The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence by David Waldstreicher (review)

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1353/eal.2024.a918914
Vincent Carretta
{"title":"The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence by David Waldstreicher (review)","authors":"Vincent Carretta","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a918914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence</em> by David Waldstreicher <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Vincent Carretta (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence</em><br/> <small>david waldstreicher</small><br/> Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2023<br/> 480 pp. <p><em>The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence</em>, by David Waldstreicher, Distinguished Professor of History at CUNY, is both timely and necessary. Timely because his is one of two biographies published during the 250th anniversary of Wheatley Peters's annus mirabilis, the year in which she both published <em>Poems on Various Subjects, Religious and Moral</em> and gained her freedom; necessary because of Cornelia H. Dayton's most significant biographical discoveries about her later life and marriage found since the publication in 2011 of the first full-length biography of the poet (Dayton, \"Lost Years Recovered: John Peters and Phillis Wheatley Peters in Middleton,\" <em>New England Quarterly</em>, vol. 94, 2021). Waldstreicher's biography is also a major contribution to the recent fictional, critical, pedagogical, and scholarly attention Wheatley Peters has received in Honorée Fannone Jeffers's imaginative biography in verse, <em>The Age of Phillis</em> (Wesleyan UP, 2020); a special issue of <em>Early American Literature</em> (vol. 57, no. 3, 2022); a new attribution argument by Wendy Raphael Roberts (<em>Early American Literature</em>, vol. 58, no. 1, 2023); my revised edition of <em>The Writings of Phillis Wheatley Peters</em> <strong>[End Page 154]</strong> (Oxford UP, 2024); and my revised <em>Phillis Wheatley Peters: Biography of a Genius in Bondage</em> (U of Georgia P, 2023).</p> <p>By publishing <em>The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley</em> with a nonacademic press, Waldstreicher will make more widely available a portrait of Wheatley Peters and her times familiar to the readers of <em>Early American Literature</em> who have followed the biographical, critical, and editorial work on her published in more academic venues during the past few decades, especially in the last dozen years. Waldstreicher graciously acknowledges that his biography of Wheatley Peters is based on the earliest edition of my own, as well as on my editions of her writings. Waldstreicher's view of Wheatley Peters, too, is that she is a skillful rhetorician and commentator claiming her place—subtly, when necessary, more overtly whenever possible—at the center rather than the margins of the literary, political, and social worlds in which she finds herself. She's a savvy businesswoman who exerts as much control over her life as she can, given her race, age, gender, and social status.</p> <p>Waldstreicher's endnotes alone are worth the price of admission. Approximately half the number of the total words in <em>The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley</em>, his endnotes virtually constitute a literature review of the previous work done on Wheatley Peters by others, as well as by Waldstreicher himself. He proves himself to be a thoughtful and discriminating judge of his predecessors' contributions. Waldstreicher complements his extensive survey of Wheatleyiana with some additional historical contexts for her life and writings. The greatest strength of his biography may be his many very discerning readings of her canonical poems, a welcome focus on more extensive literary analysis than normally found in biographies aimed at a general audience. For example, his treatment of the role that classical literature in translation plays in Wheatley Peters's oeuvre is the most balanced, sophisticated, and thorough I have seen.</p> <p>Waldstreicher does not participate in the conversation about how we should refer to the subject of his biography. Both Honorée Fannone Jeffers and Zachary McLeod Hutchins (<em>Early American Literature</em>, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 663–67) have recently made compelling arguments that we should call Phillis by her married name, as either <em>Phillis Peters</em> or <em>Phillis Wheatley Peters</em>. When Phillis Wheatley married John Peters in November 1778, she chose to replace her enslaved surname with the name he had created for himself once he had gained his own freedom. Her decision to reidentify herself by renaming herself through marriage is consistent with my overall <strong>[End Page 155]</strong> representation of the agency she demonstrated during her life before she met John. Rather than seeing Phillis's decision to marry him as the disastrous mistake her nineteenth-century biographer would have us believe it to...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a918914","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence by David Waldstreicher
  • Vincent Carretta (bio)
The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence
david waldstreicher
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2023
480 pp.

