Ratio and proportion through realistic mathematics education and pendidikan matematika realistik Indonesia approach: A systematic literature review

Irma Risdiyanti, Z. Zulkardi, R. Putri, Rully Charitas Indra Prahmana, D. S. Nusantara
{"title":"Ratio and proportion through realistic mathematics education and pendidikan matematika realistik Indonesia approach: A systematic literature review","authors":"Irma Risdiyanti, Z. Zulkardi, R. Putri, Rully Charitas Indra Prahmana, D. S. Nusantara","doi":"10.29408/jel.v10i1.24445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Foundational mathematical concepts like ratios and proportions are indispensable for solving both everyday problems and those encountered in professional settings. However, many students need help to grasp and apply these concepts effectively, often due to ineffective teaching methods, variations in students' levels of comprehension, and shortcomings in existing learning models. Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) and Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) have emerged as promising solutions to address these challenges. This study aims to systematically review the literature on ratio and proportion learning design using RME and PMRI approaches. It focuses on three specific research inquiries: profiling the literature, analyzing employed learning designs, and identifying gaps and recommendations for further research in learning design development. Conducted through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, the research involved planning, implementing, and disseminating review results. One hundred forty-four documents were scrutinized, leading to the identification of 19 pertinent papers. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the literature on learning design in the context of ratio, proportion, scale, and level, utilizing RME and PMRI approaches while highlighting research gaps and offering insights for future studies. Its findings hold significant implications for educators and researchers seeking to enhance mathematics education through RME and PMRI approaches.","PeriodicalId":109114,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Elemen","volume":" 43","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Elemen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v10i1.24445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Foundational mathematical concepts like ratios and proportions are indispensable for solving both everyday problems and those encountered in professional settings. However, many students need help to grasp and apply these concepts effectively, often due to ineffective teaching methods, variations in students' levels of comprehension, and shortcomings in existing learning models. Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) and Pendidikan Matematika Realistik Indonesia (PMRI) have emerged as promising solutions to address these challenges. This study aims to systematically review the literature on ratio and proportion learning design using RME and PMRI approaches. It focuses on three specific research inquiries: profiling the literature, analyzing employed learning designs, and identifying gaps and recommendations for further research in learning design development. Conducted through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, the research involved planning, implementing, and disseminating review results. One hundred forty-four documents were scrutinized, leading to the identification of 19 pertinent papers. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the literature on learning design in the context of ratio, proportion, scale, and level, utilizing RME and PMRI approaches while highlighting research gaps and offering insights for future studies. Its findings hold significant implications for educators and researchers seeking to enhance mathematics education through RME and PMRI approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过现实数学教育和印尼现实主义数学教学法学习比率和比例:系统文献综述
比率和比例等基础数学概念对于解决日常问题和专业环境中遇到的问题都是不可或缺的。然而,许多学生需要帮助才能有效地掌握和应用这些概念,原因往往是教学方法不得力、学生的理解水平参差不齐以及现有学习模式存在缺陷。现实数学教育(RME)和印度尼西亚现实数学教育(PMRI)已成为应对这些挑战的有前途的解决方案。本研究旨在系统地回顾使用 RME 和 PMRI 方法进行比率和比例学习设计的文献。它侧重于三个具体的研究调查:概述文献、分析已采用的学习设计,以及确定学习设计发展方面的差距和进一步研究的建议。研究采用系统文献综述(SLR)方法,包括计划、实施和传播综述结果。共审查了 144 篇文献,最终确定了 19 篇相关论文。本研究利用 RME 和 PMRI 方法,对有关比率、比例、尺度和水平的学习设计文献进行了全面分析,同时强调了研究差距,并为今后的研究提供了启示。研究结果对教育工作者和研究人员通过 RME 和 PMRI 方法提高数学教育具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of learning video rotation using Palembang tanjak context to determine students’ mathematical reasoning Ratio and proportion through realistic mathematics education and pendidikan matematika realistik Indonesia approach: A systematic literature review Exploration of Unggan weaving in Minang culture: An ethnomathematics study Understanding multiplication concept: Exploring PMRI-enhanced thematic learning using traditional games for primary teachers Crafting math minds: A bibliometric odyssey into innovative didactical designs for learning (2006-2023)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1