Shaykh Google as Ḥāfiẓ al-Aṣr: The Internet, Traditional ʿUlamā’, and Self Learning (2020)*

Q3 Arts and Humanities American Journal of Islam and Society Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI:10.35632/ajis.v41i1.3419
Emad Hamdeh
{"title":"Shaykh Google as Ḥāfiẓ al-Aṣr: The Internet, Traditional ʿUlamā’, and Self Learning (2020)*","authors":"Emad Hamdeh","doi":"10.35632/ajis.v41i1.3419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More than any other period, the last hundred years have witnesseda rise in the accessibility of information through books, media,and the internet. This introduced new ways of learning and sharingIslamic knowledge. In this article, I consider how traditionalIslamic knowledge and pedagogical techniques are challenged bythe growing number of lay Muslims participating in religious discussionsthrough print and the internet. I explain why the ʿulamā’perceive self-learning as a threat not only to the ostensibly properunderstanding of religion but also to the redefinition and reinventionof their authority. I observe how print and digital mediacaused a shift away from the necessity of the teacher and facilitatedautodidactic learning and claims to authority. Despite their criticismof self-learning, Traditionalists have embraced the internet inorder to remain relevant and to compete with non-experts.\nWriting is inferior to speech. For it is like a picture, which can giveno answer to a question, and has only a deceitful likeness of a livingcreature. It has no power of adaptation, but uses the same words forall. It is not a legitimate son of knowledge, but a bastard, and whenan attack is made upon this bastard neither parent nor anyone elseis there to defend it.                                                                                                 —Plato\n*This article was first published in the American Journal of Islam and Society 37, no. 1-2 (2020):67-101","PeriodicalId":34866,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Islam and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Islam and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35632/ajis.v41i1.3419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More than any other period, the last hundred years have witnesseda rise in the accessibility of information through books, media,and the internet. This introduced new ways of learning and sharingIslamic knowledge. In this article, I consider how traditionalIslamic knowledge and pedagogical techniques are challenged bythe growing number of lay Muslims participating in religious discussionsthrough print and the internet. I explain why the ʿulamā’perceive self-learning as a threat not only to the ostensibly properunderstanding of religion but also to the redefinition and reinventionof their authority. I observe how print and digital mediacaused a shift away from the necessity of the teacher and facilitatedautodidactic learning and claims to authority. Despite their criticismof self-learning, Traditionalists have embraced the internet inorder to remain relevant and to compete with non-experts. Writing is inferior to speech. For it is like a picture, which can giveno answer to a question, and has only a deceitful likeness of a livingcreature. It has no power of adaptation, but uses the same words forall. It is not a legitimate son of knowledge, but a bastard, and whenan attack is made upon this bastard neither parent nor anyone elseis there to defend it.                                                                                                 —Plato *This article was first published in the American Journal of Islam and Society 37, no. 1-2 (2020):67-101
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shaykh Google as Ḥāfiẓ al-Aṣr:互联网、传统ʿUlamā' 和自学 (2020)*
与其他任何时期相比,过去的一百年见证了通过书籍、媒体和互联网获取信息的速度加快。这引入了学习和分享伊斯兰知识的新方式。在这篇文章中,我探讨了越来越多的非穆斯林通过印刷品和互联网参与宗教讨论,传统的伊斯兰知识和教学技巧是如何受到挑战的。我解释了为什么ʿulamā'认为自学不仅是对表面上正确理解宗教的威胁,也是对重新定义和重塑其权威的威胁。我观察到印刷媒体和数字媒体是如何使人们不再认为教师是必要的,并促进了自学和对权威的诉求。尽管传统主义者批评自学,但他们还是拥抱了互联网,以保持与时俱进,并与非专家竞争。因为它就像一幅图画,无法回答问题,只能骗人地模仿活物。它没有变通的能力,只能用同样的词来表达一切。它不是知识的合法儿子,而是私生子,当这个私生子受到攻击时,无论是父母还是其他人都无法保护它。 -柏拉图*本文首次发表于《美国伊斯兰与社会杂志》第 37 卷第 1-2 期(2020 年):67-101。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Bir Modern Zamanlar Alimi Olarak Şeyh Google: İnternet, Geleneksel Ulema ve Kendi Kendine Öğrenme Egemenlik öncesi İslami Meşrutiyetçilik: 1861 Tunus Anayasası’nın İki Müdafaası Düşüncenin Sınır Taşları Ötesinde TANRI İslâmi İktisat Analizinin Yeni Bir Çerçevesine Doğru İslam ve Toplum Araştırmaları, Amerika Dergisi (AJIS) Hakkında
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1