Machine learning data sources in pediatric sleep research: assessing racial/ethnic differences in electronic health record–based clinical notes prior to model training

Mattina A. Davenport, Joseph W. Sirrianni, D. Chisolm
{"title":"Machine learning data sources in pediatric sleep research: assessing racial/ethnic differences in electronic health record–based clinical notes prior to model training","authors":"Mattina A. Davenport, Joseph W. Sirrianni, D. Chisolm","doi":"10.3389/frsle.2024.1271167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pediatric sleep problems can be detected across racial/ethnic subpopulations in primary care settings. However, the electronic health record (EHR) data documentation that describes patients' sleep problems may be inherently biased due to both historical biases and informed presence. This study assessed racial/ethnic differences in natural language processing (NLP) training data (e.g., pediatric sleep-related keywords in primary care clinical notes) prior to model training.We used a predefined keyword features set containing 178 Peds B-SATED keywords. We then queried all the clinical notes from patients seen in pediatric primary care between the ages of 5 and 18 from January 2018 to December 2021. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was used to investigate whether there were racial/ethnic differences in the documentation of Peds B-SATED keywords. Then, mixed-effects logistic regression was used to determine whether the odds of the presence of global Peds B-SATED dimensions also differed across racial/ethnic subpopulations.Using both LASSO and multilevel modeling approaches, the current study found that there were racial/ethnic differences in providers' documentation of Peds B-SATED keywords and global dimensions. In addition, the most frequently documented Peds B-SATED keyword rankings qualitatively differed across racial/ethnic subpopulations.This study revealed providers' differential patterns of documenting Peds B-SATED keywords and global dimensions that may account for the under-detection of pediatric sleep problems among racial/ethnic subpopulations. In research, these findings have important implications for the equitable clinical documentation of sleep problems in pediatric primary care settings and extend prior retrospective work in pediatric sleep specialty settings.","PeriodicalId":73106,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in sleep","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsle.2024.1271167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pediatric sleep problems can be detected across racial/ethnic subpopulations in primary care settings. However, the electronic health record (EHR) data documentation that describes patients' sleep problems may be inherently biased due to both historical biases and informed presence. This study assessed racial/ethnic differences in natural language processing (NLP) training data (e.g., pediatric sleep-related keywords in primary care clinical notes) prior to model training.We used a predefined keyword features set containing 178 Peds B-SATED keywords. We then queried all the clinical notes from patients seen in pediatric primary care between the ages of 5 and 18 from January 2018 to December 2021. A least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression model was used to investigate whether there were racial/ethnic differences in the documentation of Peds B-SATED keywords. Then, mixed-effects logistic regression was used to determine whether the odds of the presence of global Peds B-SATED dimensions also differed across racial/ethnic subpopulations.Using both LASSO and multilevel modeling approaches, the current study found that there were racial/ethnic differences in providers' documentation of Peds B-SATED keywords and global dimensions. In addition, the most frequently documented Peds B-SATED keyword rankings qualitatively differed across racial/ethnic subpopulations.This study revealed providers' differential patterns of documenting Peds B-SATED keywords and global dimensions that may account for the under-detection of pediatric sleep problems among racial/ethnic subpopulations. In research, these findings have important implications for the equitable clinical documentation of sleep problems in pediatric primary care settings and extend prior retrospective work in pediatric sleep specialty settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科睡眠研究中的机器学习数据源:在模型训练前评估基于电子健康记录的临床笔记中的种族/民族差异
在初级医疗机构中,不同种族/民族的亚人群都能发现小儿睡眠问题。然而,由于历史偏差和知情存在,描述患者睡眠问题的电子健康记录(EHR)数据文档可能存在固有偏差。本研究评估了模型训练前自然语言处理(NLP)训练数据(如初级医疗临床笔记中与儿科睡眠相关的关键词)中的种族/民族差异。然后,我们查询了 2018 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在儿科初级医疗机构就诊的 5 至 18 岁患者的所有临床笔记。我们使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归模型来研究 Peds B-SATED 关键字的记录是否存在种族/民族差异。通过使用 LASSO 和多层次建模方法,本研究发现医疗服务提供者在记录 Peds B-SATED 关键字和全局维度时存在种族/民族差异。本研究揭示了医疗服务提供者记录 Peds B-SATED 关键字和全局维度的不同模式,这可能是种族/族裔亚群中儿科睡眠问题检测不足的原因。在研究中,这些发现对儿科初级保健机构中睡眠问题的公平临床记录具有重要意义,并扩展了之前在儿科睡眠专科机构中的回顾性工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing TeleSleep at Veterans Healthcare Administration: an organizational case study of adaptation and sustainment. Editorial: Insights in sleep-related movement disorders and parasomnias Efficacy of a telehealth cognitive behavioral therapy for improving sleep and nightmares in children aged 6–17 Insomnia severity and daytime sleepiness in caregivers of advanced age Revitalizing CPAP adherence: lessons from THN study in patients with hypoglossal nerve stimulators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1