首页 > 最新文献

EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE最新文献

英文 中文
Climate and the Picturesque in the American Tropics by Michael Boyden (review) 美国热带地区的气候与风景如画》,迈克尔-博伊登著(评论)
IF 0.3 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, AMERICAN Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a934213
Abby Goode
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Climate and the Picturesque in the American Tropics by Michael Boyden
  • Abby Goode (bio)
Climate and the Picturesque in the American Tropics
michael boyden
Oxford University Press, 2022
214 pp.

What might the early American tropics have to do with today's climate crisis? What can we learn from late eighteenth- and nineteenth-century conceptions of climate, the body, and tropicality that might shed new light on contemporary debates about global climate justice and science? Michael Boyden takes up these questions in Climate and the Picturesque in the American Tropics (2022), a wide-ranging study of climate and sensibility in American literary encounters with the tropics, especially the Caribbean. Highlighting this lesser-known history of early climate thinking and embodied knowledge, Boyden shows how deeply entrenched conceptions of tropicality continue to shape current climate change debates. In this Anthropocenic era, Boyden's work offers a timely and vital [End Page 485] intervention into ongoing conversations about climate injustice and the interrelated impacts of colonialism and environmental degradation. This book will appeal to scholars interested in early and nineteenth-century American literature, transnational American studies, Caribbean history, aesthetics, environmental humanities, and science studies.

As Boyden highlights, climate was not always understood, as it is today, as a singular, global, and abstract concept oriented toward the future. In the eighteenth century, thinkers such as John Locke prioritized direct sensory knowledge as a mode of understanding the climate: we can feel and understand the climate on our skin and within our individual bodies. Boy-den refers to this epistemological framework as "climate sensibility" or "the mutual imbrication of atmospheric circumstances and embodied knowledge" (2). This framework contrasts sharply with that of today's climate science, which prioritizes weather patterns, simulation, and future predictions over bodily sensations: a wind chill on one's face does not negate the broader phenomenon of global warming. Far from arguing against this point, Boyden shows how abstract models of climate knowledge gradually eclipsed climate sensibility as the dominant epistemological framework. As part of this process, climate transformed from a spatial concept into a temporal one. In its earlier version, climate functioned as an index for "ranking civilizations according to spatially defined zones" (6). This spatial conception of climate was rooted in the primacy of sensory knowledge and the mutual imbrication of bodies and discrete climatological zones. Today, however, climate is understood as a process, its impacts defined increas

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 迈克尔-博伊登(Michael Boyden)所著《美洲热带地区的气候与风景如画》 艾比-古德(Abby Goode)(简历) 《美洲热带地区的气候与风景如画》 迈克尔-博伊登 牛津大学出版社,2022 年 214 页。早期的美洲热带地区与当今的气候危机有什么关系?我们可以从 18 世纪晚期和 19 世纪关于气候、身体和热带性的概念中学到什么,从而为当代关于全球气候正义和科学的辩论提供新的启示?迈克尔-博伊登(Michael Boyden)在《美国热带地区的气候与风景如画》(2022 年)一书中探讨了这些问题,该书对美国文学与热带地区,尤其是加勒比地区的接触中的气候和感性进行了广泛的研究。博伊登强调了这一鲜为人知的早期气候思考和体现知识的历史,展示了根深蒂固的热带概念如何继续影响着当前的气候变化辩论。在这个人类时代,博伊登的著作及时而重要地 [第 485 页] 介入了当前关于气候不公正以及殖民主义和环境退化的相互影响的讨论。本书将吸引对早期和 19 世纪美国文学、跨国美国研究、加勒比历史、美学、环境人文学科和科学研究感兴趣的学者。正如博伊登所强调的,气候并不总是像今天这样被理解为一个面向未来的单一、全球性的抽象概念。在十八世纪,约翰-洛克等思想家将直接感官知识作为理解气候的一种模式:我们可以通过皮肤和身体感受和理解气候。博伊登将这一认识论框架称为 "气候感受性 "或 "大气环境与身体知识的相互交融"(2)。这一框架与当今的气候科学形成了鲜明对比,后者将天气模式、模拟和未来预测置于身体感觉之上:一个人脸上的风寒并不能否定更广泛的全球变暖现象。博伊登非但没有反驳这一点,反而展示了气候知识的抽象模型是如何逐渐取代气候感性成为主流认识论框架的。在这一过程中,气候从空间概念转变为时间概念。在早期版本中,气候是 "根据空间定义的区域对文明进行排序"(6)的指标。这种气候的空间概念植根于感官知识的首要地位以及身体与离散气候区的相互交融。然而,如今气候被理解为一个过程,其影响越来越多地从未来预测的角度来定义,而忽略了个人的身体体验。重要的是,对博伊登来说,气候思维的这种转变是通过十八世纪末至十九世纪中叶文学作品与美洲热带地区的接触而发生的--那是一个充满了欧美帝国主义、工业奴役和该地区环境恶化的门槛时期。通过关注热带地区,博伊登发现了气候思想中鲜为人知的早期转变,这种转变 "预示了现代气候想象,同时也指出了其基本的政治特质"(10)。换句话说,面向未来的单一气候概念并非凭空出现;它产生于与美洲热带地区的接触以及定居者殖民主义的历史。对于来自北方的美国旅行作家来说,热带气候刺激着他们的感官,并引发了他们对大气对身体健康和 [第 486 页完] 道德稳定的影响的焦虑。在这种情况下,热带成为气候理论的重要想象资源,尤其是当气候逐渐从一个植根于感官体验的空间概念转变为一个植根于平均值和预测的抽象、单一的概念时。然而,在这一过渡时期及以后,殖民定居者对温带气候和热带气候的划分,以及与之相关的道德、性和身体假设,仍以各种形式持续存在。正如博伊登所言,这些关于热带的贬义假设--关于它们的可居住性、它们与道德沦丧和性欲过剩的联系--继续潜伏在当今的气候变化传播中:"这个'温室'地球是什么,难道不是早期殖民主义者眼中不适宜居住的热带地区的未来版本吗?(32).风景如画的美学是博伊登分析他所称的 "气候制度 "的核心内容--气候制度是从多元的空间气候向抽象的单一气候过渡的关键时期。博伊登强调了...
{"title":"Climate and the Picturesque in the American Tropics by Michael Boyden (review)","authors":"Abby Goode","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a934213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a934213","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Climate and the Picturesque in the American Tropics</em> by Michael Boyden <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Abby Goode (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Climate and the Picturesque in the American Tropics</em><br/> <small>michael boyden</small><br/> Oxford University Press, 2022<br/> 214 pp. <p>What might the early American tropics have to do with today's climate crisis? What can we learn from late eighteenth- and nineteenth-century conceptions of climate, the body, and tropicality that might shed new light on contemporary debates about global climate justice and science? Michael Boyden takes up these questions in <em>Climate and the Picturesque in the American Tropics</em> (2022), a wide-ranging study of climate and sensibility in American literary encounters with the tropics, especially the Caribbean. Highlighting this lesser-known history of early climate thinking and embodied knowledge, Boyden shows how deeply entrenched conceptions of tropicality continue to shape current climate change debates. In this Anthropocenic era, Boyden's work offers a timely and vital <strong>[End Page 485]</strong> intervention into ongoing conversations about climate injustice and the interrelated impacts of colonialism and environmental degradation. This book will appeal to scholars interested in early and nineteenth-century American literature, transnational American studies, Caribbean history, aesthetics, environmental humanities, and science studies.</p> <p>As Boyden highlights, climate was not always understood, as it is today, as a singular, global, and abstract concept oriented toward the future. In the eighteenth century, thinkers such as John Locke prioritized direct sensory knowledge as a mode of understanding the climate: we can feel and understand the climate on our skin and within our individual bodies. Boy-den refers to this epistemological framework as \"climate sensibility\" or \"the mutual imbrication of atmospheric circumstances and embodied knowledge\" (2). This framework contrasts sharply with that of today's climate science, which prioritizes weather patterns, simulation, and future predictions over bodily sensations: a wind chill on one's face does not negate the broader phenomenon of global warming. Far from arguing against this point, Boyden shows how abstract models of climate knowledge gradually eclipsed climate sensibility as the dominant epistemological framework. As part of this process, climate transformed from a spatial concept into a temporal one. In its earlier version, climate functioned as an index for \"ranking civilizations according to spatially defined zones\" (6). This spatial conception of climate was rooted in the primacy of sensory knowledge and the mutual imbrication of bodies and discrete climatological zones. Today, however, climate is understood as a process, its impacts defined increas","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141946585","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Black Atlantic at Thirty: Implications for the Canon and for Publication and Instruction 三十岁的大西洋黑人:对教规以及出版和教学的影响
IF 0.3 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, AMERICAN Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a934209
John Saillant
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • The Black Atlantic at ThirtyImplications for the Canon and for Publication and Instruction
  • John Saillant (bio)

Two habits of scholars of early African American literature, as we move into the second quarter of the twenty-first century, have probably outlived their usefulness. One is reliance on the Norton Anthology of African American Literature (three editions: 1997, 2004, 2014) for defining the canon in both classrooms and scholarship.1 The other is the prioritization of authorized versions of Black-authored texts in scholarship and in college and university courses, all of which have relied on publication of those versions in letterpress imprints.2 One of the most-cited works in Black studies, Paul Gilroy, The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness (1993), can help us navigate the transition in which we seem to find ourselves.

Stepping away from the Norton and approaching textuality in a different manner are two sides of one coin. The Norton has prevailed even as scholars and other readers have uncovered previously unknown, unpublished works, recovered little-studied variant texts produced by Black writers, and reattributed published works more accurately to Black writers.3 This process of uncovering, recovering, and reattributing followed the accomplishments of bibliophiles of Black literature such as Arturo Schomburg and Dorothy Porter, yet it has surpassed them in its use of new scholarly tools. These advances were never well represented in the Norton. If we summarize this newer work in a definition of "fluid text" as "any literary work that exists in more than one version"—a notion I draw from John Bryant and Eric D. Lamore—we can focus on its implications for the ideal of the authorized text (Bryant qtd. in Lamore, "Circulation" 65n1). The conviction that fluidity is important implies that each version of a text has its own legitimacy for study. Scholars consider the changes as well as the reasons for change that relate one version to others. A synoptic view of the fluid [End Page 431] texts of the African Atlantic suggests that many of the works once regarded as stable and authentic were part of a series of changeable texts, more like crests and underswells, as in water, than like bound books, as on a shelf. The fluid African Atlantic text will be, if we take it seriously, a remarkable advance in canonicity, scholarship, and instruction.

