‘Integrating Ethics and Equity with Economics and Effectiveness for newborn screening in the genomic age: a qualitative study protocol of stakeholder perspectives.

Christian Meagher, Didu Kariyawasam, Joanne Scarfe, Michelle Farrar, Kaustav Bhattcharya, Stacy Carter, Ainsley Newson, Margaret Otlowski, Jo Watson, Nicole Millis, Sarah Norris
{"title":"‘Integrating Ethics and Equity with Economics and Effectiveness for newborn screening in the genomic age: a qualitative study protocol of stakeholder perspectives.","authors":"Christian Meagher, Didu Kariyawasam, Joanne Scarfe, Michelle Farrar, Kaustav Bhattcharya, Stacy Carter, Ainsley Newson, Margaret Otlowski, Jo Watson, Nicole Millis, Sarah Norris","doi":"10.1101/2024.02.11.24302654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Newborn bloodspot screening is a well-established population health initiative that detects serious, childhood-onset, treatable conditions to improve health outcomes. With genomic technologies advancing rapidly, many countries are actively discussing the introduction of genomic assays into newborn screening programs. While adding genomic testing to Australia’s newborn screening program could improve outcomes for infants and families, it must be considered against potential harms, ethical, legal, equity and social implications, and economic and health system impacts. We must ask not only ‘can’ we use genomics to screen newborns?’ but ‘should we’?’ and ‘how much should health systems invest in genomic newborn screening?’. Methods This study will use qualitative methods to explore understanding, priorities, concerns and expectations of genomic newborn screening among parents/carers, health professionals/scientists, and health policy makers across Australia. In-depth, semi-structured interviews will be held with 30-40 parents/carers recruited via hospital and community settings, 15-20 health professionals/scientists, and 10-15 health policy makers. Data will be analysed using inductive content analysis. The Sydney Children’s Hospital Network Human Research Ethics Committee approved this study protocol [2023/ETH02371]. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research will guide study planning, conduct and reporting. Discussion Few studies have engaged a diverse range of stakeholders to explore the implications of genomics in newborn screening in a culturally and genetically diverse population, nor in a health system underpinned by universal health care. As the first study within a multi-part research program, findings will be used to generate new knowledge on the risks and benefits and importance of ethical, legal, social and equity implications of genomic newborn screening from the perspective of key stakeholders. As such it will be the foundation on which child and family centered criteria can be developed to inform health technology assessments and drive efficient and effective policy decision-making on the implementation of genomics in newborn screening.","PeriodicalId":501386,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Policy","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.11.24302654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Newborn bloodspot screening is a well-established population health initiative that detects serious, childhood-onset, treatable conditions to improve health outcomes. With genomic technologies advancing rapidly, many countries are actively discussing the introduction of genomic assays into newborn screening programs. While adding genomic testing to Australia’s newborn screening program could improve outcomes for infants and families, it must be considered against potential harms, ethical, legal, equity and social implications, and economic and health system impacts. We must ask not only ‘can’ we use genomics to screen newborns?’ but ‘should we’?’ and ‘how much should health systems invest in genomic newborn screening?’. Methods This study will use qualitative methods to explore understanding, priorities, concerns and expectations of genomic newborn screening among parents/carers, health professionals/scientists, and health policy makers across Australia. In-depth, semi-structured interviews will be held with 30-40 parents/carers recruited via hospital and community settings, 15-20 health professionals/scientists, and 10-15 health policy makers. Data will be analysed using inductive content analysis. The Sydney Children’s Hospital Network Human Research Ethics Committee approved this study protocol [2023/ETH02371]. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research will guide study planning, conduct and reporting. Discussion Few studies have engaged a diverse range of stakeholders to explore the implications of genomics in newborn screening in a culturally and genetically diverse population, nor in a health system underpinned by universal health care. As the first study within a multi-part research program, findings will be used to generate new knowledge on the risks and benefits and importance of ethical, legal, social and equity implications of genomic newborn screening from the perspective of key stakeholders. As such it will be the foundation on which child and family centered criteria can be developed to inform health technology assessments and drive efficient and effective policy decision-making on the implementation of genomics in newborn screening.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基因组时代新生儿筛查的伦理和公平性与经济性和有效性的整合:利益相关者观点的定性研究协议》。
背景新生儿血斑筛查是一项行之有效的人口健康计划,它能检测出儿童期发病的、可治疗的严重疾病,从而改善健康状况。随着基因组技术的快速发展,许多国家都在积极讨论在新生儿筛查项目中引入基因组检测。虽然在澳大利亚新生儿筛查项目中加入基因组检测可以改善婴儿和家庭的健康状况,但必须考虑到潜在的危害、伦理、法律、公平和社会影响,以及对经济和医疗系统的影响。我们不仅要问 "我们能否利用基因组学筛查新生儿",还要问 "我们是否应该这样做",以及 "医疗系统应该在新生儿基因组筛查方面投入多少资金"。方法 本研究将采用定性方法,探讨澳大利亚各地的家长/护理人员、卫生专业人员/科学家和卫生政策制定者对新生儿基因组筛查的理解、优先事项、关注点和期望。将对通过医院和社区机构招募的 30-40 名家长/监护人、15-20 名卫生专业人员/科学家和 10-15 名卫生政策制定者进行深入的半结构式访谈。将采用归纳内容分析法对数据进行分析。悉尼儿童医院网络人类研究伦理委员会批准了本研究方案[2023/ETH02371]。定性研究报告标准将指导研究的规划、实施和报告。讨论 很少有研究让不同的利益相关者参与进来,探讨基因组学在新生儿筛查中对文化和基因多样化人群的影响,也很少有研究在以全民医疗保健为基础的医疗系统中进行这种探讨。作为多部分研究计划中的第一项研究,研究结果将用于从主要利益相关者的角度,对基因组新生儿筛查的风险和益处以及伦理、法律、社会和公平影响的重要性产生新的认识。因此,它将成为制定以儿童和家庭为中心的标准的基础,为健康技术评估提供信息,并推动在新生儿筛查中实施基因组学的高效和有效的政策决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"WE CAN ALL CONTRIBUTE IN OUR OWN WAY" : KNOWLEDGE MOBILIZATION TOOLS TO PROMOTE BEST PRACTICES IN UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY Geospatial Analysis of the Association between Medicaid Ex-pansion, Minimum Wage Policies, and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia Prevalence in the United States The clinical and cost-effectiveness of interventions for preventing continence issues resulting from birth trauma: a rapid review Supporting women, girls and people who menstruate to participate in physical activity - Rapid evidence summary Performance of the Washington Group Questions in Measuring Blindness and Deafness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1