Comparison of helium and argon for the production of carbon monoxide (CO) by a plasma jet for biomedical applications

Eloïse Mestre, Titaïna Gibert, S. Dozias, C. Douat
{"title":"Comparison of helium and argon for the production of carbon monoxide (CO) by a plasma jet for biomedical applications","authors":"Eloïse Mestre, Titaïna Gibert, S. Dozias, C. Douat","doi":"10.1051/epjap/2024230213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carbon monoxide (CO) has anti-inflammatory properties and its production by plasma could be a significant advantage in the field of plasma medicine. We characterized a pulsed kHz-driven plasma jet to produce CO for biomedical applications. With no target interaction, the CO2 conversion into CO, the breakdown voltage and energy delivered to the plasma were investigated for two noble carrier gases: helium and argon. \nThe breakdown voltage and the energy delivered to the plasma in argon gas were twice as high as in helium. The breakdown voltage was barely affected by the gas flow rate and the applied voltage, while it decreased slightly with the excitation frequency because the amount of residual charges increases with the frequency. \nHowever, the energy delivered to the plasma was not particularly affected by a change in frequency or gas flow rate, while it increased linearly with the applied voltage. \nCO production rose from a couple of ppm to about 2000 ppm for a specific energy input from 2 to 2000 J/L (5 x 10-4 to 5200 x 10-4 eV/(atom or molecule)), making this plasma source safe in terms of CO production for biomedical applications. \nUnlike literature results, the nature of the noble carrier gas did not have an impact on CO production. The CO concentration produced with 0.3% CO2 admixture increased linearly with the specific energy input (SEI) until reaching a plateau at about 70%. This implies that loss processes were negligible and that CO2 dissociation was mainly due to energetic particles such as electrons and excited noble atoms. The conversion decreased with the ratio of CO2. Helium and argon as carrier gases are equivalent in terms of CO production and the CO concentration can be controlled by the SEI and the ratio of CO2.","PeriodicalId":301303,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal Applied Physics","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal Applied Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/epjap/2024230213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon monoxide (CO) has anti-inflammatory properties and its production by plasma could be a significant advantage in the field of plasma medicine. We characterized a pulsed kHz-driven plasma jet to produce CO for biomedical applications. With no target interaction, the CO2 conversion into CO, the breakdown voltage and energy delivered to the plasma were investigated for two noble carrier gases: helium and argon. The breakdown voltage and the energy delivered to the plasma in argon gas were twice as high as in helium. The breakdown voltage was barely affected by the gas flow rate and the applied voltage, while it decreased slightly with the excitation frequency because the amount of residual charges increases with the frequency. However, the energy delivered to the plasma was not particularly affected by a change in frequency or gas flow rate, while it increased linearly with the applied voltage. CO production rose from a couple of ppm to about 2000 ppm for a specific energy input from 2 to 2000 J/L (5 x 10-4 to 5200 x 10-4 eV/(atom or molecule)), making this plasma source safe in terms of CO production for biomedical applications. Unlike literature results, the nature of the noble carrier gas did not have an impact on CO production. The CO concentration produced with 0.3% CO2 admixture increased linearly with the specific energy input (SEI) until reaching a plateau at about 70%. This implies that loss processes were negligible and that CO2 dissociation was mainly due to energetic particles such as electrons and excited noble atoms. The conversion decreased with the ratio of CO2. Helium and argon as carrier gases are equivalent in terms of CO production and the CO concentration can be controlled by the SEI and the ratio of CO2.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较氦气和氩气在生物医学应用中通过等离子体射流生产一氧化碳 (CO) 的效果
一氧化碳(CO)具有抗炎特性,利用等离子体生产一氧化碳可能是等离子体医学领域的一大优势。我们对用于生物医学应用的脉冲千赫驱动等离子体射流生产一氧化碳进行了鉴定。在没有目标相互作用的情况下,我们研究了两种惰性载气:氦气和氩气的二氧化碳转化为一氧化碳的过程、击穿电压以及等离子体的能量。氩气的击穿电压和等离子体的能量是氦气的两倍。击穿电压几乎不受气体流速和外加电压的影响,但会随着激励频率的增加而略有下降,因为残余电荷量会随着频率的增加而增加。然而,等离子体的能量并没有受到频率或气体流速变化的特别影响,而是随着施加电压的增加而线性增加。当输入的特定能量从 2 到 2000 J/L(5 x 10-4 到 5200 x 10-4 eV/(原子或分子))时,CO 的产生量从几 ppm 上升到大约 2000 ppm,这使得这种等离子体源在生物医学应用中产生 CO 是安全的。与文献结果不同的是,惰性载气的性质并不影响 CO 的产生。在掺入 0.3% CO2 的情况下,产生的 CO 浓度随着比能量输入(SEI)的增加而线性增加,直至达到约 70% 的高点。这意味着损耗过程可以忽略不计,二氧化碳的解离主要是由电子和受激惰性原子等高能粒子引起的。转化率随着二氧化碳比例的增加而降低。作为载气的氦气和氩气在产生 CO 方面是等效的,CO 的浓度可由 SEI 和 CO2 的比例控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Synthesis and characterization of Co3O4/Ti3C2 MXene nanocomposite: Efficient catalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction Application Synthesis and characterization of Co3O4/Ti3C2 MXene nanocomposite: Efficient catalyst for Oxygen Evolution Reaction Application Characterisation of barium hexaferrite thin films in microwave frequency band Anatase TiO2 film with dominant (001) facets prepared by radio frequency atmospheric pressure plasma Synthesis and structural, morphological, and chimico-optical properties of Sr2FeO4 Ruddlesden-Popper oxide
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1