The canon could be construed as including sets of fluid texts instead of authentic ones presumably authorized by their creators and identified as authoritative by modern scholars. New veins of scholarship could be opened as we analyze the reasons texts change as they move in time and space as well

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 三十岁的大西洋黑人--对典籍、出版和教学的启示 约翰-塞兰特(John Saillant)(简历) 进入 21 世纪第二季度,早期非裔美国人文学学者的两个习惯可能已经过时。其一是依赖《诺顿美国黑人文学选集》(三版:1997 年、2004 年、2014 年)来定义课堂和学术研究中的经典1 。其二是在学术研究和大专院校课程中优先考虑黑人撰写的文本的授权版本,所有这些都依赖于这些版本在凸版印刷品上的出版2:保罗-吉尔罗伊(Paul Gilroy)的《大西洋黑人:现代性与双重意识》(The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness)(1993 年)是黑人研究领域被引用最多的著作之一,它可以帮助我们把握我们似乎正处于的转型期。摆脱《诺顿》的束缚和以不同的方式对待文本性是一枚硬币的两面。尽管学者和其他读者发掘了以前不为人知的未出版作品,复原了黑人作家创作的鲜有研究的变体文本,并将已出版的作品更准确地重新归属于黑人作家,但《诺顿》仍占据着主导地位3 。这些进步从未在《诺顿》中得到充分体现。如果我们将 "流动文本 "定义为 "任何存在不止一个版本的文学作品"--我从约翰-布赖恩特和埃里克-D-拉莫尔那里借鉴了这一概念--来概括这项更新的工作,我们就可以关注它对授权文本理想的影响(布赖恩特转引自拉莫尔,"流通 "65n1)。坚信流动性的重要性意味着每个版本的文本都有其研究的合法性。学者们会考虑一个版本与其他版本之间的变化以及变化的原因。对非洲大西洋流动 [第 431 页结束] 文本的综合观察表明,许多曾被视为稳定和真实的作品是一系列可变文本的一部分,它们更像水中的波峰和波底,而不是像书架上的装订成册的书籍。如果我们认真对待流动的非洲大西洋文本,它将是正典、学术和教学方面的显著进步。正典可以被理解为包括成套的流动文本,而不是假定由其创作者授权并被现代学者认定为权威的正宗文本。当我们分析文本在时间和空间上以及在不同的读者和印刷者之间发生变化的原因时,可以开辟新的学术脉络。教学可以反映我们学生的生活条件,在这种条件下,文本与其他媒体一样,包括我们学生创造的媒体,即使在不稳定的环境中也会迅速发展。德里克-R.-斯皮尔斯(Derrick R. Spires)所观察到的十九世纪公民身份的特征--有时是 "流动有序的,但不是静态或限定的"(199)--是我们可以从早期非洲大西洋作家的生活和他们的文本以及我们课堂上的学生身上看到的一种状况。我们可能会感叹唯一授权文本重要性的下降,但我在此要说的是,它的单一性和稳固性歪曲了大西洋黑人作家的经历。我们可以向自己提出一个问题:流动性对于早期非洲大西洋文本是否如此重要,以至于应该在课堂教学中体现出来。如果我们的回答是肯定的,那么大专院校的教师就应该重新思考我们对选集的使用。当我们将非洲大西洋作品的流动性--我不能说它们的具体性--映射到吉尔罗伊对这一领域的关注时,《黑色大西洋》可以引导我们阅读非洲大西洋的作品。吉尔罗伊认为,"黑色大西洋 "的表现形式是对反黑人现代性的反文化回应,特别是对跨大西洋奴隶贸易、新世界奴隶制、欧美人对美洲原住民和非洲裔人的压迫、文化和人口的大规模错位以及部分由奴隶劳动资助的资本主义的发展(1-40)。如果我们不了解这种对现代性的反应,就无法理解......
{"title":"The Black Atlantic at Thirty: Implications for the Canon and for Publication and Instruction","authors":"John Saillant","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a934209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a934209","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Black Atlantic</em> at Thirty<span>Implications for the Canon and for Publication and Instruction</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> John Saillant (bio) </li> </ul> <p>Two habits of scholars of early African American literature, as we move into the second quarter of the twenty-first century, have probably outlived their usefulness. One is reliance on the <em>Norton Anthology of African American Literature</em> (three editions: 1997, 2004, 2014) for defining the canon in both classrooms and scholarship.<sup>1</sup> The other is the prioritization of authorized versions of Black-authored texts in scholarship and in college and university courses, all of which have relied on publication of those versions in letterpress imprints.<sup>2</sup> One of the most-cited works in Black studies, Paul Gilroy, <em>The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness</em> (1993), can help us navigate the transition in which we seem to find ourselves.</p> <p>Stepping away from the <em>Norton</em> and approaching textuality in a different manner are two sides of one coin. The <em>Norton</em> has prevailed even as scholars and other readers have uncovered previously unknown, unpublished works, recovered little-studied variant texts produced by Black writers, and reattributed published works more accurately to Black writers.<sup>3</sup> This process of uncovering, recovering, and reattributing followed the accomplishments of bibliophiles of Black literature such as Arturo Schomburg and Dorothy Porter, yet it has surpassed them in its use of new scholarly tools. These advances were never well represented in the <em>Norton</em>. If we summarize this newer work in a definition of \"fluid text\" as \"any literary work that exists in more than one version\"—a notion I draw from John Bryant and Eric D. Lamore—we can focus on its implications for the ideal of the authorized text (Bryant qtd. in Lamore, \"Circulation\" 65n1). The conviction that fluidity is important implies that each version of a text has its own legitimacy for study. Scholars consider the changes as well as the reasons for change that relate one version to others. A synoptic view of the fluid <strong>[End Page 431]</strong> texts of the African Atlantic suggests that many of the works once regarded as stable and authentic were part of a series of changeable texts, more like crests and underswells, as in water, than like bound books, as on a shelf. The fluid African Atlantic text will be, if we take it seriously, a remarkable advance in canonicity, scholarship, and instruction.</p> <p>The canon could be construed as including sets of fluid texts instead of authentic ones presumably authorized by their creators and identified as authoritative by modern scholars. New veins of scholarship could be opened as we analyze the reasons texts change as they move in time and space as well ","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141946582","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Notes on Contributors 撰稿人说明
IF 0.3 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, AMERICAN Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a934224
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Notes on Contributors

arturo arias is John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Emeritus Professor in the Humanities at the University of California, Merced. Author of Recovering Lost Footprints: Contemporary Maya Narratives, volumes 1 (SUNY P, 2017) and 2 (SUNY P, 2018), Taking Their Word: Literature and the Signs of Central America (U of Minnesota P, 2007), The Rigoberta Menchú Controversy (U of Minnesota P, 2000), The Identity of the Word: Guatemalan Literature in Light of the New Century (1998), and Ceremonial Gestures: Central American Fiction 1960–1990 (1998), he also cowrote the film El Norte (1984) and has published seven novels. A 2020 Guggenheim Award recipient and 2019 visiting professor at Princeton University, he is twice winner of the Casa de las Americas Award (1979 and 1981) and winner of the Ana Seghers Award for Fiction in Germany (1990).

thomas n. baker is a professor of history at the State University of New York at Potsdam. He is the author of Sentiment and Celebrity: Nathaniel Parker Willis and the Trials of Literary Fame (Oxford UP, 1999). He enjoys turning cryptic archival discoveries to good use, having published articles on Aaron Burr's intriguing for the presidency, the mysterious letter of "A Slave" to Thomas Jefferson, memory-making in Lyman Beecher's autobiography, and the forgotten genealogy of Deism in New York State.

christopher allan black is an assistant professor of teaching and member of the American Literature faculty at the University of Memphis, where he teaches courses in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century American literature and composition. He is president of the James Fenimore Cooper Society and associate editor of the James Fenimore Cooper Society Journal. His articles and reviews have appeared and are forthcoming in Early American Literature, Rocky Mountain Review: The Journal of the Rocky Mountain MLA, ESQ, the Review of English Studies, and Studies in American Culture. His first book, The Anti-Gallows Movement and Republican Social Justice Reform in Antebellum Literature 1772–1862, is currently forthcoming with Lexington Books, an imprint of Rowman and Littlefield. He is the recipient of three National Endowment for the Humanities summer research fellowships.

elizabeth a. bohls is a professor of English at the University of Oregon. She has published three books: Women Travel Writers and the Language of Aesthetics, 1716–1818 (Cambridge UP, 1995); Romantic Literature and Postcolonial Studies (Edinburgh UP, 2013); and Slavery and the Politics of Place: Representing the Colonial Caribbean, 1772–1833 (Cambridge UP, 2014). Recent inte

