Pharmacist Impact on First-Line Antihypertensives in African American Patients

Mia Y. Reid, Jamie E. Coates, Naomi Y. Yates, Bennett McDonald
{"title":"Pharmacist Impact on First-Line Antihypertensives in African American Patients","authors":"Mia Y. Reid, Jamie E. Coates, Naomi Y. Yates, Bennett McDonald","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.11.24313518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\nCurrent guidelines recommend thiazide/thiazide-type diuretics and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers as first-line agents in treating African Americans with hypertension. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact that ambulatory care clinical pharmacy specialists (CPSs) had on initiation of first-line antihypertensives in the African American population within an integrated healthcare system. Methods This retrospective, matched, observational cohort analysis included African American patients with hypertension not receiving a first-line antihypertensive as of September 1, 2021. Patients followed by CPSs were matched up to 1:4 on age and sex to patients not followed by CPSs. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients started on first-line antihypertensive(s) after working with CPSs. Conditional logistic regression was used to analyze outcomes. Results\nA total of 865 patients followed by CPSs were matched to 3,192 patients not followed by CPSs. Patients followed by CPSs were initiated on first-line antihypertensives at a significantly higher rate (adjusted OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.63-2.41), and a clinically significant improvement in blood pressure was observed with systolic improving an average of 22 points and diastolic 13 points. 283 patients managed by CPSs achieved blood pressure less than 135/85 mmHg. Conclusion\nThe initiation of first-line antihypertensives in African American patients by CPSs led to clinically significant reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure which supports CPS involvement in hypertension management. The assessment of study outcomes provides guidance to clinical decision-making and contributes to the development of key practice standards across both physician and clinical pharmacy specialist services.","PeriodicalId":501023,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Primary Care Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Primary Care Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.11.24313518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Current guidelines recommend thiazide/thiazide-type diuretics and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers as first-line agents in treating African Americans with hypertension. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact that ambulatory care clinical pharmacy specialists (CPSs) had on initiation of first-line antihypertensives in the African American population within an integrated healthcare system. Methods This retrospective, matched, observational cohort analysis included African American patients with hypertension not receiving a first-line antihypertensive as of September 1, 2021. Patients followed by CPSs were matched up to 1:4 on age and sex to patients not followed by CPSs. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients started on first-line antihypertensive(s) after working with CPSs. Conditional logistic regression was used to analyze outcomes. Results A total of 865 patients followed by CPSs were matched to 3,192 patients not followed by CPSs. Patients followed by CPSs were initiated on first-line antihypertensives at a significantly higher rate (adjusted OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.63-2.41), and a clinically significant improvement in blood pressure was observed with systolic improving an average of 22 points and diastolic 13 points. 283 patients managed by CPSs achieved blood pressure less than 135/85 mmHg. Conclusion The initiation of first-line antihypertensives in African American patients by CPSs led to clinically significant reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure which supports CPS involvement in hypertension management. The assessment of study outcomes provides guidance to clinical decision-making and contributes to the development of key practice standards across both physician and clinical pharmacy specialist services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药剂师对非裔美国患者一线抗高血压药物的影响
导言:现行指南推荐将噻嗪/噻嗪类利尿剂和二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂作为治疗非裔美国人高血压的一线药物。本研究旨在探讨非住院医疗临床药学专家(CPSs)对综合医疗系统中非裔美国人一线降压药使用的影响。方法 这项回顾性、匹配、观察性队列分析包括截至 2021 年 9 月 1 日未接受一线降压药治疗的非裔美国高血压患者。接受 CPS 随访的患者与未接受 CPS 随访的患者在年龄和性别上的配对比例为 1:4。主要结果是与 CPS 合作后开始接受一线降压治疗的患者比例。条件逻辑回归用于分析结果。结果 共有 865 名接受 CPS 随访的患者与 3192 名未接受 CPS 随访的患者进行了配对。接受 CPS 随访的患者开始服用一线降压药的比例明显更高(调整后 OR 1.98,95% CI 1.63-2.41),血压也有明显的临床改善,收缩压平均改善了 22 点,舒张压平均改善了 13 点。283 名接受 CPS 管理的患者血压低于 135/85 mmHg。结论CPS对非裔美国人患者使用一线降压药后,收缩压和舒张压均有显著降低,支持CPS参与高血压管理。对研究结果的评估为临床决策提供了指导,并有助于制定医生和临床药学专家服务的关键实践标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perceived barriers to research and scholarship among physicians Providing an e-cigarette starter kit for smoking cessation and reduction as adjunct to usual care to smokers with a mental health condition: Findings from the ESCAPE feasibility study Primary Care Physicians' Practices and Barriers in Evaluating and Managing Chronic Kidney Disease in New Providence, The Bahamas Development and evaluation of codelists for identifying marginalised groups in primary care Pharmacist Impact on First-Line Antihypertensives in African American Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1