Contextualised dictionary literacy, information literacy and information behaviour in the e-environment

IF 1.3 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Library Management Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1108/lm-08-2023-0082
Theo J.D. Bothma, Ina Fourie
{"title":"Contextualised dictionary literacy, information literacy and information behaviour in the e-environment","authors":"Theo J.D. Bothma, Ina Fourie","doi":"10.1108/lm-08-2023-0082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Needs for information literacy, disparities in society, bridging digital divides, richness of information sources in electronic (e-)environments and the value of dictionaries have often been propagated. To improve information sources and information literacy training, information behaviour must be understood (i.e. all information activities). This paper conceptualises new opportunities for information sources (e.g. electronic dictionaries) to all society sectors, dictionary literacy and research lenses such as lexicography to supplement information literacy and behaviour research.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>A scoping review of information literacy and behaviour, lexicography and dictionary literature grounds the conceptualisation of dictionary literacy, its alignment with information literacy, information activities and information behaviour and lexicography as additional research lens.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Research lenses must acknowledge dictionary use in e-environments, information activities and skills, meanings of information and dictionary literacy, the value of e-dictionaries, alignment with information behaviour research that guides the development of information sources and interdisciplinary research from, e.g. lexicography – thus contextualisation.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>Research implications – information behaviour and information literacy research can be enriched by lexicography as research lens. Further conceptualisation could align information behaviour, information literacy and dictionary literacy.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Dictionary training, aligned with information literacy training, can be informed by this paper.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>The value of dictionary literacy for all sectors of societies can be improved.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Large bodies of literature on information behaviour and lexicography individually do not cover combined insights from both.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":46701,"journal":{"name":"Library Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lm-08-2023-0082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Needs for information literacy, disparities in society, bridging digital divides, richness of information sources in electronic (e-)environments and the value of dictionaries have often been propagated. To improve information sources and information literacy training, information behaviour must be understood (i.e. all information activities). This paper conceptualises new opportunities for information sources (e.g. electronic dictionaries) to all society sectors, dictionary literacy and research lenses such as lexicography to supplement information literacy and behaviour research.

Design/methodology/approach

A scoping review of information literacy and behaviour, lexicography and dictionary literature grounds the conceptualisation of dictionary literacy, its alignment with information literacy, information activities and information behaviour and lexicography as additional research lens.

Findings

Research lenses must acknowledge dictionary use in e-environments, information activities and skills, meanings of information and dictionary literacy, the value of e-dictionaries, alignment with information behaviour research that guides the development of information sources and interdisciplinary research from, e.g. lexicography – thus contextualisation.

Research limitations/implications

Research implications – information behaviour and information literacy research can be enriched by lexicography as research lens. Further conceptualisation could align information behaviour, information literacy and dictionary literacy.

Practical implications

Dictionary training, aligned with information literacy training, can be informed by this paper.

Social implications

The value of dictionary literacy for all sectors of societies can be improved.

Originality/value

Large bodies of literature on information behaviour and lexicography individually do not cover combined insights from both.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子环境中的语境词典扫盲、信息扫盲和信息行为
目的:信息扫盲的需求、社会中的差距、弥合数字鸿沟、电子(e)环境中信息来源的 丰富性以及字典的价值经常被宣传。为了改善信息来源和信息扫盲培训,必须了解信息行为(即所有信息活动)。设计/方法/方法对信息素养和行为、词典学和词典文献进行了范围界定,为词典素养的概念化、词典素养与信息素养的一致性、信息活动和信息行为以及作为补充研究视角的词典学提供了依据。研究结果研究视角必须承认电子环境中的词典使用、信息活动和技能、信息和词典素养的含义、电子词典的价值、与指导信息源开发的信息行为研究和跨学科研究(如词典学)的一致性--从而实现语境化。研究局限/影响研究意义--词典学作为研究视角可以丰富信息行为和信息素养研究。进一步的概念化可以将信息行为、信息素养和词典素养结合起来。社会意义可以提高词典素养对社会各部门的价值。原创性/价值大量关于信息行为和词典学的文献都是单独研究,并没有涵盖两者的综合见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Library Management
Library Management INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
15.40%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: ■strategic management ■HRM/HRO ■cultural diversity ■information use ■managing change ■quality management ■leadership ■teamwork ■marketing ■outsourcing ■automation ■library finance ■charging ■performance measurement ■data protection and copyright As information services become more complex in nature and more technologically sophisticated, managers need to keep pace with innovations and thinking in the field to offer the most professional service with the resources they have.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the library quality assurance system in supporting international accreditation of department at Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia In the line of disaster: preparedness and effective response of academic libraries in Malaysia Digitalization for enhancing reading habits: the improved hybrid book recommendation system with genre-oriented profiles Overwhelming effects of COVID-19 on public library services and recovery perspectives Evaluating the impact of LIS continuing professional development programmes: a survey of university libraries in Northern India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1