XBRL reporting in firms with data breach incidents

IF 0.9 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1002/jcaf.22701
Wanying Jiang, Chunhao Xu, Roy Wayne Counts
{"title":"XBRL reporting in firms with data breach incidents","authors":"Wanying Jiang,&nbsp;Chunhao Xu,&nbsp;Roy Wayne Counts","doi":"10.1002/jcaf.22701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted new rules mandating that firms disclose cybersecurity incidents and risk management procedures for inline XBRL reporting, highlighting the regulator's concern about firms’ response to data breaches. In this study, we examine whether firms use XBRL strategically to hinder external stakeholders from understanding the impact of announced data breaches. We find that firm XBRL filing complexity increases following data breaches. Further investigation suggests that the increased XBRL complexity is concentrated on financial statement note tags instead of financial statement tags. The findings imply that firms with data breach incidents are likely to increase XBRL reporting complexity to mitigate stock market reactions. We also find that analysts following moderate the relationship between the data breach and XBRL reporting timeliness. These findings provide empirical evidence about XBRL reporting changes after data breach incidents and contribute to cybersecurity literature and XBRL filing regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":44561,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcaf.22701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted new rules mandating that firms disclose cybersecurity incidents and risk management procedures for inline XBRL reporting, highlighting the regulator's concern about firms’ response to data breaches. In this study, we examine whether firms use XBRL strategically to hinder external stakeholders from understanding the impact of announced data breaches. We find that firm XBRL filing complexity increases following data breaches. Further investigation suggests that the increased XBRL complexity is concentrated on financial statement note tags instead of financial statement tags. The findings imply that firms with data breach incidents are likely to increase XBRL reporting complexity to mitigate stock market reactions. We also find that analysts following moderate the relationship between the data breach and XBRL reporting timeliness. These findings provide empirical evidence about XBRL reporting changes after data breach incidents and contribute to cybersecurity literature and XBRL filing regulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发生数据泄露事件的公司的 XBRL 报告
美国证券交易委员会(SEC)通过了新规定,要求企业在XBRL内嵌报告中披露网络安全事件和风险管理程序,这凸显了监管机构对企业应对数据泄露的关注。在本研究中,我们考察了企业是否战略性地使用XBRL来阻碍外部利益相关者了解已公布的数据泄露事件的影响。我们发现,在数据泄露事件发生后,企业XBRL申报的复杂性会增加。进一步的调查表明,XBRL复杂性的增加主要集中在财务报表附注标签上,而非财务报表标签。研究结果表明,发生数据泄露事件的公司很可能会提高XBRL报告的复杂性,以减轻股市反应。我们还发现,分析师的关注会缓和数据泄露与XBRL报告及时性之间的关系。这些发现提供了数据泄露事件后XBRL报告变化的经验证据,有助于网络安全文献和XBRL申报监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
69
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Does corporate governance affect investment efficiency of Indian firms? Panel evidence from new governance indices Issue Information Retraction: International expansion and audit opinion shopping: A signaling perspective Costs and benefits of the LIFO-FIFO choice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1