{"title":"Integrating Nano-Fertilizers with Mineral-Based Nutrients for Growth, Energy Efficiency, Economics, and Environmental Sustainability in Wheat crop","authors":"Alok Singh Jayara, Rajeew Kumar, Anil Shukla, Ajeet Pratap Singh, Priyanka Pandey, Pavan Shukla, Ram Pravesh Rajbhar, Roshan Lal Meena, K Indudhar Reddy","doi":"10.1007/s42106-024-00304-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Higher energy inputs, greenhouse gases (GHG) emission, and higher costs are associated with fertilizer use which necessitates the exploration of alternative sources of plant nutrients. Keeping this in view, modified indigenous mineral product (MIMP) along with nanofertilizers were evaluated in wheat crop. Strip plot design was followed with sources of phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) as horizontal factors viz<i>.</i> i) recommended phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) through fertilizers (P1) ii) MIMP with Nano DAP (P2), iii) MIMP with Nano K (P3); and Nitrogen (N) management options as vertical factors viz<i>.</i>, i) No nitrogen (N1), ii) Three sprays of Nano Urea (NU) (N2) iii) 50 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> at sowing with two spray of NU (N3), iv) 150 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>(N4). Growth and yield parameters were comparable for the horizontal factors; whereas, N3 and N4 recorded at par values among the vertical factors. N uptake in P2 was significantly more compared to rest. Sulfur (S) & silicon (Si) uptake were significantly higher with MIMP application. Increasing the dose of N increased the nutrient uptake. The alternative sources of NPK led to significant increase in net returns under unsubsidized supplies. Reduced input energy and increased energy ratio (each by 32%) were observed with N3 compared to N4. Lower GHG emissions was reported with P2 and P3 (74–77%) compared to P1; and with N3 (67%) compared to N4. The study provides an insight for alternative nutrient management in place of existing practices for sustainable agriculture without reducing the crop productivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":54947,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Plant Production","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Plant Production","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-024-00304-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Higher energy inputs, greenhouse gases (GHG) emission, and higher costs are associated with fertilizer use which necessitates the exploration of alternative sources of plant nutrients. Keeping this in view, modified indigenous mineral product (MIMP) along with nanofertilizers were evaluated in wheat crop. Strip plot design was followed with sources of phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) as horizontal factors viz. i) recommended phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) through fertilizers (P1) ii) MIMP with Nano DAP (P2), iii) MIMP with Nano K (P3); and Nitrogen (N) management options as vertical factors viz., i) No nitrogen (N1), ii) Three sprays of Nano Urea (NU) (N2) iii) 50 kg N ha−1 at sowing with two spray of NU (N3), iv) 150 kg N ha−1(N4). Growth and yield parameters were comparable for the horizontal factors; whereas, N3 and N4 recorded at par values among the vertical factors. N uptake in P2 was significantly more compared to rest. Sulfur (S) & silicon (Si) uptake were significantly higher with MIMP application. Increasing the dose of N increased the nutrient uptake. The alternative sources of NPK led to significant increase in net returns under unsubsidized supplies. Reduced input energy and increased energy ratio (each by 32%) were observed with N3 compared to N4. Lower GHG emissions was reported with P2 and P3 (74–77%) compared to P1; and with N3 (67%) compared to N4. The study provides an insight for alternative nutrient management in place of existing practices for sustainable agriculture without reducing the crop productivity.
期刊介绍:
IJPP publishes original research papers and review papers related to physiology, ecology and production of field crops and forages at field, farm and landscape level. Preferred topics are: (1) yield gap in cropping systems: estimation, causes and closing measures, (2) ecological intensification of plant production, (3) improvement of water and nutrients management in plant production systems, (4) environmental impact of plant production, (5) climate change and plant production, and (6) responses of plant communities to extreme weather conditions.
Please note that IJPP does not publish papers with a background in genetics and plant breeding, plant molecular biology, plant biotechnology, as well as soil science, meteorology, product process and post-harvest management unless they are strongly related to plant production under field conditions.
Papers based on limited data or of local importance, and results from routine experiments will not normally be considered for publication. Field experiments should include at least two years and/or two environments. Papers on plants other than field crops and forages, and papers based on controlled-environment experiments will not be considered.