Gender and diversity competence in sport studies programs in higher education

Karolin Heckemeyer, Marianne Meier, Matthias Grabherr
{"title":"Gender and diversity competence in sport studies programs in higher education","authors":"Karolin Heckemeyer, Marianne Meier, Matthias Grabherr","doi":"10.36950/2024.2ciss009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction\nInclusion and diversity have become increasingly important in the context of sport in recent years. Numerous sports organizations and sports policymakers are committed to enable more inclusive sport. Led by the idea of a sport for all, everyone should be able to participate in sport regardless of gender, sexuality, dis_ability, race, or class.\nInclusive sport does not only require specific structural conditions. It also demands social actors who have the skills to deal with the challenges of social diversity in an open, appreciative, and innovative way. Coaches, officials, teachers, journalists, and economists working in the field of sport need to be familiar with the topics of gender equity, diversity, and inclusion. This is where the project “Understanding and Experiencing Diversity” (funded by the Swiss Federal Office for Sport) comes in. It aims to develop and test a concept for promoting gender and diversity competence in sport-related higher education, thus enabling social actors to shape sport in a diversity-conscious and inclusive way.\nMethods\nThe project is being carried out over a period of three years and consists of four project phases. After a phase of conceptual clarification regarding the theoretical framework and terminology, current approaches to gender and diversity competence (in the sport studies context) are being critically analysed. Against this background, phases three and four of the project will focus on the development of a sport-related teaching concept for gender and diversity competence and its testing at three different universities.\nResults/Discussion\nThe understanding of gender and diversity competence developed in this project is theoretically based on the “trilemma of Inclusion” by Boger (2019). It thus refers to inclusion and non-discrimination as a complex structure of normalization, deconstruction, and empowerment. This is also linked to an intersectional perspective on social differentiation and discrimination (Degele & Winker, 2011).\nRegarding the promotion of gender and diversity competence in higher education, the attitude of social actors towards diversity and inclusion proves to be particularly important. This aspect has not yet been systematically considered in the context of sport-related higher education in German-speaking countries. The teaching concept developed in this project therefore emphasizes the aspect of attitude (Rischke et al., 2017).\nReferences\nBoger, M. A. (2019). Theorien der Inklusion: Die Theorie der trilemmatischen Inklusion zum Mitdenken [Theories of inclusion: The theory of trilemmatic inclusion to think about]. Edition Assemblage.\nDegele, N., & Winker, G. (2011). Intersektionalität als Beitrag zu einer gesellschaftstheoretisch informierten Ungleichheitsforschung [Intersectionality as a contribution to inequality research informed by social theory]. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 21(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-011-0147-y\nRischke, A., Heim, C., & Gröben, B. (2017). Nur eine Frage der Haltung? Eine empirische Analyse von personen- und institutionenbezogenen Einflussgrößen auf die Einstellungen von Sportlehrkräften der Sekundarstufe I zur schulischen Inklusion [Just a question of attitude? An empirical analysis of personal- and institutional-related variables of the attitudes of secondary school physical education teachers on school inclusion]. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 47(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-017-0437-4","PeriodicalId":415194,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36950/2024.2ciss009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Inclusion and diversity have become increasingly important in the context of sport in recent years. Numerous sports organizations and sports policymakers are committed to enable more inclusive sport. Led by the idea of a sport for all, everyone should be able to participate in sport regardless of gender, sexuality, dis_ability, race, or class. Inclusive sport does not only require specific structural conditions. It also demands social actors who have the skills to deal with the challenges of social diversity in an open, appreciative, and innovative way. Coaches, officials, teachers, journalists, and economists working in the field of sport need to be familiar with the topics of gender equity, diversity, and inclusion. This is where the project “Understanding and Experiencing Diversity” (funded by the Swiss Federal Office for