Contrasting MEG effects of anodal and cathodal high-definition TDCS on sensorimotor activity during voluntary finger movements

Jed A. Meltzer, Gayatri Sivaratnam, Tiffany Deschamps, Maryam Zadeh, Catherine Li, Faranak Farzan, Alexander Francois-Nienaber
{"title":"Contrasting MEG effects of anodal and cathodal high-definition TDCS on sensorimotor activity during voluntary finger movements","authors":"Jed A. Meltzer, Gayatri Sivaratnam, Tiffany Deschamps, Maryam Zadeh, Catherine Li, Faranak Farzan, Alexander Francois-Nienaber","doi":"10.3389/fnimg.2024.1341732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Protocols for noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) are generally categorized as “excitatory” or “inhibitory” based on their ability to produce short-term modulation of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in peripheral muscles, when applied to motor cortex. Anodal and cathodal stimulation are widely considered excitatory and inhibitory, respectively, on this basis. However, it is poorly understood whether such polarity-dependent changes apply for neural signals generated during task performance, at rest, or in response to sensory stimulation.To characterize such changes, we measured spontaneous and movement-related neural activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) before and after high-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation (HD-TDCS) of the left motor cortex (M1), while participants performed simple finger movements with the left and right hands.Anodal HD-TDCS (excitatory) decreased the movement-related cortical fields (MRCF) localized to left M1 during contralateral right finger movements while cathodal HD-TDCS (inhibitory), increased them. In contrast, oscillatory signatures of voluntary motor output were not differentially affected by the two stimulation protocols, and tended to decrease in magnitude over the course of the experiment regardless. Spontaneous resting state oscillations were not affected either.MRCFs are thought to reflect reafferent proprioceptive input to motor cortex following movements. Thus, these results suggest that processing of incoming sensory information may be affected by TDCS in a polarity-dependent manner that is opposite that seen for MEPs—increases in cortical excitability as defined by MEPs may correspond to reduced responses to afferent input, and vice-versa.","PeriodicalId":73094,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in neuroimaging","volume":"1 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnimg.2024.1341732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Protocols for noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) are generally categorized as “excitatory” or “inhibitory” based on their ability to produce short-term modulation of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in peripheral muscles, when applied to motor cortex. Anodal and cathodal stimulation are widely considered excitatory and inhibitory, respectively, on this basis. However, it is poorly understood whether such polarity-dependent changes apply for neural signals generated during task performance, at rest, or in response to sensory stimulation.To characterize such changes, we measured spontaneous and movement-related neural activity with magnetoencephalography (MEG) before and after high-definition transcranial direct-current stimulation (HD-TDCS) of the left motor cortex (M1), while participants performed simple finger movements with the left and right hands.Anodal HD-TDCS (excitatory) decreased the movement-related cortical fields (MRCF) localized to left M1 during contralateral right finger movements while cathodal HD-TDCS (inhibitory), increased them. In contrast, oscillatory signatures of voluntary motor output were not differentially affected by the two stimulation protocols, and tended to decrease in magnitude over the course of the experiment regardless. Spontaneous resting state oscillations were not affected either.MRCFs are thought to reflect reafferent proprioceptive input to motor cortex following movements. Thus, these results suggest that processing of incoming sensory information may be affected by TDCS in a polarity-dependent manner that is opposite that seen for MEPs—increases in cortical excitability as defined by MEPs may correspond to reduced responses to afferent input, and vice-versa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阳极和阴极高清 TDCS 对手指自主运动过程中感觉运动活动的对比 MEG 效果
非侵入性脑部刺激(NIBS)方案一般分为 "兴奋性 "和 "抑制性",其依据是当应用于运动皮层时,这些方案能够对外周肌肉的运动诱发电位(MEPs)产生短期调节。在此基础上,阳极和阴极刺激被广泛认为分别具有兴奋性和抑制性。为了描述这种变化,我们在参与者用左右手进行简单的手指运动时,用脑磁图(MEG)测量了左侧运动皮层(M1)在接受高清经颅直流电刺激(HD-TDCS)前后的自发和运动相关神经活动。在对侧右手手指运动时,阳极 HD-TDCS(兴奋性)降低了定位在左侧 M1 的运动相关皮层场 (MRCF),而阴极 HD-TDCS(抑制性)则增加了 MRCF。与此相反,自主运动输出的振荡特征并没有受到两种刺激方案的不同影响,而且在实验过程中振荡幅度呈下降趋势。MRCFs 被认为反映了运动后运动皮层的本体感觉再输入。因此,这些结果表明,传入感觉信息的处理可能会受到 TDCS 的影响,其影响方式与 MEPs 的极性相反--MEPs 所定义的大脑皮层兴奋性的增加可能与传入输入反应的减少相对应,反之亦然。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Neurological complications of left atrial myxoma: a case report on stroke with left atrial myxoma and postoperative brain metastasis and cerebral aneurysm. Resting-state fMRI seizure onset localization meta-analysis: comparing rs-fMRI to other modalities including surgical outcomes. Mediterranean diet and brain functional connectivity in a population without dementia. Inferring neurocognition using artificial intelligence on brain MRIs. Adolescent brain maturation associated with environmental factors: a multivariate analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1