Assimilate Remobilization in Five Spring Grain Legumes Under Mediterranean Conditions

IF 2.1 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY International Journal of Plant Production Pub Date : 2024-02-16 DOI:10.1007/s42106-023-00279-8
Spyridon D. Koutroubas, Christos A. Damalas, Sideris Fotiadis
{"title":"Assimilate Remobilization in Five Spring Grain Legumes Under Mediterranean Conditions","authors":"Spyridon D. Koutroubas, Christos A. Damalas, Sideris Fotiadis","doi":"10.1007/s42106-023-00279-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A comparative evaluation of grain legumes is essential for the effective planning of legume-based agricultural systems in a given environment. The goal of this work was to contrast the growth, translocation of assimilates, and grain yield of spring-planted common vetch (<i>Vicia sativa</i> L.), red pea (<i>Lathyrus cicera</i> L.), lentil (<i>Lens culinaris</i> Medik.), chickpea (<i>Cicer arietinum</i> L.), and field pea (<i>Pisum sativa</i> L.) under rainfed Mediterranean conditions. Two cultivars of each species were cultivated on a silty clay soil in northeastern Greece for 2 years (2014 and 2015) with contrasting rainfall patterns. Chickpea and field pea exhibited better early crop growth rate than any other legume. Species differences in assimilates availability prior to grain filling affected the remobilization of assimilates to seed, which increased by 45% for every kg ha<sup>−1</sup> rise in early dry matter accumulation. Dry matter translocation efficiency varied from 9 to 51% depending on species and year. Red pea was the best option in terms of seed yield, regardless of the seasonal rainfall. Chickpea in the drier year (2015) and field pea in the wetter year (2014) produced seed yields that were comparable to that of red pea. Lentil and common vetch were generally less productive species in terms of seed yield. Species seed yield was associated with their ability to accumulate biomass either before podding (<i>r</i> = 0.52, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05) or at maturity (<i>r</i> = 0.51, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05), but not with harvest index or translocation of dry matter. Findings provide new knowledge regarding growth attributes and reallocation of assimilate in five legume species grown simultaneously in the same environment, which has never been studied before. In addition, results highlight that selecting species with enhanced early or final biomass potential as well as adopting cultural practices that promote biomass accumulation in the growing season appear to be effective management strategies for improving seed yield of the tested grain legumes under Mediterranean conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant Production","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant Production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-023-00279-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A comparative evaluation of grain legumes is essential for the effective planning of legume-based agricultural systems in a given environment. The goal of this work was to contrast the growth, translocation of assimilates, and grain yield of spring-planted common vetch (Vicia sativa L.), red pea (Lathyrus cicera L.), lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.), chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), and field pea (Pisum sativa L.) under rainfed Mediterranean conditions. Two cultivars of each species were cultivated on a silty clay soil in northeastern Greece for 2 years (2014 and 2015) with contrasting rainfall patterns. Chickpea and field pea exhibited better early crop growth rate than any other legume. Species differences in assimilates availability prior to grain filling affected the remobilization of assimilates to seed, which increased by 45% for every kg ha−1 rise in early dry matter accumulation. Dry matter translocation efficiency varied from 9 to 51% depending on species and year. Red pea was the best option in terms of seed yield, regardless of the seasonal rainfall. Chickpea in the drier year (2015) and field pea in the wetter year (2014) produced seed yields that were comparable to that of red pea. Lentil and common vetch were generally less productive species in terms of seed yield. Species seed yield was associated with their ability to accumulate biomass either before podding (r = 0.52, P < 0.05) or at maturity (r = 0.51, P < 0.05), but not with harvest index or translocation of dry matter. Findings provide new knowledge regarding growth attributes and reallocation of assimilate in five legume species grown simultaneously in the same environment, which has never been studied before. In addition, results highlight that selecting species with enhanced early or final biomass potential as well as adopting cultural practices that promote biomass accumulation in the growing season appear to be effective management strategies for improving seed yield of the tested grain legumes under Mediterranean conditions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地中海条件下五种春播豆科植物的同化物再循环
谷物豆科植物的比较评估对于在特定环境中有效规划以豆科植物为基础的农业系统至关重要。这项研究的目的是对比春播的普通矢车菊(Vicia sativa L.)、红豌豆(Lathyrus cicera L.)、扁豆(Lens culinaris Medik.)、鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum L.)和大田豌豆(Pisum sativa L.)在雨水灌溉的地中海条件下的生长、同化物转移和谷物产量。在希腊东北部的淤泥质粘土上分别种植了两个品种,为期两年(2014 年和 2015 年),降雨模式截然不同。鹰嘴豆和大田豌豆的早期作物生长率优于其他豆科植物。谷粒灌浆前同化物可用性的物种差异影响了同化物向种子的再动员,早期干物质积累每增加一千克公顷-1,种子的再动员就增加 45%。干物质转移效率因品种和年份而异,从 9% 到 51% 不等。无论季节降雨量如何,就种子产量而言,红豌豆都是最佳选择。较干旱年份(2015 年)的鹰嘴豆和较潮湿年份(2014 年)的大田豌豆的种子产量与红豌豆相当。就种子产量而言,扁豆和普通薇菜一般是产量较低的品种。物种的种子产量与它们在结荚前(r = 0.52,P < 0.05)或成熟时(r = 0.51,P < 0.05)积累生物量的能力有关,但与收获指数或干物质转移无关。研究结果提供了有关在同一环境中同时种植的五种豆科植物的生长特性和同化物再分配的新知识,而这在以前从未有过研究。此外,研究结果还突出表明,在地中海条件下,选择早期或最终生物量潜力更强的物种,以及采用促进生长季节生物量积累的栽培方法,似乎是提高受测谷物豆科植物种子产量的有效管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IJPP publishes original research papers and review papers related to physiology, ecology and production of field crops and forages at field, farm and landscape level. Preferred topics are: (1) yield gap in cropping systems: estimation, causes and closing measures, (2) ecological intensification of plant production, (3) improvement of water and nutrients management in plant production systems, (4) environmental impact of plant production, (5) climate change and plant production, and (6) responses of plant communities to extreme weather conditions. Please note that IJPP does not publish papers with a background in genetics and plant breeding, plant molecular biology, plant biotechnology, as well as soil science, meteorology, product process and post-harvest management unless they are strongly related to plant production under field conditions. Papers based on limited data or of local importance, and results from routine experiments will not normally be considered for publication. Field experiments should include at least two years and/or two environments. Papers on plants other than field crops and forages, and papers based on controlled-environment experiments will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Prediction of the Climatically Suitable Areas of Rice in China Based on Optimized MaxEnt Model Conservation Tillage Enhances Energy Efficiency and Mitigates Carbon Footprint and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Long-Term Wheat Production Trials in the Western Indo-Gangetic Plain of India Seed Priming Boosts Plant Growth, Yield Attributes, Seed Chemical and Antioxidant Composition in Lentil under Low-Phosphorus Field Conditions Conservation Tillage and In-Situ Rice Residue Driven soil Temperature Moderation and Wheat Productivity under Terminal Heat Stress in North-Western Indo Gangetic Plains of India Integrating Nano-Fertilizers with Mineral-Based Nutrients for Growth, Energy Efficiency, Economics, and Environmental Sustainability in Wheat crop
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1