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 撰稿人简介 阿图罗-阿里亚斯是加州大学默塞德分校约翰-麦克阿瑟和凯瑟琳-麦克阿瑟基金会名誉人文学教授。著有《找回失落的足迹》(Recovering Lost Footprints):当代玛雅叙事》第 1 卷(纽约州立大学出版社,2017 年)和第 2 卷(纽约州立大学出版社,2018 年)、《以他们的话为证》:文学与中美洲的标志》(明尼苏达大学出版社,2007 年)、《里戈贝塔-门丘之争》(明尼苏达大学出版社,2000 年)、《文字的特性》:The Identity of the Word: Guatemalan Literature in Light of the New Century》(1998 年)和《Ceremonial Gestures:他还参与编剧了电影《El Norte》(1984 年),并出版了七部小说。他是 2020 年古根海姆奖获得者和 2019 年普林斯顿大学客座教授,曾两度获得美洲之家奖(1979 年和 1981 年)和德国安娜-塞格斯小说奖(1990 年)获得者。他著有《情感与名人》(Sentiment and Celebrity:Sentiment and Celebrity: Nathaniel Parker Willis and the Trials of Literary Fame》(牛津大学出版社,1999 年)。他喜欢将神秘的档案发现加以利用,曾发表过关于亚伦-伯尔对总统职位的好奇、"一个奴隶 "写给托马斯-杰斐逊的神秘信件、莱曼-比彻自传中的记忆制造以及纽约州被遗忘的神权主义谱系的文章。 克里斯托弗-艾伦-布莱克是孟菲斯大学的助理教授和美国文学系成员,教授十八和十九世纪美国文学和作文课程。他是詹姆斯-菲尼莫尔-库珀协会主席和《詹姆斯-菲尼莫尔-库珀协会期刊》副主编。The Journal of the Rocky Mountain MLA》、《ESQ》、《英语研究评论》和《美国文化研究》。他的第一部著作《1772-1862 年前贝卢姆文学中的反加洛斯运动和共和党社会正义改革》(The Anti-Gallows Movement and Republican Social Justice Reform in Antebellum Literature 1772-1862 )即将由 Rowman and Littlefield 旗下的 Lexington Books 出版。Elizabeth A. Bohls 是俄勒冈大学的英语教授。她已出版三本书:女旅行作家与美学语言,1716-1818 年》(剑桥大学出版社,1995 年);《浪漫主义文学与后殖民研究》(爱丁堡大学出版社,2013 年);《奴隶制与地方政治》:1772-1833年加勒比殖民地的表征》(剑桥大学出版社,2014年)。丹吉尔-迪兹-库奇是美国空军学院的英语副教授。他著有《美国碎片》(American Fragments:The Political Aesthetic of Unfinished Forms in the Early Republic》(宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2022 年),以及《The Part and the Whole in Early American Literature, Print Culture, and Art》(巴克内尔大学出版社,2024 年)的联合编辑。英格丽德-迪兰(Ingrid Diran)是威斯康星大学麦迪逊分校英语系助理教授。威廉-格洛弗(William glover)是波士顿大学英语系四年级博士生。他专门研究美国早期的非虚构作品,尤其关注对景观、土地所有权、自然资源和劳动力的竞争性表述。艾比-古德是新罕布什尔州普利茅斯州立大学的英语和可持续发展研究副教授。她是《Agrotopias》一书的作者:An American Literary History of Sustainability》(北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2022 年)一书的作者。卡洛斯-马西亚斯-普列托是威廉姆斯学院罗曼语助理教授,教授文学和西班牙语课程。他在加州大学伯克利分校获得西班牙语言文学博士学位,并在普渡大学获得美国研究硕士学位。他的研究重点是拉丁美洲殖民文学,尤其是十六和十七世纪新西班牙纳瓦族知识分子的著作。他的研究兴趣还包括跨越时间和空间的美洲土著叛乱......
{"title":"Notes on Contributors","authors":"","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a934224","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a934224","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Notes on Contributors <!-- /html_title --></li> </ul> <p><small>arturo arias</small> is John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Emeritus Professor in the Humanities at the University of California, Merced. Author of <em>Recovering Lost Footprints: Contemporary Maya Narratives</em>, volumes 1 (SUNY P, 2017) and 2 (SUNY P, 2018), <em>Taking Their Word: Literature and the Signs of Central America</em> (U of Minnesota P, 2007), <em>The Rigoberta Menchú Controversy</em> (U of Minnesota P, 2000), <em>The Identity of the Word: Guatemalan Literature in Light of the New Century</em> (1998), and <em>Ceremonial Gestures: Central American Fiction 1960–1990</em> (1998), he also cowrote the film <em>El Norte</em> (1984) and has published seven novels. A 2020 Guggenheim Award recipient and 2019 visiting professor at Princeton University, he is twice winner of the Casa de las Americas Award (1979 and 1981) and winner of the Ana Seghers Award for Fiction in Germany (1990).</p> <p><small>thomas n. baker</small> is a professor of history at the State University of New York at Potsdam. He is the author of <em>Sentiment and Celebrity: Nathaniel Parker Willis and the Trials of Literary Fame</em> (Oxford UP, 1999). He enjoys turning cryptic archival discoveries to good use, having published articles on Aaron Burr's intriguing for the presidency, the mysterious letter of \"A Slave\" to Thomas Jefferson, memory-making in Lyman Beecher's autobiography, and the forgotten genealogy of Deism in New York State.</p> <p><small>christopher allan black</small> is an assistant professor of teaching and member of the American Literature faculty at the University of Memphis, where he teaches courses in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century American literature and composition. He is president of the James Fenimore Cooper Society and associate editor of the <em>James Fenimore Cooper Society Journal</em>. His articles and reviews have appeared and are forthcoming in <em>Early American Literature, Rocky Mountain Review: The Journal of the Rocky Mountain MLA, ESQ</em>, the <em>Review of English Studies</em>, and <em>Studies in American Culture</em>. His first book, <em>The Anti-Gallows Movement and Republican Social Justice Reform in Antebellum Literature 1772–1862</em>, is currently forthcoming with Lexington Books, an imprint of Rowman and Littlefield. He is the recipient of three National Endowment for the Humanities summer research fellowships.</p> <p><small>elizabeth a. bohls</small> is a professor of English at the University of Oregon. She has published three books: <em>Women Travel Writers and the Language of Aesthetics, 1716–1818</em> (Cambridge UP, 1995); <em>Romantic Literature and Postcolonial Studies</em> (Edinburgh UP, 2013); and <em>Slavery and the Politics of Place: Representing the Colonial Caribbean, 1772–1833</em> (Cambridge UP, 2014). Recent inte","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141946590","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Bravo by James Fenimore Cooper (review) 詹姆斯-菲尼摩尔-库珀的《布拉沃》(评论)
IF 0.3 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, AMERICAN Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a934219
Matthew Redmond
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • The Bravo by James Fenimore Cooper
  • Matthew Redmond (bio)
The Bravo
james fenimore cooper
SUNY Press, 2023 482 pp.

When was the last time James Fenimore Cooper had a moment? The answer might be 1992, when Michael Mann's The Last of the Mohicans gave us Daniel Day-Lewis as a smoldering young version of Cooper's wonderfully crusty character Natty Bumppo. If that's the case, it has been too long. Today even Cooper's most influential novels—The Spy (1821), The Pioneers (1823), The Red Rover (1827)—are more gestured at than rigorously read, while the lesser lights seldom attract even a passing glance. The Bravo, his 1831 novel about political corruption in eighteenth-century Venice, is among the unnoticed. It is also among the latest of Cooper's works to benefit from the SUNY Press treatment, as that publisher works to deliver "sound scholarly editions of Cooper's major works, based wherever possible on authorial manuscripts" (wjfc.org).

Granting that all of Cooper's works might merit a certain kind of interest just by being his, it seems reasonable to ask what specifically we gain by livening up The Bravo's afterlife with a new edition. Certainly, this novel marks a sea change in Cooper's career, as the first of only three novels that he set in Europe. Cooper had left the United States in 1826, and, like innumerable tourists before and since, he found in Italy's culture and history tinder for the imagination. The result is a novel that centers on Jacopo Frontoni, a young man pressed into serving the Venetian government that has unjustly imprisoned his father. In his search for liberty, Frontoni must navigate a power structure as fluid and murky as the canals' waters. His suffering serves as an indictment of the demagogue-infected republic whose bottoming out, the narrator assures us every so often, will come [End Page 513] not too many decades hence. In fact, the independent Venice of this novel would succumb to Napoleon in 1797 and to Austria in 1815.

For some people, the boon of travel is a clearer perspective on life back home. Getting out of the United States set Cooper's mind only more firmly on his country's problems, even as it widened his perspective on how some of those problems persist across both epochs and oceans. In his send-up of the Venetian government and its failure to represent the best interests of the citizenry, we observe a trenchant critique of Jacksonian democracy. But the novel also represents more deep-seated political concerns. First published in 1831, The Bravo can be situated in a swirl of US cultural productions from the 1830s that were grappling with the subject of the country's long-term prospec

