Low Dose Amantadine and Escitalopram in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Multiple System Atrophy

IF 1.8 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Annals of Neurosciences Pub Date : 2024-02-07 DOI:10.1177/09727531231222700
P. Chutia, S. Tripathi
{"title":"Low Dose Amantadine and Escitalopram in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy and Multiple System Atrophy","authors":"P. Chutia, S. Tripathi","doi":"10.1177/09727531231222700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and multiple system atrophy (MSA) are less responsive to usual antiparkinsonian drugs. Purpose: To assess the treatment outcome of the combination of low-dose amantadine and escitalopram in the study population. Methods: A retrospective study of PSP and MSA patients from June 2021 to December 2022 treated with the dose of amantadine 100 mg and escitalopram 5 mg per day with a follow-up of 2 months at a tertiary care centre in India. The primary outcome measure was a change in the PSP and MSA severity rating scale scores, while cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms and functionality scale scores were secondary outcomes on follow-up visits. Repeated measures ANOVA and Friedman rank test were used to analyse the data. Results: A total of 21 patients (8 PSP and 13 MSA), including 19 males, with a mean age of 72.84 years, were included. The mean total PSP rating scale score had a significant decline from baseline to week 2 and 8 ( p < .001), along with the scores for limb symptoms ( p < .001), ocular ( p = .001), history ( p = .003), gait ( p = .007), mentation ( p = .014) and bulbar ( p = .018) symptoms. Similarly, the mean score of the MSA rating scale significantly decreased on follow-up visits ( p < .001). The cognition, functional disability and behavioural symptoms scores also had significant improvement with p < .01. Conclusion: The PSP and MSA patients had clinically significant improvement with the combination treatment in both motor and non-motor domains. Further prospective trials for longer durations are needed to establish the effect size and stability of response.","PeriodicalId":7921,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurosciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531231222700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and multiple system atrophy (MSA) are less responsive to usual antiparkinsonian drugs. Purpose: To assess the treatment outcome of the combination of low-dose amantadine and escitalopram in the study population. Methods: A retrospective study of PSP and MSA patients from June 2021 to December 2022 treated with the dose of amantadine 100 mg and escitalopram 5 mg per day with a follow-up of 2 months at a tertiary care centre in India. The primary outcome measure was a change in the PSP and MSA severity rating scale scores, while cognition, neuropsychiatric symptoms and functionality scale scores were secondary outcomes on follow-up visits. Repeated measures ANOVA and Friedman rank test were used to analyse the data. Results: A total of 21 patients (8 PSP and 13 MSA), including 19 males, with a mean age of 72.84 years, were included. The mean total PSP rating scale score had a significant decline from baseline to week 2 and 8 ( p < .001), along with the scores for limb symptoms ( p < .001), ocular ( p = .001), history ( p = .003), gait ( p = .007), mentation ( p = .014) and bulbar ( p = .018) symptoms. Similarly, the mean score of the MSA rating scale significantly decreased on follow-up visits ( p < .001). The cognition, functional disability and behavioural symptoms scores also had significant improvement with p < .01. Conclusion: The PSP and MSA patients had clinically significant improvement with the combination treatment in both motor and non-motor domains. Further prospective trials for longer durations are needed to establish the effect size and stability of response.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小剂量金刚烷胺和艾司西酞普兰在进行性核上性麻痹和多系统萎缩中的应用
背景:进行性核上性麻痹(PSP)和多系统萎缩(MSA)对普通抗帕金森病药物的反应较差。目的:在研究人群中评估小剂量金刚烷胺和艾司西酞普兰联合用药的治疗效果。方法:对帕金森病患者进行回顾性研究:回顾性研究:2021年6月至2022年12月期间,在印度的一家三级医疗中心接受金刚烷胺100毫克/天和艾司西酞普兰5毫克/天治疗的PSP和MSA患者,随访2个月。主要研究结果是PSP和MSA严重程度量表评分的变化,认知、神经精神症状和功能量表评分是随访的次要结果。采用重复测量方差分析和弗里德曼秩检验分析数据。结果共纳入 21 名患者(8 名 PSP 和 13 名 MSA),包括 19 名男性,平均年龄为 72.84 岁。从基线到第2周和第8周,PSP评分量表的平均总分显著下降(p < .001),肢体症状(p < .001)、眼部(p = .001)、病史(p = .003)、步态(p = .007)、精神(p = .014)和球部(p = .018)症状的评分也显著下降。同样,随访时 MSA 评定量表的平均得分也明显下降(p < .001)。认知、功能性残疾和行为症状评分也有明显改善,p < .01。结论通过联合治疗,PSP 和 MSA 患者在运动和非运动领域均有明显的临床改善。需要进一步开展持续时间更长的前瞻性试验,以确定疗效大小和反应的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Neurosciences
Annals of Neurosciences NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Role of Nitric Oxide Modulators in Neuroprotective Effects of Mangiferin in 6-Hydroxydopamine-induced Parkinson's Disease in Rats. Global Effect on Cortical Activity in Young Indian Males in Response to "OM" Chanting: A High-Density Quantitative Electro-Encephalography Study. Effectiveness of Psychosocial Intervention and Psychoeducation in Improving Psychological Well-being and Cognitive Functioning in Caregivers of Substance Use Issues: A Pilot Study. Level of Self-Objectification among Adolescent Girls from Co-educational Schools and All-Girls Schools: A Comparative Study. The Imperative for a Paradigm Shift in India's Healthcare Workforce.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1