Sport) comes in. It aims to develop and test a concept for promoting gender and diversity competence in sport-related higher education, thus enabling social actors to shape sport in a diversity-conscious and inclusive way. Methods The project is being carried out over a period of three years and consists of four project phases. After a phase of conceptual clarification regarding the theoretical framework and terminology, current approaches to gender and diversity competence (in the sport studies context) are being critically analysed. Against this background, phases three and four of the project will focus on the development of a sport-related teaching concept for gender and diversity competence and its testing at three different universities. Results/Discussion The understanding of gender and diversity competence developed in this project is theoretically based on the “trilemma of Inclusion” by Boger (2019). It thus refers to inclusion and non-discrimination as a complex structure of normalization, deconstruction, and empowerment. This is also linked to an intersectional perspective on social differentiation and discrimination (Degele & Winker, 2011). Regarding the promotion of gender and diversity competence in higher education, the attitude of social actors towards diversity and inclusion proves to be particularly important. This aspect has not yet been systematically considered in the context of sport-related higher education in German-speaking countries. The teaching concept developed in this project therefore emphasizes the aspect of attitude (Rischke et al., 2017). References Boger, M. A. (2019). Theorien der Inklusion: Die Theorie der trilemmatischen Inklusion zum Mitdenken [Theories of inclusion: The theory of trilemmatic inclusion to think about]. Edition Assemblage. Degele, N., & Winker, G. (2011). Intersektionalität als Beitrag zu einer gesellschaftstheoretisch informierten Ungleichheitsforschung [Intersectionality as a contribution to inequality research informed by social theory]. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 21(1), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-011-0147-y Rischke, A., Heim, C., & Gröben, B. (2017). Nur eine Frage der Haltung? Eine empirische Analyse von personen- und institutionenbezogenen Einflussgrößen auf die Einstellungen von Sportlehrkräften der Sekundarstufe I zur schulischen Inklusion [Just a question of attitude? An empirical analysis of personal- and institutional-related variables of the attitudes of secondary school physical education teachers on school inclusion]. German Journal of Exercise and Sport Research, 47(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-017-0437-4
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高等教育体育研究课程中的性别和多样性能力
导言近年来,包容性和多样性在体育运动中变得越来越重要。许多体育组织和体育政策制定者都致力于让体育更具包容性。在 "全民运动 "理念的引领下,每个人都应能够参与体育运动,无论其性别、性 别、残疾、种族或阶级如何。全纳体育不仅需要具体的结构条件,还需要社会行动者具备以开放、欣赏和创新的方 式应对社会多样性挑战的技能。在体育领域工作的教练、官员、教师、记者和经济学家需要熟悉性别平等、多样性和全纳等主题。这就是 "理解和体验多样性 "项目(由瑞士联邦体育局资助)的由来。该项目旨在开发和测试一种在与体育相关的高等教育中促进性别和多样性能力的概念,从而使社会行动者能够以一种具有多样性意识和包容性的方式塑造体育运动。在对理论框架和术语进行概念澄清阶段之后,对(体育研究背景下的)性别和多样性能力的现有方法进行了批判性分析。在此背景下,项目的第三和第四阶段将重点发展与体育相关的性别和多样性能力教学概念,并在三所不同的大学进行测试。 结果/讨论本项目对性别和多样性能力的理解是以 Boger(2019 年)的 "包容三难 "为理论基础的。因此,它将包容和非歧视视为正常化、解构和赋权的复杂结构。这也与社会分化和歧视的交叉视角相关(Degele & Winker,2011 年)。关于在高等教育中促进性别和多样性能力,社会行动者对多样性和包容性的态度被证明尤为重要。在德语国家,与体育相关的高等教育尚未系统地考虑这方面的问题。因此,本项目开发的教学理念强调态度方面(Rischke et al.Theorien der Inklusion:Die Theorie der trilemmatischen Inklusion zum Mitdenken [Theories of inclusion: The theory of trilemmatic inclusion to think about].Edition Assemblage.Degele, N., & Winker, G. (2011).Intersektionalität als Beitrag zu einer gesellschaftstheoretisch informierten Ungleichheitsforschung [Intersectionality as a contribution to inequality research informed by social theory]。Berliner Journal für Soziologie, 21(1), 69-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-011-0147-yRischke, A., Heim, C., & Gröben, B. (2017).Nur eine Frage der Haltung?Eine empirische Analyse von personen- und institutionenbezogenen Einflussgrößen auf die Einstellungen von Sportlehrkräften der Sekundarstufe I zur schulischen Inklusion [Just a question of attitude?中学体育教师对学校包容态度的个人和机构相关变量的实证分析]。德国运动与体育研究杂志,47(2),149-160。https://doi.org/10.1007/s12662-017-0437-4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From supercrip to techno supercrip Associations between daily movement behaviors, sleep, and affect in older adults: An ecological momentary assessment study Position statement regarding the current standing of exercise therapy in Austria (Positionspapier zur Situation der Trainingstherapie in Österreich) The Perceived Instrumental Effects of Maltreatment in Sport (PIEMS) scale: Translation, (cross-)validation, and short-form development of the German version Who’s better? Adaptive comparative judgment of dance performances
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1