The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley: A Poet's Journeys through American Slavery and Independence, by David Waldstreicher, Distinguished Professor of History at CUNY, is both timely and necessary. Timely because his is one of two biographies published during the 250th anniversary of Wheatley Peters's annus mirabilis, the year in which she both published Poems on Various Subjects, Religious and Moral and gained her freedom; necessary because of Cornelia H. Dayton's most significant biographical discoveries about her later life and marriage found since the publication in 2011 of the first full-length biography of the poet (Dayton, "Lost Years Recovered: John Peters and Phillis Wheatley Peters in Middleton," New England Quarterly, vol. 94, 2021). Waldstreicher's biography is also a major contribution to the recent fictional, critical, pedagogical, and scholarly attention Wheatley Peters has received in Honorée Fannone Jeffers's imaginative biography in verse, The Age of Phillis (Wesleyan UP, 2020); a special issue of Early American Literature (vol. 57, no. 3, 2022); a new attribution argument by Wendy Raphael Roberts (Early American Literature, vol. 58, no. 1, 2023); my revised edition of The Writings of Phillis Wheatley Peters [End Page 154] (Oxford UP, 2024); and my revised Phillis Wheatley Peters: Biography of a Genius in Bondage (U of Georgia P, 2023).

By publishing The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley with a nonacademic press, Waldstreicher will make more widely available a portrait of Wheatley Peters and her times familiar to the readers of Early American Literature who have followed the biographical, critical, and editorial work on her published in more academic venues during the past few decades, especially in the last dozen years. Waldstreicher graciously acknowledges that his biography of Wheatley Peters is based on the earliest edition of my own, as well as on my editions of her writings. Waldstreicher's view of Wheatley Peters, too, is that she is a skillful rhetorician and commentator claiming her place—subtly, when necessary, more overtly whenever possible—at the center rather than the margins of the literary, political, and social worlds in which she finds herself. She's a savvy businesswoman who exerts as much control over her life as she can, given her race, age, gender, and social status.

Waldstreicher's endnotes alone are worth the price of admission. Approximately half the number of the total words in The Odyssey of Phillis Wheatley, his endnotes virtually constitute a literature review of the previous work done on Wheatley Peters by others, as well as by Waldstreicher himself. He proves himself to be a thoughtful and discriminating judge of his predecessors' contributions. Waldstreicher complements his extensive survey of Wheatleyiana with some additional historical contexts for her life and writings. The greatest strength of his biography may be his many very discerning readings of her canonical poems, a welcome focus on more extensive literary analysis than normally found in biographies aimed at a general audience. For example, his treatment of the role that classical literature in translation plays in Wheatley Peters's oeuvre is the most balanced, sophisticated, and thorough I have seen.

Waldstreicher does not participate in the conversation about how we should refer to the subject of his biography. Both Honorée Fannone Jeffers and Zachary McLeod Hutchins (Early American Literature, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 663–67) have recently made compelling arguments that we should call Phillis by her married name, as either Phillis Peters or Phillis Wheatley Peters. When Phillis Wheatley married John Peters in November 1778, she chose to replace her enslaved surname with the name he had created for himself once he had gained his own freedom. Her decision to reidentify herself by renaming herself through marriage is consistent with my overall [End Page 155] representation of the agency she demonstrated during her life before she met John. Rather than seeing Phillis's decision to marry him as the disastrous mistake her nineteenth-century biographer would have us believe it to...

