Social Inequalities in Long-Term Health Effects After COVID-19—A Scoping Review

Nina Lammers, F. Beese, J. Hoebel, C. Poethko-Müller, B. Wachtler
{"title":"Social Inequalities in Long-Term Health Effects After COVID-19—A Scoping Review","authors":"Nina Lammers, F. Beese, J. Hoebel, C. Poethko-Müller, B. Wachtler","doi":"10.3389/ijph.2024.1606739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: We aimed to map and synthesize evidence about social inequalities in long-term health effects after COVID-19 (LTHE), often referred to as “long COVID” or “post-COVID-19 conditions.”Methods: We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed articles by searching the databases Embase and Scopus. According to predefined inclusion criteria, titles/abstracts and full texts were screened for eligibility. Additionally, reference lists of all included studies were hand-searched for eligible studies. This study followed the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews.Results: Nineteen articles were included. LTHE were analysed according to ethnicity, education, income, employment and deprivation indices. The studies varied significantly in their definitions of LTHE. Eighty-two analyses showed no statistically significant associations. At least 12 studies had a high risk of type II errors. Only studies associating deprivation indices and long COVID tended to show a higher prevalence of LTHE in deprived areas.Conclusion: Although some studies indicated social inequalities in LTHE, evidence was generally weak and inconclusive. Further studies with larger sample sizes specifically designed to detect social inequalities regarding LTHE are needed to inform future healthcare planning and public health policies.","PeriodicalId":504643,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Health","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2024.1606739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to map and synthesize evidence about social inequalities in long-term health effects after COVID-19 (LTHE), often referred to as “long COVID” or “post-COVID-19 conditions.”Methods: We conducted a scoping review of peer-reviewed articles by searching the databases Embase and Scopus. According to predefined inclusion criteria, titles/abstracts and full texts were screened for eligibility. Additionally, reference lists of all included studies were hand-searched for eligible studies. This study followed the PRISMA guidelines for scoping reviews.Results: Nineteen articles were included. LTHE were analysed according to ethnicity, education, income, employment and deprivation indices. The studies varied significantly in their definitions of LTHE. Eighty-two analyses showed no statistically significant associations. At least 12 studies had a high risk of type II errors. Only studies associating deprivation indices and long COVID tended to show a higher prevalence of LTHE in deprived areas.Conclusion: Although some studies indicated social inequalities in LTHE, evidence was generally weak and inconclusive. Further studies with larger sample sizes specifically designed to detect social inequalities regarding LTHE are needed to inform future healthcare planning and public health policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 后长期健康影响的社会不平等--范围审查
目标:我们旨在绘制并综合有关 COVID-19 (LTHE)(通常被称为 "长 COVID "或 "后 COVID-19 条件")后长期健康影响的社会不平等的证据:我们通过检索 Embase 和 Scopus 数据库,对经同行评审的文章进行了范围界定。根据预先确定的纳入标准,对标题/摘要和全文进行了资格筛选。此外,我们还对所有纳入研究的参考文献列表进行了人工搜索,以查找符合条件的研究。本研究遵循了范围界定审查的 PRISMA 指南:共纳入 19 篇文章。长者健康教育根据种族、教育程度、收入、就业和贫困指数进行了分析。这些研究对长者健康教育的定义差异很大。82项分析表明,两者之间没有统计学意义上的关联。至少有 12 项研究存在 II 型错误的高风险。只有将贫困指数与长 COVID 相关联的研究倾向于显示贫困地区的长者健康教育患病率较高:尽管一些研究表明长者健康教育存在社会不平等,但证据普遍薄弱且不确定。我们需要进一步开展样本量更大的研究,专门检测长者健康教育方面的社会不平等现象,为未来的医疗保健规划和公共卫生政策提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dietary Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Related to Obesity and Highly Underweight Among Urban Chinese High School Students: A Cross-Sectional Study Breast Cancer Awareness and Screening Perceptions of Women in Yerevan, Armenia Experiences of Food Insecurity Among Pregnant Adolescents and Adolescent Mothers in Ghana: A Photovoice Method Impact of the War in Ukraine on the Ability of Children to Recognize Basic Emotions Critical Care Nurses’ Perceptions of Abuse and Its Impact on Healthy Work Environments in Five European Countries: A Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1