Comparison of the Antibacterial Effect of AH26, Adseal and Beta RCS Root Canal Sealers Against Enterococcus Faecalis, an in Vitro Study

Q3 Dentistry Frontiers in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-02-04 DOI:10.18502/fid.v21i5.14853
Sholeh Ghabraei, Hadi Assadian, Hassan Razmi, Mohammad Saeid Sheikhrezaei, S. Khedmat, Nazanin Chitsaz, Zahra Mohammadi, F Noori
{"title":"Comparison of the Antibacterial Effect of AH26, Adseal and Beta RCS Root Canal Sealers Against Enterococcus Faecalis, an in Vitro Study","authors":"Sholeh Ghabraei, Hadi Assadian, Hassan Razmi, Mohammad Saeid Sheikhrezaei, S. Khedmat, Nazanin Chitsaz, Zahra Mohammadi, F Noori","doi":"10.18502/fid.v21i5.14853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Antibacterial activity against endodontic pathogens is a desirable feature for root canal sealers. The objective of this study was to compare the antibacterial effect of three resin-based endodontic sealers (AH26, Adseal, and Beta RCS) against Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. \nMaterials and Methods: The antibacterial properties of the sealers were assessed against E. faecalis using agar diffusion test (ADT) for fresh state (N=10) and direct contact test (DCT) for freshly-mixed and set states of the materials (N=10). In ADT, the diameter of the zones of inhibition was measured after 24h of contact. In DCT, the colony-forming units of the bacteria were counted after 30 minutes and 180 minutes of exposure. The results were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and independent sample t-test. P<0.05 was considered significant. \nResults: Regarding DCT results, all test materials indicated an antibacterial effect, both in freshly-mixed and set states. The highest antibacterial effect was related to Adseal, whereas the lowest was observed in Beta RCS. There was a significant difference between all study groups (different sealers, setting states, and contact times; P<0.001), except for freshly-mixed AH26 and Adseal at 180 minutes (P>0.05). According to ADT, AH26 and Adseal represented the widest and the smallest inhibition zones, respectively (P<0.001). \nConclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, AH26, Adseal, and Beta RCS showed antibacterial effects against E. faecalis in both freshly-mixed and set states. The antibacterial effect increased over time in all of the studied sealers.","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v21i5.14853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Antibacterial activity against endodontic pathogens is a desirable feature for root canal sealers. The objective of this study was to compare the antibacterial effect of three resin-based endodontic sealers (AH26, Adseal, and Beta RCS) against Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. Materials and Methods: The antibacterial properties of the sealers were assessed against E. faecalis using agar diffusion test (ADT) for fresh state (N=10) and direct contact test (DCT) for freshly-mixed and set states of the materials (N=10). In ADT, the diameter of the zones of inhibition was measured after 24h of contact. In DCT, the colony-forming units of the bacteria were counted after 30 minutes and 180 minutes of exposure. The results were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and independent sample t-test. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: Regarding DCT results, all test materials indicated an antibacterial effect, both in freshly-mixed and set states. The highest antibacterial effect was related to Adseal, whereas the lowest was observed in Beta RCS. There was a significant difference between all study groups (different sealers, setting states, and contact times; P<0.001), except for freshly-mixed AH26 and Adseal at 180 minutes (P>0.05). According to ADT, AH26 and Adseal represented the widest and the smallest inhibition zones, respectively (P<0.001). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, AH26, Adseal, and Beta RCS showed antibacterial effects against E. faecalis in both freshly-mixed and set states. The antibacterial effect increased over time in all of the studied sealers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外研究:比较 AH26、Adseal 和 Beta RCS 根管封闭剂对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果
目的:对根管病原体的抗菌活性是根管封闭剂的一个理想特性。本研究的目的是比较三种树脂根管封闭剂(AH26、Adseal 和 Beta RCS)在体外对粪肠球菌的抗菌效果。材料和方法:采用琼脂扩散试验(ADT)对新鲜状态的材料(10 人)以及直接接触试验(DCT)对新鲜混合和固化状态的材料(10 人)进行了评估。在 ADT 试验中,在接触 24 小时后测量抑制区的直径。在 DCT 中,分别在接触 30 分钟和 180 分钟后对细菌的菌落形成单位进行计数。结果采用双向方差分析和独立样本 t 检验进行分析。P0.05).根据 ADT,AH26 和 Adseal 分别代表了最宽和最小的抑菌区(P<0.001)。结论在这项体外研究的局限性范围内,AH26、Adseal 和 Beta RCS 在新混合和固定状态下对粪肠球菌都有抗菌效果。所有研究的封闭剂的抗菌效果都会随着时间的推移而增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Dentistry-General Dentistry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Influence of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Bulk-Fill Composite Resin to Cut and Uncut Enamel: An In-Vitro Study. Multidisciplinary Management of a Permanent Central Incisor Fused with a Supernumerary Tooth: A Case Report. Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Eyelets Bonded with a Self-Adhesive Moisture-Tolerant Resin Cement Under Isolation and with Blood and Saliva Contamination. Assessing the Impact of Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Oral Health Related Quality of Life: Non-Randomized Clinical Trial. Comparative Efficacy of MadaJet®XL and Conventional Injection Technique for Primary Maxillary Molar Local Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1