Defining Data Model Quality Metrics for Data Vault 2.0 Model Evaluation

Heli Helskyaho, Laura Ruotsalainen, Tomi Männistö
{"title":"Defining Data Model Quality Metrics for Data Vault 2.0 Model Evaluation","authors":"Heli Helskyaho, Laura Ruotsalainen, Tomi Männistö","doi":"10.3390/inventions9010021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Designing a database is a crucial step in providing businesses with high-quality data for decision making. The quality of a data model is the key to the quality of its data. Evaluating the quality of a data model is a complex and time-consuming task. Having suitable metrics for evaluating the quality of a data model is an essential requirement for automating the design process of a data model. While there are metrics available for evaluating data warehouse data models to some degree, there is a distinct lack of metrics specifically designed to assess how well a data model conforms to the rules and best practices of Data Vault 2.0. The quality of a Data Vault 2.0 data model is considered suboptimal if it fails to adhere to these principles. In this paper, we introduce new metrics that can be used for evaluating the quality of a Data Vault 2.0 data model, either manually or automatically. This methodology involves defining a set of metrics based on the best practices of Data Vault 2.0, evaluating five representative data models using both metrics and manual assessments made by a human expert. Finally, a comparative analysis of both evaluations was conducted to validate the consistency of the metrics with the judgments made by a human expert.","PeriodicalId":509629,"journal":{"name":"Inventions","volume":" 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/inventions9010021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Designing a database is a crucial step in providing businesses with high-quality data for decision making. The quality of a data model is the key to the quality of its data. Evaluating the quality of a data model is a complex and time-consuming task. Having suitable metrics for evaluating the quality of a data model is an essential requirement for automating the design process of a data model. While there are metrics available for evaluating data warehouse data models to some degree, there is a distinct lack of metrics specifically designed to assess how well a data model conforms to the rules and best practices of Data Vault 2.0. The quality of a Data Vault 2.0 data model is considered suboptimal if it fails to adhere to these principles. In this paper, we introduce new metrics that can be used for evaluating the quality of a Data Vault 2.0 data model, either manually or automatically. This methodology involves defining a set of metrics based on the best practices of Data Vault 2.0, evaluating five representative data models using both metrics and manual assessments made by a human expert. Finally, a comparative analysis of both evaluations was conducted to validate the consistency of the metrics with the judgments made by a human expert.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为 Data Vault 2.0 模型评估定义数据模型质量指标
设计数据库是为企业决策提供高质量数据的关键一步。数据模型的质量是数据质量的关键。评估数据模型的质量是一项复杂而耗时的任务。要实现数据模型设计过程的自动化,就必须有合适的指标来评估数据模型的质量。虽然在某种程度上有用于评估数据仓库数据模型的指标,但明显缺乏专门用于评估数据模型符合 Data Vault 2.0 规则和最佳实践的程度的指标。如果 Data Vault 2.0 数据模型未能遵守这些原则,那么它的质量就会被认为是次优的。本文介绍了可用于手动或自动评估 Data Vault 2.0 数据模型质量的新指标。这种方法包括根据 Data Vault 2.0 的最佳实践定义一套衡量标准,使用衡量标准和人工专家的手动评估对五个具有代表性的数据模型进行评估。最后,对这两种评估进行比较分析,以验证度量标准与人类专家判断的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recent Advances and Challenges in Emerging Power Systems Temperature-Dependent Residual Stresses and Thermal Expansion Coefficient of VO2 Thin Films Systematic Opportunity Scan of Energy Recovery Technologies Applied to Trucks with Electric Refrigerated Units Experimental Research on an Afterburner System Fueled with Hydrogen–Methane Mixtures A Novel Hybrid Ultrasound Abrasive-Driven Electrochemical Surface Finishing Technique for Additively Manufactured Ti6Al4V Parts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1