Exotic pet owners’ preferences for different ectothermic taxa are based on species traits and purchase prices in the United States

IF 3.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Neobiota Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI:10.3897/neobiota.91.109403
E. Pienaar, Diane J. E. Sturgeon
{"title":"Exotic pet owners’ preferences for different ectothermic taxa are based on species traits and purchase prices in the United States","authors":"E. Pienaar, Diane J. E. Sturgeon","doi":"10.3897/neobiota.91.109403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The exotic pet trade has resulted in substantial invasion and disease risks, owing to the release of pets into new environments. Scientists have conjectured that pet owners acquire and release species with undesirable traits because they are imperfectly informed about the traits of these animals. However, few studies have used social science methods to elicit pet owners’ preferences for exotic pets. In 2019 we administered a best-worst choice survey to 1,055 exotic pet owners in the United States (who own pet reptiles, amphibians, fish, or invertebrates) to examine how human preferences and incomplete information may contribute to the risks of the exotic pet trade. Respondents preferred colorful and patterned species. On average, respondents preferred medium-sized amphibians and reptiles, small fish, and large invertebrates, although they demonstrated heterogeneity in preferences with respect to the adult size of pets. Respondents also preferred amphibians and reptiles with medium life expectancies and fish and invertebrates with long life expectancies, although they again demonstrated heterogeneity in preferences with respect to pets’ life span. Respondents preferred docile animals, and were more likely to purchase lower-cost pets. We found some evidence that respondents’ decision to purchase exotic pets depended on whether these animals were native, rare, had unusual morphological features, and breed easily. Respondents’ decision to purchase specific taxa as exotic pets also depended on their age, education, and housing. Most respondents stated that they searched for information on pets’ diet, behavior, adult size, life span, costs of care such as equipment or veterinary costs, and whether the animal was captive bred before purchasing these animals. Excepting pets’ diets, fewer than half of respondents had been offered information on pets’ traits by sellers. On average, respondents rated the information they had been offered as average. Respondents typically obtained additional information about pets from online searches. Our results suggest that certification systems that provide critical information on exotic pets’ behaviors, adult size, longevity, fecundity, and husbandry needs should be implemented to prevent pet owners acquiring animals that they may subsequently abandon.","PeriodicalId":54290,"journal":{"name":"Neobiota","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neobiota","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.91.109403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The exotic pet trade has resulted in substantial invasion and disease risks, owing to the release of pets into new environments. Scientists have conjectured that pet owners acquire and release species with undesirable traits because they are imperfectly informed about the traits of these animals. However, few studies have used social science methods to elicit pet owners’ preferences for exotic pets. In 2019 we administered a best-worst choice survey to 1,055 exotic pet owners in the United States (who own pet reptiles, amphibians, fish, or invertebrates) to examine how human preferences and incomplete information may contribute to the risks of the exotic pet trade. Respondents preferred colorful and patterned species. On average, respondents preferred medium-sized amphibians and reptiles, small fish, and large invertebrates, although they demonstrated heterogeneity in preferences with respect to the adult size of pets. Respondents also preferred amphibians and reptiles with medium life expectancies and fish and invertebrates with long life expectancies, although they again demonstrated heterogeneity in preferences with respect to pets’ life span. Respondents preferred docile animals, and were more likely to purchase lower-cost pets. We found some evidence that respondents’ decision to purchase exotic pets depended on whether these animals were native, rare, had unusual morphological features, and breed easily. Respondents’ decision to purchase specific taxa as exotic pets also depended on their age, education, and housing. Most respondents stated that they searched for information on pets’ diet, behavior, adult size, life span, costs of care such as equipment or veterinary costs, and whether the animal was captive bred before purchasing these animals. Excepting pets’ diets, fewer than half of respondents had been offered information on pets’ traits by sellers. On average, respondents rated the information they had been offered as average. Respondents typically obtained additional information about pets from online searches. Our results suggest that certification systems that provide critical information on exotic pets’ behaviors, adult size, longevity, fecundity, and husbandry needs should be implemented to prevent pet owners acquiring animals that they may subsequently abandon.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国外来宠物饲养者对不同体温动物类群的偏好基于物种特征和购买价格
由于将宠物放生到新环境中,外来宠物交易造成了巨大的入侵和疾病风险。科学家们猜测,宠物主人之所以购买和放生具有不良特征的物种,是因为他们对这些动物的特征了解不全面。然而,很少有研究使用社会科学方法来了解宠物主人对外来宠物的偏好。2019 年,我们对美国的 1055 名外来宠物拥有者(拥有宠物爬行动物、两栖动物、鱼类或无脊椎动物)进行了最佳-最差选择调查,以研究人类的偏好和不完全信息可能如何导致外来宠物交易的风险。受访者更喜欢色彩鲜艳、图案丰富的物种。平均而言,受访者偏好中等体型的两栖类和爬行类动物、小型鱼类和大型无脊椎动物,但他们对宠物成年体型的偏好存在差异。此外,受访者还喜欢寿命中等的两栖类和爬行类动物,以及寿命长的鱼类和无脊椎动物,但他们对宠物寿命的喜好也有差异。受访者更喜欢温顺的动物,也更倾向于购买价格较低的宠物。我们发现一些证据表明,受访者购买外来宠物的决定取决于这些动物是否是本地的、稀有的、具有不寻常的形态特征以及是否容易繁殖。受访者决定购买特定类群的外来宠物还取决于他们的年龄、教育程度和住房情况。大多数受访者表示,在购买这些动物之前,他们会搜索有关宠物的饮食、行为、成年体型、寿命、护理成本(如设备或兽医费用)以及动物是否为人工饲养等方面的信息。除宠物的饮食外,只有不到一半的受访者曾从销售商处获得过有关宠物特征的信息。平均而言,受访者对卖家提供的信息评价为 "一般"。受访者通常从网上搜索获得更多有关宠物的信息。我们的研究结果表明,应该实施认证制度,提供有关外来宠物的行为、成年体型、寿命、繁殖力和饲养需求等重要信息,以防止宠物主人在购买动物后将其遗弃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neobiota
Neobiota Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: NeoBiota is a peer-reviewed, open-access, rapid online journal launched to accelerate research on alien species and biological invasions: aquatic and terrestrial, animals, plants, fungi and micro-organisms. The journal NeoBiota is a continuation of the former NEOBIOTA publication series; for volumes 1-8 see http://www.oekosys.tu-berlin.de/menue/neobiota All articles are published immediately upon editorial approval. All published papers can be freely copied, downloaded, printed and distributed at no charge for the reader. Authors are thus encouraged to post the pdf files of published papers on their homepages or elsewhere to expedite distribution. There is no charge for color.
期刊最新文献
Evidence of short-term response of rocky cliffs vegetation after removal of invasive alien Carpobrotus spp. Strangers in a strange land; freshwater fish introductions, impacts, management and socio-ecological feedbacks in a small island nation – the case of Aotearoa New Zealand Effects of earthworm invasion on soil properties and plant diversity after two years of field experiment Differential survival and feeding rates of three commonly traded gastropods across salinities Stable isotope analysis reveals diet niche partitioning between native species and the invasive black bullhead (Ameiurus melas Rafinesque, 1820)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1