Organizing metaphors for design methods

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Technology and Design Education Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1007/s10798-024-09880-y
Anne C. Pivonka, Laura Makary, Colin M. Gray
{"title":"Organizing metaphors for design methods","authors":"Anne C. Pivonka, Laura Makary, Colin M. Gray","doi":"10.1007/s10798-024-09880-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Design students must develop competence in a wide range of areas in order to be successful in their future practice. Increasingly, knowledge of design methods is used to frame both a designer’s repertoire and their overall facility as a designer. However, there is little research on how students build cognitive schema in relation to design methods or how these schema relate to specific patterns of engagement as developing designers. In this paper, we report a multiple case study, capturing the experiences of four advanced undergraduate students enrolled in a User Experience (UX) design program at a large research-intensive institution. Through reflexive thematic analysis on our interview study outcomes, we describe the wide variety of metaphors that these students used to organize and frame their understanding of design methods, including both principles they used to consider methods as knowledge, and the ways in which they felt these organizing principles impacted their practice of design. We conclude with recommendations for further research on the uptake of methods-focused competence in design education and practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50286,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Technology and Design Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Technology and Design Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09880-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design students must develop competence in a wide range of areas in order to be successful in their future practice. Increasingly, knowledge of design methods is used to frame both a designer’s repertoire and their overall facility as a designer. However, there is little research on how students build cognitive schema in relation to design methods or how these schema relate to specific patterns of engagement as developing designers. In this paper, we report a multiple case study, capturing the experiences of four advanced undergraduate students enrolled in a User Experience (UX) design program at a large research-intensive institution. Through reflexive thematic analysis on our interview study outcomes, we describe the wide variety of metaphors that these students used to organize and frame their understanding of design methods, including both principles they used to consider methods as knowledge, and the ways in which they felt these organizing principles impacted their practice of design. We conclude with recommendations for further research on the uptake of methods-focused competence in design education and practice.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计方法的组织隐喻
设计专业的学生必须具备多方面的能力,才能在未来的实践中取得成功。设计方法方面的知识越来越多地被用来构建设计师的能力范围和他们作为设计师的整体能力。然而,关于学生如何建立与设计方法相关的认知模式,以及这些模式与作为发展中设计师的具体参与模式之间的关系,却鲜有研究。在本文中,我们报告了一项多案例研究,捕捉了在一所大型研究密集型院校学习用户体验(UX)设计课程的四名高年级本科生的经历。通过对访谈研究成果的反思性主题分析,我们描述了这些学生用来组织和构建他们对设计方法的理解的各种隐喻,包括他们用来将方法视为知识的原则,以及他们认为这些组织原则影响其设计实践的方式。最后,我们就在设计教育和实践中采用注重方法的能力提出了进一步研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Technology and Design Education seeks to encourage research and scholarly writing about any aspect of technology and design education. Critical, review, and comparative studies are particularly prominent, as are contributions which draw upon other literatures, such as those derived from historical, philosophical, sociological or psychological studies of technology or design, in order to address issues of concern to technology and design education. One of the most significant developments of recent years has been the emergence of technology and design education as an integral part of general education in many parts of the world. Its distinctive curriculum features are technological literacy and capability and it highlights the importance of `knowledge in action'', of `doing'' as well as `understanding''.
期刊最新文献
Adapting engineering design thinking for sustainability The mediating role of creative problem solving between design thinking and self-efficacy in STEM teaching for STEM teacher candidates Technology-enhanced learning practices in studio pedagogy: A scoping review Cultivating ethics sensitivity in design: Impact of integrating ethics within K-12 digital design education Research on K-12 maker education in the early 2020s – a systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1