Impact of a team-based versus individual clinician-focused training approach on primary healthcare professionals’ intention to have serious illness conversations with patients: a theory informed process evaluation of a cluster randomized trial

Lucas Gomes Souza, Patrick Archambault, Dalil Asmaou Bouba, Suélène Georgina Dofara, Sabrina Guay-Bélanger, Sergio Cortez Ghio, Souleymane Gadio, LeAnn Michaels, Jean-Sébastien Paquette, Shigeko (Seiko) Izumi, Annette M. Totten, France Légaré, The Meta-LARC ACP Cluster Randomized Trial team
{"title":"Impact of a team-based versus individual clinician-focused training approach on primary healthcare professionals’ intention to have serious illness conversations with patients: a theory informed process evaluation of a cluster randomized trial","authors":"Lucas Gomes Souza, Patrick Archambault, Dalil Asmaou Bouba, Suélène Georgina Dofara, Sabrina Guay-Bélanger, Sergio Cortez Ghio, Souleymane Gadio, LeAnn Michaels, Jean-Sébastien Paquette, Shigeko (Seiko) Izumi, Annette M. Totten, France Légaré, The Meta-LARC ACP Cluster Randomized Trial team","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.05.24302368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background</strong> Cluster Randomized Trials (cRTs) conducted in real-world settings face complex challenges due to diverse practices and populations. Process evaluations alongside cRTs can help explain their results by exploring possible causal mechanisms as the trial proceeds.","PeriodicalId":501023,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Primary Care Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Primary Care Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.05.24302368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Cluster Randomized Trials (cRTs) conducted in real-world settings face complex challenges due to diverse practices and populations. Process evaluations alongside cRTs can help explain their results by exploring possible causal mechanisms as the trial proceeds.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以团队为基础的培训方法与以临床医生个人为重点的培训方法对初级医疗保健专业人员与患者进行重病谈话的意向的影响:一项分组随机试验的理论过程评估
背景 在真实世界环境中开展的分组随机试验(cRTs)由于实践和人群的多样性而面临着复杂的挑战。与 cRT 同时进行的过程评估可以在试验过程中探索可能的因果机制,从而帮助解释试验结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceived barriers to research and scholarship among physicians Providing an e-cigarette starter kit for smoking cessation and reduction as adjunct to usual care to smokers with a mental health condition: Findings from the ESCAPE feasibility study Primary Care Physicians' Practices and Barriers in Evaluating and Managing Chronic Kidney Disease in New Providence, The Bahamas Development and evaluation of codelists for identifying marginalised groups in primary care Pharmacist Impact on First-Line Antihypertensives in African American Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1