Exploring solar energy systems: A comparative study of optimization algorithms, MPPTs, and controllers

Aykut Fatih Güven
{"title":"Exploring solar energy systems: A comparative study of optimization algorithms, MPPTs, and controllers","authors":"Aykut Fatih Güven","doi":"10.1049/cth2.12626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study elucidates the use of optimization algorithms to identify the controller parameters employed in adjusting the current and voltage values of loads powered by solar energy systems and battery groups. Parameters for these controllers were independently derived using a combination of ant colony optimization with Levy flight, hybrid firefly‐particle swarm optimization, hybrid gravitation search algorithm‐particle swarm optimization, alongside the implementation of Jaya and whale optimization algorithms. The results from each method were juxtaposed for thorough analysis. In addition, three distinct Maximum Power Point Tracker (MPPT) algorithms were employed in the system: perturbation and observation, open circuit voltage, and incremental conductance (IC). To assess the system’s adaptability to real‐world conditions, it was tested against varying temperatures and sunlight levels. Moreover, potential changes in the loads were considered by varying the load. The efficacy of the controllers was examined by altering both the environment and load. The effectiveness of the controllers was examined by referring to the integral of time‐weighted absolute error value. The system was simulated using MATLAB/Simulink software. This study demonstrates that the fractional‐order PID controller achieves the most effective results, the Jaya algorithm provides the best controller parameters, and the IC technique exhibits the highest performance in MPPT.","PeriodicalId":502998,"journal":{"name":"IET Control Theory & Applications","volume":" 1016","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Control Theory & Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/cth2.12626","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study elucidates the use of optimization algorithms to identify the controller parameters employed in adjusting the current and voltage values of loads powered by solar energy systems and battery groups. Parameters for these controllers were independently derived using a combination of ant colony optimization with Levy flight, hybrid firefly‐particle swarm optimization, hybrid gravitation search algorithm‐particle swarm optimization, alongside the implementation of Jaya and whale optimization algorithms. The results from each method were juxtaposed for thorough analysis. In addition, three distinct Maximum Power Point Tracker (MPPT) algorithms were employed in the system: perturbation and observation, open circuit voltage, and incremental conductance (IC). To assess the system’s adaptability to real‐world conditions, it was tested against varying temperatures and sunlight levels. Moreover, potential changes in the loads were considered by varying the load. The efficacy of the controllers was examined by altering both the environment and load. The effectiveness of the controllers was examined by referring to the integral of time‐weighted absolute error value. The system was simulated using MATLAB/Simulink software. This study demonstrates that the fractional‐order PID controller achieves the most effective results, the Jaya algorithm provides the best controller parameters, and the IC technique exhibits the highest performance in MPPT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索太阳能系统:优化算法、MPPT 和控制器的比较研究
本研究阐明了如何使用优化算法来确定控制器参数,以调整由太阳能系统和电池组供电的负载的电流和电压值。这些控制器的参数是利用蚁群优化与常春藤飞行、混合萤火虫-粒子群优化、混合引力搜索算法-粒子群优化的组合,以及 Jaya 和鲸鱼优化算法的实施独立得出的。每种方法的结果都并列在一起进行了深入分析。此外,系统还采用了三种不同的最大功率点跟踪(MPPT)算法:扰动和观测、开路电压和增量电导(IC)。为了评估该系统对实际条件的适应性,还对不同的温度和日照水平进行了测试。此外,还通过改变负载来考虑负载的潜在变化。通过改变环境和负载来检验控制器的功效。通过参考时间加权绝对误差值的积分来检验控制器的有效性。使用 MATLAB/Simulink 软件对系统进行了模拟。研究结果表明,分数阶 PID 控制器取得了最有效的结果,Jaya 算法提供了最佳的控制器参数,IC 技术在 MPPT 中表现出最高的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovative hull cleaning robot design and control by Laguerre base model predictive control for impedance and vibration management A hybrid energy storage array group control strategy for wind power smoothing Optimal data injection attack design for spacecraft systems via a model free Q‐learning approach Smart line planning method for power transmission based on D3QN‐PER algorithm Lightweight environment sensing algorithm for intelligent driving based on improved YOLOv7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1