The effect of single and dual task training on the intracortical inhibition in healthy young adults

M. Wälchli, Craig Tokuno, B. Lauber, Wolfgang Taube
{"title":"The effect of single and dual task training on the intracortical inhibition in healthy young adults","authors":"M. Wälchli, Craig Tokuno, B. Lauber, Wolfgang Taube","doi":"10.36950/2024.2ciss081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction \nThe evidence for changes in intracortical inhibition when executing two tasks simultaneously (i.e., dual tasking) is ambiguous as decreased (Corp et al., 2014) and increased (Corp et al., 2016) inhibition were reported. One way to bring more light into this question is to tests the effect of a single task training (STT) and a dual task training (DTT) on the short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) during a single balancing task and two different dual tasks in healthy young adults. \nMethods \nTwenty-nine healthy young adults were randomly separated into two groups participating in STT (n = 15) or DTT (n = 14) consisting of 6 training sessions within 3 weeks. Before and after the training, a single task (balancing on a rocker board) was performed at two resistance levels (easy and hard). Additionally to the single task, either a cognitive (2-back number recall) or a motor (balancing a ball on a hand-held tray) dual task was executed simultaneously. During execution of these three tasks, SICI was measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortical area representing the right tibialis anterior. \nResults \nTraining improvements in balance performance were group and task-specific over time (p = .018). While the STT group improved more in the single balance task (12.3% vs. 6.6% DTT), the DTT group had more sway reductions in the motor dual task condition (13.7% vs. 4.5% STT). Similar statistical outcome (p = .034) was observed for the dual task costs (DTC). There was a tendence for SICI (p = .075), mainly indicating higher increase in SICI for the DTT group in the motor dual task (16.0% vs. 5.8% STT). During the execution of the single balance task, the group-specific adaptations in SICI were less pronounced (13.7% DTT vs. 16.2% STT). When analyzing the SICI dual task difference (Δ) from single to dual task, SICI is altered group and task specific (p = .011). The DTT group could increase the dual task difference in SICI in the dual motor condition (Δ 3.2%), whereas the STT group had a decrease (Δ -9.6%). \nDiscussion/Conclusion \nThe results of this study show that DTT causes gains in balance performance and increases in SICI when the secondary task is also a motor task, but not when the second task is a cognitive one. STT is particularly beneficial in the single task. It is therefore assumed that intracortical inhibition is important during the simultaneous performance of two motor tasks, while intracortical inhibition was not modulated in a group-specific manner by the additional cognitive task. \nReferences \nCorp, D. T., Lum, J. A. G., Tooley, G. A., & Pearce, A. J. (2014). Corticospinal activity during dual tasking: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS literature from 1995 to 2013. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 43, 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.017 \nCorp, D. T., Rogers, M. A., Youssef, G. J., & Pearce, A. J. (2016). The effect of dual-task difficulty on the inhibition of the motor cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 234, 443-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4479-2","PeriodicalId":415194,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","volume":"286 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36950/2024.2ciss081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The evidence for changes in intracortical inhibition when executing two tasks simultaneously (i.e., dual tasking) is ambiguous as decreased (Corp et al., 2014) and increased (Corp et al., 2016) inhibition were reported. One way to bring more light into this question is to tests the effect of a single task training (STT) and a dual task training (DTT) on the short interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) during a single balancing task and two different dual tasks in healthy young adults. Methods Twenty-nine healthy young adults were randomly separated into two groups participating in STT (n = 15) or DTT (n = 14) consisting of 6 training sessions