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛:诗人穿越美国奴隶制和独立的旅程》,作者 David Waldstreicher(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛:菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛:一位诗人的美国奴隶制和独立之旅》,作者:大卫-瓦尔德斯特里舍 文森特-卡雷塔(简历) 《菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛:一位诗人的美国奴隶制和独立之旅》,作者:大卫-瓦尔德斯特里舍 文森特-卡雷塔(简历诗人穿越美国奴隶制和独立的旅程》 David Waldstreicher Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2023 480 页。菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛:纽约市立大学历史学特聘教授戴维-瓦尔德施特里歇尔(David Waldstreicher)所著的《菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛:一位诗人的美国奴隶制与独立之旅》既及时又必要。及时是因为他的传记是在惠特利-彼得斯诞辰 250 周年之际出版的两本传记之一,在这一年,她出版了《关于宗教和道德的各种主题的诗》,并获得了自由;必要是因为科妮莉亚-H-代顿自 2011 年出版第一本诗人长篇传记(代顿,《找回失去的岁月》)以来,发现了关于她晚年生活和婚姻的最重要的传记发现:约翰-彼得斯和菲利斯-惠特利-彼得斯在米德尔顿》,《新英格兰季刊》,第 94 卷,2021 年)。Waldstreicher 的传记也是对惠特利-彼得斯近期在小说、评论、教学和学术方面所受关注的重要贡献,Honorée Fannone Jeffers 以诗歌形式撰写了富有想象力的传记《菲利斯的时代》(Wesleyan UP,2020 年);《早期美国文学》(Early American Literature)专刊(第 57 卷,第 3 期,2022 年)也对惠特利-彼得斯进行了报道。57,第 3 期,2022 年);温迪-拉斐尔-罗伯茨(Wendy Raphael Roberts)的新归属论证(《早期美国文学》,第 58 卷,第 1 期,2023 年);我的《菲利斯-惠特利-彼得斯著作》修订版 [第 154 页末](牛津大学出版社,2024 年);以及我的菲利斯-惠特利-彼得斯修订版:被奴役的天才传记》(佐治亚大学出版社,2023 年)。通过与一家非学术出版社合作出版《菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛》,沃尔德斯特里舍尔将更广泛地展示惠特利-彼得斯及其时代的肖像,这对于那些关注过去几十年,尤其是最近十几年在学术界发表的关于惠特利-彼得斯的传记、评论和编辑工作的早期美国文学读者来说是再熟悉不过的了。沃尔德施特莱彻慷慨地承认,他的《惠特莉-彼得斯传》是根据我自己的最早版本以及我对她的著作的版本编写的。沃尔德施特赖歇尔对惠特利-彼得斯的看法也是,她是一位娴熟的修辞学家和评论家,在必要时隐晦地、在可能的情况下更公开地在她所处的文学、政治和社会世界的中心而非边缘占据一席之地。她是一个精明的女商人,考虑到自己的种族、年龄、性别和社会地位,她尽可能地控制自己的生活。光是瓦尔德斯特里舍尔的尾注就值回票价。他的尾注字数约为《菲利斯-惠特利的奥德赛》总字数的一半,几乎构成了对他人以及沃尔德施特赖歇尔本人以前研究惠特利-彼得斯的文献综述。事实证明,他对前人的贡献进行了深思熟虑的鉴别。沃尔德施特赖歇尔在对惠特利进行广泛调查的基础上,又对她的生平和著作进行了一些历史背景的补充。他的传记最大的优点可能是对她的经典诗作进行了许多非常有辨识度的解读,这比一般面向普通读者的传记更注重广泛的文学分析,值得欢迎。例如,他对古典文学翻译在惠特利-彼得斯作品中所起作用的论述,是我所见过的最平衡、最精致、最透彻的。瓦尔德施特莱彻并没有参与关于我们应该如何称呼其传记主题的讨论。霍诺雷-法诺内-杰弗斯和扎卡里-麦克劳德-哈钦斯(《早期美国文学》,第 56 卷,第 3 期,第 663-67 页)最近都提出了令人信服的论点,即我们应该用菲利斯-彼得斯或菲利斯-惠特利-彼得斯的婚前姓氏来称呼她。1778 年 11 月,菲利斯-惠特利与约翰-彼得斯结婚时,她选择用约翰-彼得斯获得自由后为自己起的名字取代她被奴役时的姓氏。她决定通过婚姻改名来重新确定自己的身份,这与我对她在遇到约翰之前的生活中所表现出的能动性的总体 [第 155 页完] 表述是一致的。菲利斯与约翰结婚的决定并没有像她的十九世纪传记作者希望我们相信的那样,是一个灾难性的错误......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE
EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
62
期刊最新文献
Black Enlightenment by Surya Parekh (review) Editors' Note Reconciliation in John Winthrop's History of New England Early American Literature Book Prize for 2023 John Marrant's Nova Scotia Journal Writes Displaced Communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1