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 The Bravo by James Fenimore Cooper Matthew Redmond (bio) The Bravo james fenimore cooper SUNY Press, 2023 482 pp.詹姆斯-菲尼摩尔-库珀上一次风光是什么时候?答案可能是 1992 年,当时迈克尔-曼(Michael Mann)导演的《最后的莫希干人》(The Last of the Mohicans)让我们看到了丹尼尔-戴-刘易斯(Daniel Day-Lewis)饰演的库珀的精彩硬汉角色纳蒂-布姆波(Natty Bumppo)的年轻版本。如果真是这样,那也太久了。如今,即使是库珀最有影响力的小说--《间谍》(1821 年)、《先驱者》(1823 年)和《红色流浪者》(1827 年)--也只是匆匆一瞥,而很少有人认真阅读,而那些较次要的作品甚至连看都很少看一眼。布拉沃》是他 1831 年创作的一部关于十八世纪威尼斯政治腐败的小说,也是不被关注的作品之一。该书也是库珀最新出版的作品之一,因为纽约州立大学出版社致力于提供 "库珀主要作品的可靠学术版本,尽可能以作者手稿为基础"(wjfc.org)。如果说库珀的所有作品只要是他的作品就会引起某种兴趣,那么我们似乎有理由问一问,用一个新版本来活跃《布拉沃》的后世,我们能得到什么。当然,这部小说标志着库珀职业生涯的巨变,是他仅有的三部以欧洲为背景的小说中的第一部。库珀于 1826 年离开美国,像之前和之后无数的游客一样,他在意大利的文化和历史中找到了想象的火花。小说以雅科波-弗朗多尼(Jacopo Frontoni)为中心展开叙述,这位年轻人被迫为威尼斯政府效力,因为威尼斯政府不公正地监禁了他的父亲。在寻求自由的过程中,弗朗多尼必须驾驭像运河水域一样多变、阴暗的权力结构。他的苦难是对蛊惑人心的共和国的控诉,叙述者时不时地向我们保证,几十年后,共和国就会触底反弹[第513页完]。事实上,小说中独立的威尼斯将在 1797 年屈服于拿破仑,在 1815 年屈服于奥地利。对有些人来说,旅行的好处是可以更清楚地了解家乡的生活。走出美国后,库珀更加坚定地思考自己国家的问题,同时也拓宽了他的视野,让他了解到其中一些问题是如何跨越时代和大洋持续存在的。在他对威尼斯政府及其未能代表公民最佳利益的讽刺中,我们看到了对杰克逊民主制的尖锐批评。不过,这部小说也反映了更深层次的政治问题。布拉沃》初版于 1831 年,可以将其置于 19 世纪 30 年代美国文化产品的漩涡之中,当时的美国正在努力解决国家长期前景的问题。与画家托马斯-科尔在其《帝国的进程》系列中提出的问题一样,库珀在这部小说中也隐含地提出了同样的问题:美国的共和国如何才能在遥远的未来保持连贯性和廉洁性,尤其是当罗马等许多伟大共和国的废墟遍布历史书页的时候?虽然《布拉沃》陶醉于其背景的异国情调,但它从未停止过让人联想到一种为美国人所做的实地实验。透过库珀笔下威尼斯的重重迷雾,在其无尽的倒塌的圆柱背后,人们可以瞥见仍在建设中的国会大厦。纽约州立大学出版社的编辑们推出了这本精美而气势恢宏的著作,并将其学术顾忌昭然若揭。著名美国学家凯-西摩-豪斯(Kay Seymour House)撰写的导言揭示了库珀在整个创作过程中的价值观和优先事项,并精辟地利用了他的通信和他在欧洲曲折前进的见证。除了内容广泛、引人入胜的 "文本评论 "部分外,小说还附录了题为 "手稿及其誊写 "的附录,其中详细介绍了编辑过程中遇到的一些难题,包括库珀难以辨认的字迹、意大利文格式的不连贯使用,以及将修改后的文本粘在新纸上以覆盖已取消段落的不便习惯。至于小说的整体表现形式,人们也许会对小说封套上的 "剧透 "提出异议,但对封面插图却不会有任何意见...
{"title":"The Bravo by James Fenimore Cooper (review)","authors":"Matthew Redmond","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a934219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a934219","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Bravo</em> by James Fenimore Cooper <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Matthew Redmond (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Bravo</em><br/> <small>james fenimore cooper</small><br/> SUNY Press, 2023 482 pp. <p>When was the last time James Fenimore Cooper had a moment? The answer might be 1992, when Michael Mann's <em>The Last of the Mohicans</em> gave us Daniel Day-Lewis as a smoldering young version of Cooper's wonderfully crusty character Natty Bumppo. If that's the case, it has been too long. Today even Cooper's most influential novels—<em>The Spy</em> (1821), <em>The Pioneers</em> (1823), <em>The Red Rover</em> (1827)—are more gestured at than rigorously read, while the lesser lights seldom attract even a passing glance. <em>The Bravo</em>, his 1831 novel about political corruption in eighteenth-century Venice, is among the unnoticed. It is also among the latest of Cooper's works to benefit from the SUNY Press treatment, as that publisher works to deliver \"sound scholarly editions of Cooper's major works, based wherever possible on authorial manuscripts\" (wjfc.org).</p> <p>Granting that all of Cooper's works might merit a certain kind of interest just by being his, it seems reasonable to ask what specifically we gain by livening up <em>The Bravo</em>'s afterlife with a new edition. Certainly, this novel marks a sea change in Cooper's career, as the first of only three novels that he set in Europe. Cooper had left the United States in 1826, and, like innumerable tourists before and since, he found in Italy's culture and history tinder for the imagination. The result is a novel that centers on Jacopo Frontoni, a young man pressed into serving the Venetian government that has unjustly imprisoned his father. In his search for liberty, Frontoni must navigate a power structure as fluid and murky as the canals' waters. His suffering serves as an indictment of the demagogue-infected republic whose bottoming out, the narrator assures us every so often, will come <strong>[End Page 513]</strong> not too many decades hence. In fact, the independent Venice of this novel would succumb to Napoleon in 1797 and to Austria in 1815.</p> <p>For some people, the boon of travel is a clearer perspective on life back home. Getting out of the United States set Cooper's mind only more firmly on his country's problems, even as it widened his perspective on how some of those problems persist across both epochs and oceans. In his send-up of the Venetian government and its failure to represent the best interests of the citizenry, we observe a trenchant critique of Jacksonian democracy. But the novel also represents more deep-seated political concerns. First published in 1831, <em>The Bravo</em> can be situated in a swirl of US cultural productions from the 1830s that were grappling with the subject of the country's long-term prospec","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141946587","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Folly of Revolution: Thomas Bradbury Chandler and the Loyalist Mind in a Democratic Age by S. Scott Rohrer (review) 革命的愚蠢:托马斯-布拉德伯里-钱德勒与民主时代的忠君思想》,作者 S. Scott Rohrer(评论)
IF 0.3 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, AMERICAN Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a934212
Daniel Diez Couch
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • The Folly of Revolution: Thomas Bradbury Chandler and the Loyalist Mind in a Democratic Age by S. Scott Rohrer
  • Daniel Diez Couch (bio)
The Folly of Revolution: Thomas Bradbury Chandler and the Loyalist Mind in a Democratic Age
s. scott rohrer
University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2022
248 pp.

In many ways, S. Scott Rohrer claims, British loyalism in the colonies during the eighteenth century remains an untold story. Despite canonical studies by scholars including Robert M. Calhoon, Catherine S. Crary, and Mary Beth Norton, as well as more recent studies by Maya Jasanoff and Phillip Gould, Rohrer finds an unexplored, and important, story of loyalism in the figure of Thomas Bradbury Chandler, the Anglican minister at St. John's in Elizabeth Town, New Jersey. Rohrer makes a convincing case throughout The Folly of Revolution: Thomas Bradbury Chandler and the Loyalist Mind in a Democratic Age. He situates Chandler as a major theological and political node in a network of colonial Anglican ministers, explaining Chandler's education, ideological formation, mission to further Anglicanism in the colonies, and resistance to American independence. For Rohrer, Chandler's life and worldview constitute an "alternative vision" that "has receded from historical memory" (3). Indeed, even as The Folly of Revolution provides a finely detailed biographical study of Chandler's life, it simultaneously tracks the broader intellectual milieu, with particular attention to the eighteenth-century debates surrounding Anglicanism and evangelicalism, as well as republicanism and monarchism. In many ways, for Chandler, the problems of evangelism and republicanism were one and the same. Rohrer's study does an admirable job of examining a range of intellectual traditions through the lens of Chandler's life and learning.

The Folly of Revolution begins by unfolding a central question for Chandler throughout much of his career: "How could social and political order [End Page 481] survive when subjects had the right to challenge authority?" (4). Beginning with his schooling at Yale, where Chandler rejected the Congregationalism of his youth, Rohrer takes us through the minister's meticulously monarchical positions, the most vital of which was his goal of establishing an Anglican bishop in America. He became friends early in his life with Samuel Johnson, one of the chief Anglican ministers in the colonies, a man who fought fiercely for the creation of a colonial episcopate. Chandler took up this cause when Johnson no longer could. In support of his position, Chandler "did not look to the ancient world for guidance," unlike many other American intellectuals, instead opting to exam

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 革命的愚蠢:S. Scott Rohrer 著 Daniel Diez Couch (bio) The Folly of Revolution:Thomas Bradbury Chandler and the Loyalist Mind in a Democratic Age S. Scott Rohrer University Park:宾夕法尼亚州立大学出版社,2022 年,248 页。斯科特-罗勒(S. Scott Rohrer)称,在许多方面,18 世纪殖民地的英国效忠主义仍然是一个不为人知的故事。尽管罗伯特-M-卡尔洪(Robert M. Calhoon)、凯瑟琳-S-克拉里(Catherine S. Crary)和玛丽-贝丝-诺顿(Mary Beth Norton)等学者进行了经典研究,玛雅-贾萨诺夫(Maya Jasanoff)和菲利普-古尔德(Phillip Gould)也进行了较新的研究,但罗勒发现,在新泽西州伊丽莎白镇圣约翰教堂的英国圣公会牧师托马斯-布拉德伯里-钱德勒(Thomas Bradbury Chandler)这个人物身上,还有一个未被发掘的、重要的效忠故事。罗勒在《革命的愚蠢》一书中提出了令人信服的理由:托马斯-布拉德伯里-钱德勒与民主时代的忠君思想》一书中,罗勒提出了一个令人信服的观点。他将钱德勒定位为殖民地圣公会牧师网络中一个重要的神学和政治节点,解释了钱德勒的教育、思想形成、在殖民地推进圣公会主义的使命以及对美国独立的抵制。在罗勒看来,钱德勒的生平和世界观构成了一种 "另类视野","已从历史记忆中消失"(3)。事实上,尽管《革命的愚蠢》对钱德勒的生平进行了细致入微的传记研究,但它同时对更广泛的思想环境进行了追踪,尤其关注了十八世纪围绕英国圣公会和福音派以及共和主义和君主主义的争论。对钱德勒来说,福音主义和共和主义的问题在很多方面是相同的。罗勒的研究通过钱德勒的生平和学识审视了一系列思想传统,令人钦佩。革命的愚蠢》一开篇就提出了钱德勒职业生涯中的一个核心问题:"当臣民有权挑战权威时,社会和政治秩序 [第481页完] 如何才能生存下去?(4).钱德勒在耶鲁大学求学时摒弃了青年时期的公理会主义,罗勒从他在耶鲁大学的求学经历开始,带我们回顾了这位牧师一丝不苟的君主立宪立场,其中最重要的是他在美国设立圣公会主教的目标。他早年与塞缪尔-约翰逊(Samuel Johnson)成为朋友,约翰逊是英国圣公会在殖民地的主要牧师之一,此人为在殖民地建立主教团进行了激烈的斗争。钱德勒在约翰逊力不从心时接过了他的事业。为了支持自己的立场,钱德勒 "没有像其他许多美国知识分子那样从古代世界寻求指导",而是选择研究 17 世纪晚期的保皇派思想 (12)。罗勒揭示说,钱德勒仔细研究了埃德蒙-摩根(Edmund S. Morgan)等学者认为是美国革命思想熔炉核心的议会争吵。但与爱国者不同的是,钱德勒站在高等教会君主制一边,尤其是在拒绝宣誓效忠威廉和玛丽的非陪审员案件以及班戈之争中,这两起诉讼深深地塑造了钱德勒的世界观。随着本书的进展,罗勒按时间顺序追溯了钱德勒的一生--连续考察了他的早年生活和学校教育、他对圣公会主教职位的推动、他的反革命情绪,以及他最后被流放和返回美国的经历--他同时深入研究了塑造这位圣公会牧师宗教和政治立场的过去。通过这种方式,罗勒的研究为我们提供了一个重要途径,让我们了解 17 世纪的英国历史是如何影响效忠者而不仅仅是爱国者的。过去的细节对于理解钱德勒的观点很重要,这一点显示了罗勒对钱德勒自身历史学家身份的敏感性(《革命的愚蠢》主要依靠钱德勒图书馆的记录来解读他的知识背景)。1688 年,当议会废黜詹姆斯二世并由威廉和玛丽取而代之时,九位英国圣公会主教拒绝向新君主宣誓,他们解释说:"议会代表人民行事,不能将某人推上王位。在一个神圣有序的宇宙中,这样做是不自然的,也是违背常理的"(73)。钱德勒同意这种观点。在他的历史研究中,钱德勒站在所谓的 "非法学家 "一边,并对英国的共和思想感到震惊......
{"title":"The Folly of Revolution: Thomas Bradbury Chandler and the Loyalist Mind in a Democratic Age by S. Scott Rohrer (review)","authors":"Daniel Diez Couch","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a934212","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a934212","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>The Folly of Revolution: Thomas Bradbury Chandler and the Loyalist Mind in a Democratic Age</em> by S. Scott Rohrer <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Daniel Diez Couch (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Folly of Revolution: Thomas Bradbury Chandler and the Loyalist Mind in a Democratic Age</em><br/> <small>s. scott rohrer</small><br/> University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2022<br/> 248 pp. <p>In many ways, S. Scott Rohrer claims, British loyalism in the colonies during the eighteenth century remains an untold story. Despite canonical studies by scholars including Robert M. Calhoon, Catherine S. Crary, and Mary Beth Norton, as well as more recent studies by Maya Jasanoff and Phillip Gould, Rohrer finds an unexplored, and important, story of loyalism in the figure of Thomas Bradbury Chandler, the Anglican minister at St. John's in Elizabeth Town, New Jersey. Rohrer makes a convincing case throughout <em>The Folly of Revolution: Thomas Bradbury Chandler and the Loyalist Mind in a Democratic Age</em>. He situates Chandler as a major theological and political node in a network of colonial Anglican ministers, explaining Chandler's education, ideological formation, mission to further Anglicanism in the colonies, and resistance to American independence. For Rohrer, Chandler's life and worldview constitute an \"alternative vision\" that \"has receded from historical memory\" (3). Indeed, even as <em>The Folly of Revolution</em> provides a finely detailed biographical study of Chandler's life, it simultaneously tracks the broader intellectual milieu, with particular attention to the eighteenth-century debates surrounding Anglicanism and evangelicalism, as well as republicanism and monarchism. In many ways, for Chandler, the problems of evangelism and republicanism were one and the same. Rohrer's study does an admirable job of examining a range of intellectual traditions through the lens of Chandler's life and learning.</p> <p><em>The Folly of Revolution</em> begins by unfolding a central question for Chandler throughout much of his career: \"How could social and political order <strong>[End Page 481]</strong> survive when subjects had the right to challenge authority?\" (4). Beginning with his schooling at Yale, where Chandler rejected the Congregationalism of his youth, Rohrer takes us through the minister's meticulously monarchical positions, the most vital of which was his goal of establishing an Anglican bishop in America. He became friends early in his life with Samuel Johnson, one of the chief Anglican ministers in the colonies, a man who fought fiercely for the creation of a colonial episcopate. Chandler took up this cause when Johnson no longer could. In support of his position, Chandler \"did not look to the ancient world for guidance,\" unlike many other American intellectuals, instead opting to exam","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141946586","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Archive: "Founded on Facts": Correcting Misattribution of the Novels Monima (1802) and Margaretta (1807) 档案:"基于事实":纠正小说《莫妮玛》(1802 年)和《玛格丽特》(1807 年)的错误归属
IF 0.3 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, AMERICAN Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a934204
Thomas N. Baker