within 3 weeks. Before and after the training, a single task (balancing on a rocker board) was performed at two resistance levels (easy and hard). Additionally to the single task, either a cognitive (2-back number recall) or a motor (balancing a ball on a hand-held tray) dual task was executed simultaneously. During execution of these three tasks, SICI was measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor cortical area representing the right tibialis anterior. Results Training improvements in balance performance were group and task-specific over time (p = .018). While the STT group improved more in the single balance task (12.3% vs. 6.6% DTT), the DTT group had more sway reductions in the motor dual task condition (13.7% vs. 4.5% STT). Similar statistical outcome (p = .034) was observed for the dual task costs (DTC). There was a tendence for SICI (p = .075), mainly indicating higher increase in SICI for the DTT group in the motor dual task (16.0% vs. 5.8% STT). During the execution of the single balance task, the group-specific adaptations in SICI were less pronounced (13.7% DTT vs. 16.2% STT). When analyzing the SICI dual task difference (Δ) from single to dual task, SICI is altered group and task specific (p = .011). The DTT group could increase the dual task difference in SICI in the dual motor condition (Δ 3.2%), whereas the STT group had a decrease (Δ -9.6%). Discussion/Conclusion The results of this study show that DTT causes gains in balance performance and increases in SICI when the secondary task is also a motor task, but not when the second task is a cognitive one. STT is particularly beneficial in the single task. It is therefore assumed that intracortical inhibition is important during the simultaneous performance of two motor tasks, while intracortical inhibition was not modulated in a group-specific manner by the additional cognitive task. References Corp, D. T., Lum, J. A. G., Tooley, G. A., & Pearce, A. J. (2014). Corticospinal activity during dual tasking: A systematic review and meta-analysis of TMS literature from 1995 to 2013. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 43, 74-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.017 Corp, D. T., Rogers, M. A., Youssef, G. J., & Pearce, A. J. (2016). The effect of dual-task difficulty on the inhibition of the motor cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 234, 443-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4479-2
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单任务和双任务训练对健康年轻人皮层内抑制的影响
导言:关于同时执行两项任务(即双重任务)时皮层内抑制作用变化的证据并不明确,因为有报道称抑制作用会降低(Corp等人,2014年),也有报道称抑制作用会增强(Corp等人,2016年)。要想更深入地了解这一问题,一种方法是测试单一任务训练(STT)和双重任务训练(DTT)对健康青壮年在单一平衡任务和两种不同的双重任务中短间歇皮层内抑制(SICI)的影响。方法 将 29 名健康青壮年随机分为两组,分别参加 STT(15 人)或 DTT(14 人),在 3 周内进行 6 次训练。训练前后,在两种阻力水平(简单和困难)下进行单项训练(在摇摇板上保持平衡)。除单一任务外,还同时执行认知(2-back 数字记忆)或运动(在手持托盘上平衡球)双重任务。在执行这三个任务期间,通过经颅磁刺激代表右胫前肌的运动皮层区域来测量 SICI。结果 随着时间的推移,训练对平衡能力的提高具有组别和任务特异性(p = .018)。STT 组在单一平衡任务中的改善幅度更大(12.3% vs. 6.6% DTT),而 DTT 组在运动双重任务条件下的摇摆减少幅度更大(13.7% vs. 4.5% STT)。在双重任务成本(DTC)方面也观察到了类似的统计结果(p = 0.034)。SICI 有上升趋势(p = 0.075),主要表明在运动双重任务中,DTT 组的 SICI 上升较高(16.0% 对 5.8% STT)。在执行单一平衡任务时,特定组别的 SICI 适应性不太明显(DTT 组为 13.7% 对 STT 组为 16.2%)。在分析从单一任务到双重任务的 SICI 双重任务差异 (Δ)时,SICI 的改变具有组别和任务特异性(p = .011)。在双运动条件下,DTT 组可以增加 SICI 的双任务差异(Δ 3.2%),而 STT 组则有所减少(Δ -9.6%)。讨论/结论 本研究结果表明,当第二项任务也是运动任务时,DTT 可提高平衡能力并增加 SICI,但当第二项任务是认知任务时,DTT 不会提高平衡能力并增加 SICI。STT 对单一任务尤其有益。因此可以推测,在同时完成两项运动任务时,皮层内抑制非常重要,而额外的认知任务并不会以特定组别的方式调节皮层内抑制。参考文献 Corp, D. T., Lum, J. A. G., Tooley, G. A., & Pearce, A. J. (2014).双重任务时的皮层脊髓活动:1995-2013年TMS文献的系统回顾和荟萃分析。https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.03.017 Corp, D. T., Rogers, M. A., Youssef, G. J., & Pearce, A. J. (2016)。双重任务难度对运动皮层抑制的影响。实验脑研究》,234, 443-452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4479-2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From supercrip to techno supercrip Associations between daily movement behaviors, sleep, and affect in older adults: An ecological momentary assessment study Position statement regarding the current standing of exercise therapy in Austria (Positionspapier zur Situation der Trainingstherapie in Österreich) The Perceived Instrumental Effects of Maltreatment in Sport (PIEMS) scale: Translation, (cross-)validation, and short-form development of the German version Who’s better? Adaptive comparative judgment of dance performances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1