{"title":"The Growth of Tourism and ‘Development’ in an Indigenous Setting: Exploring a Case of the Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh","authors":"Sabiha Yeasmin Rosy","doi":"10.1079/tourism.2024.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This case study examines the process of tourism development in the Chittagong Hill Tracts of Bangladesh, where multidimensional concerns related to Indigenous communities are coming to the fore. This area contains valuable natural resources that provide huge potential for the growth of tourism. However, accounts of discrimination and violations by the state towards Indigenous peoples indicate the potential for inequality and exploitation while developing tourism. Eleven Indigenous groups live in the Chittagong Hill Tracts, a historically conflict-ridden area where there is tension between the dominant ethnic Bangalee and the Indigenous groups due to the latter's limited control over their way of life and the environment. Structurally, the state endorses mass tourism, where powerful actors – government, military, politically influential individuals, and companies – are engaged in determining the ‘development’ for the Indigenous people and modernising the place as a part of capitalist ventures to gain profits. Given that state actors or private investors wield power and control over tourism, exploitation ranges from Indigenous peoples' lack of control over the planning to limited participation in tourism. Therefore, this case study explores the implications of tourism development for Indigenous peoples, analysing the state’s economic intervention in favour of the Bangalee people, who are an ethnically dominant group in Bangladesh. Moreover, this case study raises questions about how the ‘development’ is taking place and identifies the practice of ‘development’ in an Indigenous setting and how the Indigenous peoples are situated in this capitalistic venture in a post-conflict setting. The case study is based on empirical findings collected through an ethnographic study as part of a PhD. The study followed ethical guidelines approved by the Macquarie University Ethics Committee in 2017.\n \n \n © The Author 2024\n","PeriodicalId":505928,"journal":{"name":"Tourism Cases","volume":" 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1079/tourism.2024.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
旅游业的增长与土著环境中的 "发展":孟加拉国吉大港山区案例探讨
本案例研究探讨了孟加拉国吉大港山区的旅游业发展进程,该地区与土著社区有关的多层面问题正逐渐凸显出来。该地区拥有宝贵的自然资源,为旅游业的发展提供了巨大潜力。然而,有关国家歧视和侵犯土著人民的报道表明,在发展旅游业的同时,可能会出现不平等和剥削现象。11 个土著群体生活在吉大港山区,该地区历来冲突不断,占主导地位的班加罗尔族与土著群体之间关系紧张,因为后者对其生活方式和环境的控制有限。从结构上看,国家支持大众旅游,政府、军队、有政治影响力的个人和公司等有权势的行为者参与决定土著人的 "发展",并将该地现代化作为资本主义企业获取利润的一部分。鉴于国家行为者或私人投资者掌握着对旅游业的权力和控制,剥削的范围包括土著人民对规划缺乏控制,以及对旅游业的参与有限。因此,本案例研究探讨了旅游业发展对原住民的影响,分析了国家对孟加拉占优势民族 Bangalee 人的经济干预。此外,本案例研究还对 "发展 "是如何进行的提出了疑问,并确定了在土著环境中的 "发展 "实践,以及土著人民在冲突后环境中是如何置身于这种资本主义冒险中的。本案例研究以作为博士论文一部分的人种学研究中收集的实证结果为基础。该研究遵循了麦考瑞大学伦理委员会于 2017 年批准的伦理准则。 © 作者 2024
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。