Abstract:

Using archival and genealogical sources, this study corrects the long-standing misattribution of the American novels Monima; or, The Beggar Girl (1802) and Margaretta; or, The Intricacies of the Heart (1807) to Martha Meredith Read. Their true author, Mary Endress Ralston (1772–1850), is introduced as a bilingual Pennsylvania German Lutheran literary pioneer.

摘要:本研究利用档案和家谱资料,纠正了长期以来将美国小说《Monima; or, The Beggar Girl》(1802 年)和《Margaretta; or, The Intricacies of the Heart》(1807 年)误认为是 Martha Meredith Read 所著的错误说法。这两部作品的真正作者玛丽-恩德蕾丝-拉尔斯顿(Mary Endress Ralston,1772-1850 年)是宾夕法尼亚州德国路德教派的双语文学先驱。
{"title":"Archive: \"Founded on Facts\": Correcting Misattribution of the Novels Monima (1802) and Margaretta (1807)","authors":"Thomas N. Baker","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a934204","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a934204","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Abstract:</p><p>Using archival and genealogical sources, this study corrects the long-standing misattribution of the American novels <i>Monima; or, The Beggar Girl</i> (1802) and <i>Margaretta; or, The Intricacies of the Heart</i> (1807) to Martha Meredith Read. Their true author, Mary Endress Ralston (1772–1850), is introduced as a bilingual Pennsylvania German Lutheran literary pioneer.</p></p>","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141946581","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire by Adrian Chastain Weimer (review) 宪法文化:Adrian Chastain Weimer 所著的《新英格兰与复辟帝国中反对专制统治的斗争》(评论)
IF 0.3 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, AMERICAN Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a934218
Bryce Traister
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire by Adrian Chastain Weimer
  • Bryce Traister (bio)
A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire
adrian chastain weimer
University of Pennsylvania Press, 2023
366 pp.

From the Errand into the Wilderness to "Schoolhouse Rock," students of American colonial history have offered a variety of answers to the question "Where did the idea of American self-government come from?" Adrian Chastain Weimer's splendid new study, A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire, joins this conversation. What Weimer labels a "regional constitutional culture" emerges "in defiance of the Restoration monarchy" (2). Governors, ministers, and commoners, "under extraordinary pressure to compromise with the crown, … developed a cohesive, broad-based constitutional culture … enriched by a wide range of political, artistic, religious and historical forms, [that] would define the region for decades to come" (3). Not content to leave the object of her exhaustively researched study secured hermetically in the past, she remarks, "Its long term implications can still be felt in some places" (3).

A Constitutional Culture focuses on a quite specific period, 1660–67, or, roughly, from the year of the Stuart monarchy's restoration to the year in which the General Court voted to defy Charles II's demand that the New England colonies send agents commissioned to receive direct instruction from the Crown, in London. This would see the end of colonial self-rule and have the colonies acknowledge the Crown's absolute sovereignty (241–42). In lieu of its accession to these demands, the General Court instead sent a tribute payment of trees felled in the old-growth forests of New England that would make masts for naval ships needed in the ongoing conflict with the Dutch and the French (252). When the trees finally arrived, the Crown "received them with surprising warmth," and the colonists provided relief as well for naval forces in the Caribbean. Such gestures were well received, but the larger point was still made: "In restoration Massachusetts, the king's ability to command had run up against a sturdy constitutional culture" (256). [End Page 508]

That culture, at least so far as Weimar's book demonstrates, both solicited and resisted a formal Royal Commission that traveled New England from February 1665 to September 1666 charged with a series of activities that would together assert the Crown's authority in the day-to-day lives of the colonists. The Royal Commission would demand oat

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 宪法文化:阿德里安-查斯坦-魏玛著 布莱斯-特雷斯特(简历) 《宪政文化:新英格兰与复辟帝国中反对专制统治的斗争》(A Constitutional Culture:Adrian Chastain Weimer 宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2023 年,366 页。从《荒野求索》到《摇滚校舍》,研究美国殖民史的学生们对 "美国自治理念从何而来 "这一问题给出了各种答案。阿德里安-查斯坦-魏玛(Adrian Chastain Weimer)的精彩新作《宪政文化》(A Constitutional Culture):阿德里安-查斯坦-魏玛(Adrian Chastain Weimer)的精彩新作《宪政文化:新英格兰与复辟帝国中反对专制统治的斗争》加入了这一对话。魏玛称之为 "地区宪法文化",它的出现是 "对复辟君主制的蔑视"(2)。总督、大臣和平民 "在与王室妥协的巨大压力下,......发展出一种具有凝聚力、基础广泛的宪政文化......丰富了各种政治、艺术、宗教和历史形式,[这]将在未来数十年中定义该地区"(3)。她并不满足于将她详尽研究的对象封闭在过去,她说:"在一些地方,我们仍然可以感受到它的长期影响"(3)。宪政文化》关注的是一个相当特殊的时期,即 1660-67 年,或大致从斯图亚特王权复辟的那一年到普通法院投票违抗查理二世要求新英格兰殖民地向伦敦派遣受命直接接受王室指令的代理人的那一年。这意味着殖民地自治的终结,殖民地必须承认王室的绝对主权(241-42)。作为对这些要求的回应,总法院转而将新英格兰古老森林中砍伐的树木作为贡品,这些树木将在与荷兰人和法国人的冲突中用来制作军舰所需的桅杆(252)。当这些树木最终运抵时,王室 "以惊人的热情接待了它们",殖民者也为加勒比海的海军部队提供了救济。这些举动受到了好评,但更重要的一点仍然存在:"在恢复后的马萨诸塞州,国王的指挥能力遇到了坚固的宪政文化"(256)。[至少就魏玛在书中所展示的而言,这种文化既争取又抵制一个正式的皇家委员会,该委员会从 1665 年 2 月到 1666 年 9 月在新英格兰旅行,负责一系列活动,这些活动将共同维护王室在殖民者日常生活中的权威。皇家委员会要求以国王的名义宣誓;将选举权扩大到所有有资格且 "信仰 "良好的土地所有者;向所有正统教徒提供圣餐礼;废除委员会认为不利于王室利益和特权的所有法律(156-57)。在此过程中,皇家委员会将听取上诉(从而取代新英格兰的司法主权),解决土地纠纷,执行与原住民的条约,并在必要时谈判新的条约。新英格兰人是如何逃避、假装尊重、蔑视并最终违抗这些命令的,这构成了魏玛研究的主要内容,而魏玛的研究主要是在不同的殖民地背景下以历史年表的形式进行讲述,并经常通过 "案例研究 "的方式集中阐述一个观点。作为历史故事,《宪政文化》确实大放异彩。例如,该研究以 1666 年斯图亚特王朝派来的皇家专员之一罗伯特-卡尔爵士的故事开始。卡尔酗酒闹事,殴打了波士顿一位名叫理查德-贝内特(Richard Bennett)的警员,随后他以作为国王的代理人,可以不受当地法律及其执行的约束为由,拒绝接受逮捕通知。"魏玛指出:"事后看来,卡尔的故事似乎并不重要,甚至有些幽默。"国王或他们的专员是否要对法律负责?蔑视宪法和煽动叛乱之间的界限在哪里?(2).魏玛的研究从多个角度考虑了这些问题的可能答案,包括大臣(第 4 章)、总督和海湾殖民地官方的其他成员(第 3、5、6 章);定居者与土著民族和社区的对话者,如罗杰-威廉姆斯和约翰-艾略特(第 9 章);以及...
{"title":"A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire by Adrian Chastain Weimer (review)","authors":"Bryce Traister","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a934218","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a934218","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire</em> by Adrian Chastain Weimer <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Bryce Traister (bio) </li> </ul> <em>A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire</em><br/> <small>adrian chastain weimer</small><br/> University of Pennsylvania Press, 2023<br/> 366 pp. <p>From the <em>Errand into the Wilderness</em> to \"Schoolhouse Rock,\" students of American colonial history have offered a variety of answers to the question \"Where did the idea of American self-government come from?\" Adrian Chastain Weimer's splendid new study, <em>A Constitutional Culture: New England and the Struggle against Arbitrary Rule in the Restoration Empire</em>, joins this conversation. What Weimer labels a \"regional constitutional culture\" emerges \"in defiance of the Restoration monarchy\" (2). Governors, ministers, and commoners, \"under extraordinary pressure to compromise with the crown, … developed a cohesive, broad-based constitutional culture … enriched by a wide range of political, artistic, religious and historical forms, [that] would define the region for decades to come\" (3). Not content to leave the object of her exhaustively researched study secured hermetically in the past, she remarks, \"Its long term implications can still be felt in some places\" (3).</p> <p><em>A Constitutional Culture</em> focuses on a quite specific period, 1660–67, or, roughly, from the year of the Stuart monarchy's restoration to the year in which the General Court voted to defy Charles II's demand that the New England colonies send agents commissioned to receive direct instruction from the Crown, in London. This would see the end of colonial self-rule and have the colonies acknowledge the Crown's absolute sovereignty (241–42). In lieu of its accession to these demands, the General Court instead sent a tribute payment of trees felled in the old-growth forests of New England that would make masts for naval ships needed in the ongoing conflict with the Dutch and the French (252). When the trees finally arrived, the Crown \"received them with surprising warmth,\" and the colonists provided relief as well for naval forces in the Caribbean. Such gestures were well received, but the larger point was still made: \"In restoration Massachusetts, the king's ability to command had run up against a sturdy constitutional culture\" (256). <strong>[End Page 508]</strong></p> <p>That culture, at least so far as Weimar's book demonstrates, both solicited and resisted a formal Royal Commission that traveled New England from February 1665 to September 1666 charged with a series of activities that would together assert the Crown's authority in the day-to-day lives of the colonists. The Royal Commission would demand oat","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141946589","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Black Enlightenment by Surya Parekh (review) 苏里亚-帕瑞克的《黑色启蒙》(评论)
IF 0.3 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, AMERICAN Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a934217
Jordan Alexander Stein
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Black Enlightenment by Surya Parekh
  • Jordan Alexander Stein (bio)
Black Enlightenment
surya parekh
Duke University Press, 2023
216 pp.

