Perforated mucinous diverticulitis of the appendix: a case report

Matthew L. Basa, Andrew Riddell
{"title":"Perforated mucinous diverticulitis of the appendix: a case report","authors":"Matthew L. Basa, Andrew Riddell","doi":"10.18203/2349-2902.isj20240307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acute right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain typically raises the suspicion of appendicitis and must be ruled out, as the treatment is primarily surgical. Other differentials, many of which are medically treated, ought to also be considered. Right sided diverticulitis, although uncommon, often mimics appendicitis due to its inflammatory nature and its location of pain. A 37-year-old woman with a history of recurrent right-sided diverticulitis presented with rapidly escalating RLQ pain. While appendicitis was a prime suspect, additional imaging was refused due to radiation concerns, hence clinical judgement had to be aptly applied. Facing diagnostic ambiguity, Hickam's dictum (seeking the most probable cause) pointed towards appendicitis, while Ockham's razor (favouring the simplest explanation) supported recurrent right sided diverticulitis. This uncertainty necessitated a definitive approach, weighing up the risks and benefits of medical vs surgical treatment for an unconfirmed pathology. To resolve the uncertainty, a diagnostic laparoscopy was performed. Contrary to expectations, it revealed a perforated diverticulum of the appendix with a mucinous tip and free-floating mucin, making both leading differentials, that is, right sided diverticulitis and appendicitis, correct. We explore the diagnostic reasoning used in the case, including the anticipated management strategies and outcomes, if other differentials were encountered. This case aims to support clinicians in pursuing further investigations, or need be, a diagnostic laparoscopy, in order to prioritise patient safety, if clinical concern is present.","PeriodicalId":14372,"journal":{"name":"International Surgery Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20240307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute right lower quadrant (RLQ) abdominal pain typically raises the suspicion of appendicitis and must be ruled out, as the treatment is primarily surgical. Other differentials, many of which are medically treated, ought to also be considered. Right sided diverticulitis, although uncommon, often mimics appendicitis due to its inflammatory nature and its location of pain. A 37-year-old woman with a history of recurrent right-sided diverticulitis presented with rapidly escalating RLQ pain. While appendicitis was a prime suspect, additional imaging was refused due to radiation concerns, hence clinical judgement had to be aptly applied. Facing diagnostic ambiguity, Hickam's dictum (seeking the most probable cause) pointed towards appendicitis, while Ockham's razor (favouring the simplest explanation) supported recurrent right sided diverticulitis. This uncertainty necessitated a definitive approach, weighing up the risks and benefits of medical vs surgical treatment for an unconfirmed pathology. To resolve the uncertainty, a diagnostic laparoscopy was performed. Contrary to expectations, it revealed a perforated diverticulum of the appendix with a mucinous tip and free-floating mucin, making both leading differentials, that is, right sided diverticulitis and appendicitis, correct. We explore the diagnostic reasoning used in the case, including the anticipated management strategies and outcomes, if other differentials were encountered. This case aims to support clinicians in pursuing further investigations, or need be, a diagnostic laparoscopy, in order to prioritise patient safety, if clinical concern is present.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阑尾穿孔性粘液性憩室炎:病例报告
急性右下象限(RLQ)腹痛通常会引起阑尾炎的怀疑,必须排除阑尾炎,因为治疗方法主要是手术。还应该考虑其他鉴别因素,其中很多都可以通过药物治疗。右侧憩室炎虽然不常见,但由于其炎症性质和疼痛部位,往往会模仿阑尾炎。一名 37 岁的女性曾反复发作右侧憩室炎,并伴有迅速加剧的 RLQ 疼痛。虽然阑尾炎是主要的疑点,但由于担心辐射而拒绝做进一步的影像学检查,因此必须应用临床判断。面对诊断上的不确定性,希卡姆法则(寻求最可能的病因)指向阑尾炎,而奥卡姆剃刀法则(倾向于最简单的解释)支持复发性右侧憩室炎。在这种不确定性的情况下,必须采取明确的方法,权衡药物治疗和手术治疗的风险和益处,以治疗未经确诊的病症。为了解决这种不确定性,医生进行了腹腔镜诊断。与预期相反,腹腔镜检查发现阑尾憩室穿孔,憩室顶端有粘液,并有游离的粘液漂浮,这使得两个主要的鉴别诊断--右侧憩室炎和阑尾炎--都是正确的。我们探讨了该病例中使用的诊断推理,包括如果遇到其他鉴别情况时的预期处理策略和结果。本病例旨在帮助临床医生进行进一步检查,或在必要时进行腹腔镜诊断,以便在出现临床问题时优先考虑患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Congenital hepatic hemangioma: a review Pelvic congestion syndrome and its treatment: topic review Giant pancreatic cyst with extension to spleen managed by laparoscopy Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma, a rare mimic and important differential of iliopsoas abscess Cerebrospinal fluid shunt catheter extrusion through the mouth in a child: a case report with brief literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1