school graduates without disabilities, and 5% with disabilities exit with proficient writing skills (U.S. Department of Education, 2011). There is growing body of evidence for the use of explicit instruction and timed practice interventions to teach writing skills to struggling writers. However, to date there is no review of these combined strategies (i.e., explicit instruction and timed practice) to teach writing skills. The current review analyzed 10 studies that met the What Works Clearinghouse Single Case Design Standards 5.0 and included 53 students who received explicit instruction and timed practice interventions for sentence-level writing skills. Results from the independent analysis show that explicit instruction and timed practice have a significant impact on decreasing the frequency of incorrect writing performance and establish the need for additional research on frequency building strategies for writing skills. Results of the review, recommendations for educators, and future directions for researchers are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":51493,"journal":{"name":"Education and Treatment of Children","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Treatment of Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43494-024-00125-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A primary goal of educational settings in the United States is to produce competent writers. However, most students do not receive adequate instruction and practice beyond grade three. Furthermore, only 29% of high school graduates without disabilities, and 5% with disabilities exit with proficient writing skills (U.S. Department of Education, 2011). There is growing body of evidence for the use of explicit instruction and timed practice interventions to teach writing skills to struggling writers. However, to date there is no review of these combined strategies (i.e., explicit instruction and timed practice) to teach writing skills. The current review analyzed 10 studies that met the What Works Clearinghouse Single Case Design Standards 5.0 and included 53 students who received explicit instruction and timed practice interventions for sentence-level writing skills. Results from the independent analysis show that explicit instruction and timed practice have a significant impact on decreasing the frequency of incorrect writing performance and establish the need for additional research on frequency building strategies for writing skills. Results of the review, recommendations for educators, and future directions for researchers are discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统回顾旨在指导学生写作的显性教学和频率培养干预措施
美国教育的一个主要目标是培养合格的作家。然而,大多数学生在三年级以后并没有得到足够的指导和练习。此外,只有 29% 的非残疾高中毕业生和 5% 的残疾高中毕业生在毕业时具备熟练的写作技能(美国教育部,2011 年)。越来越多的证据表明,使用明确的指导和定时练习干预来教授写作困难者的写作技巧。然而,迄今为止,还没有关于这些综合策略(即明确指导和定时练习)来教授写作技巧的综述。本次综述分析了 10 项符合 What Works Clearinghouse 单一案例设计标准 5.0 的研究,其中包括 53 名接受明确指导和定时练习干预的学生的句子级写作技巧。独立分析的结果表明,明确指导和定时练习对减少错误写作表现的频率有显著影响,并确定了对写作技能频率培养策略进行更多研究的必要性。本文讨论了综述结果、对教育工作者的建议以及研究人员未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Education and Treatment of Children (ETC) is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning the development of services for children and youth who are at risk for or experiencing emotional or behavioral problems. A primary criterion for publication is that the material be of direct value to educators, parents, child care providers, or mental health professionals in improving the effectiveness of their services. Therefore, authors are required to compose their manuscripts in a clear, concise style that will be readily understood by the practitioners who are likely to make use of the information.
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness- and Relationship-Based Interventions: Which Break is Better for Improving Classroom Behavior? Enhancing Ci3T Professional Learning: Initial Lessons Learned from Ci3T Implementers A Systematic Review of Explicit Instruction and Frequency Building Interventions to Teach Students to Write The Daily Report Card and Check-in/Check-out: A Commentary About Two Siloed Interventions The Effects of the Establishment of Generalized Imitation across Multiple Topographies on Accuracy and Modality of Responding in Preschoolers with Developmental Delays
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1