Black Atlantic writing, indelibly shaped by the transatlantic slave trade, articulates powerful demands for freedom. The project of Surya Parekh's suggestive and learned study, Black Enlightenment, is to ask what else Black Atlantic writing articulates and, indeed, how recent scholars' attention to freedom has made some of those other articulations hard to see. Treating Olaudah Equiano's 1789 Narrative as a temporal threshold—contemporary with the rise of political abolition in Britain—after which concerns for freedom come to dominate Black Atlantic writing, Black Enlightenment turns back the clock to consider earlier eighteenth-century writings by Francis Williams, Phillis Wheatley, and Ignatius Sancho. These span geographies (Jamaica, New England, London) and genres (poetry, letters). Yet they were all taken up, directly and indirectly, by indisputably [End Page 504] major Enlightenment thinkers who also wrote before the political ascent of abolition in the late 1780s, including David Hume, Immanuel Kant, and Thomas Jefferson. Black Enlightenment thus seeks to demonstrate both how earlier Black Atlantic writers made heterogenous claims on Black humanity in the spirit of the Enlightenment, and how those claims were "imperfectly foreclosed" by advocates of Enlightenment who nevertheless could not see to expand its claims to Black subjects (4).

Individual chapters alternate between these points. The first reads Williams's one extant poem in relation to his civil suits that tried to establish his right to property and inheritance from his free Black father. Williams's right to do so troubled Hume so much that in 1753 he revised his essay "Of National Characters" to include a footnote making clear that the deracinated (and what we would now call cultural or historically contingent) claims to national identity for which that essay advocates do not extend to a free Black man in Jamaica trying to claim them as a British subject. This essay and its footnote were read by Kant, who, we learn in chapter 2, elaborates on Hume's footnote in a section of his own Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime (1763). Here we see how Kant pursues racist generalizations that appear simple but in fact proceed through a complex rhetorical "flatten[ing of] the figure of the Black subject" (66). The reader is urged not to dismiss Kant's racism but to understand the carefulness and consequence of the "original contribution" he constructs (52). That contribution morphs, however, by chapter 3, which considers the racism o

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 Surya Parekh 著 Black Enlightenment Jordan Alexander Stein (bio) Black Enlightenment Surya Parekh Duke University Press, 2023 216 pp.跨大西洋奴隶贸易对大西洋黑人的写作产生了不可磨灭的影响,他们表达了对自由的强烈要求。苏里亚-帕瑞克(Surya Parekh)的这本富有启发性和学识的研究著作《黑人启蒙》,旨在探究大西洋黑人的写作还表达了什么,以及近来学者们对自由的关注是如何使其他一些表达变得难以察觉的。黑人启蒙运动》将奥劳达-艾奎亚诺(Olaudah Equiano)1789 年的《叙述》视为一个时间门槛--与英国政治废奴运动的兴起同时代--在此之后,对自由的关注开始主导大西洋黑人的写作,并将时间倒流,思考弗朗西斯-威廉姆斯(Francis Williams)、菲利斯-惠特利(Phillis Wheatley)和伊格纳修斯-桑乔(Ignatius Sancho)十八世纪早期的写作。这些作品跨越地域(牙买加、新英格兰、伦敦)和体裁(诗歌、书信)。然而,这些作品都直接或间接地被无可争议的 [第 504 页完] 主要启蒙思想家所采用,这些思想家也是在 17 世纪 80 年代末废奴政治兴起之前写作的,其中包括大卫-休谟、伊曼纽尔-康德和托马斯-杰斐逊。因此,《黑人启蒙运动》力图证明早期大西洋黑人作家是如何本着启蒙运动的精神对黑人人性提出异质主张的,以及这些主张是如何被启蒙运动的倡导者 "不完美地排除在外 "的,而这些倡导者却看不到启蒙运动对黑人主体的主张(4)。各个章节在这些观点之间交替进行。第一章解读了威廉斯现存的一首与他的民事诉讼有关的诗歌,这些民事诉讼试图确立威廉斯从其自由黑人父亲那里获得财产和继承权的权利。威廉斯这样做的权利让休谟深感不安,以至于他在 1753 年修改了他的《论民族性格》一文,并在其中加入了一个脚注,明确指出该文所主张的脱胎换骨(以及我们现在所说的文化或历史上的偶然性)的民族身份主张并不适用于一个试图以英国臣民身份主张这些权利的牙买加自由黑人。康德阅读了这篇文章及其脚注,我们在第二章中了解到,康德在他自己的《关于美的和崇高的感受的观察》(1763 年)中的一个章节阐述了休谟的脚注。在这里,我们可以看到康德是如何通过复杂的修辞手法 "将黑人主体的形象扁平化"(66),来进行种族主义概括的,这些概括看似简单,但实际上是通过复杂的修辞手法进行的。我们敦促读者不要否定康德的种族主义,而要理解他所构建的 "原始贡献 "的谨慎和后果(52)。然而,这一贡献在第 3 章中发生了变化,该章探讨了康德晚期人类学著作中的种族主义。在这里,这位哲学家的修辞策略不是将黑人的主体性扁平化,而是将白人与道德统一起来。其结果是形成了一种单一的、等级森严的种族理论,使有时被简称为白人至上的启蒙逻辑合法化。由于 "随后几代德国和法国科学家 "都受到康德种族观念的影响,黑人启蒙主体的可能性被排除,取而代之的是一个普遍的启蒙主体--艾奎亚诺在他的书信和《叙述》中明确反对詹姆斯-托宾和戈登-特恩布尔的康德主义,渴望成为这样的主体(91)。这前三章对一组范围广泛但相互关联的文本进行了严密的论证。有了这一争论及其结果,最后两章将邀请我们重读一些大西洋黑人作家的作品,根据前面的论证,这些作家的名字可能耳熟能详,但他们的作品却显得 [尾页 505]陌生。第 4 章回到 1780 年代,重读桑丘的书信,寻找"'黑人'这一角色与启蒙运动、帝国和美学主题之间的脱节",这些书信试图跨越这些主题 (110)。桑丘是已知的唯一一位在十八世纪投票的英国黑人,他的著作表明,桑丘行使选举权的形式是由于他的生活,而不是因为他的生活,在这种生活中,"中间通道是政治主体性的进入条件"(4)。第五章再次回到 17 世纪 70 年代的菲利斯-惠特利,探讨这位被奴役诗人与基督教的关系。将惠特利作为启蒙美学理论的贡献者来解读,我们会看到她在修辞上对基督教的运用。
{"title":"Black Enlightenment by Surya Parekh (review)","authors":"Jordan Alexander Stein","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a934217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a934217","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Black Enlightenment</em> by Surya Parekh <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Jordan Alexander Stein (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Black Enlightenment</em><br/> <small>surya parekh</small><br/> Duke University Press, 2023<br/> 216 pp. <p>Black Atlantic writing, indelibly shaped by the transatlantic slave trade, articulates powerful demands for freedom. The project of Surya Parekh's suggestive and learned study, <em>Black Enlightenment</em>, is to ask what else Black Atlantic writing articulates and, indeed, how recent scholars' attention to freedom has made some of those other articulations hard to see. Treating Olaudah Equiano's 1789 <em>Narrative</em> as a temporal threshold—contemporary with the rise of political abolition in Britain—after which concerns for freedom come to dominate Black Atlantic writing, <em>Black Enlightenment</em> turns back the clock to consider earlier eighteenth-century writings by Francis Williams, Phillis Wheatley, and Ignatius Sancho. These span geographies (Jamaica, New England, London) and genres (poetry, letters). Yet they were all taken up, directly and indirectly, by indisputably <strong>[End Page 504]</strong> major Enlightenment thinkers who also wrote before the political ascent of abolition in the late 1780s, including David Hume, Immanuel Kant, and Thomas Jefferson. <em>Black Enlightenment</em> thus seeks to demonstrate both how earlier Black Atlantic writers made heterogenous claims on Black humanity in the spirit of the Enlightenment, and how those claims were \"imperfectly foreclosed\" by advocates of Enlightenment who nevertheless could not see to expand its claims to Black subjects (4).</p> <p>Individual chapters alternate between these points. The first reads Williams's one extant poem in relation to his civil suits that tried to establish his right to property and inheritance from his free Black father. Williams's right to do so troubled Hume so much that in 1753 he revised his essay \"Of National Characters\" to include a footnote making clear that the deracinated (and what we would now call cultural or historically contingent) claims to national identity for which that essay advocates do not extend to a free Black man in Jamaica trying to claim them as a British subject. This essay and its footnote were read by Kant, who, we learn in chapter 2, elaborates on Hume's footnote in a section of his own <em>Observations on the Feeling of the Beautiful and Sublime</em> (1763). Here we see how Kant pursues racist generalizations that appear simple but in fact proceed through a complex rhetorical \"flatten[ing of] the figure of the Black subject\" (66). The reader is urged not to dismiss Kant's racism but to understand the carefulness and consequence of the \"original contribution\" he constructs (52). That contribution morphs, however, by chapter 3, which considers the racism o","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141946549","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Collision of Worlds: A Deep History of the Fall of Aztec Mexico and the Forging of New Spain by David M. Carballo, and: Conquistadors and Aztecs: A History of the Fall of Tenochtitlan by Stefan Rinke (review) 世界的碰撞:阿兹特克墨西哥衰落与新西班牙形成的深层历史》,大卫-M.-卡巴罗著,以及《征服者与阿兹特克人:阿兹特克人的历史》,大卫-M:征服者与阿兹特克人:斯特凡-林克(Stefan Rinke)著的《特诺奇蒂特兰城的衰落史》(评论
IF 0.3 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, AMERICAN Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a934214
Carlos Macías Prieto
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Collision of Worlds: A Deep History of the Fall of Aztec Mexico and the Forging of New Spain by David M. Carballo, and: Conquistadors and Aztecs: A History of the Fall of Tenochtitlan by Stefan Rinke
  • Carlos Macías Prieto (bio)
Collision of Worlds: A Deep History of the Fall of Aztec Mexico and the Forging of New Spain
david m. carballo
Oxford University Press, 2020
352 pp. Conquistadors and Aztecs: A History of the Fall of Tenochtitlan
stefan rinke
Oxford University Press, 2023 (trans. from German, 2019)
316 pp.

Five hundred years after Spanish colonizers attacked the Aztec capital, Mexico-Tenochtitlan, scholars continue to debate the cataclysmic [End Page 490] event and its significance. David M. Carballo's Collision of Worlds and Stefan Rinke's Conquistadors and Aztecs grapple with the history of the invasion and conquest of Mesoamerica—complicating our understanding of these events by taking different yet complementary approaches. Collision of Worlds is unique in its use of the archaeological record to highlight the hybrid dimensions of two regions—Mesoamerica and the Iberian Peninsula—over many centuries, whereas Conquistadors and Aztecs (initially published in German as Conquistadoren und Azteken: Cortés und die Eroberung Mexikos) relies on both written and pictorial sources written by European and Indigenous writers to provide a nuanced explanation for "the fall of Tenochtitlan."

Through archaeological evidence, Collision of Worlds explores "the comparative cultural developments of early Mesoamerica and Iberia and the material manifestations of their entanglement in the focal period of encounter, conquest, colonialism, and Native resilience" (11). Carballo's compelling and innovative approach to the Spanish conquest of Mesoamerica—using both archaeology and history—reveals that the history and culture of (colonial) New Spain is rooted in the "deep" histories of Mesoamerica and the Iberian Peninsula millennia before the initial encounter. Carballo borrows from archaeology the term deep history—a term that, as he explains, refers to the "layers of occupation" that span "millennia of cultural, technological, political, and religious development" (5). In taking a "deep" historical approach, Carballo traces the ancient histories of both the Iberian Peninsula and Mesoamerica to show how two ancient civilizations "collided" to form what became (colonial) New Spain.

Carballo convincingly argues that a more accurate understanding of the invasion and occupation of the Americas requires mixing lines of evidence and methods to study Iberia and Mesoamerica. For instance, he t

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 世界的碰撞:阿兹特克墨西哥衰落和新西班牙形成的深层历史》,作者 David M. Carballo,以及《征服者与阿兹特克人:阿兹特克人的历史》,作者 David M. Carballo:征服者与阿兹特克人:世界的碰撞:阿兹特克墨西哥衰落和新西班牙形成的深厚历史》,大卫-M-卡巴罗著,牛津大学出版社,2020 年,352 页。征服者与阿兹特克人:特诺奇蒂特兰沦陷史》(A History of the Fall of Tenochtitlan),斯特凡-林克(Stefan Rinke),牛津大学出版社,2023 年(德文译本,2019 年),316 页。西班牙殖民者攻打阿兹特克人的首都墨西哥-特诺奇蒂特兰(Tenochtitlan)五百年后,学者们仍在争论这一灾难性 [尾页 490]事件及其意义。大卫-M-卡巴罗(David M. Carballo)的《世界的碰撞》和斯特凡-林克(Stefan Rinke)的《征服者与阿兹特克人》对入侵和征服中美洲的历史进行了探讨--通过采取不同但互补的方法,使我们对这些事件的理解更加复杂。世界的碰撞》的独特之处在于,它利用考古记录突出了两个地区--中美洲和伊比利亚半岛--多个世纪以来的混合维度,而《征服者与阿兹特克人》(最初以德文出版,名为《征服者与阿兹特克人:科尔特斯与墨西哥的毁灭》)则依靠欧洲和土著作家撰写的文字和图片资料,对 "特诺奇蒂特兰的陷落 "做出了细致入微的解释。通过考古证据,《世界的碰撞》探讨了 "早期中美洲和伊比利亚文化发展的比较,以及它们在遭遇、征服、殖民主义和原住民复原等焦点时期纠缠的物质表现"(11)。Carballo 采用考古学和历史学这两种令人信服的创新方法来研究西班牙对中美洲的征服,揭示了(殖民地)新西班牙的历史和文化植根于中美洲和伊比利亚半岛最初相遇前千年的 "深层 "历史。卡巴罗从考古学中借用了 "深层历史"(deep history)一词,他解释说,该词指的是跨越 "千年文化、技术、政治和宗教发展 "的 "占领层"(5)。在采用 "深层 "历史方法时,卡巴罗追溯了伊比利亚半岛和中美洲的古代历史,以说明两种古代文明是如何 "碰撞 "形成后来的(殖民地)新西班牙的。Carballo 令人信服地指出,要想更准确地理解美洲的入侵和占领,就必须混合使用各种证据和方法来研究伊比利亚和中美洲。例如,他利用非文字材料来补充文字叙述,其中一个例子是利用苏尔特佩克-特科阿克发掘现场的考古证据来说明墨西卡人对西班牙人进攻的抵抗(215)。与此同时,Carballo 强调了书面资料中固有的问题,提到了埃尔南-科尔特斯写给国王查理五世的信中的偏见、土著编年史作者的微爱国主义和偏见,以及并非事件亲历者的编年史作者所写的回顾性叙述所带来的挑战。[本书前半部分分析了伊比利亚和中美洲从公元前二千年到十五世纪末的平行历史,为读者理解征服是一场相互转化的交锋(尽管这场交锋导致土著人被暴力剥夺)奠定了基础。)例如,Carballo 将特奥蒂瓦坎和图拉留给阿兹特克人的遗产与腓尼基人、罗马人和阿拉伯人留给 15 世纪伊比利亚人的遗产相提并论。他注意到,这些文化的遗产可以在西班牙教堂中的罗马神庙遗迹以及墨西哥乔卢拉教堂中的前西班牙神庙遗迹中找到。卡巴罗写道,到 15 世纪,阿兹特克帝国和西班牙帝国都在扩张,同时也经历了技术、宗教和哲学的发展(如城市定居点的出现)。本书的后半部分从西班牙人对今天墨西哥东南部墨西哥湾沿岸的探索和入侵开始,结合对文字资料(如《佛罗伦萨法典》)和考古发现(如科尔特斯沉船遗迹)的分析。卡巴罗还依靠文字和考古证据来叙述西班牙征服者与中美洲人民之间早期冲突和联盟的历史。例如,他观察到...
{"title":"Collision of Worlds: A Deep History of the Fall of Aztec Mexico and the Forging of New Spain by David M. Carballo, and: Conquistadors and Aztecs: A History of the Fall of Tenochtitlan by Stefan Rinke (review)","authors":"Carlos Macías Prieto","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a934214","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a934214","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Collision of Worlds: A Deep History of the Fall of Aztec Mexico and the Forging of New Spain</em> by David M. Carballo, and: <em>Conquistadors and Aztecs: A History of the Fall of Tenochtitlan</em> by Stefan Rinke <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Carlos Macías Prieto (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Collision of Worlds: A Deep History of the Fall of Aztec Mexico and the Forging of New Spain</em><br/> <small>david m. carballo</small><br/> Oxford University Press, 2020<br/> 352 pp. <em>Conquistadors and Aztecs: A History of the Fall of Tenochtitlan</em><br/> <small>stefan rinke</small><br/> Oxford University Press, 2023 (trans. from German, 2019)<br/> 316 pp. <p>Five hundred years after Spanish colonizers attacked the Aztec capital, Mexico-Tenochtitlan, scholars continue to debate the cataclysmic <strong>[End Page 490]</strong> event and its significance. David M. Carballo's <em>Collision of Worlds</em> and Stefan Rinke's <em>Conquistadors and Aztecs</em> grapple with the history of the invasion and conquest of Mesoamerica—complicating our understanding of these events by taking different yet complementary approaches. <em>Collision of Worlds</em> is unique in its use of the archaeological record to highlight the hybrid dimensions of two regions—Mesoamerica and the Iberian Peninsula—over many centuries, whereas <em>Conquistadors and Aztecs</em> (initially published in German as <em>Conquistadoren und Azteken: Cortés und die Eroberung Mexikos</em>) relies on both written and pictorial sources written by European and Indigenous writers to provide a nuanced explanation for \"the fall of Tenochtitlan.\"</p> <p>Through archaeological evidence, <em>Collision of Worlds</em> explores \"the comparative cultural developments of early Mesoamerica and Iberia and the material manifestations of their entanglement in the focal period of encounter, conquest, colonialism, and Native resilience\" (11). Carballo's compelling and innovative approach to the Spanish conquest of Mesoamerica—using both archaeology and history—reveals that the history and culture of (colonial) New Spain is rooted in the \"deep\" histories of Mesoamerica and the Iberian Peninsula millennia before the initial encounter. Carballo borrows from archaeology the term <em>deep history</em>—a term that, as he explains, refers to the \"layers of occupation\" that span \"millennia of cultural, technological, political, and religious development\" (5). In taking a \"deep\" historical approach, Carballo traces the ancient histories of both the Iberian Peninsula and Mesoamerica to show how two ancient civilizations \"collided\" to form what became (colonial) New Spain.</p> <p>Carballo convincingly argues that a more accurate understanding of the invasion and occupation of the Americas requires mixing lines of evidence and methods to study Iberia and Mesoamerica. For instance, he t","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141946588","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Challenges, Strategies, and Adaptations in Colonial Mexico 墨西哥殖民地时期的挑战、战略和调整
IF 0.3 3区 文学 N/A LITERATURE, AMERICAN Pub Date : 2024-08-07 DOI: 10.1353/eal.2024.a934211
Veronica Rodriguez
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Challenges, Strategies, and Adaptations in Colonial Mexico
  • Veronica Rodriguez (bio)
The Franciscans in Colonial Mexico
thomas m. cohen, jay t. harrison, and david rex galindo, eds.
University of Oklahoma Press, 2021
362 pp. The Stations of the Cross in Colonial Mexico: The "Via crucis en mexicano" by Fray Agustin de Vetancurt, and the Spread of a Devotion
john f. schwaller
University of Oklahoma Press and the Academy of American Franciscan History, 2021
242 pp. Transforming Saints: From Spain to New Spain
charlene villaseñor
Vanderbilt University Press, 2022
384 pp.

Catholicism is an intrinsic part of Mexican history and its inhabitants' lives. Residents walking the streets of cities and small communities encounter numerous churches, chapels, or convents. Cultural traditions are strongly connected to religious practices. The three books reviewed here touch on aspects of Catholicism in New Spain. Two of them address the work of Franciscans who worked intensively with Indigenous peoples since their arrival in 1521. Franciscan missionary work vigorously contributed to the foundation and development of Catholicism in New Spain. Edited by Thomas M. Cohen, Jay T. Harrison, and David Rex Galindo, The Franciscans in Colonial Mexico comprises thirteen illuminating essays that provide a broad picture of Franciscans' missionary work in New Spain. The work of John F. Schwaller, The Stations of the Cross in Colonial Mexico, examines the work of Fray Agustin de Vetancurt, offering a thorough analysis of his [End Page 467] work in Nahuatl, Via crucis, while elaborating on the history of the Stations of the Cross. The third book under review here, Transforming Saints, by Charlene Villaseñor Black, discusses the transportation and transformation of female Catholic images from Spain to New Spain. Following diverse approaches, these books underscore how ecclesiastic men and authorities adapt their approaches to the Christianization of Native peoples as they interact with them in New Spain. Interdisciplinarity allows the authors to highlight how Indigenous people, their culture, and their language collide with and influence Spanish Catholicism. These books bring important new light to the study of Catholic practices and products in the Americas, offering more knowledge of Indigenous practices and languages.

The Franciscans in Colonial Mexico addresses the complexity of missionary labor, offering a "broad picture of Catholic evangelization in North America while keeping Franciscans at the center of the story" (5). It comprises thirteen works on Franciscan's participation in

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 殖民时期墨西哥的挑战、战略和适应 Veronica Rodriguez (bio) The Franciscans in Colonial Mexico Thomas M. Cohen, Jay T. Harrison, and David Rex Galindo, eds.俄克拉荷马大学出版社,2021 年,362 页。墨西哥殖民时期的十字架之路:The Stations of Cross in Colonial Mexico: The "Via crucis en mexicano" by Fray Agustin de Vetancurt, and the Spread of a Devotion john f. schwaller 俄克拉荷马大学出版社和美国方济各会历史学院,2021 年 242 页。改变圣徒:从西班牙到新西班牙 charlene villaseñor 范德比尔特大学出版社,2022 年 384 页。天主教是墨西哥历史和居民生活的固有组成部分。居民走在城市和小社区的街道上,会遇到许多教堂、小礼拜堂或修道院。文化传统与宗教习俗紧密相连。本文评述的三本书涉及新西班牙天主教的方方面面。其中两本涉及方济各会的工作,他们自 1521 年抵达新西班牙以来,一直与土著居民密切合作。方济各会的传教工作有力地推动了天主教在新西班牙的建立和发展。由托马斯-科恩(Thomas M. Cohen)、杰伊-哈里森(Jay T. Harrison)和戴维-雷克斯-加林多(David Rex Galindo)编辑的《殖民时期墨西哥的方济各会》包含十三篇富有启发性的文章,全面介绍了方济各会在新西班牙的传教工作。John F. Schwaller 的著作《殖民时期墨西哥的十字架之路》研究了 Fray Agustin de Vetancurt 的工作,深入分析了他的 [尾页 467]纳瓦特尔语作品 Via crucis,同时阐述了十字架之路的历史。本文评论的第三本书《圣人的转变》(Transforming Saints)由 Charlene Villaseñor Black 撰写,讨论了天主教女性形象从西班牙到新西班牙的运输和转变。这几本书采用了不同的方法,强调了教会人士和权威人士在新西班牙与原住民互动时,如何调整他们的方法来实现原住民的基督教化。跨学科性使作者们能够突出原住民、原住民文化和原住民语言是如何与西班牙天主教发生碰撞并对其产生影响的。这些书籍为研究美洲的天主教习俗和产品带来了新的重要启示,提供了更多关于土著习俗和语言的知识。殖民时期墨西哥的方济各会》探讨了传教劳动的复杂性,提供了 "天主教在北美传教的广阔图景,同时将方济各会置于故事的中心"(5)。这本论文集收录了 13 篇关于方济各会参与墨西哥和西班牙美洲殖民地事务的作品,包括墨西哥城、尤卡坦、上加利福尼亚和下加利福尼亚、塔毛利帕斯、戈尔达山脉和克雷塔罗。这本论文集以不同的视角和方法研究方济各会在新西班牙的活动。文章探讨了方济会的历史、与教育的关系、与原住民的接触、多语言任务以及修辞策略。科恩、哈里森和雷克斯-加林多合编了这本文集,以纪念美洲方济会的先驱历史学家弗朗西斯科-莫拉莱斯神父。莫拉莱斯撰写了本书的第一章,这是一篇题为 "我与方济会和历史的相遇 "的个人随笔。在这里,他提供了有关其职业轨迹的重要信息,详细介绍了他的档案工作、研究、学术任命以及作为方济会国际执行委员会成员的经历。例如,莫拉莱斯讲述了他早年在乔卢拉和卡尔潘的重要经历,以及他在美国方济各会历史学会的工作。在这篇文章中,他强调了这些任命如何使他能够积极开展研究工作。莫拉莱斯的长期职业生涯为研究方济会铺平了道路。雷克斯-加林多(Rex Galindo)、哈里森(Harrison)和科恩(Cohen)断言,他是 "过去五十年中研究墨西哥殖民地方济会最重要的历史学家"(12)。以下三章将研究方济会在墨西哥中部的工作。第 2 章 "为美德服务的愿景:第 2 章 "为美德服务的愿景:莫托里尼亚《纪念册》中的修辞神秘主义[第 468 页完]"重点探讨了《纪念册》中的过度修辞。Hilaire Kallenford 认为,莫托利尼娅对原住民超自然幻象和神秘经历的描述是为了证明他们的美德。她将莫托利尼娅的作品与弗雷-贝尔纳迪诺-德-萨哈贡 (Fray Bernardino de Sahagún) 的温和修辞进行了比较,强调莫托利尼娅的过度修辞旨在保护土著人民。第 3 章 "弗莱-胡安-包蒂斯塔-德-维塞奥在三座城市的传教工作 "介绍了弗莱-胡安-包蒂斯塔-德-维塞奥的传教工作。
{"title":"Challenges, Strategies, and Adaptations in Colonial Mexico","authors":"Veronica Rodriguez","doi":"10.1353/eal.2024.a934211","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1353/eal.2024.a934211","url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\u0000<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Challenges, Strategies, and Adaptations in Colonial Mexico <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Veronica Rodriguez (bio) </li> </ul> <em>The Franciscans in Colonial Mexico</em><br/> <small>thomas m. cohen</small>, <small>jay t. harrison</small>, and <small>david rex galindo</small>, <small>eds</small>.<br/> University of Oklahoma Press, 2021<br/> 362 pp. <em>The Stations of the Cross in Colonial Mexico: The \"Via crucis en mexicano\" by Fray Agustin de Vetancurt, and the Spread of a Devotion</em><br/> <small>john f. schwaller</small><br/> University of Oklahoma Press and the Academy of American Franciscan History, 2021<br/> 242 pp. <em>Transforming Saints: From Spain to New Spain</em><br/> <small>charlene villaseñor</small><br/> Vanderbilt University Press, 2022<br/> 384 pp. <p>Catholicism is an intrinsic part of Mexican history and its inhabitants' lives. Residents walking the streets of cities and small communities encounter numerous churches, chapels, or convents. Cultural traditions are strongly connected to religious practices. The three books reviewed here touch on aspects of Catholicism in New Spain. Two of them address the work of Franciscans who worked intensively with Indigenous peoples since their arrival in 1521. Franciscan missionary work vigorously contributed to the foundation and development of Catholicism in New Spain. Edited by Thomas M. Cohen, Jay T. Harrison, and David Rex Galindo, <em>The Franciscans in Colonial Mexico</em> comprises thirteen illuminating essays that provide a broad picture of Franciscans' missionary work in New Spain. The work of John F. Schwaller, <em>The Stations of the Cross in Colonial Mexico</em>, examines the work of Fray Agustin de Vetancurt, offering a thorough analysis of his <strong>[End Page 467]</strong> work in Nahuatl, <em>Via crucis</em>, while elaborating on the history of the Stations of the Cross. The third book under review here, <em>Transforming Saints</em>, by Charlene Villaseñor Black, discusses the transportation and transformation of female Catholic images from Spain to New Spain. Following diverse approaches, these books underscore how ecclesiastic men and authorities adapt their approaches to the Christianization of Native peoples as they interact with them in New Spain. Interdisciplinarity allows the authors to highlight how Indigenous people, their culture, and their language collide with and influence Spanish Catholicism. These books bring important new light to the study of Catholic practices and products in the Americas, offering more knowledge of Indigenous practices and languages.</p> <p><em>The Franciscans in Colonial Mexico</em> addresses the complexity of missionary labor, offering a \"broad picture of Catholic evangelization in North America while keeping Franciscans at the center of the story\" (5). It comprises thirteen works on Franciscan's participation in ","PeriodicalId":44043,"journal":{"name":"EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141946584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
EARLY AMERICAN LITERATURE
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1